Speaker 1: All right, so the government is open, and that's great,
Speaker 1: fighting dandy. We're gonna deal with that coming up. But
Speaker 1: before we get to that, we have a big lie
Speaker 1: that is unraveling that involves Hunter Biden and the President
Speaker 1: and their claims that they didn't receive one cent from
Speaker 1: Chinese associate, despite now wired transfers that proved that they
Speaker 1: were lying to all of us.
Speaker 2: Now this all goes back to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was the first person to deny receiving quote
Speaker 1: unquote one cent from his family's deal with BEHR Partner
Speaker 1: associate Jonathan Lee. A video from October of nineteen, twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen confirms, well, guess what in the summer of twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden did receive more than one cent. A hell
Speaker 1: of a lot more. In fact, if you want to
Speaker 1: do the math, you can figure out how many cents
Speaker 1: are in two wired transfers totaling two hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. Guess where it came from? Jonathan Lee from
Speaker 1: BHR Partner Associates. This includes Lee that listed that these
Speaker 1: wire transfer listed President Joe Biden's Delaware home as the
Speaker 1: beneficiary address for the funds to be transferred. The House
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee revealed all of this this week while everybody
Speaker 1: was talking about government shutdowns. Look over here right at
Speaker 1: the government shutdown, and then we'll release some intel that
Speaker 1: no one will have to cover. Guess what's even more
Speaker 1: shocking than that the funds were bankrolled by none other
Speaker 1: than the actual Bank of China.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: Months after receiving the bank wires in twenty nineteen, Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden told ABC News in that sit down interview that
Speaker 1: he did not receive one penny from Lee. That was
Speaker 1: a lie. And we know it was a lie because
Speaker 1: we had the video from the ABC News one on
Speaker 1: one exclusive with Hunter Biden listen.
Speaker 3: Air Force two with his father during an official government
Speaker 3: trip to China in twenty thirteen, leveraging that connection for
Speaker 3: financial gain in an investment deal with Chinese businessman Jonathan Lee.
Speaker 4: The president has repeatedly said that you received one point
Speaker 4: five billion dollars from China, despite no experience and for
Speaker 4: no apparent reason. Obviously, fact checkers have said that that is.
Speaker 1: Not Look this literally has no basis in fact in
Speaker 1: any way.
Speaker 4: Have you received any money from my business dealing at all?
Speaker 5: Not one cent, not one cent.
Speaker 1: Not one cent. Let's go with the facts again. In
Speaker 1: October of twenty nineteen, Hunter Biden said he hadn't made
Speaker 1: one cent from his business deals with Chinese national Jonathan Lee.
Speaker 1: You fast forward in time, or I technically go backwards
Speaker 1: into August of twenty nineteen. Right, this interview was in
Speaker 1: October the same year, so just two and a half
Speaker 1: months earlier. Lee wired two hundred and fifty thousand Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden with Joe Biden's Delaware home listed as the beneficiary address. Now,
Speaker 1: if hunter Biden didn't make a cent, as he was
Speaker 1: claiming off this deal with Lee, then the big question
Speaker 1: now is who did think about that. Let's say that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is telling the truth. Let's say hypothetically that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is telling you the god honest truth. Hey,
Speaker 1: I didn't make a cent from Lee. That also could
Speaker 1: be very accurate. Why because the money wasn't going to
Speaker 1: hunter Biden's address. We also know where Hunter Biden was
Speaker 1: living during that time that the money was transferred back
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen, in his own memoir, he says he
Speaker 1: was living in California. Well, we also know from the
Speaker 1: Sweetheart plea deal that was given to him that blew
Speaker 1: up in court just a month and a half ago
Speaker 1: that in the court documents during that time, it states
Speaker 1: in that plea deal that Hunter Biden was living in California.
Speaker 1: We have two confirmations now that Hunter Biden was in
Speaker 1: California at the time that the two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars was wired to the home of the Big Guy,
Speaker 1: and we now have the president's son who is contradicting
Speaker 1: the White House. The White House has said that the
Speaker 1: President never received a dime from any of these business deals.
Speaker 2: Yet his home.
Speaker 1: Address, where Hunter Biden was not living at the time,
Speaker 1: was the address used to wire transfer a quarter of
Speaker 1: a million dollars from the Bank of China.
