Speaker 1: So over fifty classified folders sees by the FBI from
Speaker 1: our lago, we now know we're empty. I'm gonna hit
Speaker 1: pause on that story and i want to go to
Speaker 1: another one. There's a new lawsuit out that reveals dozens
Speaker 1: and the Biden administration worked with big tech to suppress
Speaker 1: free speech, an online coronavirus discourse, and other stories like
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. I'm gonna pause on that story and go
Speaker 1: to another story. CNN is now reporting that there are
Speaker 1: quote serious questions about Hunter Biden's scandal, and the FBI
Speaker 1: claiming now that it shouldn't be a partisan issue quote unquote.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna pause that story and I'm painting a picture.
Speaker 1: I just want you to connect all these dots to
Speaker 1: another story. All right, But first I want to tell
Speaker 1: you about the incredible company Patriot Mobile. If you are
Speaker 1: like me, and you're sick and tired of giving your
Speaker 1: money to companies that are fighting against your family values,
Speaker 1: fighting against your First and Second Amendment rights, trying to
Speaker 1: indoctrinate your kids, then you need to make the switch
Speaker 1: to the only Christian conservative cell phone company in the US. Now,
Speaker 1: they're not just a company that is a Christian conservative company.
Speaker 1: They actually take a part of your bill every month
Speaker 1: when you pay, and they use that money to fight
Speaker 1: for our first, our Second Amendment rights. They use it
Speaker 1: to fight for the sanctity of life and for adoption services.
Speaker 1: After we have had this big victory with Roe v Wade.
Speaker 1: This is a company that's on the front lines fighting
Speaker 1: for our freedoms. That's why I want you to make
Speaker 1: the switch to Patriot Mobile, because every time you use
Speaker 1: your phone, you're going to be making a difference on
Speaker 1: these important issues. Now, it doesn't matter what your budget is.
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile has incredible plans nationwide coverage that will work
Speaker 1: with your So go to Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson
Speaker 1: and get in the fight and stand with a company
Speaker 1: that's fighting for your values. You can also call them
Speaker 1: right now ninety seven two Patriot. That's nine seven two Patriot. Now.
Speaker 1: All you gotta do is use the promo code at
Speaker 1: ferguson to get free activation. Plus special discounts are available
Speaker 1: for all veterans and first responders. So join the movement
Speaker 1: and make the switch today. Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson.
Speaker 1: Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or call nine seven two patriot.
Speaker 1: There's a new Rasmus and poll that has come out
Speaker 1: this morning that says faith in Biden and the DEM's
Speaker 1: direction is still falling, meaning that even after they attack
Speaker 1: everybody this past week looking like for you was speaking
Speaker 1: from the Gates of Hell referring to Joe Biden, it
Speaker 1: didn't work right. Demonizing conservatives and calling us domestic terrorists
Speaker 1: not working. Saying that we're anti democracy or the worst
Speaker 1: part of America is not working. In fact, faith in
Speaker 1: the direction of the country was low a year ago,
Speaker 1: but it is even lower now. According to the latest Pole,
Speaker 1: a majority of likely US voters sixty five percent in fact,
Speaker 1: say the country is heading the wrong direction under President
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, and with the Democrats having control of the
Speaker 1: both the House and the Senate. That number is four
Speaker 1: points worse than a year ago and one point worse
Speaker 1: than last week's Pole. This is after he made the
Speaker 1: Gates from Hell speech, basically saying that half the country
Speaker 1: is a bunch of evil, demonic, sick individuals that are
Speaker 1: anti democracy. I'm gonna move on from that story, and
Speaker 1: I want you again stay with me and keep connecting
Speaker 1: these dots right to a new story that you haven't
Speaker 1: heard about. There is a new version of the Journalism
Speaker 1: Competential Competition and Preservation Act. You've probably never even heard
Speaker 1: of this. It's also known as the JCPA. It is
Speaker 1: now circulating a new version that is actually worse than
Speaker 1: the original version, which is what they were supposed to
Speaker 1: be fixing. And what it would do is it would
Speaker 1: allow mainstream and legacy media, as well as left wing
Speaker 1: media to form exclusionary media cartels that empower them with
Speaker 1: extraordinary collective bargaining power to collude with big tech companies.
