Speaker 1: You're listening to Comedy Central from New York City, the
Speaker 1: only city in America gets the shows and intended this
Speaker 1: good daily show with your host Cricket. Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, Welcome,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Welcome to the Daily Show. I'm Al Franken,
Speaker 1: and tonight is my last night hosting the Daily Show.
Speaker 1: And I just hi, I just want to say it's
Speaker 1: been an honor for everyone here to get to work
Speaker 1: with me. But we've got a great show for you tonight. Though.
Speaker 1: Let's get into the headlines. Okay. Let's kick things off
Speaker 1: with the big story on Capitol Hill today where there
Speaker 1: was a major hearing that could determine the future of TikTok.
Speaker 1: A rare display of bipartisanship today for the grilling of
Speaker 1: TikTok's CEO on Capitol Hill, the executive of the controversial
Speaker 1: and incredibly popular app facing some tough questions about child
Speaker 1: safety data collection and its Chinese ownership. The chair of
Speaker 1: the committee today says that TikTok should be banned. We
Speaker 1: do not trust TikTok will ever embrace American values, values
Speaker 1: for freedom, human rights, and innovation. TikTok has repeatedly chosen
Speaker 1: the path for more control, more surveillance, and more manipulation.
Speaker 1: Your platform should be banned. That's right. We don't need
Speaker 1: a Chinese comp and he's stealing our data and spying
Speaker 1: on us. That's a job for American companies USA, USA,
Speaker 1: U s A. Of course a band will affect me
Speaker 1: personally because as many of you know, I have a
Speaker 1: huge following on TikTok thanks to my unboxing videos, my
Speaker 1: makeup tutorials, and of course my dance moves. I invented
Speaker 1: this one. Now, aside from the hearing in the House today,
Speaker 1: there's another hearing in the Senate next week which I
Speaker 1: think might go a bit like this. When is TikTok
Speaker 1: going to release? And not from my football? That's what
Speaker 1: I want to know, our fears, your your spine on America,
Speaker 1: and my question is whether you've are inspired under Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: And if so, but you please share that data for
Speaker 1: the brodsculs. I want. I want your assurances that if
Speaker 1: TikTok is banned, China won't retaliate by closing Hun Balcony,
Speaker 1: the restaurant near my house, because that's where the shoemasy
Speaker 1: on Christmas they make. They make a wonderful moshoe pork.
Speaker 1: I know it's a kosher, but it's you know, it's Christmas.
Speaker 1: I'm worried about the use of artificial intelligence because I
Speaker 1: have seen a deep fake video out there of MEE
Speaker 1: saying that I trust Brett Caberra to uphold Rob Wade.
Speaker 1: Can you change that to me saying I don't trust
Speaker 1: him because that's what I said. Okay, let's move to Florida,
Speaker 1: which I know is something I know that's something a
Speaker 1: lot of old Jews say, but that's not what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. We all know that last year our governor
Speaker 1: To Santis passed the so called Don't Say Gay Bill,
Speaker 1: which banned band teachers from discussing sexual orientation or gender
Speaker 1: identity with students in kindergarten through third grade. Well, guess
Speaker 1: what the Santis is now announcing that he plans to
Speaker 1: expand the law to cover students all the way through
Speaker 1: high school. So this don't Say Gay law is terrible. Luckily,
Speaker 1: although it doesn't say you can't sing about being gay.
Speaker 1: Being gay, being gay is an equally valid way to
Speaker 1: be a perfecting day anyway. Good luck in English class
Speaker 1: Florida teens. I think you'll really enjoy reading classics like
Speaker 1: Moby Large Whale with no subtexts whatsoever. And finally, here's
Speaker 1: some fascinating news from the worlds of science and music
Speaker 1: and the associated press. As scientist analyzed DNA from betho
Speaker 1: with hair nearly two hundred years after his death. They
Speaker 1: are looking for clues about the celebrated composer's many health
Speaker 1: problems and his hearing loss. I found information about the
Speaker 1: liver disease that is widely believed to have killed him.
