Speaker 1: There's a lot of screw ups in the media over
Speaker 1: the last year, a lot of big stories they got wrong,
Speaker 1: a lot of stories that they wanted you to believe
Speaker 1: were true, and then they just moved on from them
Speaker 1: after they got busted getting it wrong. I used to
Speaker 1: believe it was a issue of getting it wrong. I
Speaker 1: no longer do. I think the media has been lying
Speaker 1: to us on purpose, deliberately misleading us, and deliberately lying
Speaker 1: to the American people on any number of different issues
Speaker 1: and or things, because honestly, why not why not lie
Speaker 1: to the American people? Why not just say, yeah, we're
Speaker 1: gonna mislead you with propaganda to influence you, to influence
Speaker 1: the elections. Now, the reason why I say this is
Speaker 1: being done deliberately is look at the Russian hoax, the
Speaker 1: Russian collusion story. Remember that story. They kept it alive
Speaker 1: for four years, and they knew for four years it
Speaker 1: was a lie. There are a lot of different stories.
Speaker 1: Let's go with COVID and the vaccines. They knew the
Speaker 1: vaccines were not going to stop you from getting COVID.
Speaker 1: They knew because people were getting COVID after getting vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and they still kept that lie going for almost two years.
Speaker 1: They also had data and whistleblowers that were saying things,
Speaker 1: for example, like the mask were pretty much worthless. It
Speaker 1: was data and doctors and different people saying that. But
Speaker 1: what do they do. They kept telling you, you're trying
Speaker 1: to kill everybody if you don't wear a mask. Why
Speaker 1: do they say it? It's called propaganda. What's scary is
Speaker 1: just how many stories in the last three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty five days, big stories and big scandals that they
Speaker 1: got wrong. And when I say they got them wrong,
Speaker 1: they knew they were getting them wrong. I don't think
Speaker 1: any of these stories that I'm about to list off
Speaker 1: for you they got wrong by accident. I believe that
Speaker 1: every one of these was done deliberately to mislead the
Speaker 1: American people. That's what I want you to understand. I
Speaker 1: don't think that the media is as stupid as I'm
Speaker 1: about to show you when I play these things to you.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that they are this incompetent. There's also
Speaker 1: another reason why I say this. I believe the biggest
Speaker 1: reason why I think they do this every single time,
Speaker 1: deliberately on purpose, to screw us, to manipulate us, is
Speaker 1: because it's always orchestrated. What I mean by that the
Speaker 1: media will constantly tell you something and it's not breaking
Speaker 1: news on one news channel, for example, it's across all
Speaker 1: of their mediums. It's on ABC, it's on NBC, it's
Speaker 1: on CBS, it's on MSNBC, it's on CNN. They do
Speaker 1: this in the New York Times and the Washington Posts.
Speaker 1: They do this over and over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: and it's everywhere at the exact same time. That's not
Speaker 1: by accident. If one reporter came out with some breaking
Speaker 1: news and they got duped by a source so they
Speaker 1: got it wrong, and other people didn't go with the
Speaker 1: news story, then it would be a different conversation. But
Speaker 1: all of this seems to be consistently orchestrated, and they
Speaker 1: seemed to say the exact same words. What do I
Speaker 1: mean by this, Well, let's give you the top ten
Speaker 1: list of the year of the biggest stories, the biggest lies,
Speaker 1: the biggest screw ups of the media. At number ten
Speaker 1: on my list, you may remember the media. They then
Speaker 1: claim they got duped by another anti Trump hoax. I
Speaker 1: don't believe for a second that it was an anti
Speaker 1: Trump hoax that got them. I think they created out
Speaker 1: of thin air. They wanted to believe this, and they figured,
Speaker 1: if we all go with it, then why not. Now?
Speaker 1: The story was a simple story. There was a report
Speaker 1: that came out that there were hours a seven hour
Speaker 1: call gap from January the six The White House, they said,
Speaker 1: was using burner phones, phones that you would throw away
Speaker 1: that no one knew about to communicate. They said there
Speaker 1: was a seven hour gap that was bigger than Nixon's
Speaker 1: erased tapes and Watergate, and then a scandal was borne
Speaker 1: out of thin air. The only problem was there was
Speaker 1: no missing phone calls. The media just wanted to attack
Speaker 1: the present. They saw January six as a major vulnerability
Speaker 1: and they said, let's run with it. Now. How did
Speaker 1: the media sound, Well, here they are in their own words,
Speaker 1: with this ridiculous lie to the American people. It still
Speaker 1: was damaging to Donald Trump, and it still pushed the
Speaker 1: January sixth committee narrative that they were trying to hide
Speaker 1: something and they were actually involved in an insurrection at
Speaker 1: the White House, the highest levels in orchestrating it behind
Speaker 1: the scenes on January the sixth, or seven hours of
Speaker 1: missing tape to prove it. Washington Post headline January six,
Speaker 1: White House logs give given the House show seven hour
Speaker 1: gap in Trump call. That's all they needed and everybody
Speaker 1: in the media ran with it. Seven hours makes the
Speaker 1: eighteen minutes of a raised Oval office taped around Watergate
Speaker 1: look like a game of patty cake. There appears to
Speaker 1: be in real cover up of who Trump was talking
Speaker 1: to while the mob was attacking and ransacking the Capitol.
Speaker 1: These White House records are not just incomplete, The gaps
Speaker 1: are just staggering and potentially willful omissions Trump where someone's
Speaker 1: administration appears to have actually tampered with the records. Tampered
Speaker 1: with the record. Did you hear this? We tampered with
Speaker 1: somebody in the White House, maybe even Donald Trump himself.
Speaker 1: They tampered with the records. Had no idea it was
Speaker 1: this big of a deal. Oh yes it is. The
Speaker 1: White House was burning, tapes were smashing, tapes, were ripping
Speaker 1: out pieces of paper and a phone log. This is
Speaker 1: worse than Watergate. Did this actually happen? No? Were they
Speaker 1: lying to you? Yeah? But don't worry. They kept going.
Speaker 1: It looks like he made a decision. I'm going to
Speaker 1: take this offline for the next seven and a half hours.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has acted like a mafia boss. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has allies whether they remove calls from the log where
Speaker 1: they made secret calls on burner phones, knew what they
Speaker 1: were doing was wrong and tried to hide it, simple
Speaker 1: as that, simple as that was. Any of this true? No,
Speaker 1: none of it was. Are we positive that this is
Speaker 1: a lie? Yes? Did the media have to come back
Speaker 1: and tell everybody, hey, we got it wrong. Well, some
Speaker 1: of the people in the media did actually say they
Speaker 1: got it wrong. January six committee started meeting, Republicans started
Speaker 1: going after them, and they had to correct their story.