Speaker 2: So there are two different scenarios here.
Speaker 1: One, clearly Lee and others in China were buying access
Speaker 1: to the US government through the vice president who was
Speaker 1: then running for president, Joe Biden. That's option one. K
Speaker 1: Two is Hunter Biden is telling you the truth. He
Speaker 1: didn't receive a single dime from Jonathan Lee because it
Speaker 1: all went to the big Guy. Let me say that again,
Speaker 1: it all went to the big Guy. The question is
Speaker 1: very simple, have you received any money from that business
Speaker 1: dealing that's what the ABC News reporter asked Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: His reply, no, no, not one cent, she quested, not
Speaker 1: one cent. Hunter Biden then claimed. Now the time frame
Speaker 1: detailed and Hunter Biden's collapsed plea deal in July with
Speaker 1: the now Special Council, David White says Hunter Biden's residence
Speaker 1: was in California when the Chinese partner sent money to
Speaker 1: an account linked to Joe Biden's home address. The Big
Speaker 1: Guy Hunter Biden quote remained in California and spent much
Speaker 1: of the summer of twenty nineteen painting and developing plans
Speaker 1: for his memoir.
Speaker 2: The plea Deal states on page.
Speaker 1: Nine, and Hunter Biden's memoir Beautiful Things the Sun also
Speaker 1: noted that he lived in California at the time his
Speaker 1: Chinese partners wired the money to Delaware. We also now
Speaker 1: have the White House spokeswoman dodging questions about Chinese payments
Speaker 1: to the Biden family.
Speaker 6: House over Site says they've got bank records showing a
Speaker 6: Chinese energy company paying three Biden family members through a
Speaker 6: third party.
Speaker 5: What were they paid for?
Speaker 7: Look, I'm just not going to respond to that from here. Look,
Speaker 7: we have heard from House Republicans for years in years
Speaker 7: and years, how the inaccuracies and lies when it comes
Speaker 7: to this issue. And I don't even wear to begin
Speaker 7: to even answer that question, because again, it's been lies
Speaker 7: and lies and inaccuracy for the past couple of years,
Speaker 7: and I'm just not going to get into it from here.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to get into it from here. So,
Speaker 1: in other words, you don't have an answer to that question.
Speaker 1: That is your White House spresser, Terry right, I don't
Speaker 1: have an answer for that question.
Speaker 2: I just don't.
Speaker 1: The money, by the way, wired from Beijing, China. It
Speaker 1: directly contradicts Joe Biden's false claim, his lie that Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden never made money from China. Or it proves that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was telling the truth and Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: the big guy. Joe Biden was making all the money
Speaker 1: on these types of deals since his son wasn't living
Speaker 1: at that address during the time.
Speaker 2: You get to pick who you believe.
Speaker 1: Now, either Joe Biden is not the big guy but
Speaker 1: somehow randomly gets money sent to his house from Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party officials, or Hunter Biden took all the money
Speaker 1: and uses dad's address to get all the money and
Speaker 1: then paid for his dad's things, or Hunter Biden is
Speaker 1: a crackhead that always tells the truth and is telling
Speaker 1: the truth in that ABC interview when he said he
Speaker 1: never made a single cent from China, never made a
Speaker 1: single cent from Lee. If you believe that, that means
Speaker 1: the big guy wasn't getting ted percent. That means the
Speaker 1: big guy was getting one hundred percent of the payments
Speaker 1: coming into the Biden crime family. That is the headline
Speaker 1: that everybody here should be talking about. And we also
Speaker 1: know by the way that BHR Partners, the fund that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden co founded with a joint venture with Devon
Speaker 1: Archer and Lee, maintains investments worth billions.
Speaker 2: Of dollars in China.
Speaker 1: We also know that Kevin Morris, Hunter Biden's lawyer and confidant,
Speaker 1: controls Hunter Biden's.
Speaker 2: Steak in the entity.
Speaker 1: And we know that Devin Archer's wife also controls his
Speaker 1: stake in BHR Partners. Now there also is a third
Speaker 1: scenario here. Everybody's lying about everything. In August of twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: when Lee wired the two hundred fty thousand dollars one
Speaker 1: Hunter and Joe Biden and Joe Biden's Delaware address and
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden wasn't living there, and Hunter Biden was in
Speaker 1: California the time. There is a chance then maybe that
Speaker 1: payment's just hey, Dad.