Speaker 1: I go back to the headline I just told you
Speaker 1: about a moment ago, right, You've got this lawsuit that
Speaker 1: reveals that the Biden administration worked with big tech to
Speaker 1: suppress free speech and online discourse on Twitter, Instagram, the
Speaker 1: list goes on LinkedIn, by the way, was even involved
Speaker 1: in this, just so you know, and we know now
Speaker 1: that they were also working with big tech to suppress
Speaker 1: parity accounts that made fun of doctor Fauci. We know
Speaker 1: in this lawsuit that the White House was also working
Speaker 1: to protect Hunter and Joe and James Biden stories as well.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a pretty big list, folks. So
Speaker 1: remember that story. As I go back to this Journalism
Speaker 1: Competition and Preservation Act, the amendment serves only to spell
Speaker 1: out in greater specificity how to exclude conservative an anti
Speaker 1: establishment media from any alleged benefits. Specifically, this new JCPA
Speaker 1: contains a provision that allows quote eligible media companies forming
Speaker 1: a cartel to create admission criteria for membership unrelated to
Speaker 1: the size of an eligible digital journalism provider the views
Speaker 1: expressed by its content criteria of content to limit memberships
Speaker 1: to only eligible publishers. Are only eligible broadcasters quote unquote
Speaker 1: Stephen Brill and Gordon Cortez. They are cocos of News Guard,
Speaker 1: They're involved in all this. US House Minority Leader Ken
Speaker 1: McCarthy also very concerned about this. And here's why. What
Speaker 1: that provision that I just read for you means. Is
Speaker 1: it significant because these mainstream and left wing media cartels
Speaker 1: may not exclude people so right now based on size
Speaker 1: or views expressed by its content. But if this moves
Speaker 1: forward and happens, it would absolutely allow for them to say, no,
Speaker 1: we don't want conservatives in here. And these self appointed
Speaker 1: mainstream left wing media cartels are now allowed to exclude
Speaker 1: many conservative journalists or organizations based on the usual totally
Speaker 1: subjective factors they always do so, such as things like
Speaker 1: trustworthiness or fake news, or they can just say you're
Speaker 1: an extremist, or you have misinformation or hate speech or
Speaker 1: conspiracy or correction policy issues, right, all of these things.
Speaker 1: They can say, no, no, you're not part of the media,
Speaker 1: so now you're different and will be treated different. All
Speaker 1: of these terms, by the way, our viewpoint neutral. Yet
Speaker 1: when interpreted by these leftist ngeo's media watchdogs like newscard
Speaker 1: that I just mentioned a moment ago and the fact
Speaker 1: checkers right that mark things they don't like is being
Speaker 1: false so that no one sees them even though they're
Speaker 1: actually real and content moderators a big tech what do
Speaker 1: they do. They end up targeting one side of the
Speaker 1: political spectrum. Great examples a Hunter Biden's story. They all
Speaker 1: censored its silence and refused to allow you to share it.
Speaker 1: And even if you could share it, no one could
Speaker 1: see it. We know that from what Zuckerberg said last
Speaker 1: week when he was on the Rogan podcast. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: could share it, but no one saw it. When you
Speaker 1: share the story on Hunter Biden. But he's like, hey,
Speaker 1: we're better than Twitter, who just banned the story and
Speaker 1: you couldn't share it no matter what. Now, despite misleading
Speaker 1: the American public for years, even winning a Pulitzer Prize
Speaker 1: for their efforts, most of the news companies that pushed
Speaker 1: the discredited Russia Gate conspiracy theory, for example, like The
Speaker 1: New York Times and Washington Posts, continue to receive a
Speaker 1: quote green approval rating from NewsGuard. Well, news outlets that
Speaker 1: debunked the conspiracy theory like bright Bart News and Fox
Speaker 1: News are smeared as untrustworthy and reliable by the same organizations.
