Speaker 1: You think about it, We're almost at the end of
Speaker 1: the year. There's a lot of screw ups in the
Speaker 1: media over the last year, a lot of big stories
Speaker 1: they got wrong, a lot of stories that they wanted
Speaker 1: you to believe were true, and then they just moved
Speaker 1: on from them after they got busted getting it wrong.
Speaker 1: I used to believe it was a issue of getting
Speaker 1: it wrong. I no longer do. I think the media
Speaker 1: has been lying to us on purpose, deliberately misleading us,
Speaker 1: and deliberately lying to the American people on any number
Speaker 1: of different issues and or things, because honestly, why not,
Speaker 1: why not lie to the American people? Why not just say, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna mislead you with propaganda to influence you, to
Speaker 1: influence the elections. Now, the reason why I say this
Speaker 1: is being done deliberately is look at the Russian hoax,
Speaker 1: the Russian collusion story. Remember that story. They kept it
Speaker 1: alive for four years, and they knew for four years
Speaker 1: it was a lie. There are a lot of different stories.
Speaker 1: Let's go with COVID and the vaccines. They knew the
Speaker 1: vaccines were not going to stop you from getting COVID.
Speaker 1: They knew because people were getting COVID after getting vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and they still kept that lie going for almost two years.
Speaker 1: They also had data and whistleblowers that were saying things,
Speaker 1: for example, like the mask were pretty much worthless. It
Speaker 1: was data and doctors and different people saying that. But
Speaker 1: what do they do. They kept telling you you're trying
Speaker 1: to kill everybody if you don't wear a mask. Why
Speaker 1: do they say it? It's called propaganda. What's scary is
Speaker 1: just how many stories in the last three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty five days, big stories and big scandals that they
Speaker 1: got wrong. And when I say they got them wrong,
Speaker 1: they knew they were getting them wrong. I don't think
Speaker 1: any of these stories that I'm about to list off
Speaker 1: for you they got wrong by accident. I believe that
Speaker 1: every one of these was done delivery to mislead the
Speaker 1: American people. That's what I want you to understand. I
Speaker 1: don't think that the media is as stupid as I'm
Speaker 1: about to show you when I play these things to you.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that they are this incompetent. There's also
Speaker 1: another reason why I say this. I believe the biggest
Speaker 1: reason why I think they do this every single time
Speaker 1: deliberately on purpose, to screw us, to manipulate us, is
Speaker 1: because it's always orchestrated. What do I mean by that?
Speaker 1: The media will constantly tell you something and it's not
Speaker 1: breaking news on one news channel, for example, it's across
Speaker 1: all of their mediums. It's on ABC, it's on NBC,
Speaker 1: it's on CBS, it's on MSNBC, it's on CNN. They
Speaker 1: do this in the New York Times and the Washington Posts.
Speaker 1: They do this over and over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: and it's everywhere at the exact same time. That's not
Speaker 1: by accident. If one reporter came out with some breaking
Speaker 1: news and they got duped by a source so they
Speaker 1: got it wrong, and other people didn't go with the
Speaker 1: news story, then it would be a different conversation. But
Speaker 1: all of this seems to be consistently orchestrated, and they
Speaker 1: seemed to say the exact same words. What do I
Speaker 1: mean by this? Well, let's give you the top ten
Speaker 1: list of the year of the biggest stories, the biggest lies,
Speaker 1: the biggest screw ups of the media. At number ten
Speaker 1: on my list, you may remember the media. They then
Speaker 1: claim they got duped by another anti Trump hoax. I
Speaker 1: don't believe for a second that it was an anti
Speaker 1: Trump hoax that got them. I think they created out
Speaker 1: of thin air. They wanted to believe this, and they figured,
Speaker 1: if we all go with it, and why not? Now,
Speaker 1: the story was a simple story. There was a report
Speaker 1: that came out that there were hours a seven hour
Speaker 1: call gap from January the six The White House, they said,
