Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is in serious trouble, at least in Arkansas.
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden is having to go and.
Speaker 1: Did go before a court in Arkansas, and this was
Speaker 1: a disaster.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: He was not there for what he's done directly with
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. He was not there because of
Speaker 1: the deals he made with Russian oligarchs connected to Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: He was not in court for the deals he did
Speaker 1: with a Chinese Communist party. Why was Hunter Biden in
Speaker 1: court requesting to pay less per month for a child
Speaker 1: that he fathered, that he denied he fathered this child.
Speaker 2: Let's always be very clear about that.
Speaker 1: A grandchild of the President, the first Lady, that they
Speaker 1: don't even count when talking about their grandkids in public,
Speaker 1: A grandchild they have never met and refused to admit
Speaker 1: is even real. A child that the Biden family doesn't
Speaker 1: even want to have their last name and fought hard
Speaker 1: to make sure this child does not receive the Biden
Speaker 1: last name. He was in court trying to lower the
Speaker 1: amount of money in child support he had to pay.
Speaker 1: That's right, how much money he had to pay to
Speaker 1: this woman to take care of his child. We also
Speaker 1: know a lot more about how much money Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: has been making in the past. We've been told that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, for a child he says wasn't his and
Speaker 1: still refuses to admit in public is his, pays twenty
Speaker 1: thousand a month to Navy Joan Roberts mothers, the attorney
Speaker 1: said during the court hearing. Hunter Biden, son of the President,
Speaker 1: appeared in person in an Arkansas courtroom for this hearing
Speaker 1: in the child support case of his unclaimed four year
Speaker 1: old daughter born out of wedlock. Lenden Roberts is the
Speaker 1: mother of four year old Navy Joan Roberts. They had
Speaker 1: reached agreement with Hunter Biden back in twenty twenty for
Speaker 1: the child's paternity and child support payments. This after he
Speaker 1: was a deadbeat father and refused to refuse to take
Speaker 1: care of one of his own, a child that the
Speaker 1: Biden family has refused to admit even exists. Think about
Speaker 1: how scumbaggy that is. The case was reopened when Biden
Speaker 1: requested adjustments to the child support payments. In December, Roberts
Speaker 1: lawyers filed emotion to have the girl's last name changed
Speaker 1: to Biden.
Speaker 3: Well.
Speaker 1: During Monday's hearing, Biden's new attorney Lyles said, the president's son,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, is paying twenty thousand dollars a month to
Speaker 1: the plaintiff. Now that sounds like a lot of money. Well,
Speaker 1: if you're paying twenty grand a month, imagine how much
Speaker 1: money Hunter Biden is having to admit that he does make.
Speaker 1: And we know they love to hide money, so imagine
Speaker 1: what he's really making.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The Independence County Circuit judge set deadlines for attorneys to
Speaker 1: submit discovery and begin depositions. This is what the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family is terrified of, and this is exactly why
Speaker 1: the Biden family had them go to Delaware to meet
Speaker 1: with prosecutors last week. They need Hunter Biden to be indicted.
Speaker 1: They have four things they're willing to admit that he
Speaker 1: has done and can be found guilty of and go
Speaker 1: to jail because that will stop all of this and
Speaker 1: there's a good chance it will save Joe Biden from
Speaker 1: real criminal issues.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: I expect this case to move forward, the judge said,
Speaker 1: So get it done. In court, Biden appeared to blankly
Speaker 1: stare ahead and had no interaction with Roberts. Robert's family
Speaker 1: set behind her, along with Garrett Ziegler, whom Biden's other attorney,
Speaker 1: Brent Langdon, described during a hearing last week as a
Speaker 1: potential expert witness and the case involving the contents of
Speaker 1: Biden's laptop, which reportedly includes some income tax records. The
Speaker 1: judge said, the ability to redact information is being abused
Speaker 1: by the Biden team quote unquote.
Speaker 2: Let's read that again.
Speaker 1: The judge said that the ability to redact information is
Speaker 1: being abused by the Biden team. Again, there is information
Speaker 1: they don't want the public to see because what comes
Speaker 1: out of this court hearing and what comes out of
Speaker 1: court in Arkansas could have massive ramifications for the investigation
Speaker 1: against Hunter Biden and the President in Congress. That's why
Speaker 1: they need all this to go away. I am sure
Speaker 1: right now the Biden's wish what they would have done
Speaker 1: is just not try to pay less money.