Speaker 1: If you want to know what communism sounds like, this
Speaker 1: is literally it is easy to imagine news Cartel pointing
Speaker 1: to Newsguard's criteria or the criteria of any organization presenting
Speaker 1: itself as an independent watchdog over an industry, and then saying, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're neutral. So we think think that this conservative outlet,
Speaker 1: of this independent media outlet is bad and evil, and
Speaker 1: we're going to mark them as such. So if you're
Speaker 1: a conservative or even an independent or even a free
Speaker 1: speech advocate, what they're trying to do right now is
Speaker 1: they're trying to basically say, we're going to give you
Speaker 1: a list in the United States of America through through
Speaker 1: official regulations that you can read and believe as trustworthy.
Speaker 1: And then we're going to silence, suppress, and shut down
Speaker 1: the reach of anybody else that isn't basically state sponsored media.
Speaker 1: Maybe I should have led with that, so you understand
Speaker 1: how big of a deal this is, right all, they're
Speaker 1: all doing this, by the way, by supporting this amended bill,
Speaker 1: in rewarding mainstream and legacy media and left wing publishers
Speaker 1: in big tech, by allowing them to exclude whomever they
Speaker 1: deem not part of the club, or who they do
Speaker 1: not like, or who they think is telling too much
Speaker 1: of the truth. This is what happens literally in communist countries.
Speaker 1: Think about last week, the President Units It's America just
Speaker 1: called half the country extremists who threatened the very foundation
Speaker 1: of a republic. And if you believe that, if you're
Speaker 1: the president Units It's America and the people around you
Speaker 1: believe that, right then then what would happen is they
Speaker 1: would then say, anybody else disagrees, we basically are going
Speaker 1: to ban you from being able to reach the masses.
Speaker 1: We're gonna shadow ban you, silence you, come after you,
Speaker 1: and shut you down. I want to play for you
Speaker 1: some audio of Donald Trump. He was talking about big
Speaker 1: tech suppressing the Hunter Biden's story. He was talking about
Speaker 1: big tech getting it wrong with Russia, get he was
Speaker 1: talking about big tech getting it wrong with impeachment. He
Speaker 1: was talking about the media getting it wrong on all
Speaker 1: these stories and coming after him for four years. And
Speaker 1: he said this at a speech. And then there was
Speaker 1: a panel on Fox News The Big Show on Sundays.
Speaker 1: We're in to Vogel was having a conversation and I
Speaker 1: want you to hear this with Tommy Aren't and I
Speaker 1: want you to listen to what they said. So our
Speaker 1: President brought up a good point here, though, Anita, that
Speaker 1: this actually has consequences for elections. It's not just a
Speaker 1: parody account that maybe somebody liked or COVID misinformation. This
Speaker 1: actually goes to the core of what was happening before
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election and how big tech colluded. Does
Speaker 1: this go to a First Amendment issue at some point
Speaker 1: as well? Absolutely it does, and it really bothers me
Speaker 1: as a journalist because it absolutely goes to the First
Speaker 1: Amendment and freedom of the press, which is one of
Speaker 1: the things that sets this country apart from so many
Speaker 1: others that don't have that, and I can't help but
Speaker 1: also see some hypocrisy here because President Biden likes to
Speaker 1: call out Maggot supporters and call them semi fascists. But
Speaker 1: if you look at the definition of fascism the history there,
Speaker 1: one of the first things fascist regimes do is they
Speaker 1: try to stifle and control the press. So this is
Speaker 1: not a good look for the administration if it comes
Speaker 1: to beach through that they were colluding with big tech,
Speaker 1: it's not a good look. Well, the truth is actually there.