Speaker 1: was using burner phones, phones that you would throw away
Speaker 1: that no one knew about to communicate. They said there
Speaker 1: was a seven hour gap that was bigger than Nixon's
Speaker 1: erased tapes and Watergate, and then a scandal was borne
Speaker 1: out of thin air. The only problem was there was
Speaker 1: no missing phone calls. The media just wanted to attack
Speaker 1: the present. They saw January six as a major vulnerability
Speaker 1: and they said, let's run with it. Now. How did
Speaker 1: the media sound, Well, here they are in their own
Speaker 1: words with this ridiculous lie to the American people. It
Speaker 1: still was damaging to Donald Trump, and it still pushed
Speaker 1: the January sixth Committee nar kiv that they were trying
Speaker 1: to hide something and they were actually involved in an
Speaker 1: insurrection at the White House to the highest levels and
Speaker 1: orchestrating it behind the scenes. On January sixth or seven
Speaker 1: hours of missing tape to prove it. Washington Post headline,
Speaker 1: January six. White House logs give given the House show
Speaker 1: seven hour gap in Trump call. That's all they needed
Speaker 1: and everybody in the media ran with it. Seven hours
Speaker 1: makes the eighteen minutes of a raised Oval office taped
Speaker 1: around Watergate look like a game of patty cake. There
Speaker 1: appears to be in real cover up of who Trump
Speaker 1: was talking to while the mob was attacking and ransacking
Speaker 1: the Capitol. These White House records are not just incomplete.
Speaker 1: The gaps are just staggering and potentially willful omissions Trump
Speaker 1: where someone's administration appears to have actually tampered with the records.
Speaker 1: Tampered with the record. Did you hear this? We tampered
Speaker 1: with somebody in the White House, maybe even Donald Trump himself.
Speaker 1: They tampered with the records. Had no idea it was
Speaker 1: this big of a deal. Oh, yes it is. The
Speaker 1: White House was burning, tapes, were smashing, tapes, were ripping
Speaker 1: out pieces of paper and a phone log. This is
Speaker 1: worse than Watergate. Did this actually happened? No? Were they
Speaker 1: lying to you? Yeah? But don't worry. They kept going.
Speaker 1: It looks like he made a decision I'm going to
Speaker 1: take this offline for the next seven and a half hours.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has acted like a mafia boss. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has allies whether they remove calls from the log where
Speaker 1: they made secret calls on burner phones, knew what they
Speaker 1: were doing was wrong and tried to hide it. Simple
Speaker 1: as that, simple as that was. Any of this true? No,
Speaker 1: none of it was. Are we positive that this is
Speaker 1: a lot? Yes? Did the media have to come back
Speaker 1: and tell everybody, hey, we got it wrong. Well, some
Speaker 1: of the people in the media did actually say they
Speaker 1: got it wrong. January six, committee started meeting, Republicans started
Speaker 1: going after them, and they had to correct their story.
Speaker 1: It sound like now not all of them went prime
Speaker 1: time to correct the primetime attack, claiming it was worse
Speaker 1: than Watergate. They did say it this way in the
Speaker 1: middle of the afternoon on CNN. The six pages all
Speaker 1: of logs for January six are determined to be complete
Speaker 1: based on an official review of those White House records,
Speaker 1: so there are no missing pages and the seven hour
Speaker 1: gap is likely explained by the use of white House landlines,
Speaker 1: white house cell phones, and personal cell phones that don't
Speaker 1: go through a switchboard. There it is all right, So
Speaker 1: we corrected the record. Now. We went for this story
Speaker 1: for days and days and days and weeks, and then
Speaker 1: we started trashing, saying people desire to go to jail.
Speaker 1: This is worse than Watergate. The media got it wrong,
Speaker 1: but it's fine, right, so we'll correct it after the
Speaker 1: damage has already been done. Did anybody get fired for
Speaker 1: this dubious blockbuster story. No? Was anybody in his career
Speaker 1: bothered or destroyed because of this reporting? No? Was there
Speaker 1: any official We apologized to our viewers and listeners for
Speaker 1: lie to you know, none of that happened. Some move
Speaker 1: on to number nine. Number nine was a classic anonymous source.