Speaker 2: I think they didn't realize.
Speaker 1: And remember, when you're psychotic narcissists like the Biden Crime,
Speaker 1: when you can get away with anything, you probably think
Speaker 1: you can get away with all of this in Arkansas too.
Speaker 2: So far, they've been way wrong on that issue. Now.
Speaker 1: Landon cited last week's Daily Mail article on the case,
Speaker 1: claiming it included redacted information and violation of a protective
Speaker 1: order and exposing income tax records. Meyer disagreed and said
Speaker 1: that the press, what the press comes up with is
Speaker 1: out of her control, remarking, I can't gag the whole world.
Speaker 2: The judge said.
Speaker 1: In other words, this judge is saying, you might be
Speaker 1: able to get away with this crap up in Washington.
Speaker 1: You might be able to do business with corrupt leaders
Speaker 1: of the world around the world, and you might be
Speaker 1: able to silence people around the world, but you're not
Speaker 1: going to be able to do it here in my
Speaker 1: courtroom in Arkansas. So you better get ready for reality,
Speaker 1: which is I don't play by the same rules. That
Speaker 1: is what this judge is an essence saying to the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family. Now, the Biden team has got to
Speaker 1: be sweating right now because Lancaster is hammering them with
Speaker 1: requests on information of the value of Biden's art, his salary,
Speaker 1: slash employment for the past five years, a state slash
Speaker 1: funds from foreign persons, last domestic persons, family members, fight
Speaker 1: hotel payments, the reason for a promisory note from top
Speaker 1: Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris, and documents on business done with
Speaker 1: a Chinese firm. In response, Landon said his team had
Speaker 1: already turned over more than four hundred and ninety documents.
Speaker 1: Biden's attorney also requested Robert's tax returns and her information
Speaker 1: on fringe benefits from her employer, father, bank statements, and
Speaker 1: Ziegler's witness statements. How fast is this moving? The deadline
Speaker 1: for discovery was set for May twelfth, at five o'clock.
Speaker 1: Look at your calendar, folks. This is going to move fast.
Speaker 1: And this is why the Biden family is desperate for
Speaker 1: their son to be indicted, because whatever comes out of this,
Speaker 1: if they are, if he's not indicted by then, will
Speaker 1: be very hard for the people to not look like
Speaker 1: and look at. In Delaware, we also know that depositions
Speaker 1: are going to be happening very quickly. For example, Ziegler's
Speaker 1: depositions to take place on May the twenty second at
Speaker 1: Lancaster's office in Little Rock.
Speaker 2: A status conference hearing.
Speaker 1: They say, we'll be held on May the twenty third
Speaker 1: to address discovery requests, any contempt filings, and a potential
Speaker 1: request to push back the trial date. This is how
Speaker 1: vulnerable the Bidens finally are, they say, Then, depositions for
Speaker 1: both parties and witnesses will take place June the thirteenth
Speaker 1: through the sixteenth at Lancaster's office as well. Now, as
Speaker 1: of now, this trial that could expose all all of
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family's finances has a start date set
Speaker 1: for July the twenty fourth. This is why the Bidens
Speaker 1: need a deal before then, because there's a lot that
Speaker 1: could come out in court, a lot of damning information
Speaker 1: that could come out starting on July the twenty fourth
Speaker 1: that could put the Biden crime family into serious trouble. Now,
Speaker 1: when you talk about depositions, all of the people that
Speaker 1: work for Hunter Biden could easily be called in, that
Speaker 1: have worked with him or deals with him. They could
Speaker 1: be called in to talk about his income and how
Speaker 1: much cash he's making from different places. All the financial
Speaker 1: records that have been seen by the public because of
Speaker 1: his emails could then come in, and there are questions
Speaker 1: that could be asked even of the First Lady and
Speaker 1: the President. What we also know is last week this
Speaker 1: judge ruled that Biden and Roberts must be present for
Speaker 1: every future hearing the case, implying I'm not putting up
Speaker 1: with your guys gamemanship and crap anymore Biden's attorneys. By
Speaker 1: the way, they're not happy with something else, the fact