Speaker 2: You take it all right. I'm out here in California.
Speaker 1: I've got plenty of hookers and blow and instead of
Speaker 1: you know, me worrying about it, I'm just going to
Speaker 1: send you the two fifty.
Speaker 3: That hunterd flu on Air Force two with his father
Speaker 3: during an official government trip to China in twenty thirteen,
Speaker 3: leveraging that connection for financial gain in an investment deal
Speaker 3: with Chinese businessman Jonathan Lee.
Speaker 4: The president has repeatedly said that you received one point
Speaker 4: five billion dollars from China, despite no experience and for
Speaker 4: no apparent reason. Obviously, fact checkers have said that that is.
Speaker 1: Not Look, this literally has no basis in fact in
Speaker 1: any way.
Speaker 3: Have you received any money from on business dealing at all?
Speaker 5: Not one cent, not one.
Speaker 2: Cent, not one cent. There it is.
Speaker 1: So maybe he didn't receive a cent. Maybe that payment
Speaker 1: was for the dad. Maybe that all went to daddy.
Speaker 1: And remember you got yelling coming from the President of
Speaker 1: the United States of America doing his press conference, not
Speaker 1: in the West Wing, not.
Speaker 2: In the White House.
Speaker 1: He has to go over with the EEO B so
Speaker 1: he can have his big a teleprompter for his answers.
Speaker 1: He was asked about some of this. Listen to what
Speaker 1: the President said back in the day, China compromise by
Speaker 1: your family, man, give me a break man. The question
Speaker 1: that was yelled out is your ability to deal with
Speaker 1: China compromised by your family's business relationships in China. In China,
Speaker 1: give me a break man, laughing. There's your official answer
Speaker 1: from the White House. Now, while all of this has
Speaker 1: been going on, there's also another story related to this,
Speaker 1: and this is another problem for the Biden crime family
Speaker 1: as well. The other part of the story is a
Speaker 1: forensic expert. A forensic expert who has a code name
Speaker 1: for financial crimes said that code words and code names
Speaker 1: like the Big Guy are commonly used in financial crime
Speaker 1: cover ups. They say code names are used to protect
Speaker 1: people that you know from being accused of financial crimes
Speaker 1: the same way, and that we have text messages and
Speaker 1: emails saying leave Joe Biden's name out of these text
Speaker 1: messages and emails. Don't mention his name in emails or
Speaker 1: text messages, don't talk about his name on the phone. Right,
Speaker 1: we have all this from text messages and code names
Speaker 1: like President Joe Biden's infamous alias the Big Guy, are
Speaker 1: often used in financial crimes. That was the official testimony
Speaker 1: of the accountant witness, the forensic account and witness, Bruce Dobinski.
Speaker 1: Typically you'll see code names used and money is being
Speaker 1: paid to someone under that code name, he said, That's
Speaker 1: how these processes work.
Speaker 2: Vinski.
Speaker 1: The question was asked, you have extensive experience as an expert,
Speaker 1: witness and consultant in the area of white collar crime,
Speaker 1: financial fraud, and corruption. Is it characteristic of these types
Speaker 1: of crimes that actors hide behind nicknames or pseudonyms to
Speaker 1: mask their identity? Congress Men let Turner asked Dibenski's reply,
Speaker 1: it's very very common. Take a listen to.
Speaker 6: This, I would say to the American people, look at
Speaker 6: the evidence before you and make a judgment, and do
Speaker 6: not allow the White House or our colleagues on the
Speaker 6: other side of the aisle try to convince you that
Speaker 6: what you're seeing isn't the truth, trying to convince you
Speaker 6: that you're crazy. Mister Dobinski, you have extensive experience as
Speaker 6: an expert witness and consultant in the areas of white
Speaker 6: collar crime, financial fraud, and corruption. Is it characteristic of
Speaker 6: these types of crimes that actors hide behind nicknames or
Speaker 6: other pseudonyms to master their identity that you have investigated
Speaker 6: or provided expert testimony on in the past.
Speaker 5: Well, typically you'll see code names used and money is
Speaker 5: being paid to somebody under that code name, and that's
Speaker 5: how these processes work.