Speaker 1: This time an anonymous source came from the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: and that one anonymous source told NPR, you know your
Speaker 1: tax dollars pay for that National Public Radio that the beautiful,
Speaker 1: loving kind suited Justice sodom Orb was being bullied for
Speaker 1: political reasons. She was being forced to telework from home.
Speaker 1: Why because the evil Republican scumbag jack a Justice Gorsich
Speaker 1: refused to wear a mask to work. What made this
Speaker 1: story even worse is that she was immune compromised, and
Speaker 1: she had quite had quietly and politely requested that Gorshits
Speaker 1: wear a mass to work. But since he was a
Speaker 1: anti vaxer and a toolbag, a scumbag, an evil Republican man,
Speaker 1: talking down to side of my Oar, he said, hell no,
Speaker 1: and you can work from home. You can tell a work.
Speaker 1: Now this story broke and there was only one anonymous
Speaker 1: source claiming to be at the Supreme Court. Was the
Speaker 1: story true, No, it was a lie. Did anybody else
Speaker 1: try to verify the source or maybe just call Side
Speaker 1: of my Oar's office directly or the Supreme Court for
Speaker 1: official comment. No. Instead, NPR went with the story. And
Speaker 1: once they went with the story, so did everybody else.
Speaker 1: Now the story turned out not to be true, and
Speaker 1: when they got in trouble for this, NPR was unfazed.
Speaker 1: NPR said they were quote standing by their reporting, claiming
Speaker 1: that it was still true. Your taxpayer funded dollars went
Speaker 1: to this fake news story that the rest of the
Speaker 1: media was so excited to report. Take a list into
Speaker 1: how they did it on TV. Practically, anti mask insanity
Speaker 1: has now reached the highest court in the land. My
Speaker 1: first reaction was to think, what a mean spirited, almost
Speaker 1: ghoulish person Neil Gorsich is Gorsi has the nerve to
Speaker 1: refuse to wear a mask indoors while seated next to
Speaker 1: his colleague who's vulnerable to possible death from a highly
Speaker 1: communicable disease. Neil Goulsitch. She's prioritizing his right to be
Speaker 1: a tool over protecting Sonia. So to Mal's life, that
Speaker 1: just seems ridiculous. Can you put a mask on? Seriously?
Speaker 1: Helights so hard? Neil Gorci's shame on you. Shame on you.
Speaker 1: You Neil Gorsich are both a rotten coworker, dangerous to
Speaker 1: be near in a pandemic scon It's absolute worst. And
Speaker 1: here is a joint statement from So listen, this all
Speaker 1: happens across all these networks, and the only people to actually,
Speaker 1: you know, ask the question was Fox News. The story
Speaker 1: got so out of control the Justice Sotomayor and Justice
Speaker 1: Gorgeous Gorsus had to put out a joint statement saying,
Speaker 1: this is this story is a lie. It's not true
Speaker 1: Sotomayor and Gorse reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice courses
Speaker 1: to where a mass surprised us it is false. Well,
Speaker 1: we may sometimes disagree about the law. We are warm
Speaker 1: colleagues and friends Ottawa is. I mean, what else do
Speaker 1: you need from that? They have to put out a statement,
Speaker 1: and the statement that they have to put out is
Speaker 1: a very clear and simple statement. Reporting that Justice Sotomayor
Speaker 1: asked Justice Gorse It's to wear a mask surprised us.
Speaker 1: It is false. While we may sometimes disagree about the law,
Speaker 1: we are warm colleague and friends. Did any of the
Speaker 1: networks that reported this story that you know, Justice cours
Speaker 1: is just some scumbag, evil person, did they correct it? No?