Speaker 1: that this lady wants their child to have the Biden
Speaker 1: last name.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: The Biden name is now synopsis with being well educated, successful,
Speaker 1: financially acute, and politically powerful, Roberts, attorney wrote in a
Speaker 1: December name change motion. In a rebuttal, the Biden's attorneys
Speaker 1: demandaged strict proof thereof that such request is in the
Speaker 1: best interests of the child. In a January twenty twenty order,
Speaker 1: Meyer declared with near scientific certainty that Biden is the
Speaker 1: father of the girl referred to in court documents as
Speaker 1: baby Doe following a DNA test. This is how sick
Speaker 1: the Biden family is. They refuse to admit a child
Speaker 1: that is theirs is actually theirs. By the way, if
Speaker 1: you think I'm being mean to the Biden crime family
Speaker 1: for saying this, or you think, well, Ben, you shouldn't
Speaker 1: say that about the President and the First Lady, this
Speaker 1: could just be hunter. President Biden, as president, has refused
Speaker 1: to acknowledge the granddaughter was even born. Has refused to
Speaker 1: acknowledge the existence of this granddaughter last Christmas season. For example,
Speaker 1: the First Lady Joe Biden hung stockings for six of
Speaker 1: their grandchildren at the White House, specifically excluding Navy. Those
Speaker 1: that were recognized were Naomi Finnigan, Mazie Natalie, Robert Hunter,
Speaker 1: Biden the Second, and Boe. They said, no, no, no, this
Speaker 1: out of wedlock kid down there in Arkansas with a stripper.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: Not only can she not have a stocking, she can't
Speaker 1: have our last name either, and we refuse to acknowledge
Speaker 1: that she exists. If they will treat their own family
Speaker 1: this way, think how little they care about you. Now,
Speaker 1: before I get into more of this story, I want
Speaker 1: to say thank you and tell you about our good
Speaker 1: friends at Patriot Mobile. They are now offering a performance guarantee.
Speaker 1: If you're not happy with your coverage, you can switch
Speaker 1: between the three major carriers for free.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. They
Speaker 1: are for nationwide coverage on the best G four and
Speaker 1: G five networks, the same network and towers are using
Speaker 1: right now. The difference is not only do you get
Speaker 1: the same great quality that you're used to, but they
Speaker 1: actually are a company that fights to preserve or God
Speaker 1: given rights and freedoms. So this year resolve to stop
Speaker 1: spending your money with companies that don't align with your values,
Speaker 1: in fact, actually fight against what you believe in. Switch
Speaker 1: to Patriot Mobile. You'll be supporting First and Second Amendment groups,
Speaker 1: the rights of unborn children, and even helping with adoptions.
Speaker 2: It is easy to switch.
Speaker 1: Call them right now, or go online to Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson.
Speaker 1: Or call them eight seven eight Patriot. You're gonna get
Speaker 1: free activation with the offer code ferguson. That's eight seven
Speaker 1: eight Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. There's something
Speaker 1: else that's also happening in Washington that deals with this
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden issue, and this has nothing to do what's happening.
Speaker 1: I'm talking specifically in the case in Arkansas, but the
Speaker 1: more that they can find out in depositions in Arkansas
Speaker 1: could then be used in Washington. John Ratcliffe, who's the
Speaker 1: former Director of National Intelligence, has come out whistleblowing on
Speaker 1: Anthony Blincoln lying to Congress to get his job, lying
Speaker 1: about putting together all of those Intel officials who then
Speaker 1: lied to the American people and the media helps sell
Speaker 1: that lot to you to change an alter the outcome
Speaker 1: of the election. Show Joe Biden would win by saying
Speaker 1: the laptop hunter Biden's Laptop's not real. It's the Russians, right,
Speaker 1: the Russian Russian Russian disinformation campaign. Listen to what John
Speaker 1: Ratcliffe had to say on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.
Speaker 4: Anthony Blincoln, and Mike Morrell and the fifty former intelligence
Speaker 4: officials who didn't have access to intelligence but had put.
Speaker 5: This letter together.