Speaker 1: What did it sound like? Now? Not all of them
Speaker 1: went Prime Time to correct the Prime Time attack, claiming
Speaker 1: it was worse than Watergate. They did say it this
Speaker 1: way in the middle of the afternoon on CNN. The
Speaker 1: six pages of logs for January six are determined to
Speaker 1: be complete based on an official review of those White
Speaker 1: House records, so there are no missing pages and the
Speaker 1: seven hour gap is likely explained by the use of
Speaker 1: white House landlines, white house cell phones, and personal cell
Speaker 1: phones that don't go through a switchboard. There. It is
Speaker 1: all right, So we corrected the record. Now, we went
Speaker 1: for this story for days and days and days and weeks,
Speaker 1: and then we started trashing, saying people desire to go
Speaker 1: to jail. This is worse than Watergate. The media got
Speaker 1: it wrong, but it's fine, right, so we'll correct it
Speaker 1: after the damage has already been done. Did anybody get
Speaker 1: fired for this dubious blockbuster story? No? Was anybody in
Speaker 1: his career bothered or destroyed because of this reporting? No?
Speaker 1: Was there any official We apologize to our viewers and
Speaker 1: listeners for lying to you. No, none of that happened.
Speaker 1: Smith on to number nine. Number nine was a classic
Speaker 1: anonymous source. This time an anonymous source came from the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, and that one anonymous source told NPR, you
Speaker 1: know your tax dollars pay for that National Public Radio
Speaker 1: that the beautiful, loving kind suitd Justice Sodomi Orb was
Speaker 1: being bullied for political reasons. She was being forced to
Speaker 1: telework from home. Why because the evil Republican scumbag jack
Speaker 1: a Justice Gorcich refused to wear a mask to work.
Speaker 1: What made this story even worse is that she was
Speaker 1: immune compromised, and she had quite had quietly and politely
Speaker 1: requested that Gorshits wear a mask to work. But since
Speaker 1: he was a anti vaxer and a toolbag, a scumbag,
Speaker 1: an evil Republican man. Talking down to side of my Oar,
Speaker 1: he said, hell no, and you can work from home.
Speaker 1: You can tell a work. Now this story broke and
Speaker 1: there was only one anonymous source claiming to be at
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. Was the story true? No, it was
Speaker 1: a lie. Did anybody else try to verify the source
Speaker 1: or maybe just call side of my Oar's office directly
Speaker 1: or the Supreme Court for official comment. No. Instead, NPR
Speaker 1: went with the story. And once they went with the story,
Speaker 1: so did everybody else. Now the story turned out not
Speaker 1: to be true. And when they got in trouble for this,
Speaker 1: NPR was unfazed. NPR said they were quotes standing by
Speaker 1: their reporting, claiming that it was still true. Your taxpayer
Speaker 1: funded dollars went to this fake news story that the
Speaker 1: rest of the media was so excited to report. Take
Speaker 1: a list into how they did it on TV. Practically,
Speaker 1: anti mask insanity has now reached the highest court in
Speaker 1: the land. My first reaction was to think, what a
Speaker 1: mean spirited, almost ghoulish person Neil Gorsi Gorsage has the
Speaker 1: nerve to refuse to wear a mask indoors while seated
Speaker 1: next to his colleague who's vulnerable to possible death from
Speaker 1: a highly communicable disease. Neil Goulsitch's prioritizing his right to
Speaker 1: be a tool overprotecting Soniaso to male's life. That just
Speaker 1: seems ridiculous. Can you put a mask on serious lights
Speaker 1: so hard? Neil Gorsi's shame on you, Shame on you.
Speaker 1: Neil Gorsich are both a rotten coworker, dangerous to be
Speaker 1: near in a pandemic ston It's absolute worst. And here
Speaker 1: is a joint statement from so no listen, this all
Speaker 1: happens across all these networks, and the only people to actually,
Speaker 1: you know, ask the question was Fox News. The story
Speaker 1: got so out of control the Justice Sotomayor and Justice
Speaker 1: Gorgeous Gorsus had to put out a joint statement saying,
Speaker 1: this is this story is a lie. It's not true
Speaker 1: Sotomayor and Gorse reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked justice courses
Speaker 1: to where a mass surprised us. It is false. Well,
Speaker 1: we may sometimes disagree about the law. We are warm
Speaker 1: colleagues and friends, Ottawa is I mean, what else do
Speaker 1: you need from that? They have to put out a
Speaker 1: statement and the statement that they have to put out
Speaker 1: is a very clear and simple statement. Reporting that Justice
Speaker 1: Sotomayor asked Justice Gorse's to wear a mask surprised us.
Speaker 1: It is false. While we may sometimes disagree about the law,
Speaker 1: we are warm colleagues and friends. Did any of the
Speaker 1: networks that reported this story that you know, Justice Course
Speaker 1: is just some scumbag, evil person, did they correct it? No?
Speaker 1: They did not. Now why did this story happen? I'll
Speaker 1: tell you this was right around the time when Democrats
Speaker 1: were wanting to pack the court, So right around the
Speaker 1: time that they were leaking other stories or were about
Speaker 1: to leak other stories that Rov Wade was going to
Speaker 1: be overturned in an unprecedented way. Remember that they leaked
Speaker 1: out though what the decision was going to be and
Speaker 1: then put out a kill list for other people in
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court to kill them. And then the White
Speaker 1: House refused to condemn the protesters who were out there
Speaker 1: and the protesters that were going to the homes other
Speaker 1: conservative justices when they leaked it out of the Supreme Court. Now,
Speaker 1: as we in twenty twenty two, there's something else that
Speaker 1: happened that's really weird. You notice that the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: At this point, we don't know who the leaker was.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's because the FBI is spending too much time
Speaker 1: spying on Americans on Twitter or sending the account names
Speaker 1: of Twitter accounts they wanted to get rid of in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two to big Tech. Maybe that's because they're
Speaker 1: trying to silence conservatives like myself and put us on
Speaker 1: bandlifts or cannot find lists or cannot see them lists. Right,
Speaker 1: the list is pretty you know, long of what they've
Speaker 1: been trying to do. Maybe that's why all this is happening.
Speaker 1: Maybe they were trying to change the narratives so if
Speaker 1: they did in fact pack the court, they could justify
Speaker 1: it by saying, look at how evil Gorset is, look
Speaker 1: at how terrible Neil Gorsetch is, look at how corrupt
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is, and why you shouldn't respect it.
Speaker 1: These colleagues, these Republicans are trying to kill the Democrats
Speaker 1: on the court. And that's what they were saying the
Speaker 1: entire time. That's the whole ballgame here, folks, like that's it,
Speaker 1: That's what this is. So maybe that's what this story
Speaker 1: is actually all about. Right, Maybe this is the whole
Speaker 1: goal to undermine our institutions on purpose. And if you
Speaker 1: don't have to correct the story, then it's a pretty
Speaker 1: big win, isn't it. This is what victory for them
Speaker 1: looks like, even while they're in defeat. It's pretty brilliant
Speaker 1: if you ask me. Let's move on to the next
Speaker 1: story on the list, and that involves the truckers. You
Speaker 1: may remember in Canada, it was time to smash the
Speaker 1: working class revolt. It was time to make sure that
Speaker 1: we turned truckers who refuse to get vaccinated, who were
Speaker 1: sitting in their own truck by themselves, driving keeping a
Speaker 1: country to working and going with supply chain issues, like
Speaker 1: they were domestic terrorists. And that's exactly what Trudeau and
Speaker 1: the woke liberals in Canada did. The villain was a
Speaker 1: truck driver, the working classman. And who was it on
Speaker 1: the other side that we're trying to squash them? It
Speaker 1: wasn't just Canada, was also Washington, an American journalist that
Speaker 1: quickly ascertained that these activists, surely they weren't really activists.