Speaker 1: They did not. Now why did this story happen? I'll
Speaker 1: tell you this was right around the time when Democrats
Speaker 1: were wanting to pack the court, So right around the
Speaker 1: time that they were leaking other stories or were about
Speaker 1: to leak other stories that Roe v. Wade was going
Speaker 1: to be overturned in an unprecedented way. Remember that they
Speaker 1: leaked out though what the decision was going to be
Speaker 1: and then put out a kill list for other people
Speaker 1: in the Supreme Court to kill them. And then the
Speaker 1: White House refused to condemn the protesters who were out
Speaker 1: there and the protesters that were going to the homes
Speaker 1: other conservative justices when they leaked it out of the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Now, as we in twenty twenty two. There's
Speaker 1: something else that happened that's really weird. You notice that
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court at this point we don't know who
Speaker 1: the leaker was. Maybe that's because the FBI spending too
Speaker 1: much time spying on Americans on Twitter or sending the
Speaker 1: account names of Twitter accounts they wanted to get rid
Speaker 1: of in twenty twenty two to big Tech. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: because they're trying to silence conservatives like myself and put
Speaker 1: us on bandlists or cannot find lists or cannot see
Speaker 1: them lists. Right, the list is pretty you know, long
Speaker 1: of what they've been trying to do. Maybe that's why
Speaker 1: all this is happening. Maybe they were trying to change
Speaker 1: the narratives so if they did in fact pack the court,
Speaker 1: they could justify it by saying, look at how evil
Speaker 1: Gorset is, look at how terrible Neil Gorsetch is, look
Speaker 1: at how corrupt the Supreme Court is, and why you
Speaker 1: shouldn't respect it. These colleagues, these Republicans are trying to
Speaker 1: kill the Democrats on the court. And that's what they
Speaker 1: were saying the entire time. That's the whole ballgame here, folks,
Speaker 1: like that's it, That's what this is so. Maybe that's
Speaker 1: what this story is actually all about, right, Maybe this
Speaker 1: is the whole goal to undermine our institutions on purpose.
Speaker 1: And if you don't have to correct the story, then
Speaker 1: it's a pretty big win, isn't it. This is what
Speaker 1: victory for them looks like, even while they're in defeat.
Speaker 1: It's pretty brilliant if you ask me. Let's move on
Speaker 1: to the next story on the list, and that involves
Speaker 1: the truckers. You may remember in Canada, it was time
Speaker 1: to smash the working class revolt. It was time to
Speaker 1: make sure that we turned truckers who refused to get vaccinated,
Speaker 1: who were sitting in their own truck by themselves, driving
Speaker 1: keeping a country to working and going with supply chain issues,
Speaker 1: like they were domestic terrorists. And that's exactly what Trudeau
Speaker 1: and the woke liberals and Canada did. The villain was
Speaker 1: a truck driver, the working classman. And who was it
Speaker 1: on the other side that we're trying to squash them?
Speaker 1: It wasn't just Canada, was also Washington, an American journalist
Speaker 1: that quickly ascertained that these activists, surely they weren't really activists.
Speaker 1: They were more or less evil people. That deserved to
Speaker 1: go to jail. That's how they wanted this to be.
Speaker 1: The American media turned on them quickly. It even started
Speaker 1: in late night television and the monologues that took place,
Speaker 1: the monologues that they wanted to make sure every American heard,
Speaker 1: because they didn't want you to get any ideas that
Speaker 1: you should revolt in America like they did in Canada.
Speaker 1: Take a listen. Ottawa is being besieged by a group
Speaker 1: of anti do anything about COVID truckers called the freedom convoy,
Speaker 1: so called freedom convoy, so called freedom convoy. I love
Speaker 1: the so called freedom convoy. We're not even gonna call
Speaker 1: it the freedom convoy. We're gonna call it the so
Speaker 1: called freedom Convoy truckers. The police chief is calling it
Speaker 1: a nationwide insurrection driven by madness. This city is under siege.
Speaker 1: They are now calling it an occupation, a threat to democracy,
Speaker 1: an insurrection, sedition, sedition, insurrection, a threat to democracy. We've
Speaker 1: heard it called a nationwide insurrection. This is kind of
Speaker 1: our insurrection by airhorn moments. I think it's part of
Speaker 1: the globalization of Trump. Is a called yes it is.