Speaker 1: We have the emails between the CDC, for example, that
Speaker 1: I believe the Washington Free Beacon first put out, and
Speaker 1: when you look at this, it's a track record James Rosen,
Speaker 1: the Obama Biden administration, Cheryl Actus and surveilling journalists. That's
Speaker 1: a true violation of the First Amendment when the federal
Speaker 1: government or any government is involved. So why not just
Speaker 1: keep doing it right if you're so successful at it
Speaker 1: so far, And that's exactly what they're now trying to
Speaker 1: do now. Several important voices are speaking up against this. JCPA,
Speaker 1: numerous witnesses and congress have testified to the bills failings
Speaker 1: before the Senate and the House, including award winning journalists
Speaker 1: like Glenn Greenwald. The GOP leadership and the House representatives
Speaker 1: has condemned this bill, Kevin McCarthy calling it, you know,
Speaker 1: an attack on our society and our democracy. Judiciary Committee
Speaker 1: ranking member Jim Jordan's warning it will be used to
Speaker 1: suppress competition and conservative media. They quote the media will
Speaker 1: use it in the end to discriminate against people who
Speaker 1: don't fit into their category, who aren't defined as the press,
Speaker 1: and who's going to determine that definition? Jordan said in
Speaker 1: the Senate, the bill has been condemned by a growing
Speaker 1: number of Republican senators, including Marshall Blackburn, Mark Arubio, Tom Cotton,
Speaker 1: and Mike Lee. Republican FCC commissioner has come out. He's
Speaker 1: also a legal scholar who worked on President Trump's proposed
Speaker 1: Section two thirty reforms. Has also warned of the dangers
Speaker 1: of this legislation, saying you're picking and choosing rights, who
Speaker 1: gets to be called a journalist and who gets to
Speaker 1: be silenced. It's it's not just conservatives opposing this bill.
Speaker 1: By the way, the JCPA is so aligned with the
Speaker 1: interest of corporations and the liberal think tanks that some
Speaker 1: on the left are even set are coming out against this.
Speaker 1: Some of the groups including Public Knowledge, which called it
Speaker 1: a gift to the Wall Street media Executives, Fight for
Speaker 1: Our Future, Fight for the Future, which argued enables an
Speaker 1: Internet killing link tax, and Free Press, which called it
Speaker 1: a bailout for legacy media. The left winning Electronic Frontier
Speaker 1: Foundation also came out opposing the bill. All emphasize how
Speaker 1: the bill would benefit America's largest, wealthiest, and most corrupt
Speaker 1: media companies while destroying those at the bottom. But despite
Speaker 1: this widespread opposition from those on the right and the left, right,
Speaker 1: these people that are truly terrified about just shutting down
Speaker 1: free speech lobbyists have brought this JCP back again with amendments.
Speaker 1: And the reason why they've done is because the left realizes,
Speaker 1: if we can control the media, we can control America.
Speaker 1: If we can control the media, we can control everyone.
Speaker 1: We just have to figure out how to control the media,
Speaker 1: and once we do that, we own them. They've already
Speaker 1: figured out, by the way, how to suppress certain things.
Speaker 1: We know that they figured out pretty easily how to
Speaker 1: suppress what's happening. Right, We've got that, Okay, we understand
Speaker 1: that they've figured that out, they get it right, they've
Speaker 1: figured out how to suppress. But now they just want
Speaker 1: to end it. They want to control it all. And
Speaker 1: there's only one reason why they want to control it.
Speaker 1: Because if they can control the narrative, if they can
Speaker 1: control it all, then they really have to worry about
Speaker 1: what's what's true, what's honest, what's fair, what's right, what's legit. No,
Speaker 1: they're not to worry about any of that, folks saying
Speaker 1: just they can just make it up as they go.
Speaker 1: They can go out there and put out propaganda just
Speaker 1: like what I mentioned, right, they can they can put
Speaker 1: out propaganda against anybody, not just Donald Trump, but any conservative,
Speaker 1: and they can tell you that they are right and
Speaker 1: the other side is wrong, and they can tell you
Speaker 1: that even when the story is real, that it's not real,
Speaker 1: that it's silence. Right. Look at this divisive rhetoric that
Speaker 1: happened last week from the President United States of America.
Speaker 1: When the President comes out and calls half, I mean
Speaker 1: trash is half of America saying that you're an extremist,
Speaker 1: that you threatened the very foundations of our republic. This
Speaker 1: is what dictators and tyrants do and say about the opposition. Party.
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden took to social media on Sunday to
Speaker 1: trash what he called Maga Agenda, dismissing it and those
Speaker 1: Republicans who follow it as again as a threat to
Speaker 1: the very fabric of America. This after he did the
Speaker 1: speech literally from the Gates of Hell with a red backdrop.