Speaker 1: According to his study, it includes a genetic risk for
Speaker 1: liver disease plus a liver damaging hepatitis B infection in
Speaker 1: the last months of his life. I am so impressed
Speaker 1: by the science, But did we really need to know
Speaker 1: how Beethoven died? I feel like most people living in
Speaker 1: the nineteenth century died from living in the nineteenth century. Now,
Speaker 1: if you're wondering how someone was able to get Beethoven's hair,
Speaker 1: remember he was deaf. It's not you know, it's not
Speaker 1: too hard to sneak up on a deaf person playing
Speaker 1: piano and snip off the souvenir. Now, I'll admit I
Speaker 1: did the exact same thing multiple times mainly to Ray Charles. Hey, look,
Speaker 1: if we have the guy's DNA, I can't be the
Speaker 1: only one thinking it. Let's make a Beethoven Jurassic Park.
Speaker 1: I for one, would love to see the brilliant composer
Speaker 1: of the Fifth Symphony eats Jeff Goldbloom. For more on
Speaker 1: the scientific breakthrough, we turned to Michael Costa. Michael, this
Speaker 1: is a This is a pretty amazing discovery, isn't it.
Speaker 1: I guess so, you know, But when scientists dig someone
Speaker 1: up to study their DNA, it's an amazing discovery. But
Speaker 1: when I do it, it's a felony. I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: but still it is amazing that we can learn how
Speaker 1: Beethoven died just by analyzing his hair. Well, and it's
Speaker 1: not just Beethoven, aw Thanks to these cutting edge discoveries,
Speaker 1: scientists can finally learn how all sorts of historical figures died.
Speaker 1: I mean, for example, you know, after analyzing a DNA
Speaker 1: sample from Julius Caesar, we now know that he died
Speaker 1: from being stabbed today, right, of course, Shakespeare? Who William
Speaker 1: William Shakespeare, the legendary playwright. I'm not a literature guy,
Speaker 1: I'm a scientist, Okay, And how about this little tidbit.
Speaker 1: President Abraham Lincoln shot in the head by John John
Speaker 1: Wilkes booth, John Wilkes. I'm not a historian. I'm a scientist.
Speaker 1: Al do you think they just give this lab coat
Speaker 1: to anyone? No, and that's why, through empirical evidence, I
Speaker 1: now know that how JFK died. Also, yes, we know
Speaker 1: he was shot in there. What the did someone leak
Speaker 1: this report to No, It's just that your science only
Speaker 1: seems to be confirming well known historical facts. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: I bet you didn't know how Queen Elizabeth died while
Speaker 1: she was ninety six, So I'm guessing natural natural causes,
Speaker 1: no meth overdose. Okay, Yes, turns out the Oh girl
Speaker 1: couldn't handle a little Kensington crank at her age. Look,
Speaker 1: and that's a lesson for all you kids out there.
Speaker 1: Don't wait too long to try mess. That is a
Speaker 1: terrible lesson, Michael, Michael costs everyone. All Right, when we
Speaker 1: come back, I'll tell you why taxes are good. So
Speaker 1: don't go away. Welcome back, Welcome back to the Daily Show. Well,
Speaker 1: it's tax season, or as Donald Trump calls it, would
Speaker 1: you get off my back already? And the Biden administration
Speaker 1: has been making a big effort to make tax season
Speaker 1: a bit less painful. The Inflation Reduction Act, which the
Speaker 1: President signed last August, includes eighty billion dollars in new
Speaker 1: funding for the IRS to hire new employees and upgrade
Speaker 1: its technology. And it's working. The IRS is doing much
Speaker 1: better at processing our returns and answering our questions about
Speaker 1: how to file correctly, and that's great. Better enforcement of
Speaker 1: tax laws means more money for all the many, many
Speaker 1: things the government does, Social Security, medicare, infrastructure, not to
Speaker 1: mention scraping off the feces smeared on the capital walls
Speaker 1: by the crowd boys. Clearly, the new funding is long overdue.
Speaker 1: In addition to pain for immensely popular programs, it will
Speaker 1: help reduce the depths. So everybody's got to be happy
Speaker 1: about this. Everybody, right? Am I right? Democrats want to
Speaker 1: spend eighty billion dollars to hire eighty seven thousand more
Speaker 1: armed IRS agents to terrorize Americans. They want to add
Speaker 1: eighty seven thousand IRS agents that can use deadly force
Speaker 1: to go after American families. They want to turn the
Speaker 1: IRS into the Gustapo. They are arming up the IRS
Speaker 1: like they're preparing to take Fallujah a little bit like
Speaker 1: James Bond, but instead of hunting down evil maniacs, these
Speaker 1: agents hunt down and killed middle class taxpayers that don't
Speaker 1: pay enough. What on earth are these people talking about?