Speaker 6: Let me ask you something. You're very experienced when conducting
Speaker 6: an investigation. If your boss prevented you from taking investigative steps,
Speaker 6: how would you react? How would it affect your findings?
Speaker 5: First, it would be extremely troubling if I was told
Speaker 5: not to continue to investigate something, and if I was
Speaker 5: put in that position, I'd probably withdraw from the investigation.
Speaker 6: Has the Department of Justice ever restricted any of your
Speaker 6: investigative steps?
Speaker 5: No, they have not.
Speaker 6: It's amazing, mister chairman, I yield back my time.
Speaker 2: What else do you need besides that?
Speaker 1: A total of six people appeared to previously use the
Speaker 1: big guy name to reference. Okay, this is very important
Speaker 1: to reference Joe Biden. These are big players, including Gary Shapley,
Speaker 1: James Glaar, Mister Rogers, Hunter, Biden himself, and Frank Biden.
Speaker 1: This name became famous when The New York Post reported
Speaker 1: an email found on Hunter Biden's laptop ten to one
Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden's business partners, James Galar, in the weeks
Speaker 1: leading up to the twenty twenty president sho election. The
Speaker 1: email outlined the proposed percentage distribution of equity in the
Speaker 1: joint venture of CEFC China Energy Company. The proposed plan
Speaker 1: included ten percent held for H. Hell excuse me, let
Speaker 1: me make sure I says exactly right. Ten percent held
Speaker 1: by H H stood for Hunter for the big guy,
Speaker 1: the big guy. The question about the big guy also
Speaker 1: rose during an ongoing federal investigation Delaware into Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: In fact, irs whistleblowers now alleged at the assistant US
Speaker 1: Attorney Leslie wolf refused to allow Hunter Biden investigators to
Speaker 1: ask if Joe Biden was the big Guy. In addition
Speaker 1: to that, an email released this week by the House
Speaker 1: Ways and Means Committee showed that that same Assistant US
Speaker 1: Attorney Leslie Wolfe ordered investigators in August of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: presidential election season to remove any reference to political figure
Speaker 1: one from a FAARAH search warrant. You don't know why
Speaker 1: because in August of twenty twenty. It was right after
Speaker 1: the presidential election and Joe Biden was a sitting president of.
Speaker 2: The United States of America.
Speaker 1: Then a document subsequently release showed that Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: in fact political number political figure number one. All right,
Speaker 1: let me tell you real quick about an amazing company
Speaker 1: called Patriot Mobile. For ten years, they have been America's
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. And when I say only
Speaker 1: trust me, they're the only one. Glenn and the team
Speaker 1: have been great supporters of this show, which is why
Speaker 1: I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile. They offer you
Speaker 1: dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all
Speaker 1: three major networks, which means you get the same coverage
Speaker 1: you've been accustomed to without funding the leftist agenda. When
Speaker 1: you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending the message that
Speaker 1: you support free speech, religious freedom, sancty of life, Second Amendment,
Speaker 1: and our military, our veterans and first responder heroes. They
Speaker 1: have one hundred percent US based customer service team making
Speaker 1: switching easy. You get to keep your same cell phone number,
Speaker 1: keep your same phone that you have right now, keep
Speaker 1: your same phone, or upgrade to a new one and
Speaker 1: their team will help you find the best plan for
Speaker 1: your needs and save you real money. You've got a
Speaker 1: small business, they can cover all that as well. All
Speaker 1: you need to do is go to Patriot mobile dot
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson, patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson, or call
Speaker 1: them nine to seven to two Patriot. That's nine to
Speaker 1: seven to two Patriot get free activation when you use
Speaker 1: the promo code Ferguson. Join me and make the switch
Speaker 1: today and protect our values and stand for them with
Speaker 1: every phone call patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine
Speaker 1: to seven too Patriot. There is a story right now
Speaker 1: that if it was a Republican that did this, I
Speaker 1: would argue, they would have already been arrested. Okay, they
Speaker 1: would have already been kicked out of Congress, they would
Speaker 1: have been charged with major crimes, including bare minimum insurrection,
Speaker 1: and it would have been the leading story for the
Speaker 1: last twenty four to forty eight hours since this happened.