Speaker 4: As you pointed out, Maria, it was fourteen hours after
Speaker 4: I made those statements on National TV that they published
Speaker 4: this letter. So they knew that the letter that they
Speaker 4: were going to put out was false. At that point
Speaker 4: it was confirmed by the IC and by the Department
Speaker 4: of Justice, but they decided to do it anyway. This
Speaker 4: was two weeks before a presidential election. They knew that
Speaker 4: the letter that they were putting out was essentially a hoax,
Speaker 4: a fraud on the American people, intended to mislead them
Speaker 4: and in the process to frame a foreign government for
Speaker 4: something that was not taking place. You know that is
Speaker 4: you know, that is a fraud on the American people.
Speaker 4: It's election interference. And you know, this was the same
Speaker 4: group of people like Mike Morrell who tried to do
Speaker 4: it in twenty sixteen with the Stele dossier where they
Speaker 4: weren't successful, came back in twenty twenty and again knowing
Speaker 4: full well, deliberately went ahead and to mislead the American
Speaker 4: people and essentially said, look, we only need to keep
Speaker 4: this alive for two weeks.
Speaker 5: After that we.
Speaker 4: Can admit that the Hunter Biden laptop, the Biden family laptop,
Speaker 4: is real.
Speaker 2: We just need two weeks.
Speaker 1: He's right, by the way, they needed to give Joe
Speaker 1: Biden the cover that he needed to go into that
Speaker 1: last and final debate, to go in there and to
Speaker 1: say this is a hoax. This never happened. This is
Speaker 1: something that has never ever, ever happened. By the way,
Speaker 1: there's one person that did stand up that we're learning
Speaker 1: about now who sang I wouldn't sign off on this letter.
Speaker 1: Dan Hoffman explained to Fox News Channel why he didn't
Speaker 1: sign the Hunter Biden laptop letter by saying this on
Speaker 1: Fox News, there was no evidence. I wasn't going to
Speaker 1: sign a letter that lied to the American people. Listened
Speaker 1: to what he had to say on Fox about saying
Speaker 1: no to Anthony Blincoln, no to Joe Biden, no to
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, no to the entire Biden crime family and
Speaker 1: the Democratic National Committee.
Speaker 6: Now that the story, now, that story that we promised
Speaker 6: it at the top of the hour, and that infamous
Speaker 6: letter that was signed by fifty one former intelligence officials
Speaker 6: days before the twenty twenty election casting doubt on the
Speaker 6: New York Post report on Hunter Biden's laptop.
Speaker 3: Former CIA Chief of Station.
Speaker 6: Dan Hoffman was asked to add his signature, explaining for
Speaker 6: the first time in an op ed in the Washington
Speaker 6: Times why he said no. Dan Hoffman is a Fox
Speaker 6: News contributor, and he joins us, Now, Dan, this is
Speaker 6: my most interesting story of the day. I read this
Speaker 6: op ed and I thought, why didn't you tell us,
Speaker 6: like a long time ago here? So this letter went out,
Speaker 6: We famously now and here's what the basic finding was
Speaker 6: that the hundred Biden laptop story has quote all the
Speaker 6: classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. You had this
Speaker 6: letter circulated to you, They asked for your signature, You
Speaker 6: said no.
Speaker 7: Why I remember I got the letter October eighteen, twenty twenty,
Speaker 7: and at first glance it seemed natural to lay the
Speaker 7: blame at the Kremlin's doorstep. Remember, Vladimir Putin is in
Speaker 7: the Kremlin and he's well known for cloak and dagger
Speaker 7: espionage operations. But at the same time, there was no evidence,
Speaker 7: and the letter noted there was no evidence, and I
Speaker 7: just felt like we needed to do the forensics. There
Speaker 7: was a very convoluted story. Folks will recall that there
Speaker 7: was a laptop found at a store in Delaware, and
Speaker 7: I remembered at CIA, when we didn't have all the answers,
Speaker 7: we would task our sources to get more information so
Speaker 7: we could be more definitive. And I felt like in
Speaker 7: this case, the FBI could do those forensics and it
Speaker 7: was not up to us to speculate.
Speaker 5: So I didn't sign the letter.
Speaker 7: I typically don't put my name to other people's words.
Speaker 7: My wife was in her late in her third year
Speaker 7: of fighting cancer, and I didn't have the time to
Speaker 7: go back to Michael Morrell and ask him what the
Speaker 7: point was about the letter, So I just left it
Speaker 7: and didn't sign a letter and didn't respond.