Speaker 1: Residents say they feel like hostages there hasn't been as
Speaker 1: much violence as some had perhaps projected. I love this.
Speaker 1: There hasn't been as much violence as we were hoping for.
Speaker 1: But we'll still tell you these people are domestic terrorists
Speaker 1: and this is all Donald Trump's fault in Canada somehow.
Speaker 1: But that does not necessarily mean that it has been peaceful.
Speaker 1: Am I love this. It doesn't necessarily mean it's been peaceful.
Speaker 1: What there hasn't been violenced by the fault. It's been
Speaker 1: peaceful right there in Ottawa, they well, I love this right.
Speaker 1: This is America's media saying no, no, no, don't get
Speaker 1: any ideas, you Americans about what they're doing in Canada.
Speaker 1: Don't be inspired by that. We're going to tell you
Speaker 1: that they are they're terrorists, their domestic terrorists, that they
Speaker 1: are evil seditious people that are anti democracy people in Canada,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna lock them up. And you should know,
Speaker 1: don't be inspired by any of these people. Let's get
Speaker 1: over to number seven now on the list. Number seven
Speaker 1: involves something the media loves to do, and that deals
Speaker 1: with the issue of race baiting. Race baiting is something
Speaker 1: that the media always likes to bring up because it
Speaker 1: makes them look like they are somehow the do gooders,
Speaker 1: that they are the chosen ones to gate keep what
Speaker 1: is right and wrong. It's a moment for them to
Speaker 1: grandstand in the media and talk about how great they
Speaker 1: are compared to the rest of the country. They make
Speaker 1: sure that they get to highlight these important moments, right,
Speaker 1: these exciting moments, these very important moments that they desperately
Speaker 1: need from all of us to understand so that we
Speaker 1: can be better in the society with their list of virtues.
Speaker 1: Virtue signaling is extremely important to the media because without it,
Speaker 1: you may just actually think they're a bunch of liberal propagandists,
Speaker 1: state run media in essence, and that's exactly what they are.
Speaker 1: But hey, if we can change the narrative a little bit,
Speaker 1: then it can change everything. We just have to change
Speaker 1: that narrative a little bit to make it happen. Well,
Speaker 1: they saw an opportunity, an opportunity to not only race bate,
Speaker 1: but virtue signal all at the same time, and to
Speaker 1: tell you that America's Supreme Court was also somehow evil
Speaker 1: before a moment in time that they were about to celebrate. Now,
Speaker 1: you have to understand the last year undermining the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court was extremely important. The idea of packing the court,
Speaker 1: adding three new justices to switch it back from a
Speaker 1: conservative leaning court to a liberal leaning court instantly. By
Speaker 1: packing that court was a real thing that the media
Speaker 1: was trying to float with the Democratic Party. The Democrats
Speaker 1: are terrified of a conservative court for things like rov Waite,
Speaker 1: Title forty three. So you have to undermine that court,
Speaker 1: and you have to make sure that people hate the court.
Speaker 1: You have to make sure that there's no respect for
Speaker 1: the court. Now, if you can pull that off, there's
Speaker 1: going to be a very big victory. If you can
Speaker 1: pull this part of the agenda off, then you could
Speaker 1: possibly have the American people on your side to say,
Speaker 1: all right, yeah, you know what, screw it, let's throw
Speaker 1: three new Supreme Court justices on there. Let's pack the
Speaker 1: court because we don't believe that the current court is
Speaker 1: a good court. Now, you may say, how do they
Speaker 1: race bate on something like this? How is it possible
Speaker 1: for the media to race bate when we have African
Speaker 1: American and minorities on the Supreme Court. Clarence Thomas as
Speaker 1: an African American man representing the African American community on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, for decades. Now, this isn't some surprise.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows who Clarence Thomas is. Now. Remember, the true
Speaker 1: racism of the Democratic Party happened when they tried through
Speaker 1: Anita Hill to fabricate and makeup stories that he was
Speaker 1: the worst person in the world to make sure they
Speaker 1: kept that black man off the Supreme Court. That was
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party that did that. It was the Republican
Speaker 1: Party that nominated Clarence Thomas to be on the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court as an African American man. But if you're a Conservative,
Speaker 1: you're not a real black person. That's what the media
Speaker 1: wants you to understand. You're not a real black man.