Speaker 1: I'm guessing that many of you who are listening right
Speaker 1: now are probably going to hear about this story for
Speaker 1: the very first time on the show. Not because you're
Speaker 1: not politically a student, not because you're not paying attention,
Speaker 1: but because this story is a story that's like, oh no, no,
Speaker 1: it didn't happen.
Speaker 2: Now why did it not happen? Two reasons why.
Speaker 1: One because the person that did it is an African
Speaker 1: American and two because the person that did it as
Speaker 1: a Democrat who's an African American in the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Now let me go back real quick, just give a
Speaker 1: very quick comparing contrast. January sixth happened. It was a
Speaker 1: day that is a bad day for this country. Was
Speaker 1: not nine to eleven. Want to make that clear. Democrats
Speaker 1: say it was. It was a nine to eleven event.
Speaker 2: It was not.
Speaker 1: There were people that made release stupid decisions on that
Speaker 1: day and they should be held accountable.
Speaker 2: I want to be clear.
Speaker 1: I do not believe that they are like al Qaeda,
Speaker 1: as Democrats have treated them, and as the court system
Speaker 1: is treat them like they are actual terrorists. Okay, if
Speaker 1: you were let into the capitol that day by police
Speaker 1: and shown your way around like some of them were
Speaker 1: clearly shown on video, do I believe that you deserve
Speaker 1: to go to jail for five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, twelve, fifteen,
Speaker 1: twenty years. No, do I believe that little grandmothers who
Speaker 1: wandered into the Capitol that day that didn't do anything,
Speaker 1: didn't destroy anything, didn't try to set anything on fire.
Speaker 1: Do I believe they should be in prison for that.
Speaker 5: No.
Speaker 1: If you walk through a door and there was a
Speaker 1: police officer there that walked you in that door or
Speaker 1: opened that door for you, and you're in the Capitol,
Speaker 1: doub believe you should be charged with crime.
Speaker 2: No, I do not.
Speaker 1: But nevertheless, anyone that was in and around January sixth,
Speaker 1: the Capitol building has been treated like a domestic terrace.
Speaker 1: It's a problem, and they've hunted them down. In fact,
Speaker 1: there was every government agency that was went into full
Speaker 1: court press and they even were requesting the financial records
Speaker 1: ATM transaction debit card transactions of hotels and others around
Speaker 1: there to even see and to get a calculation of
Speaker 1: who was in Washington, d C. On January the sixth.
Speaker 1: We went into a full on nine to eleven style
Speaker 1: mentality because.
Speaker 2: Of January sixth. That also is a.
Speaker 1: Problem, and we've hunted down people now literally for years
Speaker 1: after January sixth. We arrested people recently for things that
Speaker 1: they are accused of doing on January the sixth, just
Speaker 1: to again put it in perspective. Now, I say all
Speaker 1: that to remind you how people were treated that we're Republicans, right.
Speaker 1: We also can't get real clear answers or honest answers
Speaker 1: about how many people were instigators in the crowd that
Speaker 1: were actually on the government payroll. And we're talking about
Speaker 1: on the government dime. Ray Epps was just now charged
Speaker 1: with some joke of a crime. Many believed that ray
Speaker 1: Epps was a guy that some have described and media
Speaker 1: accounts as being an informant of the FBI. We still
Speaker 1: haven't been able to get a direct or clear answer
Speaker 1: on that. And why was ray Epps not charge of
Speaker 1: crimes until he was charged with a slap on the
Speaker 1: wrist of a crime made Joe Biden or i say
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden type of slap on the wrist for what
Speaker 1: he clearly did on Janeity six compared to others who
Speaker 1: are going to spend more than a decade in prison,
Speaker 1: more than a decade in prison. I say all of
Speaker 1: this to put it in perspective before I tell you
Speaker 1: the next story, because the next story should make everyone
Speaker 1: very angry. There is a congressman who was a grand
Speaker 1: stander who is a race baiter by the name of
Speaker 1: Jamalt Bowman. He is now quote under investigation for pulling
Speaker 1: a fire alarm inside the US Capital to delay the
Speaker 1: vote to avoid a government shut down. The squad member,
Speaker 1: this member of the squad, the AOC type squad member.
Speaker 1: So I thought the alarm would open the door. That
Speaker 1: is now the excuse. Photos, however, disprove that ridiculous, outlandish claim.