Speaker 6: And we are still to this day. So sorry for
Speaker 6: the loss of you, dear wife. You said a second
Speaker 6: ago that this didn't invite further inquiry, which is what
Speaker 6: you're right.
Speaker 3: About in the Washington Times op ed.
Speaker 6: You say, but the email I received from mister Morrell
Speaker 6: did not invite any further discussion or debate. The letter
Speaker 6: was a feticom play. It was being passed around for signatures,
Speaker 6: not edits. I've never been one to put my name
Speaker 6: to words someone else wrote on my behalf, So this
Speaker 6: thing was cooked and he was just looking for signatures.
Speaker 3: And you could have been number fifty two.
Speaker 6: But you said in the break that there were a
Speaker 6: lot more as well, people who didn't sign onto it.
Speaker 5: Right, there were many others who didn't sign it.
Speaker 7: Look, when I was at CIA, we would sit in
Speaker 7: Michael Morrell's office when we had a particularly difficult, challenging
Speaker 7: intelligence issue, and we would hash out all the evidence
Speaker 7: that we had, the intelligence we had, and then Michael
Speaker 7: would draw analytical conclusions with some level of confidence, low media.
Speaker 5: Or high, and bring it to the White House.
Speaker 7: We didn't have that debate about this laptop issue. We
Speaker 7: weren't invited to debate it. And I also felt like
Speaker 7: I was somebody who was a Russia hand. I spent
Speaker 7: many many years focused on Russia, and I was a
Speaker 7: little surprised that I and others who had that same
Speaker 7: experience weren't involved in even discussing whether such a letter
Speaker 7: was worth writing.
Speaker 6: Now, during the debate, the one debate of the twenty
Speaker 6: twenty election campaign, now President Biden and Canada, Biden said,
Speaker 6: as we showed at the top of this fifty intelligence
Speaker 6: officers signed on to this letter, saying it was a classic.
Speaker 3: Russian disinformation campaign.
Speaker 6: You write in your op D, the American public should
Speaker 6: be careful to distinguish between retired and actively serving US
Speaker 6: intelligence officers.
Speaker 7: Explain, Well, the part that I didn't know, and I'm
Speaker 7: assuming that my former colleagues who signed the letter probably
Speaker 7: didn't know either, was that Michael Morrell had discussed the
Speaker 7: laptop issue with then campaign advisor Tony Blink, and so
Speaker 7: Michael was aware of the campaign's interest. And there's a
Speaker 7: straight line from that to the letter, to the debate
Speaker 7: and the comment from then candidate Biden about the laptop.
Speaker 7: And so the point that I made in the op
Speaker 7: ed is, look, if you're serving actively at the CIA,
Speaker 7: we vote. But look, we serve under presidents for whom
Speaker 7: we voted and those for whom we didn't.
Speaker 5: When I served in Iraq. Look, half of.
Speaker 7: Us probably voted for President Bush and the other half didn't.
Speaker 7: It doesn't matter. We're focused on our sacred mission of
Speaker 7: recruiting spies and stealing secrets and delivering the best analytical
Speaker 7: conclusions we can to the president, and that's.
Speaker 5: What we do.
Speaker 7: But retired intelligence officers who wish to engage politically can
Speaker 7: do so as long as they don't reveal classified intelligence.
Speaker 7: They're free to speak their mind, and that's their choice,
Speaker 7: and it carries with it all of the implications for
Speaker 7: them because they're going to have to defend their public statements.
Speaker 5: And that's what we're seeing right now.
Speaker 3: I'll tell you your op ed is eye opening.
Speaker 6: There's no question but that everybody who's interested in this
Speaker 6: should read it.
Speaker 1: Everybody should read it, by the way, because what Dan
Speaker 1: Hoffman is saying here is very clear. They cook this story,
Speaker 1: and they knew they were cooking this story. They decided
Speaker 1: that it was important to cook this story. This AXCIA
Speaker 1: Moscow chief refused to sign the Hunter Biden letter, saying
Speaker 1: there was no evidence at all that Vladimir Putin was involved.
Speaker 2: Think about that.