Speaker 1: If you forget to carry the one while you're calculating
Speaker 1: your return, while the IRS actually come to your home,
Speaker 1: break down the door, and gun down your entire family
Speaker 1: in a word, no, in six words, of course, not,
Speaker 1: you Republican idiots. So let's talk about what the IRS
Speaker 1: money is really going for and another installment of long
Speaker 1: story short. The administration is trying to fix a whole
Speaker 1: host of problems that began back in twenty eleven after
Speaker 1: Republicans and Congress started cutting the IRS budget. Since then,
Speaker 1: the IRS's audit rate has dropped almost sixty percent, and
Speaker 1: the number of IRS agents the same number we had
Speaker 1: in nineteen fifty four, when the country's population was half
Speaker 1: the size it is today, and pediatricians treated six children
Speaker 1: by prescribing them menthol cigarettes, and the combination of understaffing
Speaker 1: and stone age technology has resulted in a very weird situation.
Speaker 1: You were more likely to be audited the United States
Speaker 1: if you make twenty thousand dollars a year. Then if
Speaker 1: you make five hundred thousand dollars a year, less money
Speaker 1: you have, the easier it is for the IRS to
Speaker 1: come after you. This is because the IRS doesn't have
Speaker 1: enough money to hire the highly trained investigators needed to
Speaker 1: go head to head with the wealthy. Ultimately, it's easier
Speaker 1: for them to audit lower income people because it's cheap,
Speaker 1: can be done by mail, and doesn't take a lot
Speaker 1: of time. Can you believe that the IRS is so
Speaker 1: understaffed that they audit poor people more than the wealthy
Speaker 1: because they just don't have the experts to handle the
Speaker 1: most complex returns. They're going after poor people because it's easier.
Speaker 1: It's like a comic who only does your mama jokes.
Speaker 1: Sure it's easy, but at what costs to my mama?
Speaker 1: Her life? Her life is difficult enough, do you know?
Speaker 1: Do you know how hard it is to find a
Speaker 1: belt the size of the equator? So how much money
Speaker 1: in lost taxes are we talking about here? According to
Speaker 1: the former head of the IRS, it could be as
Speaker 1: much as one trillion dollars a year. To put that
Speaker 1: in perspective, if you stacked a trillion one dollar bills
Speaker 1: on top of each other. It would blow away. It'd
Speaker 1: be ridiculous if even try that. The solution is pretty simple,
Speaker 1: and it's a bargain comparatively, Comparatively speaking, just adequately fund
Speaker 1: the IRS so it can prove its enforcement capabilities and
Speaker 1: collect that extra trillion dollars. Now you would you would
Speaker 1: think Republicans would love an extra trillion dollars in revenue.
Speaker 1: They're the ones who are always complaining that America is
Speaker 1: spending money that we don't have. Politicians in Washington cannot
Speaker 1: stop spending money that we don't have. Let's live in reality.
Speaker 1: We have a spending problem. We have a dramatic spending problem.
Speaker 1: If you had a child, you gave them a credit
Speaker 1: card and they kept hitting the limit, you wouldn't just
Speaker 1: keep increasing it. You'd first see what are you spending
Speaker 1: your money on. So we're going to look at every
Speaker 1: single dollar spent. We're going to audit it. If you're
Speaker 1: going to have a party, you have to pay the band.
Speaker 1: Come on center, You don't have to have a band
Speaker 1: at a party, just hire hire your nephew's roommate to
Speaker 1: be a DJ. Just think what we could do with
Speaker 1: an extra trillion dollars a year. We could begin to
Speaker 1: retire our national debt and balance our budget. Or we
Speaker 1: could do some new things that would be worthy of
Speaker 1: a great nation. We could have universal pre K or
Speaker 1: subsidized childcare like they do everywhere. We could eliminate federal
Speaker 1: income taxes completely for the bottom ninety percent of American household.
Speaker 1: And this isn't just lefty liberal pine this sky stuff.