Speaker 1: You're an Uncle Tom, You're a fake black person. We
Speaker 1: only count minorities. If you are a liberal, if you
Speaker 1: vote for us, the Democratic Party, if you back in
Speaker 1: support the media. Because if you're a conservative, in your
Speaker 1: black ben Carson, Clarence Thomas, the list goes on and on,
Speaker 1: you're not a real black man or a real black woman.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly why they lie to you and claimed.
Speaker 1: Then having a new Justice Kay b j who is
Speaker 1: going to be the new Ruth Vader Ginsburg right going
Speaker 1: to take the place in a big way with feminists
Speaker 1: and feminism and women and everything else. Well, they wanted
Speaker 1: to make sure you understood that she is a black woman.
Speaker 1: Finally we have a black person on the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: We already have one, Clarence Thomas, but they don't count him.
Speaker 1: Take a listen to this from the media. Have to
Speaker 1: call a black woman justice in America. She's going to
Speaker 1: be sitting there as a woman in her black skin,
Speaker 1: in a black robe, on the highest court in the land.
Speaker 1: I love this, a woman sitting in her black skin
Speaker 1: in a black robe. What if she doesn't. By the way,
Speaker 1: just throwing this out there for the transgendered all this
Speaker 1: crap happening. What if you don't identify as black? What
Speaker 1: if you are black, but you don't identify as being
Speaker 1: in the black skin. Isn't it pretty racist to imply
Speaker 1: that a black woman has to be black. You're just
Speaker 1: going to throw that out there because I have a
Speaker 1: feeling pretty soon we're gonna be having that debate in
Speaker 1: this country. They're gonna have to listen to a black
Speaker 1: woman talk to them in the Supreme Court. These white
Speaker 1: people in America, these white men, this is part of
Speaker 1: delegitimizing the Supreme Court, it gets worse, and finally there'll
Speaker 1: be people going in front of the court looking like
Speaker 1: me and seeing someone that looks like them. To all
Speaker 1: the colored girls who considered shaping justice when this system
Speaker 1: was not enough, this moment is ours. Let me just
Speaker 1: go ahead and speak for all black women in America
Speaker 1: today saying we are extremely proud. This was a step
Speaker 1: towards the court actually looking like a reflection of the
Speaker 1: country it oversees. It is a powerful symbol to look
Speaker 1: up on that court and see somebody that looks like you,
Speaker 1: that looks like you. Clarence tom looks like you. Nope,
Speaker 1: we don't count him. He's not a real black man.
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas is a black man, a black robe sitting
Speaker 1: on a court. Nope, we don't count him. That didn't
Speaker 1: apply there. African American men shouldn't be inspired by Clarence
Speaker 1: Thomas because he's not really a black guy. Now, for
Speaker 1: the first time in twenty twenty two, we've got a
Speaker 1: black person on the court. Well, that's not really true.
Speaker 1: Actually say him close to true. It doesn't matter. We
Speaker 1: don't count him. The media knew what they were doing
Speaker 1: when they were doing this, But this is part of
Speaker 1: the undermining and delegitimizing of a Supreme Court. That they
Speaker 1: really wanted just to pack the court. That's what they
Speaker 1: wanted here. They wanted to pack the court. That's how
Speaker 1: they wanted this to go down. You just pack that court.
Speaker 1: Game over. You pack that court, and we're good. You
Speaker 1: flip it quickly. Everybody gets excited that you flipped it.