Speaker 1: This is the guy that is the ex station chief
Speaker 1: in Russia in Moscow. He's the former Moscow station chief
Speaker 1: for the CIA, saying, yeah, I was given the chance
Speaker 1: to sign into a letter attacking the posts bombshell report
Speaker 1: on Hunter's infamous laptop and possibly rushing disinformation. It's the
Speaker 1: guy that would know about it, right, this is the
Speaker 1: guy that's over at the CIA in Moscow. And he said, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not doing it. He was present and pressured with
Speaker 1: signing that letter signed by fifty other fifty one top
Speaker 1: US intelligence officials. He said, but I didn't sign it
Speaker 1: because there was quote no evidence of Russian disinformation, Russian involvement.
Speaker 1: At a first glance, it seemed natural to lay the
Speaker 1: blame at the Kremlin doorstep. Hoptman said during that interview,
Speaker 1: Remember Vladimir Putin is in the Kremlin, and he's well
Speaker 1: known for cloak and dagger espionage operations. But at the
Speaker 1: same time, there was no evidence in the letter, noted,
Speaker 1: there was no evidence. They just wanted to win the election.
Speaker 1: They wanted to lie to you to win an election,
Speaker 1: to overthrow the will of the people. Plain and simple.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about a great opportunity for your IRA. In
Speaker 1: four one ks, you can get free gold. Just by
Speaker 1: learning about gold iras from Augusta Precious Medals. It's important
Speaker 1: that you know what's going on in this crazy economy
Speaker 1: and your hard earned savings need protecting from the devalued dollar.
Speaker 1: Protecting from the devalued dollar, especially if you're close to retirement.
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Medals will give you information on how to
Speaker 1: protect your savings and open a gold IRA. So if
Speaker 1: you've saved at least one hundred thousand for retirement, call
Speaker 1: and ask about their ultimate guide to gold iras. I
Speaker 1: trust Augusta Precious Medals and you can too. They will
Speaker 1: make sure that you understand what is best for you
Speaker 1: and your portfolio. There's a reason Money magazine says they
Speaker 1: are the best gold IRA company. Get free gold, free
Speaker 1: information and retirement protection now by calling eight seven seven
Speaker 1: four Gold Ira. That's eight seven seven the number four
Speaker 1: GOLDRA or Augusta Precious Medals dot Com. I want to
Speaker 1: move to another story real quick that the media was
Speaker 1: obsessed with when it first broke because it dealt with
Speaker 1: an individual that killed people with an AR fifteen. Now
Speaker 1: they don't want to touch this story because one it's
Speaker 1: a Mexican national who not only apparently killed five in Texas.
Speaker 1: But the second problem is he had a criminal pass
Speaker 1: and has been deported out of this country multiple times.
Speaker 1: How many times have we caught him and deported him
Speaker 1: four different times?
Speaker 2: But with an open border?
Speaker 1: This Texas shooting fugitive Francisco or a Posa who killed
Speaker 1: allegedly killed five neighbors has been deported four different times,
Speaker 1: and they're like, oh wait, this doesn't fit the narrative.
Speaker 2: Never mind.
Speaker 1: Now, what did the media sound like when this story
Speaker 1: first broke over the weekend. Here is what they were
Speaker 1: saying on CNN.
Speaker 8: A desperate man hunt is underway in Texas, a gunman
Speaker 8: killing five people, including an eight year old, and police
Speaker 8: are racing to a house in Cleveland, Texas overnight on
Speaker 8: reports of an active shooter. At least three others were
Speaker 8: wounded in the brutal attack, and now the search is
Speaker 8: on for the suspect, who took off before police arrived
Speaker 8: on the scene. CNN's Ryan Young is following this breaking
Speaker 8: story for so tell us what we.
Speaker 2: Know thus far?
Speaker 8: This taking place in a house? Does this mean that
Speaker 8: everyone knew each other, meaning the suspect and the victims.
Speaker 9: Well, it appears they were neighbors, and in fact, they
Speaker 9: were talking to him across the street. He had a
Speaker 9: gun and apparently he's been firing in that yard. According
Speaker 9: to the sheriff, many times. They asked him to stop
Speaker 9: shooting because it was disturbing the baby inside the home.
Speaker 9: At some point, apparently he became angry and then actually
Speaker 9: went inside the home and started shooting.
Speaker 5: He shot five people, according.
Speaker 9: To the Sheriff's department, including an eight year old. And
Speaker 9: one of the details about this that stands out that's
Speaker 9: quite scary is the fact that two of the women
Speaker 9: who were killed seemed like they were covering younger children.