Speaker 1: With a trillion dollars we could do. We could fund
Speaker 1: an entirely new Iroq war. And why are we the
Speaker 1: only developed country that doesn't have universal healthcare? And it
Speaker 1: doesn't have to be single payer. We can have a
Speaker 1: public option, which we should have been done in the
Speaker 1: first place, Laborman. The point is polling shows that ninety
Speaker 1: three percent of Americans believe it's every American civic duty
Speaker 1: to pay their taxes. And I think you can guess
Speaker 1: who the other seven percent are. So let's let's give
Speaker 1: the irs the resources to make sure that everybody does
Speaker 1: what we should all should do for the right of
Speaker 1: living in this great country, a nation we can make
Speaker 1: even better if we do the rational thing and collect
Speaker 1: the taxes that people actually owe. All right, all right,
Speaker 1: all right, stay tuned because when we come back, Ben
Speaker 1: de la Creme, we'll be joining us, So don't go away.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Welcome back to the Daily Show. My
Speaker 1: guest tonight is a writer, producer and director you know
Speaker 1: from RuPaul's Drag Race. She's here to talk about the
Speaker 1: Drag Defense Fund, which benefits the ACLUS lgbt Q plus
Speaker 1: rights work. Please welcome Ben de la Creme. Wild, no idea,
Speaker 1: this is so this is so lovely. I didn't know
Speaker 1: the audience was going to go so crazy. I didn't
Speaker 1: know what would happen after Lindsey Graham. Before we get
Speaker 1: into these anti drag bills that are popping up around
Speaker 1: the country, I think there are a lot of people,
Speaker 1: uh objecting to drag without even having any idea what
Speaker 1: it is. And I know I've never I've ever gone
Speaker 1: to a drag show. And can you explain, Drett. Absolutely, yeah, Well,
Speaker 1: somebody just was shocked that you've never been to a
Speaker 1: drag show. You I'm embarrassed. No, no, no, it's not
Speaker 1: shocking that you've never been to a show that you
Speaker 1: would think of as a drag show. But you've probably
Speaker 1: seen Missus Doubt Fire or Tutsie or any of those
Speaker 1: you know things that we have, I didn't realize they
Speaker 1: were in drag. Well that's some very convincing costuming, you know.
Speaker 1: So drag is something that's been part of the culture
Speaker 1: for a very long time in a lot of different ways,
Speaker 1: and so there's many types of it that we've sort
Speaker 1: of been accepting in contemporary culture, like those examples. But
Speaker 1: you know, it's something that hearkens back to. We see
Speaker 1: it in Shakespeare, we see it in kabuki theater, across cultures.
Speaker 1: It's something that has just been a neat and unquestioned
Speaker 1: for a long time. But within American history, I mean,
Speaker 1: drag is something that has uplifted and protected and fought
Speaker 1: for the queer community. Pre Stonewall, I mean pre Stonewall era,
Speaker 1: queer people had to congregate in clubs and bars. That
Speaker 1: was the one place that they could sort of find
Speaker 1: community and find togetherness and feel safe, even though there
Speaker 1: were constantly police raids on those places. And drag queens,
Speaker 1: transwomen were the entertainers, were the matriarchs, were the people
Speaker 1: who fostered this community and went Stonewall, which was the
Speaker 1: alleged beginning of the gay rights movement when it rolled around.
Speaker 1: They were the folks who really started the riot. Yeah,
Speaker 1: on drag race, you sing, you work the runway, We
Speaker 1: create and perform your own variety show. It's just all
Speaker 1: the things that I do, except the runway and the singing. Well,
Speaker 1: you're in good company with drag queens not being especially
Speaker 1: good singers, so that's fine. And you and I can
Speaker 1: work on your runway. So thank you, thank you. And
Speaker 1: you you direct, and you write and produce a seventy
Speaker 1: minute show. Drag shows right, different ones, right, Yeah, what
Speaker 1: are those shows about? Yeah, so, m I do a
Speaker 1: lot of different stuff that's more in the theatrical realm.