Speaker 1: The House Administration Committee, the Capitol Police, they now say
Speaker 1: they are in fact investigating this individual. Now, if that's
Speaker 1: not the definition of insurrectionist, I don't know what is.
Speaker 1: You have a sitting member of Congress ripped down by
Speaker 1: the way, two signs warning, a second four door and
Speaker 1: the Cannon House office building was for emergency use only
Speaker 1: before then pulling the fire alarm and running out through
Speaker 1: a different door on a diff front floor. So the
Speaker 1: idea that he was confused or thought it would open
Speaker 1: the door, we know is a lie, just from what
Speaker 1: I explained to you. Multiple sources now familiar with the
Speaker 1: investigation to Bowman pulling the firearm in the house, which
Speaker 1: triggered a full scale law enforcement and emergency services response
Speaker 1: leading to the evacuation of the building are now saying
Speaker 1: that Bowman ripped these two signs down through them on
Speaker 1: the ground. First, the sources familiar with the investigation are
Speaker 1: in essence at this point, I think whistleblowing so this
Speaker 1: doesn't get swept under the rug. There are new photographs
Speaker 1: the scene of the alleged crime later, after the emergency
Speaker 1: door had been restored after damage Bowen did to it
Speaker 1: showing the signs. This again is another example of the
Speaker 1: pure evil in the Democratic Party. Now, in the photos
Speaker 1: of the double doors with glass windows, there are clearly
Speaker 1: two giant red signs on the door. They both say
Speaker 1: emergency exit only push until alarm sounds three second. Stores
Speaker 1: will unlock in thirty seconds. There is also another sign
Speaker 1: on a stand in front of the door that makes
Speaker 1: it clear this is an emergency exit only. Off to
Speaker 1: the left on the wall is the fire alarm that
Speaker 1: Bowman pulled. The fire alarm clearly states it is a
Speaker 1: fire alarm. The photograph of Bowman pulling the fire alarm,
Speaker 1: which Capit Police already released publicly shows the two red
Speaker 1: signs that are normally affixed the window are no longer there,
Speaker 1: so therefore he ripped them down right. This is what
Speaker 1: we know, and a source familiar with the matter said
Speaker 1: Bowman casually, as the House was holding open the House
Speaker 1: Democrat's motion to adjourned vote earlier in the day, walked
Speaker 1: up to the door and then ripped the emergency signs
Speaker 1: off and threw them on the ground.
Speaker 2: He ripped both of them off the door and threw
Speaker 2: them both on the floor, the source says.
Speaker 1: Then he leaned and to the door and tit tied
Speaker 1: and tried to open it. The source added, then he
Speaker 1: pulled the fire alarm. When the alarm begins going off,
Speaker 1: he turns around and ran, going down to the first
Speaker 1: four of cannon off this building and exit out a
Speaker 1: different door than made his way across the street to votes.
Speaker 1: At no point did he say to anyone, sorry, this
Speaker 1: is a mistake, or sorry I pulled the fire alarm
Speaker 1: by mistake, or anything like that. He didn't say anything
Speaker 1: to anyone until he was confronted by Capitol police later
Speaker 1: that day. By doing that, by doing what he did,
Speaker 1: he caused a whole building to be evacuated. Capitol police
Speaker 1: and emergency services needed to treat any arm like a
Speaker 1: real threat until they know otherwise, like a terrorist event.
Speaker 1: These factors also undercut his official public statement that he
Speaker 1: was trying to get out of the door. He did
Speaker 1: not try to get out the door. He did not
Speaker 1: wait the thirty seconds like the sign said. He clearly
Speaker 1: did not follow the instructions on the emergency signs. He
Speaker 1: later told reporters, I thought the alarm would open the door.
Speaker 1: This guy should be in jail, and he sure as
Speaker 1: hell shouldn't be in congres. And yet this story you're
Speaker 1: probably hearing nothing about it. Why because the Democrats they
Speaker 1: don't care, and they don't believe January six was actually
Speaker 1: an insurrection. I want to be clear about that. They
Speaker 1: don't care. Please share this podcast with your family and friends.
Speaker 1: Please make sure you write us a five star review
Speaker 1: wherever you're listening to this podcast, so that it will
Speaker 1: help us reach more people.
Speaker 2: And we will see you back here tomorrow