Speaker 1: He said on his Twitter account, ready for this. The
Speaker 1: Maga Agenda represents an extremism that threatens a very foundation
Speaker 1: of our republic. It doesn't respect our constitution. No, we
Speaker 1: do actually respect our constitution. We're the ones that don't
Speaker 1: want it to be trampled. We believe that the Constitution
Speaker 1: is a living document that is literally the basis of America,
Speaker 1: and you guys run all over it all the time.
Speaker 1: Biden went on to tweet, it doesn't believe in the
Speaker 1: rule of law. That's a lie. We're the ones that
Speaker 1: are the law and order party. You're the ones that
Speaker 1: allow for people to set up third world countries in
Speaker 1: the middle of cities. You're the one that allowed for
Speaker 1: churches to be burned, for police cars to be burned,
Speaker 1: for people to chant what do we want dead cops?
Speaker 1: When do we want them. Now, you're the ones that
Speaker 1: supported the ransacking and the attacks on cities, the torching
Speaker 1: of cities, the torching of government buildings within TIVA and
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter. You guys were raising money for them.
Speaker 1: You guys were sitting out tweets supporting them while by
Speaker 1: the way, they were doing this. So don't tell me
Speaker 1: that we're the threat to that to society. But remember,
Speaker 1: if you control the media, you can say stupid crap
Speaker 1: like this and everybody will agree with you. He went
Speaker 1: on to finally saying, it doesn't recognize the will of
Speaker 1: the people. We know that the Democratic Party tried to
Speaker 1: overthrow the will of the people by impeaching Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: We know that they knew that the documents were created
Speaker 1: by them, the Democratic Party, and were created by the
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton campaign, and they used it right. They used
Speaker 1: it to overthrow the will of the people. They said,
Speaker 1: we want to we want to get rid, we want
Speaker 1: to get rid of Donald Trump, and we're gonna overthrow
Speaker 1: the will of the people because we don't like who
Speaker 1: they voted for. That's what they actually did. Now, before
Speaker 1: I get into more of this story, I want to
Speaker 1: say thank you and tell you about our good friends
Speaker 1: at Legacy Precious Medals. Without them, the show wouldn't be possible.
Speaker 1: And if you have not looked at gold and silver
Speaker 1: as a way to protect your hard earned dollars against
Speaker 1: what happening on Wall Street with inflation, it's time for
Speaker 1: you to call them and get the free Investor's Guide.
Speaker 1: Why because so many around the world are now using
Speaker 1: gold and silver, and historically they have for decades as
Speaker 1: a protection, a hedge against inflation, which is exactly what
Speaker 1: we're dealing with right now. If you're terrified to look
Speaker 1: at your retirement account, your four one case statement because
Speaker 1: of what's happening on Wall Street, that's all the more
Speaker 1: reason why you should call and get the investors Guide
Speaker 1: in gold and silver, protect your hard earned money and diversify.
Speaker 1: Call them and get the free Investor's Guide from Legacy
Speaker 1: Precious Medals one eight six, six, seven five one twenty
Speaker 1: two eighteen. One eight six, six, seven five one twenty
Speaker 1: two eighteen are online at Legacy PM investments dot Com.
Speaker 1: Faith in Biden and the Democrats direction is still falling
Speaker 1: because there still are some people in this country that
Speaker 1: I think understand just how bad things actually are. Just
Speaker 1: twenty nine percent of Americans believe the country's head in
Speaker 1: the right direction. Now all indicators say we're heading the
Speaker 1: wrong direction. And then I also tells you how many
Speaker 1: stupid people that they are in the world. The fact
Speaker 1: that there's people that will dig in regardless of what's
Speaker 1: actually happening. And this does concern me as well. You know,
Speaker 1: back when Jimmy Carter, by the way, was president and
Speaker 1: things were heading the wrong direction, yeah, you still hadn't
Speaker 1: close to the same numbers, right, which just means that
Speaker 1: there's too many people that dig in on ideology and
Speaker 1: refuse to admit when their side screws up. The fact
Speaker 1: that there's twenty nine percent of the people in this
Speaker 1: country that believe that we're heading the right direction is
Speaker 1: insanity unless you understand who those twenty nine percent of
Speaker 1: people actually are. I think that's twenty nine percent of
Speaker 1: people that truly genuinely want okay, who really, really, really
Speaker 1: actually want socialism. They're just straight up willing to admit it. Now.
