because science is fundamental in the 21st century
https://www.scienceforprogress.eu/
Gesamtlänge aller Episoden: 1 day 11 hours 54 minutes
#1 Science Communication and FameLab – with Hugo Bettencourt
with Hugo Bettencourt, finalist in FameLab Portugal 2017, and Science for Progress team member
#2: Science History & Philosophy, and Research in Museum Collections – with Gabriella Ferreira
with Gabriella Ferreira, student in Science History and Philosophy
#3: The March for Science in Germany – with Dr. Tanja Baudson and Claus Martin
with Dr. Tanja Baudson and Claus Martin: science denial, academic freedom, and the becoming of the March for Science
#4: Founding Science for Progress, and the representation of science in public – with Dennis Eckmeier
Guest Host: Hugo Bettencourt "We face a dilemma in conveying the scientific process to the public, and even within academia: Real science doesn't fit the elements of effective storytelling." Dennis had been vocal on topics surrounding academia,
#5: Mental Health during your PhD – with Lauriane Nallet
Working on your PhD is a stressful phase, and the academic culture isn't making it better. In this episode I talk to Lauriane Nallet, who is a PhD student in Switzerland. She has a personal history with depression and even PTSD.
#6.1 Skepticism in Portugal: COMCEPT – with Diana Barbosa
I had an extended conversation with Diana Barbosa (@diraquel on Twitter) from the skeptical society in Portugal, COMCEPT. This is the first of two parts to this episode where Diana Barbosa answers questions about what skepticism is,
#6.2. Creationism, Nuclear Power, and Alternative Medicine – with Diana Barbosa
This is the 2nd part of my conversation with Diana Barbosa from COMCEPT, the Portuguese Skeptics Community (find the 1st episode here). In the first part of the episode we got an overview over scientific skepticism and what kinds of topics they would u...
#7: Funding Adviser: career at the Interface of Science – with Cristina Oliveira
Most academics won't stay in academia... or let's say, not every PhD will land a permanent position as a researcher. With the increasing numbers of PhDs this situation is becoming more serious. In this context,
#8 Cognitive Biases in Science and Society – with Dr. Bart Geurten
The brain uses heuristics, short-cuts in thinking, to speed up decision making. But this also leads to systematic mistakes, so called 'cognitive biases'.
9: The Journal Impact Factor: how (not) to evaluate researchers – with Björn Brembs
What is the Journal Impact Factor? The Journal Impact Factor is widely used as a tool to evaluate studies, and researchers. It supposedly measures the quality of a journal by scoring how many citations an average article in this journal achieves...