Speaker 3: Three other children survived this.
Speaker 9: But when you think about this desperate search right now,
Speaker 9: the Sheriff's department does tell us they do have an
Speaker 9: ID from the man who's involved in the shooting.
Speaker 3: They talked to his wife.
Speaker 9: They believe he's about twelve miles away from the shooting
Speaker 9: scene in a wooded area. They're chasing him down. But
Speaker 9: take a listen to the sheriff.
Speaker 10: When they got here, they found four people deceased inside
Speaker 10: of the residence, and there was an eight year old
Speaker 10: that had been shot. Everybody that was shot was shot
Speaker 10: from the neck of almost execution style. We know him
Speaker 10: by name Vader Bird, and we've got his Mexican consulate tark. Plus,
Speaker 10: there was a ring doorbell on the victim's house that
Speaker 10: we actually captured him coming up to the front door
Speaker 10: with the weapon.
Speaker 3: Yeah, clearly this is troubling, but you hear.
Speaker 9: That the ring doorbell that they had there then shot
Speaker 9: almost execution style. The kids who were also in that
Speaker 9: home who survived were covered in blood.
Speaker 3: There were ten people in that home, and then you.
Speaker 9: Think about the five other shot execution style, including their
Speaker 9: five year old. Obviously a desperate Hopefully we'll get more
Speaker 9: details as today goes long, because the active man search
Speaker 9: is going on right now.
Speaker 8: Terribly sad, but probably not on the wrong run for
Speaker 8: very long, given we're given the images and the idea
Speaker 8: that they already have. All Right, thanks so much, Mine
Speaker 8: Young appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Why did CNN love this story early on because it
Speaker 1: was an ar fifteen. You notice then they didn't know
Speaker 1: that this person had been deported from this country multiple times.
Speaker 1: They didn't know that four different times we had him.
Speaker 1: And this is a thirty eight year old, right he
Speaker 1: has been apprehended and deported by US Immigration and Customers Enforcement.
Speaker 1: He was first supported back in March of nine. He
Speaker 1: was then deported again in September of nine same year,
Speaker 1: and another time in January twenty twelve after he was
Speaker 1: convicted in Montgomery County for driving lind tyks get a
Speaker 1: kid that killed somebody. Then he was then deported again
Speaker 1: back in July of twenty sixteen. It remains unclear what
Speaker 1: his current immigration status is or when he came back
Speaker 1: into the country. So now what's happened, Well, there's now
Speaker 1: more than two hundred and fifty law enforcement officers on
Speaker 1: the hunt for this man. Obviously, he's considered armed and
Speaker 1: dangerous after he fled the blood bath inside that Cleveland
Speaker 1: home about fifty miles north of Houston. Survivor and grieving father,
Speaker 1: Wilson Garcia, said he and his wife confronted him on
Speaker 1: Friday night after he was allegedly shooting his.
Speaker 2: Gun while drunk in his front yard.
Speaker 1: When the gunman refused, Garcia said, he called the police
Speaker 1: five times, but it was the shooter who arrived his
Speaker 1: home armed with an ar style rifle, and that's when
Speaker 1: he decided to do what he wanted to do. Told
Speaker 1: my wife get inside this man has e loaded his weapon.
Speaker 1: My wife told me to go inside because he won't
Speaker 1: fire at me. I'm a woman. The gambit, however, failed.
Speaker 1: Sonya Guzman, twenty five, was the first person to be
Speaker 1: slain in the rampage. Garcia said that after his wife
Speaker 1: fell to the ground, it was his son, Daniel, nine,
Speaker 1: who rushed to try and help her. He died because
Speaker 1: he wanted to defend his mother, along with a mother
Speaker 1: and son. Police identify the other victims as a twenty
Speaker 1: one year old, a thirty one year old, and an
Speaker 1: eighteen year old. This is what happens when you allow
Speaker 1: legal immigrants into this country, and when you deport them
Speaker 1: and you have an open border and a porous border.
Speaker 1: This is what happens. Santa Sinto County Sheriff noted that
Speaker 1: this man clearly had been dealt.
Speaker 2: With before with law enforcement.
Speaker 1: But if you can break into a country, are you
Speaker 1: really worried about law enforcement? You're probably not worried at all.