Speaker 1: I want socialism. I want free stuff. I want free healthcare,
Speaker 1: I want a free cell phone, I want free college.
Speaker 1: I want you to pay off my bills, right, which
Speaker 1: is what they're trying to do. With this college loan
Speaker 1: forgiveness program. I want I want the government to take
Speaker 1: over the media, which is exactly what we're talking about now.
Speaker 1: I want them to center and silence stories to the
Speaker 1: people that I disagree with, and I want them to
Speaker 1: do it now. That's what these thirty percent are. Maybe
Speaker 1: they're not that stupid, Maybe they are just dis messed
Speaker 1: up that they actually believe that America would be better
Speaker 1: off if we were a socialist and communist country. Go
Speaker 1: to the story about the w NBA player grind Or
Speaker 1: who's still being held in Russia. This is a woman
Speaker 1: who said that she believed that the national anthem should
Speaker 1: not be played at w NBA games. So woman that
Speaker 1: said on multiple occasions that she was pretty much ashamed
Speaker 1: of the United States of America. She didn't love America.
Speaker 1: She it was the opposite. Should love America, shouldn't like America.
Speaker 1: She was ashamed of America's America was a bad place.
Speaker 1: You can never forget who these people are, you can
Speaker 1: never forget what they stand for, you can never forget
Speaker 1: what they believe. This is what they believe. And there
Speaker 1: is a real shift tappening now. You know. I think
Speaker 1: the people that were dug in with Jimmy Carter, and
Speaker 1: even when things are heading in the wrong direction, that
Speaker 1: twenty plus percent, I think it was just more or
Speaker 1: less because they didn't want to admit that they were wrong.
Speaker 1: And people hate admitting when they're wrong. It's natural instinct
Speaker 1: to not want to say, yep, I'm wrong. I voted
Speaker 1: for this guy, and I was an idiot. It right.
Speaker 1: I voted for this moron, and it's on me, my bad.
Speaker 1: Referring to Joe Biden, there are people that just don't
Speaker 1: want to admit they made a mistake. But I think
Speaker 1: that's now. You know, Jimmy Carter had that. This time.
Speaker 1: It is different. There people saying no, no no, you don't understand.
Speaker 1: I want full blown socialism. I'm fine with us becoming
Speaker 1: a communist country. I think Britney Griner is a great
Speaker 1: example of that. I think many on the left or
Speaker 1: agree with that. The fact they want there to be
Speaker 1: this new law with standards with journalism, which will only
Speaker 1: allow for the establishment media, the liberal media, to have
Speaker 1: all the power into silence and shut down anybody else
Speaker 1: that's not giving the government's narrative. You look at this lawsuit,
Speaker 1: and I mentioned it earlier but the Biden administration big
Speaker 1: tech colluded to suppress free speech during the pandemic, with
Speaker 1: at least eighty eight separate communications with the Missouri Attorney
Speaker 1: General revealed last week. You had Missouri and the Louisiana
Speaker 1: Attorney generals Jeff Landry file the lawsuit May sought to
Speaker 1: expose how top Biden administration officials colluded with social media
Speaker 1: companies a censor free speech on a number of topics,
Speaker 1: including COVID nineteen. They won the lawsuit in July. Then
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice was forced to reveal to the
Speaker 1: plaintiffs in total, and these are the ones that we
Speaker 1: know about. I'm assuming this is probably not all of
Speaker 1: them realistically, but eighty eight different communications between the Biden
Speaker 1: administration and social media companies that showed exactly how the
Speaker 1: Biden administration operated and how big tech worked together and
Speaker 1: operated together to censor freedom of speech. And there's thirty
Speaker 1: percent of Americans that love this. You look at how
Speaker 1: many different defendants were identified. Forty five federal officials at
Speaker 1: the top levels of the Department of Homeland Security, at
Speaker 1: the CDC, at the NIAID under Fauci, and the CISA,
Speaker 1: as well as the Office of the Surgeon General, all
Speaker 1: of which are contained in either the Department of Home
Speaker 1: and Security or the Health and Human Services Division. Communicated
Speaker 1: directly with top lelevel people at social media platforms and
Speaker 1: told them what to do, told them what to label
Speaker 1: is misinformation, told them what to label it was censorship,
Speaker 1: and then you have beyond the DOJ. Meta Also that's
Speaker 1: a new name for Facebook. The company Meta identified thirty
Speaker 1: two additional federal officials, including White House officials, who communicated
Speaker 1: directly with them on what they wanted to silence or censor.