Speaker 1: They understand why you needed to flip it, because it
Speaker 1: was a race this evil court before where evil white
Speaker 1: men wouldn't even wear masks. Story was alive. Notice that's
Speaker 1: two of the ten biggest stories of the year. We're
Speaker 1: actually attacking the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: And there's and I would even give the honorable mention
Speaker 1: to the other leak from the Supreme Court on Roe v. Wade.
Speaker 1: I would add that in there as an honorable mention
Speaker 1: or part of these stories where this leak comes out
Speaker 1: that they were gonna overturn Roe v. Wade. We still
Speaker 1: haven't found the leaker yet. You're telling me that the
Speaker 1: FBI and the DOJ can't find who the leaker was
Speaker 1: who tried to intimidate justices the way that they were
Speaker 1: trying to intimidate them. You're telling me that you can't
Speaker 1: find who this leaker was. I mean, you know it
Speaker 1: came from a liberal office, not a conservative office. You
Speaker 1: can't find this, Come on, you can't figure it out. Really,
Speaker 1: Or maybe it's just you guys didn't want to look.
Speaker 1: Maybe the person that did it was so brave in
Speaker 1: your opinion that you're like, we're not going to out them.
Speaker 1: No chance in hell we're going to out them. Why
Speaker 1: would we out them? That's not something we would ever do.
Speaker 1: You have to understand, none of the things that I'm
Speaker 1: mentioning right now are in fact accidents. All of the
Speaker 1: things I'm mentioned right now are things that were done deliberately, purposefully.
Speaker 1: Every single one of these things was something they decided
Speaker 1: and said, we are going to push this narrative. Let's
Speaker 1: move on to the next one on the list. Here,
Speaker 1: the media posts the Dobbs leak, which I mentioned a
Speaker 1: moment ago. We still haven't found the person that did it.
Speaker 1: Number six and the event that you were unaware America's
Speaker 1: sacred democracy was mere moments away from being lost. That's
Speaker 1: how the media wanted to report. January to six. Constitutional
Speaker 1: scholars were immediately brought out well. They claimed they were
Speaker 1: scholars to tell you that what just happened was a insurrection,
Speaker 1: the overthrowing of a government. They also wanted you to
Speaker 1: believe that everybody involved in January six, who didn't have firearms,
Speaker 1: who didn't have guns, was expertly trained, was well organized
Speaker 1: unit of highly discipline, maga's special forces that managed to
Speaker 1: locate the capital secret chamber of the scrolls and proceeded
Speaker 1: to read the Madison Manifesto from atop the dome while
Speaker 1: wearing a horned helmet. They wanted to believe you to
Speaker 1: believe that Donald Trump was the current emperor of America.
Speaker 1: They wanted you to believe that everybody in Congress narrowly
Speaker 1: escaped this evil day of insurrection, attack on our democracy.
Speaker 1: America's newspeople spent the last two years years reliving these moments,
Speaker 1: soberly warning new threats of insurrection and attacks on our
Speaker 1: democracy or everywhere. That's exactly what they did with a
Speaker 1: Canada story, the same words, the same verbiage. They also
Speaker 1: wanted you to believe that a righteous cause was happening,
Speaker 1: that surely you, as an American would understand that we
Speaker 1: need to hit pause in this country. And look at
Speaker 1: what happened and throw everybody that was involved in jail forever,
Speaker 1: maybe even kill them. We had that anonymous Supreme Court
Speaker 1: leak right of the draft Dabb's ruling. Now we're being told,
Speaker 1: in fact, a violent insurrection can sometimes be exactly what
Speaker 1: America needs when it comes to overthrowing a Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Across the media landscape came calls for political unrest. There
Speaker 1: were kill less of the addresses of Supreme Court justices
Speaker 1: that were put out. This was what an insurrection would
Speaker 1: look like. The White House refused to denounce the intimidation
Speaker 1: of Supreme Court justice at their homes. There was talk
Speaker 1: of violent rhetoric and imagery that the media have at
Speaker 1: other times blamed for many deaths, but in this case
Speaker 1: it was okay. It's amazing how different these two scenarios were,
Speaker 1: right in the media's eyes. And in one case, one
Speaker 1: trouble man became radicalized enough, in fact by the media
Speaker 1: to travel to Virginia for the express purpose of assassinating
Speaker 1: Justice Alito, who inspired him the media. But it isn't
Speaker 1: that that the media wanted to focus on. What I'll
Speaker 1: tell you is this is a perfect example of how hypocritical.