Speaker 1: They were more or less evil people that deserve to
Speaker 1: go to jail. That's how they wanted this to be.
Speaker 1: The American media turned on them quickly. It even started
Speaker 1: in late night television and the monologues that took place,
Speaker 1: the monologues that they wanted to make sure every American
Speaker 1: heard because they didn't want you to get any ideas
Speaker 1: that you should revolt in America like they did in Canada.
Speaker 1: Take a listen. Ottawa is being besieged by a group
Speaker 1: of anti do anything about COVID truckers called the freedom convoy,
Speaker 1: a so called freedom convoy, so called freedom convoy. I
Speaker 1: love it. So called freedom convoy. We're not even gonna
Speaker 1: call it the freedom convoy. We're gonna call it these
Speaker 1: so called freedom convoy, the truckers. The police chief is
Speaker 1: calling it a nationwide insurrection driven by madness. This city
Speaker 1: is under siege. They are now calling it an occupation,
Speaker 1: a threat to democracy, an insurrection, sedition, sedition, insurrection, a
Speaker 1: threat to democracy. We've heard it called a nationwide insurrection.
Speaker 1: This is kind of our insurrection by airhorn momenticus. I
Speaker 1: think it's part of the globalization of Trump. Is a
Speaker 1: called yes it is. Residents say they feel like hostages.
Speaker 1: There hasn't been as much violence as some had perhaps projected.
Speaker 1: I love this. There hasn't been as much violence as
Speaker 1: we were hoping for, but we'll still tell you these
Speaker 1: people are domestic terrorists and this is all Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: fault in Canada somehow, But that does not necessarily mean
Speaker 1: that it has been peaceful alarming. I love this, It
Speaker 1: doesn't necessarily mean it's been peaceful. What there hasn't been
Speaker 1: violence by the fault, it's been peaceful, right or an
Speaker 1: autowork they well, I love this, right. This is America's
Speaker 1: media saying no, no, no, don't get any ideas, you
Speaker 1: Americans about what they're doing in Canada. Don't be inspired
Speaker 1: by that. We're going to tell you that they are
Speaker 1: they're terrorists, they're domestic terrorists, that they are evil seditious
Speaker 1: people that are anti democracy people in Canada and we're
Speaker 1: gonna lock them up. And you should know, don't be
Speaker 1: inspired by any of these people. Let's get over to
Speaker 1: number seven now on the list. Number seven involved something
Speaker 1: the media loves to do, and that deals with the
Speaker 1: issue of race baiting. Race baiting is something that the
Speaker 1: media always likes to bring up because it makes them
Speaker 1: look like they are somehow the do gooders, that they
Speaker 1: are the chosen ones to gate keep what is right
Speaker 1: and wrong. It's a moment for them to grandstand in
Speaker 1: the media and talk about how great they are compared
Speaker 1: to the rest of the country. They make sure that
Speaker 1: they get to highlight these important moments, right, these exciting moments,
Speaker 1: these very important moments that they desperately need from all
Speaker 1: of us to understand so that we can be better
Speaker 1: in the society. With their list of virtues. Virtue signaling
Speaker 1: is extremely important to the media because without it you
Speaker 1: may just actually think they're a bunch of liberal propagandists,
Speaker 1: state run media in essence, and that's exactly what they are.
Speaker 1: But hey, if we can change the narrative a little bit,
Speaker 1: then it can change everything. We just have to change
Speaker 1: that narrative a little bit to make it happen. Well,
Speaker 1: they saw an opportunity, an opportunity to not only race, batement,
Speaker 1: virtue signal all at the same time, and to tell
Speaker 1: you that America's Supreme Court was also somehow evil before
Speaker 1: a moment in time that they were about to celebrate. Now,
Speaker 1: you have to understand the last year undermining the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court was extremely important. The idea of packing the court,
Speaker 1: adding three new justices to switch it back a conservative
Speaker 1: leaning court to a liberal leaning court instantly. By packing
Speaker 1: that court was a real thing that the media was
Speaker 1: trying to float with the Democratic Party. The Democrats are
Speaker 1: terrified of a conservative court for things like rov Waite,
Speaker 1: Title forty three. So you have to undermine that court,
Speaker 1: and you have to make sure that people hate the court.
Speaker 1: You have to make sure that there's no respect for
Speaker 1: the court. Now, if you can pull that off, there's
Speaker 1: going to be a very big victory. If you can
Speaker 1: pull this part of the agenda off, then you could
Speaker 1: possibly have the American people on your side to say,
Speaker 1: all right, yeah, you know what, screw it, Let's throw
Speaker 1: three new Supreme Court justice on there. Let's pack the
Speaker 1: court because we don't believe that the current court is
Speaker 1: a good court. Now, you may say, how do they
Speaker 1: race bate on something like this? How is it possible
Speaker 1: for the media to race bate when we have African
Speaker 1: American and minorities on the Supreme Court. Clarence Thomas as
Speaker 1: an African American man representing the African American community on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court for decades. Now, this isn't some surprise.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows who Clarence Thomas is now. Remember the true
Speaker 1: racism of the Democratic Party happened when they tried through
Speaker 1: Anita Hill to fabricate and makeup stories that he was
Speaker 1: the worst person in the world to make sure they
Speaker 1: kept that black man off the Supreme Court. That was
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party that did that. It was the Republican
Speaker 1: Party that nominated Clarence Thomas to be on the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court as an African American man. But if you're a Conservative,
Speaker 1: you're not a real black person. That's what the media
Speaker 1: wants you to understand. You're not a real black man.
Speaker 1: You're an uncle Tom, You're a fake black person. We
Speaker 1: only count minorities. If you are a liberal, if you
Speaker 1: vote for us the Democratic Party, if you back in
Speaker 1: support the media, because if you're a conservative in you're black,
Speaker 1: Ben Carson, Clarence Thomas, the list goes on and on.
Speaker 1: You're not a real black man or a real black woman.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly why they lie to you and claimed.
Speaker 1: Then having a new Justice Kay b j who is
Speaker 1: going to be the new Ruth Bader Ginsburg right going
Speaker 1: to take the place in a big way. With feminists
Speaker 1: and feminism and women and everything else, well, they wanted
Speaker 1: to make sure you understood that she is a black woman. Finally,
Speaker 1: we have a black person on the Supreme Court. We
Speaker 1: already have one, Clarence Thomas, but they don't count him.