Speaker 1: Look at YouTube. YouTube was forced to identify eleven federal officials,
Speaker 1: including White House officials, who can communicate with them, many
Speaker 1: of whom were not disclosed by the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: The AG gave specific examples of how the Biden administration
Speaker 1: and big tech coordinated to suppress freedom of speech on
Speaker 1: their platforms. For example, a senior Facebook officials send an
Speaker 1: email to the Surgeon General stating quote, I know our
Speaker 1: teams met today to better understand the scope of what
Speaker 1: the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.
Speaker 1: The email. This email chain followed the Surgeon General's Misinformation
Speaker 1: Health Advisory in July of twenty twenty one, the same
Speaker 1: by the way, senior officials send a letter and send
Speaker 1: an email to the Health and Human HHS and noted
Speaker 1: thank you again for taking time to meet earlier today.
Speaker 1: Then the official continue to discuss how Facebook is taking
Speaker 1: even more steps to censor freedom of speech. We have
Speaker 1: further communications that have come out from this lawsuit showing
Speaker 1: that Facebook is increasing quote the strength of our demotions,
Speaker 1: meaning that you can post something but no one will
Speaker 1: see it for anything that it questions the government's propaganda
Speaker 1: on COVID and vaccine related content, and how they will
Speaker 1: use fact checkers to rate many posts that they don't
Speaker 1: want out there is partially false or missing context, so
Speaker 1: then no one will see it. They see that content
Speaker 1: will now be demoted at the same strength that we
Speaker 1: demote any content on our platform rated falls. So even
Speaker 1: if you put something up there and they can say,
Speaker 1: and it's very easy to rate something as quote missing
Speaker 1: contexts Okay, you need to understand that as well. Putting
Speaker 1: something up there that is missing context is not hard.
Speaker 1: It's actually incredibly easy. And when you do that, when
Speaker 1: you put it up there that way, they said, all right, well,
Speaker 1: we'll make sure that anything in that scenario, right, anything
Speaker 1: that is that way, right an anything that goes in
Speaker 1: that capacity, what we will do is we will we
Speaker 1: will suppress it at the same level as if you
Speaker 1: put out something that was totally false. Thirty percent of
Speaker 1: the American people actually love this, right, That's that's what
Speaker 1: this is. Okay. You need to realize that thirty percent
Speaker 1: of this country is like, yeah, let's go full blown socialist,
Speaker 1: let's go full blown communists. Let's go full blown government
Speaker 1: regulate everything. This is no different than what they do
Speaker 1: in Russia, folks, so different than what they do in China.
Speaker 1: And there's thirty percent of Americans now that are on
Speaker 1: the record is openly saying, yes, this is what I want.
Speaker 1: This is what America needs. We need to fundamentally change
Speaker 1: this country forever. Make sure by the way that you
Speaker 1: share this podcast with your family and friends. Hit that
Speaker 1: little forward arrow and text it or put it on
Speaker 1: social media while the media does everything you can to
Speaker 1: try to shut you down, silence us, and make sure
Speaker 1: no one knows what's really happening. Also, hit that auto
Speaker 1: download or subscribe button so you get this podcast each
Speaker 1: and every day for free, and I'll see you back
Speaker 1: here tomorrow,