Speaker 1: So some of them are evening length plays as you
Speaker 1: would more traditionally know. Some of them are cabarets with
Speaker 1: through lines. And that's another thing about drag is that
Speaker 1: it's so many things. A lot of people think of
Speaker 1: it as what we know it as from reality TV
Speaker 1: right now, which is largely lip syncing and big dance movements,
Speaker 1: which is really exciting, but there's also a full history
Speaker 1: of theater and a lot of other disciplines. So my
Speaker 1: shows are shows that are essentially a love letter to
Speaker 1: the queer community, to folks who need to feel a
Speaker 1: sense of hope and sense of generosity. Specifically, I do
Speaker 1: a holiday show with my good friend Jinc's monsoon right
Speaker 1: and we've been touring that for This will be our
Speaker 1: sixth year. I'm not announcing it, but it's our sixth
Speaker 1: year coming up, and that show is very much rooted
Speaker 1: in the idea of that Christmas show. It's a Christmas show, yes,
Speaker 1: So we do it every November and December, and that
Speaker 1: came about because of just really seeing the need among
Speaker 1: queer young people and queer adults to feel a sense
Speaker 1: of family and homecoming at a time of year where
Speaker 1: it can have a lot of messaging that we don't
Speaker 1: feel included in. There's many people who have strained relationships
Speaker 1: with their families, and so this show is a message
Speaker 1: of and you know, and it's body and it's funny
Speaker 1: and there's big, sparkly dances, but it's got its heart
Speaker 1: about about coming together and making people realize that that
Speaker 1: your future can be whatever you want it to be.
Speaker 1: Your traditions can be what they want, what you want
Speaker 1: them to be, and you can be who you want
Speaker 1: to be. Let okay, thinking about beingle you want to
Speaker 1: be Ablet's talk about Tennessee. It's the first I've stayed,
Speaker 1: I think, to explicitly ban it's first place that it passed. Yes, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: and uh in public places where miners are something like
Speaker 1: that once you're but now it's happening all over the place, right,
Speaker 1: this is some new thing they've invented. I'm sure that
Speaker 1: most of the Republicans who are they find stuff every
Speaker 1: once in a while to go after or they and
Speaker 1: I bet you most of them don't know what this
Speaker 1: is about at all, have any idea. There's things I
Speaker 1: don't you know, I don't actually I've never gone in Nascar.
Speaker 1: I don't know I know what it's about. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff I don't go to. So but what
Speaker 1: is this about? What is their thing about? Yeah? I mean,
Speaker 1: what is this about? Is kind of the biggest question
Speaker 1: because it's all so vague. These bills are terrifying because
Speaker 1: the language is so open ended, and they are and
Speaker 1: a lot of end You're also exactly right that a
Speaker 1: lot of these people don't really understand what drag shows
Speaker 1: are and they don't have to because this is all
Speaker 1: sort of coded language for an attack on the LGBTQIA
Speaker 1: plus community, and the wording of this bill talks about
Speaker 1: drag as adult entertainment, which is insidious within itself to
Speaker 1: say that someone dressing this way is only appropriate for
Speaker 1: adults when they're not doing anything that's adult oriented. And
Speaker 1: it also talks about them not being able to do
Speaker 1: it within range where a minor could see, right, which
Speaker 1: means no pride parades, no outdoor pride events, But it
Speaker 1: also means things like what if the window is viewable
Speaker 1: from the sidewalk in a drag bar. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: all so subjective and it's also open to interpretation that
Speaker 1: they can really kind of go wherever they want with it.
Speaker 1: Not to mention the fact that the bill defines this
Speaker 1: as this adult entertainment or adult cabaret, as men or
Speaker 1: women dressing as the doing male or female impersonation, and
Speaker 1: that within itself is also something that who is interpreting
Speaker 1: this bill? Lee who gets to decide whether he in
Speaker 1: a cheerleadero skirt counts or not? You know who's Billa.
Speaker 1: So he is the He's the one who the governor,
Speaker 1: who the photo surfacet of Now he's the one who
Speaker 1: was and the photosurfast of him in high school dressed
Speaker 1: as a cheerleader at some sort of high school events,
Speaker 1: and everyone started pointing this out and saying, this is
Speaker 1: pretty hypocritical, and he said, no, no, no, that doesn't count.
Speaker 1: That is not of a Korean nature, that is not
Speaker 1: lewd this other. And so he has decided that he
Speaker 1: is the person who gets to decide these things. Oh no,
Speaker 1: cheerleader outfits have never been considered like sexual at all,
Speaker 1: but now, but by that definition, even though most of
Speaker 1: us in twenty three understand that trans women are women
Speaker 1: and transmit are men, they're this bill can be interpreted
Speaker 1: any number of ways. And so if someone is enforcing
Speaker 1: us who doesn't believe that, who is to say that
Speaker 1: that trans person walking down the street in public, if
Speaker 1: I view them as a male or female impersonator and
Speaker 1: they're within the eyesight of a child, will they're bringing
Speaker 1: the law by walking to the grocery store. That's terrifying.