Speaker 1: Take a listen to this from the media. Have to
Speaker 1: call a black woman justice in America. She's going to
Speaker 1: be sitting there as a woman in her black skin,
Speaker 1: in a black robe, on the highest court in the lane.
Speaker 1: I love this, a woman sitting in her black skin
Speaker 1: in a black robe. What if she doesn't. By the way,
Speaker 1: just throwing this out there for the transgendered all this
Speaker 1: crap happening. What if you don't identify as black? What
Speaker 1: if you are black but you don't identify as being
Speaker 1: in the black skin? Isn't it pretty racist to imply
Speaker 1: that a black woman has to be black. You're just
Speaker 1: going to throw that out there because I have a
Speaker 1: feeling pretty soon we're gonna be having that debate in
Speaker 1: this country. They're gonna have to listen to a black
Speaker 1: woman talk to them on the Supreme Court. These white
Speaker 1: people in America, these white men, this is part of
Speaker 1: delegitimizing the Supreme Court. It gets worse, and finally there'll
Speaker 1: be people going in front of the court looking like
Speaker 1: me and seeing someone that looks like that, to all
Speaker 1: the colored girls who considered shaping justice when this system
Speaker 1: was not enough, this moment is ours. Let me just
Speaker 1: go ahead and speak for all black women in America
Speaker 1: today saying we are extremely proud. This was a step
Speaker 1: towards the court actually looking like a reflection of the
Speaker 1: country it oversees. It is a powerful symbol to look
Speaker 1: up on that court and see somebody that looks like you.
Speaker 1: It looks like you. Clarence Thomas looks like you. Nope,
Speaker 1: he we don't count him. He's not a real black man.
Speaker 1: And Clarence Thomas is a black man, a black robe
Speaker 1: sitting on a court. No, we don't count him. That
Speaker 1: didn't apply there. African American men shouldn't be inspired by
Speaker 1: Clarence Thomas because he's not really a black guy. Now,
Speaker 1: for the first time in twenty twenty two, we've got
Speaker 1: a black person on the court. Well, that's not really true. Actually,
Speaker 1: it's not him close to true. It doesn't matter. We
Speaker 1: don't count him. The media knew what they were doing
Speaker 1: when they were doing this, But this is part of
Speaker 1: the undermining and delegitimizing of a Supreme Court that they
Speaker 1: really wanted just to pack the court. That's what they
Speaker 1: wanted here. They wanted to pack the court. That's how
Speaker 1: they wanted this to go down. You just pack that court.
Speaker 1: Game over. You pack that court, and we're good. You
Speaker 1: flip it quickly. Everybody gets excited that you flipped it.
Speaker 1: They understand why you needed to flip it because it
Speaker 1: was a racist, evil court before where evil white men
Speaker 1: wouldn't even and wear masks. Story was alive. Notice that's
Speaker 1: two of the ten biggest stories of the year. We're
Speaker 1: actually attacking the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: And there's and I would even give the honorable mention
Speaker 1: to the other leak from the Supreme Court on Roe v. Wade.
Speaker 1: I would add that in there as an honorable mention
Speaker 1: or part of these stories where this leak comes out
Speaker 1: that they were gonna overturn Roe v. Wade. We still
Speaker 1: haven't found the leaker yet. You're telling me that the
Speaker 1: FBI and the DOJ can't find who the leaker was
Speaker 1: who tried to intimidate justices the way that they were
Speaker 1: trying to intimidate them. You're telling me that you can't
Speaker 1: find who this leaker was. I mean, you know it
Speaker 1: came from a liberal office on a conservative office. You
Speaker 1: can't find this, Come on, you can't figure it out, really,
Speaker 1: Or maybe it's just you guys didn't want to look.
Speaker 1: Maybe the person that did it was so brave in
Speaker 1: your opinion that you're like, we're not going to out them.
Speaker 1: No chance in hell we're going to out them. Why
Speaker 1: would we out them? That's not something we would ever do.
Speaker 1: You have to understand, none of the things that I'm
Speaker 1: mentioning right now are in fact accidents. All of the
Speaker 1: things I'm mentioned right now are things that were done deliberately, purposefully.
Speaker 1: Every single one of these things was something they decided
Speaker 1: and said, we are going to push this narrative. Let's
Speaker 1: move on to the next one on the list. Here,
Speaker 1: the media posts the Dobbs leak, which I mentioned a
Speaker 1: moment ago. We still haven't found the person that did it.
Speaker 1: Number six and the event that you were unaware America's
Speaker 1: sacred democracy was mere moments away from being lost. That's
Speaker 1: how the media wanted to report. January to six. Constitutional
Speaker 1: scholars were immediately brought out, well, they claimed they were
Speaker 1: scholars to tell you that what just happened was a insurrection,
Speaker 1: the overthrowing of a government. They also wanted you to
Speaker 1: believe that everybody involved in January six, who didn't have firearms,
Speaker 1: who didn't have guns, was expertly trained, was well organized
Speaker 1: unit of highly discipline Magus special forces that managed to
Speaker 1: locate the capital secret chamber of the scrolls and proceeded
Speaker 1: to read the Madison Manifesto from atop the dome while
Speaker 1: wearing a horned helmet. They wanted to believe you to
Speaker 1: believe that Donald Trump was the current emperor of America.
Speaker 1: They wanted you to believe that everybody in Congress narrowly
Speaker 1: escaped this evil day of insurrection, attack on our democracy.
Speaker 1: America's newspeople has spent the last two years reliving these moments,
Speaker 1: soberly warning new threats of insurrection and attacks on our
Speaker 1: democracy or everywhere. That's exactly what they did with a
Speaker 1: Canada story, the same words, the same verbiage. They also
Speaker 1: wanted you to believe that a righteous cause was happening,
Speaker 1: that surely you, as an American would understand that we
Speaker 1: need to hit pause in this country and look at
Speaker 1: what happened and throw everybody that was involved in jail forever,
Speaker 1: maybe even kill them. We had that anonymous Supreme Court
Speaker 1: leak right of the draft Dabb's ruling. Now we're being told,
Speaker 1: in fact, a violent insurrection can sometimes be exactly what
Speaker 1: America needs when it comes to overthrowing a Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Across the media landscape came calls for political unrest. There
Speaker 1: were kill less of the addresses of Supreme Court justices
Speaker 1: that were put out. This was what an insurrection would
Speaker 1: look like. The White House refused to denounce the intimidation
Speaker 1: of Supreme Court justice at their homes. There was talk
Speaker 1: of violent rhetoric and imagery that the media have at
Speaker 1: other times blamed for many deaths, but in this case
Speaker 1: it was okay. It's amazing how different these two scenarios
Speaker 1: were right in the media's eyes. And in one case,
Speaker 1: one trouble man became radicalized enough, in fact by the
Speaker 1: media to travel to Virginia for the express purpose of
Speaker 1: assassinating Justice Alito, who inspired him the media. But it
Speaker 1: isn't that that the media wanted to focus on. What
Speaker 1: I'll tell you is this is a perfect example of
Speaker 1: how hypocritical the media is. January sixth was the worst
Speaker 1: in American history worst than nine to eleven. But when
Speaker 1: we decide to become insurrectionists, when we decide to overthrow
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, it's totally fine. None of this was
Speaker 1: done by accident. They knew what they were doing. They
Speaker 1: were putting out lies and propaganda to you on purpose.