Speaker 1: The media is January sixth was the worst in American history,
Speaker 1: worst than nine to eleven. But when we decide to
Speaker 1: become insurrectionists, when we decide to overthrow the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: it's totally fine. None of this was done by accident.
Speaker 1: They knew what they were doing. They were putting out
Speaker 1: lies and propaganda to you on purpose. Didn't care if
Speaker 1: the story was a lie. They were trying to reshape
Speaker 1: things like the Supreme Court. A great example of this
Speaker 1: is just comparing and contrasting how they treated the January
Speaker 1: sixth story to the media's obsession with the League from
Speaker 1: the Dobbs decision, right where they were basically giving the
Speaker 1: marching orders to crazy Americans. Hey come kill some Republican
Speaker 1: justices and Rove Wade won't be overturned. Take a listen
Speaker 1: those way. We are not just at the brink of
Speaker 1: a civil war, but that one has already begun. The
Speaker 1: Mega Movement is a threat. This means war. That is
Speaker 1: where we are. We are at war with these people.
Speaker 1: These folks are evil. This is literally what conservative white
Speaker 1: folks do when they don't get their way. They turn violent.
Speaker 1: The extremists that we're dealing with every single day. We've
Speaker 1: got to kill and confront that movement. It is a
Speaker 1: danger to our democracy, it is a danger to our
Speaker 1: way of life. These crazy, deranged folks who want to
Speaker 1: import evil in every facet of our society. And this
Speaker 1: is why it could be more dangerous than eighteen sixty
Speaker 1: or the nineteen thirties. Clearly, you know this is literally
Speaker 1: call to arms. Call to arms, folks, this is literally
Speaker 1: a call to arms. So anyone that supported Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: you're an insurrectionist. You're a domestic terrorist. Now when we
Speaker 1: decide to overthrow the Supreme Court or give out the
Speaker 1: home addresses of Supreme Court justices so that you can
Speaker 1: go and off them, totally fine. But the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: wanted you to understand that anybody that supported Trump, anybody,
Speaker 1: even if you weren't there, even if you were in
Speaker 1: real time denouncing January the six, you're part of the
Speaker 1: domestic terrorists that should be spied on and most importantly
Speaker 1: should be silenced. That's what they wanted you to believe.
Speaker 1: That's the media when they do it, it's not an insurrection.
Speaker 1: When they advocate for the killing of Supreme Court justices
Speaker 1: they don't like that's not an insurrection. When they put
Speaker 1: out the lies, the big lies, and they are big
Speaker 1: lies that Gorstitch wouldn't even wear a mask, was trying
Speaker 1: to kill sodomayor to undermine the Supreme Court right, they
Speaker 1: won't even correct the story. NPRS like, we stand by
Speaker 1: our reporting. That's what we do. We stand by our reporting.
Speaker 1: This reporting is solid, that's reporting is good. That's reporting
Speaker 1: is exactly what we said it was going to be.
Speaker 1: This is the reporting, and we will not say that
Speaker 1: we were wrong, and we will not back down. Now
Speaker 1: there's no way to obviously fit top ten in one show,
Speaker 1: So tomorrow I'm going to give you the top five
Speaker 1: stories of the media purposely lied to you about that
Speaker 1: coming up tomorrow. Make sure you share this podcast. I
Speaker 1: hit that forward button, share with your family and friends,
Speaker 1: and I will have for you the top five tomorrow.
Speaker 1: So make sure you listen tomorrow's show as well. Please
Speaker 1: write us a five star review so that we reach
Speaker 1: more people on the charts as well, and I'll see
Speaker 1: you back here with our top five screw up to
Speaker 1: the media that tomorrow