Speaker 1: When I was and we talked about this a little bit.
Speaker 1: When I was in the Senate, we were reforming No
Speaker 1: Child Left Behind, which didn't work very well, and I
Speaker 1: had a piece in it called pseudo discrimination that that
Speaker 1: would protect LGBT kids Q plus kids who would give
Speaker 1: them the same rights as were given to other kids, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, race and gender. And I went to a colleague,
Speaker 1: a Republican colleague who was a friend of mine, and
Speaker 1: asked him to sponsor this. And what what you could
Speaker 1: do is if a kid was being bullied for being
Speaker 1: lgbtqu they to go to the principal, go to the
Speaker 1: supertend schools and if they didn't get any that they
Speaker 1: could sue, they could sue us like the other kids
Speaker 1: was talking about. And and this senator said to me, oh,
Speaker 1: if they could do that, yeah, they'll just act more gay.
Speaker 1: Well first of all, and I said, I said, I
Speaker 1: said no, no, no, I don't want to say his name.
Speaker 1: I said no. And he goes, oh, you watch. Well,
Speaker 1: I hope he's watching right now and knows that I
Speaker 1: am acting this gay no matter what happens around. But well,
Speaker 1: kids in school, lgbtis in school. I have great absolutee
Speaker 1: There's all kinds of bullying obviously, and this is would
Speaker 1: this would really have helped kids? Absolutely? Would? I can
Speaker 1: from my personal experience. I grew up in a small
Speaker 1: town in Connecticut. I was very very flamboyant, and myself
Speaker 1: from a very young age, and I was identified by
Speaker 1: other people as queer before I even understood how to
Speaker 1: do that myself. And I was mercilessly bullied in school
Speaker 1: and I went to my vice principal who told me
Speaker 1: that I should probably tone it down a little, So
Speaker 1: thank you for working on that. It's I mean, it's
Speaker 1: but it was terribly frustrating. And the idea that children
Speaker 1: are somehow going to be made more queer by access
Speaker 1: to queer culture. I mean I was very queer without
Speaker 1: any access. And when I finally found drag, which is
Speaker 1: where it, you know, it was not like, oh, that's
Speaker 1: a cool job, I want to do that when I
Speaker 1: grow up. It was there's a container for who I am.
Speaker 1: There's something out there for me, and that saved my life.
Speaker 1: I mean, suicide rates among queer kids and suicidal ideation
Speaker 1: is more than half of trans and non binary kids
Speaker 1: of suicidal ideation, which when I heard that statistic, I
Speaker 1: was like, that seems low, because every queer person I
Speaker 1: know has thought about suicide in their youth. And I
Speaker 1: barely made it out of my childhood. But I did
Speaker 1: because I had a little bit of access to this
Speaker 1: glimpse of a world outside that would accept me for
Speaker 1: who I am, and not just in spite of who
Speaker 1: I am, but because of who I am. Hi here,
Speaker 1: Hi here, and I'm going to call I'm gonna start
Speaker 1: thinking you. You can support the ACLUS work by donating
Speaker 1: at the link below. Okay, we're gonna take a quick break,
Speaker 1: but we'll be right back after this. Well, that's that's
Speaker 1: our show for tonight, and that's my time as your host.
Speaker 1: But stay tuned next week when your host will be
Speaker 1: John Leguizamo. And if you want to find more, may
Speaker 1: check out the Franken Podcast. But let me and then
Speaker 1: they don't want me to do this for sure on time.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you how great it's been being here
Speaker 1: working with these folks all week. They've just been great.
Speaker 1: I'm just sorry Trump wasn't indicted. Now, explore more shows
Speaker 1: from the Daily Show podcast universe by searching The Daily
Speaker 1: Show wherever you get your podcast. Watch The Daily Show
Speaker 1: weeknights and eleven tenth Central, own Comedy Central, and stream
Speaker 1: full episodes anytime on Fairmount Clubs. This has been a
Speaker 1: Comedy Central podcast