Speaker 1: Didn't care if this story was a lie. They were
Speaker 1: trying to reshape things like the Supreme Court. A great
Speaker 1: example of this is just comparing and contrasting how they
Speaker 1: treated the January sixth story to the media's obsession with
Speaker 1: the League from the Dabbs decision, right where they were
Speaker 1: basically giving the marching orders to crazy Americans. Hey, come
Speaker 1: kill some Republican justices, and Roe v. Wade won't be overturned.
Speaker 1: Take a listen to way. We are not just at
Speaker 1: the brink of a civil war, but that one has
Speaker 1: already begun. The Mega Movement is a threat. This means war.
Speaker 1: That is where we are. We are at war with
Speaker 1: these people. These folks are evil. This is literally what
Speaker 1: conservative white folks do when they don't get their way.
Speaker 1: They turned violent. The extremists that we're do with every
Speaker 1: single day. We've got to kill and confront that movement.
Speaker 1: It is a danger to our democracy, It is a
Speaker 1: danger to our way of life. These crazy, deranged folks
Speaker 1: who want to import evil in every facet of our society.
Speaker 1: And this is why it could be more dangerous than
Speaker 1: eighteen sixty or the nineteen thirties. Clearly, you know this
Speaker 1: is literally call to arms. Call to arms, folks, this
Speaker 1: is literally a call to arms. So anyone that supported
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, you're an insurrectionist. You're a domestic terrorist. Now
Speaker 1: when we decide to overthrow the Supreme Court or give
Speaker 1: out the home addresses of Supreme Court justices so that
Speaker 1: you can go and off them, totally fine. But the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party wanted you to understand that anybody that supported Trump, anybody,
Speaker 1: even if you weren't there, even if you were in
Speaker 1: real time denouncing January the six, you're part of the
Speaker 1: domestic terrorists that should be spied on and most importantly
Speaker 1: should be silenced. That's what they wanted you to believe.
Speaker 1: That's the media when they do it, it's not an insurrection.
Speaker 1: When they advocate for the killing of Supreme Court justices
Speaker 1: they don't like, that's not an insurrection. When they put
Speaker 1: out the lies, the big lies, and they are big
Speaker 1: lies that Gore Stitch wouldn't even wear a mask, was
Speaker 1: trying to kill Sodomay or to undermine the Supreme Court. Right.
Speaker 1: They won't even correct the story. NPRS like, we stand
Speaker 1: by our reporting. That's what we do. We stand by
Speaker 1: our reporting. This reporting is solid, that's reporting is good,
Speaker 1: that's reporting is exactly what we said it was going
Speaker 1: to be. This is the reporting, and we will not
Speaker 1: say that we were wrong, and we will not back down.
Speaker 1: All Right, before I get to number five on this list,
Speaker 1: if you want to listen to ten through six that's
Speaker 1: in yesterday's podcast, go back, listen to those stories. They're incredible.
Speaker 1: I just gave you a quick recap, But if you
Speaker 1: want to hear the media and everything they were doing,
Speaker 1: make sure you download our podcasts from yesterday. Now let's
Speaker 1: get into number five. Remember when the media blamed us
Speaker 1: for the hot weather in July. Now you look around,
Speaker 1: we have record cold temperatures right now. Right if we're
Speaker 1: global warming, you would assume it wouldn't be freezing as
Speaker 1: it is across the country this December. But hey, in July,
Speaker 1: when it's supposed to actually be hot, the media said
Speaker 1: it's our fault. That everything is so hot. It's our
Speaker 1: fault that everything is so bad. It's our fault that
Speaker 1: it is people are hurting out there with the temperatures
Speaker 1: of July. It comes to heat waves. Climate duxpert say,
Speaker 1: this is not just summer being summer. This is not
Speaker 1: your parents or grandparents. Whether this is new weather that
Speaker 1: we're experiencing because the climate change, well we have right now,
Speaker 1: scientists say the attribution to this rapid rise in temperatures
Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions. It's us is learning about extreme heat,
Speaker 1: which unfortunately is getting worse because of climate change. We're
Speaker 1: certainly seeing more extreme weather due to climate change. This
Speaker 1: is what scientis have been telling us the future looks like,
Speaker 1: except it is now temperatures far above what was once
Speaker 1: considered the summer norm, inflicting misery and creating a health
Speaker 1: danger for millions. We can't cool the back down again,
Speaker 1: at least not easily, but we can prevent further warming
Speaker 1: if we reduce greenest gas emissions to zero rapidly. Hear, so,
Speaker 1: when it's hot, this is what happens. When it's hot,
Speaker 1: it's our fault. When it's cold, we'll shut up about it.
Speaker 1: Right now, it's cold, it can't be global warming, so
Speaker 1: we'll just move on. But the media blamed us for
Speaker 1: the hot weather. This is not your grandparents warm summer. No,
Speaker 1: this is your fault for this, right, This is all
Speaker 1: your fault that this happened. There you go. Let's move
Speaker 1: on to number four on the list, and that is
Speaker 1: the media freaking out. Spend the last year working on
Speaker 1: a commission to investigate a two hour riot that took
Speaker 1: place on January the six of twenty twenty one. A
Speaker 1: lot of people forget that the Democrats actually brought in
Speaker 1: members of the media to volunteer their services as carnival
Speaker 1: barkers to help attract a big audience in prime time. Now,
Speaker 1: you may remember that the media came out and said
Speaker 1: that January sixth, the insurrection of two hours was worse
Speaker 1: than nine to eleven. You may not realize the commission
Speaker 1: was rigged from the very beginning, and you may not
Speaker 1: realize they actually hired people in TV to arrange for
Speaker 1: the meetings to be televised in prime time. Democrats had
Speaker 1: a whole calm team the media that volunteered for service
Speaker 1: as carnival barkers helped attract an audience to their prime
Speaker 1: time propaganda. So why did Congress spend so much time
Speaker 1: and money on the political unrest of January the sixth,
Speaker 1: while ignoring what was actually happening in this country on
Speaker 1: real issues like I don't know, inflation, rising interest rates,
Speaker 1: major problems that we were having in the markets. They
Speaker 1: were spending time going after January six issues instead of
Speaker 1: actually protecting you as a consumer from Wells Fargo or
Speaker 1: from XTF. And why did it happen this way? It's
Speaker 1: pretty simple, because it's all about convincing you that the
Speaker 1: Republican Party is the worst party in the world and
Speaker 1: they should be banned because we have to protect our democracy.
Speaker 1: Here's how they did the nine to eleven aka January
Speaker 1: six hearings on TV last night. They were searing, they
Speaker 1: were vivid. This is very compelling television because it's a
Speaker 1: very compelling hearing. It was compelling, it was chilling. The
Speaker 1: videos for chilling, and it was I think it's going
Speaker 1: to be historic. This was a historic hearing. It's compelling,
Speaker 1: it's must CTV. We've seen all eight episodes through Thursday.
Speaker 1: Season finale of the hearings. Wasn't a cliffhanger for you
Speaker 1: in any way? It almost felt as if it was
Speaker 1: like the series finale. At one Pointless Cheney said, stay
Speaker 1: tuned for September, which is like season two. We thought
Speaker 1: this was the season finale. Everybody's like, come back for war. No,
Speaker 1: everybody's like comeback for more. So we've turned Congress into
Speaker 1: a Netflix documentary that you can binge watch. Now. These
Speaker 1: aren't blunders. That's the point I want to make to you.
Speaker 1: Many would say, oh, they're screw ups. No, they were deliberate,
Speaker 1: they were on purpose, and it was one hundred percent propaganda.
Speaker 1: It was important propaganda for them. They wanted to make
Speaker 1: sure that you believe the propaganda that they were pushing
Speaker 1: out there. A great example of that is when the
Speaker 1: FBI came under scrutiny. The FBI came under scrutiny, as
Speaker 1: we now know, for cooking the books against conservative silence,
Speaker 1: seeing conservatives, monitoring conservatives, listening to conservatives, and censoring them online.
Speaker 1: We know this for a fact now from the Twitter files.
Speaker 1: They want you to believe. No, No No, that's a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: It's not. It's the truth. Was the FBI cooking the
Speaker 1: books against conservatives for a long time, including Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and others, you better believe it. But don't worry. The
Speaker 1: FBI has also the utmost integrity. You can't question the FBI.
Speaker 1: That's what the media said all year long, which brings
Speaker 1: me to number three on our list. What happens if
Speaker 1: you're an American and you decide to ask some questions
Speaker 1: about the FBI rating the home of a sitting president
Speaker 1: in Donald Trump. Does that mean that you're an American?
Speaker 1: Does that mean that you're an evil person? Does that
Speaker 1: mean you're an insurrectionist? Well, if you listen to the
Speaker 1: media and how they handled the raid on Donald Trump's home,
Speaker 1: something they decided to do to him, but they've never
Speaker 1: done any other present history, and they certainly didn't do
Speaker 1: it to Hillary Clinton with her server and her basement
Speaker 1: with classified documents. But if you even question, you even
Speaker 1: think of asking a question about what just happened with
Speaker 1: the president's home being rated, Donald Trump's home being rated,
Speaker 1: they are going to immediately turn on you. Take a
Speaker 1: list into how the media handled this shocking moment in
Speaker 1: American history. Oh man, there was no raid on your home,
Speaker 1: a peaceful search that they gave them a heads up
Speaker 1: on it. Peaceful search. I don't think there was any
Speaker 1: politics involved. This appears to be a non partisan process.
Speaker 1: The Justice Department is returning to its historical position as
Speaker 1: a law enforcement agency above politics, trying to do the
Speaker 1: right thing. He's a tax on. The FBI are just
Speaker 1: very sort of out there and outletting. That's why we
Speaker 1: have law enforcement to actually bring fascists to justice. It's
Speaker 1: all legal, it's all lawful. It's not a raid. They
Speaker 1: didn't know, they're not they're improperly or unlawfully. Because anybody
Speaker 1: on this set had done the same thing, the exact
Speaker 1: same result would have occurred. Yeah, you remember with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and the rate on mar Lago. This is normal,
Speaker 1: this is everything, and everybody else that would have done
Speaker 1: something like this. This is exactly what I got what happened,
Speaker 1: all right, So I'll take the bait. Hillary Clinton did
Speaker 1: a help a lot more than this. She had a
Speaker 1: private server in her basement. She had classified documents by
Speaker 1: the thousands on a server that anybody could break into
Speaker 1: anyone anywhere in the world. And there was classified documents
Speaker 1: found on Uma Aberdeen's computer. We know that from the FBI.
Speaker 1: We know that. Then when she was asked to turn
Speaker 1: over they started literally bleaching the phones, smashing the phones,
Speaker 1: the blackberries, and bleaching the servers of her emails and
Speaker 1: that server that in the computers that were involved. Did
Speaker 1: anybody freak out? Did anybody go to jail? Did anybody's
Speaker 1: home get rated? Just asking? I think it's a fair
Speaker 1: question to ask, right, there was a lot that happened.
Speaker 1: Anybody want to discuss it? Anybody want to talk about it? Well,
Speaker 1: I mean again, if you listen to the the media, they
Speaker 1: say this was normal. Anybody that would have done this
Speaker 1: would have been rated. Okay. Were people rated that committed
Speaker 1: Hainah's crimes like Hillary Clinton? No, they were not rated.
Speaker 1: And why because their name is Hillary Clinton? And we
Speaker 1: know that if your name is Hillary Clinton, there will
Speaker 1: not be anything that happens to you, and you can
Speaker 1: do whatever the hell you want. The FPI is not
Speaker 1: going to raid your home. They also want you to
Speaker 1: believe that what Donald Trump did was so unprecedented that
Speaker 1: that absolutely warrnted a raid on a former president. That's
Speaker 1: also a lie. It is unprecedented to raid the President
Speaker 1: Unitates of America's home. Why did this happen? For one reason?
Speaker 1: This was about the swamp. That's what this was about
Speaker 1: the entire time. This was about silencing and shutting up
Speaker 1: the swamp. That excuse me, This was about the swamp
Speaker 1: silencing and shutting up a present that actually decided to
Speaker 1: challenge them to expose them. As soon as he said
Speaker 1: he wanted to drain the swamp, the swamp said, wat's this?
Speaker 1: And that was the FBI. The FBI said, get ready,
Speaker 1: because we're about to own you. Get ready because we're
Speaker 1: going to shut you down forever. We're gonna get you arrested,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get you charged with crimes. We're gonna make
Speaker 1: it where you can't even be president. How dare you
Speaker 1: ever question the deep state? We're now going to own
Speaker 1: you forever. That's what this was. And they wanted you
Speaker 1: to believe that this was normal, that this was business
Speaker 1: as usual. This is, by the way, total crap. It's
Speaker 1: not normal to rate a former president. And if anybody
Speaker 1: was going to get rated for committing crimes, it should
Speaker 1: have been Hillary Clinton. We know there were thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of emails that she deleted. We know that she
Speaker 1: instructed her staff to destroy blackberries. We know that they
Speaker 1: bleached the servers to make sure that no one could
Speaker 1: ever see what was on there, and no one went
Speaker 1: to jail, no one got rated. There was never a
Speaker 1: knock on the door or knocking down of a door.
Speaker 1: There was nothing that ever happened to Hillary Clinton. There
Speaker 1: was no raid, by the way, on Hunter Biden's home.
Speaker 1: There was no raid on Hunter Biden's offices, there was
Speaker 1: no raid on James Biden's offices. None of what happened
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump is happening to people that have actually
Speaker 1: committed crimes. And we know that Hunter Biden's committed crimes.
Speaker 1: He documented his own crimes from the laptop from hell.
Speaker 1: Did anybody go busting down those doors? Hell? No, Why
Speaker 1: because he's a Democrat and the media sits there and
Speaker 1: they tell you, oh, well, you know, everything's good. This
Speaker 1: is you know, what happened with Donald Trump is something
Speaker 1: that is just You should understand that they had to go.
Speaker 1: They had no choice but to go. This is too
Speaker 1: important not to go. But that's not the only thing
Speaker 1: that the media did this year. And again this isn't
Speaker 1: by accident. This is what you call propaganda. Now, before
Speaker 1: I get into anymore the insanity of these people on
Speaker 1: the left that attack conservatives, I want to tell you
Speaker 1: real quick about Legacy Precious Metals. You know what's happening
Speaker 1: with inflation, you know what's happening with people now talking
Speaker 1: about the idea of recession. You know what's happening with
Speaker 1: supply chain issues, and you know what's been happening with
Speaker 1: your retirement account. If you are not diversified with part
Speaker 1: of your financial strategy involving precious metals, now is the
Speaker 1: time to call the people that I use and trust,
Speaker 1: Legacy Precious Metals. You can get the free Investor's Guide
Speaker 1: on gold and silver, precious metal investing and how to
Speaker 1: diversify your portfolio. We have seen that they want to
Speaker 1: raise taxes. We are seeing a skyrocketing of our national debt,
Speaker 1: and if your retirement is in only investments that are
Speaker 1: directly connected to the market, you need to take a
Speaker 1: look at Legacy Precious Metals. Call and get the free
Speaker 1: investors guide right now from them one eight sixty six
Speaker 1: seven five one twenty two eighteen. That's one eight six
Speaker 1: six seven five one twenty two eighteen, or online at
Speaker 1: Legacy PM Investments. It's Legacy PM investments dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: let's move on to number two on our list. One
Speaker 1: of the other big stories. Was the media just flat
Speaker 1: out getting it wrong, bulldozing true journalism in a race
Speaker 1: to exploit the Colorado tragedy. Now you it's not. This
Speaker 1: is a horrific event that happened in Colorado Springs and
Speaker 1: the club queue killings there, but the media couldn't wait
Speaker 1: to make this a big issue politically, to seize firearms
Speaker 1: and to claim that somehow this is conservatives that were
Speaker 1: involved in Conservatives did this when that wasn't the case
Speaker 1: at all. Listen to the media try to exploit this
Speaker 1: horrific tragedy to push a political agenda and a narrative.
Speaker 1: There are five dead people in a strip mall because
Speaker 1: that was the only place they felt safe as gay
Speaker 1: or trans people in this town in Colorado Springs. I
Speaker 1: think that the Santis Bobert, they have blood on their
Speaker 1: hands on this. These bodies are not in the ground
Speaker 1: yet and they're being used as political props right now.
Speaker 1: When you demonize someone to that extent and you make
Speaker 1: them feel like an existential threat to you and your children,
Speaker 1: it's no wonder again that we get this kind of violence,
Speaker 1: this exact same language of grooming and pedophilia, targeting the
Speaker 1: LGBTQ community. It kills, and I'm just wondering, what can
Speaker 1: I have done different? Seriously, as reporters, what can we
Speaker 1: do different? I think we have to have a come
Speaker 1: to Jesus moment here as reporters. There is no inward
Speaker 1: reflection here. It's just, you know, continue to use these
Speaker 1: people as props continues, the grief of these people as props.
Speaker 1: I think as reporters, we're going to look in here
Speaker 1: and double down as much as we did. We got
Speaker 1: to double down. Oh okay, there we go. We gotta
Speaker 1: double down because we need to push a narrative. Was
Speaker 1: a shooter conservative? No? Was a shooter inspired by de Santists?
Speaker 1: No or Bobert. No was a shooter there to a
Speaker 1: conservative maga guide to do what he did? No? Does
Speaker 1: that matter? No? Because they hate the Scantists, Right. This
Speaker 1: guy's a threat to the Democratic Party. This is a
Speaker 1: guy that's become very popular by making sure that he
Speaker 1: protects the citizens and the rights of its citizens and
Speaker 1: his date. And so they decide to connect a horrific
Speaker 1: tragedy to run descentis who had nothing to do with
Speaker 1: this tragedy, had not a single thing to do with
Speaker 1: This tragedy doesn't matter though, folks, because this is how
Speaker 1: we roll. We are the media. We get to push
Speaker 1: him a narrative immediately after a tragedy happens, implying that
Speaker 1: the people that were in charge of it, the people
Speaker 1: who did this, they did it for political reasons because
Speaker 1: they supported Descentists. Did the shooters support descentis No? Did
Speaker 1: that ever come out afterwards? Yet? Did they report it? No?
Speaker 1: You gotta understand these are not mistakes. This is a
Speaker 1: political narrative, and it's a narrative that you are going
Speaker 1: they are going to push no matter what. That's what
Speaker 1: they're trying to make you understand. The narrative is whatever
Speaker 1: they decided to be on a random day of the week,
Speaker 1: and you better get on board with their narrative. And
Speaker 1: if you don't get on board with their narrative, there
Speaker 1: will be held to pay. We're gonna slander De Santists
Speaker 1: for a horrific shooting that happened, implying that he has
Speaker 1: blood on his hands, even though he doesn't. The shooter
Speaker 1: had nothing to do with Conservatives or De Santists. And
Speaker 1: when that comes out, we will not report on the
Speaker 1: story because we don't report on stories like that. That
Speaker 1: is not something that we do. But we never let
Speaker 1: a tragedy or a crisis go to waste. That is
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party's mantra. We never let a crisis go
Speaker 1: to waste. And when someone gets killed and there's mass shootings,
Speaker 1: we immediately push for things and advocate for things that
Speaker 1: would have had no bearing on the shooting. In fact,
Speaker 1: we've seen this happen over and over again where they'll
Speaker 1: come out with massive gun control, not even knowing what
Speaker 1: guns were used in certain events, and claiming they're going
Speaker 1: to pass laws that would have saved the problem. Even
Speaker 1: if those laws were in place, they would not have
Speaker 1: fixed the problem. They would not have saved people's lives.
Speaker 1: But it's a narrative, and you keep pushing it, You
Speaker 1: keep pushing it until you win finally, And one of
Speaker 1: the biggest stories of the year for me. I think
Speaker 1: it is the biggest story of the year. The media
Speaker 1: throwing a tantrum at the prospect of Americans freely exchanging ideas,
Speaker 1: with Twitter being bought by Elon Musk and now being
Speaker 1: exposed through the Twitter files, every conspiracy theory that was
Speaker 1: our every theory of conservatives, what we were dealing with
Speaker 1: what we were going through. What was actually happening to us,
Speaker 1: shadow banning and silencing and not being able to find people,
Speaker 1: shutting down accounts for actually not committing violations of terms
Speaker 1: of service just because you were a conservative. Having the
Speaker 1: FBI flag accounts and the deep State flag accounts of conservatives.
Speaker 1: They just didn't like all of these things were happening,
Speaker 1: and we all knew that it was happening. We all
Speaker 1: saw it where we were silence and shut out just
Speaker 1: because they didn't like what they were what we were saying.
Speaker 1: We saw people's accounts that were banned not for actually
Speaker 1: breaking any rules except for, you know, being conservative. And
Speaker 1: then the media freaked out. They freaked out the idea
Speaker 1: that they couldn't silence a certain group of people anymore
Speaker 1: because of what Elon Musk did. They were furious that
Speaker 1: Elon Musk was going to expose the left and how
Speaker 1: much power and control they had over our thoughts and
Speaker 1: ideas and what was trending on social media, the idea
Speaker 1: that he could buy this thing and expose them for
Speaker 1: their corruption. And again, ABCNBC and CBS has spent zero
Speaker 1: minutes as of now on the Twitter files why because
Speaker 1: they don't want you to know just how bad things
Speaker 1: actually were. They don't want you to understand just how
Speaker 1: corrupt they are. That's why if a big tree falls
Speaker 1: in the forest, right and no one hears it, because
Speaker 1: no one's there, did it even happen. That's how ABCNBC
Speaker 1: and CBS are treating this moment in time in history
Speaker 1: where they know about the corruption of the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: they know the corruption of the FBI, they know the
Speaker 1: corruption of the d State, They know the corruption from
Speaker 1: candidates and elected officials and government officials who were emailing
Speaker 1: Twitter saying hey we don't like disaccount Silence said, hey,
Speaker 1: we don't like discounts. Silence said, hey we don't like
Speaker 1: this tweet, get rid of it. Hey we want this
Speaker 1: person ban And they did it every damn time, and
Speaker 1: then Elon Must bought it. Now where they want to do.
Speaker 1: They want to ruin this platform, and they want to
Speaker 1: ruin Teslas stock in the process. They want to destroy
Speaker 1: Elon Musk, and they want to destroy anything that Elon
Speaker 1: Must touches, and they want to make sure that you
Speaker 1: don't like or use the platform. They want you to
Speaker 1: believe that now it's a racist and bigoted platform. They
Speaker 1: want you to believe that Twitter is now the wild West,
Speaker 1: and that there's all these evil things that are happening there,
Speaker 1: so that eels shut down your account, silence your account.
Speaker 1: That's what they want you to believe. This is how
Speaker 1: they roll. Take a listen to the media freaking out
Speaker 1: over Twitter being exposed by the new owner. We all
Speaker 1: have sort of treated this platform as like the town square,
Speaker 1: the public forum. It's not anymore. It's Elon Musks and
Speaker 1: he's gonna do with it what he wants, and it's
Speaker 1: bad for the rest of us. Ever since Elon Musk
Speaker 1: took over Twitter, we've seen it devolved into something that
Speaker 1: is nothing close to truth and nothing close to unifying
Speaker 1: in the country as we see it today. And here
Speaker 1: we have something as important as Twitter, which is an
Speaker 1: important platform, now descending into the health scape that he
Speaker 1: claimed it wouldn't be. My tummy meter says, there's something
Speaker 1: just not great about this. Let's say they ransay Donald
Speaker 1: Trump onto Twitter. Would you leave the service? Yeah? Probably?
Speaker 1: I mean I don't I don't need to be there
Speaker 1: for that. When Elon Musk says, wow, this is about
Speaker 1: free speech, it seems to me that it's about free
Speaker 1: speech of straight white men, and he himself straight white men. Yeah,
Speaker 1: said Jollie Beople. They're going to have speech on Twitter, right,
Speaker 1: that's what she just said. It's about straight white men.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump comes back, it was reinstated. What would you do.
Speaker 1: I believe the platform. I don't need to be there
Speaker 1: for that. Right. That's when they started beating the drums
Speaker 1: of let's destroy Twitter if we can't control it, if
Speaker 1: we can't silence the people that we want to silence,
Speaker 1: and we'll just will burn the place to the ground
Speaker 1: so that it has no more power or no more
Speaker 1: influence anymore. Because we can't decide who's important and who
Speaker 1: is powerful, and whose tweets are seeing and what tweets
Speaker 1: are not and who to shadow band and who to
Speaker 1: silence and who to shut down. That's what this is
Speaker 1: really all about. Can we just be honest. This is
Speaker 1: about control. If we can't control you and your mind,
Speaker 1: then we don't want any of it to survive. That's
Speaker 1: what the media is saying here. It's racist as big
Speaker 1: as it's hate speech. It's white supremacists are now using Twitter,
Speaker 1: so you should get off of it. Meanwhile, Twitter under
Speaker 1: the old regime had no problem taking money from Chinese
Speaker 1: communist dictators and slave owners. They had no problem being
Speaker 1: a platform for ISIS or al Qaida. They had no
Speaker 1: problem being a platform for people that have child labor
Speaker 1: and sex trafficking and human trafficking leaders on the platform,
Speaker 1: Communist dictators. They have no problem taking money from the
Speaker 1: most evil people in the world and giving them a platform.
Speaker 1: They have no problem hosting leaders of terrorist organizations like
Speaker 1: Hamas and Hezbollah on the platform. But a Republican gets
Speaker 1: to say what they want to say without us being
Speaker 1: able to shut them down in silence them. Oh, now
Speaker 1: there's going to be hell to pay and all of this. Right,
Speaker 1: that's now what they're saying. Oh, it's a troll. So
Speaker 1: his idea of freedom means freedom to be a jerk
Speaker 1: and to be cool and to have no one be
Speaker 1: able to stop you. It certainly feels like we're in
Speaker 1: the dying days of this platform unless something changes quickly.
Speaker 1: You need controls on this, You need regulation. You cannot
Speaker 1: let these guys control discourse in this country or we
Speaker 1: are headed to hell. We are headed to hell. You
Speaker 1: cannot let people actually have a place to go and
Speaker 1: have a grand debate. We have to control it. We
Speaker 1: have to control the narrative, we have to control every
Speaker 1: single aspect of this. This is the media in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two. This is the lies that they told you
Speaker 1: on purpose. None of this was by accident. Please share
Speaker 1: this with your family and friends so they can hear
Speaker 1: what the media has done in the last year alone.
Speaker 1: And this is just in the last year. We need
Speaker 1: to make sure everybody understands just how corrupt they actually are.
Speaker 1: And I'll see you back here tomorrow.