Speaker 1: He also noted how brave these two individuals were that
Speaker 1: it used their bodies to protect the three children who
Speaker 1: were found uninjured but covered in blood inside the home.
Speaker 1: He had that all five victims were shot from the
Speaker 1: neck up execution style during the massacre of Garcia said,
Speaker 1: one of the women demanded he'd jump out a window
Speaker 1: to escape the carnage. Garcia said the victim told him
Speaker 1: he needs to survive because my children were without a
Speaker 1: mother and one of their parents had to stay alive
Speaker 1: to take care of them. The heartbroken husband said that
Speaker 1: even though the gunman tried shooting him, with bullets flying everywhere,
Speaker 1: he was somehow able to avoid getting hit. Garcie has
Speaker 1: now launched a go Fundme page to help bring his
Speaker 1: wife and son's bodies back to their native Honduras. Authorities
Speaker 1: have yet to comment on the immigration status of the victims,
Speaker 1: but at least one Alvarado, was confirmed to be a
Speaker 1: permanent US resident. When you have lawlessness at a border,
Speaker 1: you get lawlessness in a country. When you have lawlessness
Speaker 1: at a border and you have an open border, then
Speaker 1: even when you catch people committing crimes and deport them,
Speaker 1: they just come back. When you've caught a guy four
Speaker 1: times over, can we just say that again four times over?
Speaker 1: This guy was caught, He could have killed somebody, was
Speaker 1: caught drunk driving. But if you're not from this country,
Speaker 1: do you really care?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: If you get caught drunk driving in America, you're not an
Speaker 1: American citizen.
Speaker 2: Do you really care? The answer is no, you probably don't.
Speaker 1: If you get caught in this country and you get deported,
Speaker 1: do you care, The answer is no, you probably don't.
Speaker 1: And the reason why, the reason why it's pretty simple.
Speaker 1: You know that you can just come back in. We
Speaker 1: give more rights to illegal immigrants in this country than
Speaker 1: we do to American citizens. We give more protections to
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants in this country then we give to American citizens.
Speaker 1: We give illegal immigrants more chances to screw up and
Speaker 1: come back than we do to American citizens, who we
Speaker 1: will put in jail. Why is that Because the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is doing everything they can to flood this country
Speaker 1: with illegal immigrants, and they will never stop. They get
Speaker 1: as many in here as they can, and then they're
Speaker 1: going to give them amnesty. Never forget, by the way,
Speaker 1: what Donald Trump said, they send really bad people here.
Speaker 1: They send their worst, they send their their rapists, murderers,
Speaker 1: and people like that, right, And then people said, oh,
Speaker 1: he's disparaging Hispanics. No he wasn't, he was disparaging criminals.
Speaker 1: This is also, by the way, if you want to
Speaker 1: go back in history and just look at history.
Speaker 2: This is no different than what Fidel Castro did.
Speaker 1: And I think it was what in nineteen seventy nine,
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty, somewhere in that timeframe where he decided to
Speaker 1: take his worst people and send them to America. He's like,
Speaker 1: we don't want him here, right, we amped out the prisons.
Speaker 1: We don't want you go to America. Be their problem.
Speaker 1: I don't want to have to take care of you
Speaker 1: in prison. I don't want to have to deal with
Speaker 1: you when you get out. And he said, see you.
Speaker 1: So the idea that everybody coming across the border is
Speaker 1: someone that deserves a hug is a lie. This guy
Speaker 1: just took the lives of countless people and now has
Speaker 1: cost against millions of dollars millions of dollars in this
Speaker 1: man hunt, millions of dollars, millions of dollars in the
Speaker 1: media all of a sudden doesn't want to report on
Speaker 1: the story because early on, okay, early on, they were
Speaker 1: obsessed with the story because they said of using Air fifteen.
Speaker 1: But after they found out the details of who he was,
Speaker 1: they moved on very quickly. And that is what you
Speaker 1: call propaganda. Make sure you share a podcast, we'll keep
Speaker 1: you up to date on all the big breaking news,
Speaker 1: including the Hunter Biden crime family story. It is moving
Speaker 1: quickly now, so hit that subscriber roughder download button. Please
Speaker 1: write it's a five star review and I'll see you
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow