Speaker 1: The Department of Justice investigators. We now know they're admitting
Speaker 1: that they actually ordered to remove any reference to Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in the Pharah warrant. An email has been released
Speaker 1: now by the House Ways and Means Committee, and it
Speaker 1: shows that the Assistant US Attorney Leslie Wolf ordered investigators
Speaker 1: in August of twenty twenty to remove any reference to
Speaker 1: political figure number one from the search warrant. A document
Speaker 1: subsequently released showed that President Joe Biden is political figure
Speaker 1: number one. Quote as a priority, someone needs to redraft attachment.
Speaker 1: Be Wolf wrote in an email, I'm not sure what
Speaker 1: this is cut and pasted from, but other than the attribution,
Speaker 1: location and identity stuff at the end, none of it
Speaker 1: appears it is appropriate and within the scope of this warrant.
Speaker 1: She's saying, you're not going to talk about the vice
Speaker 1: president or the president of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: She then says, in her own words, please focus on
Speaker 1: Pharaoh Foreign Agent's Registration Act evidence only. There should be
Speaker 1: nothing about political figure one in here, meaning there should
Speaker 1: be nothing about Joe Biden in here. A second document
Speaker 1: that the committee released on Wednesday also showed that political
Speaker 1: figure number one is in fact former Vice President Joseph
Speaker 1: Bidenette Biden Junior. The document says VP Biden is currently
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party presidential candidate for the United States and
Speaker 1: served as the forty seventh officeholder of the position of
Speaker 1: the Office of the Vice President of United States of
Speaker 1: America and the Barack Obama administration from January twentieth rough
Speaker 1: nine to January twenty, twenty seventeen. He is the father
Speaker 1: of subject one. That's what it actually says, okay in
Speaker 1: this day document. The documents were made public after the
Speaker 1: committee voted to approve more disclosures from IRS whistleblowers. Now
Speaker 1: Wolfe is at the Senator of additional allegations levied by
Speaker 1: IRS whistleblowers that said that they were not allowed to
Speaker 1: do their job. The committee also released information from a
Speaker 1: May twenty twenty one report generated by IRS investigators that
Speaker 1: noted that Hunter Biden's lawyer, Kevin Morris, could have committed
Speaker 1: campaign finance violations, which Wolfe then told investigators to also ignore,
Speaker 1: saying this there may be campaign finance criminal violations based
Speaker 1: on interviews and a review of the evidence, wolf allegedly stated,
Speaker 1: but a Department of Justice official told the investigators to
Speaker 1: ignore the allegation, noting she was not personally quote unquote interested.
Speaker 1: R S whistleblower handwritten notes now show. IRS whistleblowers also
Speaker 1: alleged that Wolf refused to allow investigators to ask about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden being the big guy. Let me say that again.
Speaker 1: IRS whistleblowers also say that Wolf, the same person that
Speaker 1: covered all of this up that I just told you about,
Speaker 1: is the same Wolf who refused to allow investigators to
Speaker 1: ask about Joe Biden being the big guy, and that
Speaker 1: the DOJ twice prevented Weiss from bringing stronger charges against
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Now, these recent revelations are coming as a
Speaker 1: House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comber held the first impeachment
Speaker 1: inquiry hearing saying quote at least ten times Joe Biden
Speaker 1: lied to the American people and that he never spoke
Speaker 1: to his family about their business dealings. He lied by
Speaker 1: telling the American people that he was an absolute wall
Speaker 1: between his official government duties in his personal life. Those
Speaker 1: are the words of Joe Biden. Let's be clear, there
Speaker 1: was no wall. The door was wide open those who
Speaker 1: purchased what a business associate described as the Biden brand.
Speaker 1: Now you go into all that, and now the media
Speaker 1: has a problem. NBC News is even covering this.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I want you to hear what NBC News said about
Speaker 1: all the evidence that deals with the President and his son.
Speaker 3: Pali outside the hearing room. NBC's Kendelanian is in DC.
Speaker 3: Barbara McQuaid is a former US attorney and University of
Speaker 3: Michigan law professor and MSNBC legal analyst. And Matthew Dowd
Speaker 3: is a former chief strategist for the Bush Cheney re
Speaker 3: election campaign as well as a senior MSNBC political analyst.
Speaker 3: So Ken, bring us up to speed. What stuck out
Speaker 3: to you here? Well, Chris, I think that.
Speaker 4: Turly sound really captured the tenor of all three of
Speaker 4: the Republican witnesses which they came to the hearing to
Speaker 4: basically say, look, there's a lot of troubling behavior here,
Speaker 4: a lot of smoke. Hunter Biden was paid millions of
Speaker 4: including by foreign business entities. There's an email where he
Speaker 4: says I had to give half my salary to Pop
Speaker 4: that's never been explained, but there's no evidence beyond that smoke.
Speaker 1: I love this, but there's no evidence beyond that smoke.
Speaker 2: Let's just back that up. Real quick.
Speaker 1: This is a Justice and Intel correspondent of NBC News.
Speaker 1: Listen to him, tell you, okay that Joe hunter Biden
Speaker 1: said he gave half his salary to Joe and no
Speaker 1: one can explain that. But there's no hard evidence. It's
Speaker 1: not even smoke.
Speaker 4: The Republican witnesses which they came to the hearing to
Speaker 4: basically say, look, there's a lot of troubling behavior here,
Speaker 4: a lot of smoke. Hunter Biden was paid millions of dollars,
Speaker 4: including by foreign business entities. There's an email where he says,
Speaker 4: I had to give half my salary to Pop.
Speaker 5: That's never been explained.
Speaker 1: But that's never been explained, So am MEYC News saying, hey,
Speaker 1: look we're admitting it now, all right, Hunter Biden was was,
Speaker 1: you know, telling everybody and emails are saying and he's
Speaker 1: paying for a bunch of stuff for his daddy and
Speaker 1: that's never been explained. But then to listen to immediately
Speaker 1: how fast they turn around and go the other way.
Speaker 4: Crimes which there doesn't seem to be any. Now that said,
Speaker 4: we all know this is a political game here as well,
Speaker 4: and what the Republicans have succeeded in doing is putting
Speaker 4: a lot of the evidence that they've been working on
Speaker 4: for months in their oversight inquiries into Hunter Biden's business dealings,
Speaker 4: putting that in front of an audience that perhaps is
Speaker 4: not familiar with it, and it's not a great picture
Speaker 4: for Democrats. The Democrats acknowledged that Hunter Biden was essentially
Speaker 4: trading on what they call the illusion of access to
Speaker 4: his father.
Speaker 1: So now they're admitting that the that the business structure.
Speaker 1: This on NBC News MSNBC. They're now admitting that the
Speaker 1: the the game was selling access to the big guy.
Speaker 1: Now they say it was an illusion. That's what they're
Speaker 1: trying to argue. Now they say, no, no, it's not real. Okay,
Speaker 1: calm down, it's not actual. This really didn't happen. It's
Speaker 1: not real. It was Hunter Biden was just selling the
Speaker 1: illusion he really did didn't have access to his dad. Okay,
Speaker 1: then explain all the payments going to all the Biden
Speaker 1: family members. You're saying all of them were just randomly
Speaker 1: taking cash from random people at random times for millions
Speaker 1: of dollars and it was all just a ruse and
Speaker 1: that happened by Hunter Biden. Come on, one of the
Speaker 1: key witnesses that also went before the hearing this week,
Speaker 1: the impeachment of hearing was a forensic accountant. Okay, This
Speaker 1: forensic accountant by the name of Bruce Debnski said this
Speaker 1: on Fox News about the compensation that the Biden family
Speaker 1: was receiving, specifically Hunter Biden with Barisma Listen.
Speaker 6: Biden was receiving a million dollars a year to be
Speaker 6: on the board of Varissma with no expertise, no known
Speaker 6: expertise for an oil company. I just went and looked
Speaker 6: at the same year twenty fifteen trucks on mobile. Their
Speaker 6: average compensation for their directors, their independent directors was about
Speaker 6: three hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year. So you
Speaker 6: have to ask yourself almost two and a half times
Speaker 6: the rate. What is Parisona paying Hunter Biden for and why?
Speaker 6: And what's being given in exchange for that? Was it
Speaker 6: just the illusion of access to Washington? That's the story
Speaker 6: now or was there something more? Again, the American people
Speaker 6: deserve the truth and we need to find that out.
Speaker 2: You go back to the new story.
Speaker 1: The news story is okay, Well, Hunter Biden was a
Speaker 1: trouble crackhead who loved Hooker's and blow and he was
Speaker 1: selling the allusion to his father. Okay, then why were
Speaker 1: all the family members taking the money? If he's a
Speaker 1: screw up like that, and you're trading off your father's
Speaker 1: name and your father wanted no part of this, then
Speaker 1: why would every family member take money. No one has
Speaker 1: answered that question yet. No one has answered the basic
Speaker 1: question of Okay, well, then when all the millions were
Speaker 1: coming in and then all these things are being paid for,
Speaker 1: didn't Daddy say, hey, Hunter crackhead, how are you paying
Speaker 1: to you model my house? How are you paying my
Speaker 1: tax bill? How are you paying all of these things?
Speaker 1: That is the question that should have been asked. Kevin
Speaker 1: McCarthy also saying this about the dinners that they had.
Speaker 7: But despite the chaos, the president still won't go to
Speaker 7: the border, setting new records every day. Fintanyl at an
Speaker 7: all time high, killing Americans, and he refuses to go
Speaker 7: to the border. He's been one time in fifty years.
Speaker 7: One time in fifty years. He's had more dinners with
Speaker 7: Hunter biden business partners than he has going to the border.
Speaker 1: He's had more dinners with Hunter Biden's business partners, and
Speaker 1: he has gone to the border. He's absolutely right on
Speaker 1: saying that. Now, let's go back to the story that's
Speaker 1: now being told. A lot of people missed it, okay,
Speaker 1: and it's an important that was being told by this
Speaker 1: expert witness on the bidens The question simple, what was
Speaker 1: the money for? He was asked that question on Newsmax. Listen,
Speaker 1: all right.
Speaker 8: There were four expert witnesses at today's hearings.
Speaker 5: Bruce Dedvinski was one of them.
Speaker 8: Devinsky has been a forensic accountant for forty years and
Speaker 8: he joins us tonight, Sir, thank you for coming on.
Speaker 8: I want to start by saying that the three Republican
Speaker 8: witnesses did a great job yourself included of playing this
Speaker 8: hearing pretty straight. You all agreed initially that we aren't
Speaker 8: at the level of evidence to actually impeach Biden yet
Speaker 8: that's why we have an inquiry. Of course, can you
Speaker 8: tell me more about what you need to see before
Speaker 8: you would believe that Biden has clearly taken a bribe
Speaker 8: for his influence by a foreign power.
Speaker 6: Well, I think we need to see more bank statements,
Speaker 6: more information from those bank statements, where did the money
Speaker 6: go and also what was the money being paid for?
Speaker 6: I mean, that's the critical question. That ball was being
Speaker 6: thrown around a little bit back and forth today. But why,
Speaker 6: for instance, was three point five million dollars sent to
Speaker 6: a company and then Biden's got part of that money.
Speaker 9: What was being what was that money for?
Speaker 6: Was that a success fee for something that doesn't seem
Speaker 6: to me to be a fee for consulting? So we
Speaker 6: really need to get to the bottom of what the
Speaker 6: different money was being paid for, what was the substance,
Speaker 6: if anything, or was it a paid a polace scheme.
Speaker 8: We have loads of evidence, you know, we have a lot.
Speaker 8: You talked about smoke and fire. We have a ton
Speaker 8: of smoke right that Joe Biden was involved in this.
Speaker 8: We have many comments by his own brother, by his
Speaker 8: own son. We have a very credible paid FBI and
Speaker 8: foreman who says that Barisma's owner paid hundred five million
Speaker 8: and also paid Joe five million. We've got a former
Speaker 8: business partner from the Chinese deal who says Joe was
Speaker 8: in on the meetings. Joe's power is what they were selling,
Speaker 8: and Joe was in on these deals. We know the
Speaker 8: Biden family got millions despite having nothing of value to
Speaker 8: anybody except Joe's position in the government when you look
Speaker 8: at all of that smoke, and then you hear you
Speaker 8: hear the Democrats in Congress that were questioning you today
Speaker 8: and trying to marginalize the things you were saying. They're
Speaker 8: saying that there's no evidence at all and it's outrageous
Speaker 8: to even have an inquiry.
Speaker 5: What's your response to that?
Speaker 9: Well, I think that was misleading.
Speaker 6: I think again they didn't want to face the facts
Speaker 6: that were presented today, and I think those facts will
Speaker 6: lead to potentially other facts, and then the question is
Speaker 6: was there does this lead to wrongdoing on the President's
Speaker 6: part or the then Vice President Biden. So I think
Speaker 6: those are the questions that need to be asked and
Speaker 6: get to the bottom of what was this money being
Speaker 6: paid for, what was done for it, if anything, and
Speaker 6: if there was substance to those transactions, then the Biden
Speaker 6: should come forward with that information and put it forward
Speaker 6: and put an.
Speaker 9: End to this.
Speaker 8: You know, one major Democrat defense is that some of
Speaker 8: this activity occurred after Joe Biden left the White House,
Speaker 8: making it meaningless is what they're trying to claim. I
Speaker 8: take a listen to how Nancy Mace, the congressman, described
Speaker 8: the twenty seventeen payments by CFC China, which is a
Speaker 8: communist China energy company.
Speaker 5: This is after Joe Biden left the White House.
Speaker 9: Take a look. We know CEFC was.
Speaker 10: Working with the Biden family while Joe Biden was Vice president.
Speaker 10: Hunter Biden and James Biden did not receive compensation because
Speaker 10: Joe Biden was still Vice president during this time period.
Speaker 10: There is a concern it would be improper for payments
Speaker 10: to be made to Hunter Biden and James Bien Biden
Speaker 10: by CEFC due to its close affiliation with the Chinese government.
Speaker 10: Hunter Biden and James Biden both wanted to be compensated
Speaker 10: for the assistance they had provided to CEFC's ventures. The
Speaker 10: Bidens coincidentally were paid over a million dollars by CCP
Speaker 10: affiliated Chinese company CEFC shortly after Joe Biden left office
Speaker 10: as Vice president. Now we know why, because it was
Speaker 10: back pay.
Speaker 8: I wanted to ask your assessment of that. I mean,
Speaker 8: it would make sense to me if I was somebody
Speaker 8: in power, I was selling access to my power, it
Speaker 8: would make sense that you would want to get paid,
Speaker 8: maybe in a position in a time when you weren't
Speaker 8: in power.
Speaker 5: Is that would you know.
Speaker 8: That would kind of cover your tracks a little bit.
Speaker 8: Do you see that as a possibility. Have you seen
Speaker 8: that before?
Speaker 6: I have seen that before, and it's basically a deferred payment.
Speaker 6: So the question is, you know what was done for
Speaker 6: that payment and now it's being deferred till after that
Speaker 6: he leaves office? Was that was there intent to structure
Speaker 6: it that way? And if it's proven that there was
Speaker 6: intent to structure it that way, that's a problem.
Speaker 9: Certainly.
Speaker 8: You talked again, you know, you talked a lot about
Speaker 8: where there's smoke, there's fire.
Speaker 5: Your initial statement, Given.
Speaker 8: The evidence that we have, if this is allowed to
Speaker 8: be investigated fully, and if you know, we can get
Speaker 8: to these bank statements, if we can get personal bank statements,
Speaker 8: do you think we're going to have a clear answer
Speaker 8: one way or the other as to whether or not,
Speaker 8: you know, the man who's now the president of the
Speaker 8: United States has committed some sort of a treasonous violation.
Speaker 9: That's a good question. I don't know.
Speaker 6: You know, like any investigation, you walk down the hallway,
Speaker 6: you start opening doors and looking behind it to see
Speaker 6: what's behind there.
Speaker 9: You may come up empty and.
Speaker 6: Door number one, but door number three yields a treasure
Speaker 6: trove of information, so so no one will know till
Speaker 6: the investigation is advanced to the level of getting answers.
Speaker 9: And you make a good point.
Speaker 6: That investigation has to be unimpeded, and if there's an
Speaker 6: attempt to impede that investigation, we certainly won't get the answers. Yeah,
Speaker 6: it's been certain.
Speaker 8: It certainly has been a lot of evidence that they're
Speaker 8: trying to obstruct this thing. They don't want to let
Speaker 8: anybody see what's really going on here.
Speaker 1: By the way, I love this expert witness. You can
Speaker 1: see he stays out of the things that are political, like, hey,
Speaker 1: I'm staying out of that. He's just giving you the facts,
Speaker 1: and that's the part that's the most important here. But
Speaker 1: you look at what they're trying to cover up and
Speaker 1: how they're moving the goal post consistently.
Speaker 2: It's a problem, folks. It's a really big problem.
Speaker 1: There's something else that is going to happen this week,
Speaker 1: and that is a guy by the name of Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden who is going to be in court Tuesday. Is
Speaker 1: the media going to cover that fact that Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: is going to appear in federal court on Tuesday. I'm
Speaker 1: going to guess probably not. Now there's also something else
Speaker 1: that's interesting. The editor in chief of Breitbart is a
Speaker 1: guy by the name of Alex Marlowe. He is the
Speaker 1: author of a new book, Breaking Biden, exposing the hidden
Speaker 1: forces in secret money machine behind Joe Biden's family and
Speaker 1: his administration. That book coming out. He talked to Maria
Speaker 1: Bartuoma about what he found in that book. At the
Speaker 1: same exact time, they're going after Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: Listen, Hunter Biden essential peer in federal court this upcoming
Speaker 11: Tuesday to be arraigned on three felony gun charges, where
Speaker 11: he's expected to enter a not guilty pleate. Join me
Speaker 11: right now with an in depth loop into the Biden
Speaker 11: family business. Is the editor in chief of Breitbart News.
Speaker 11: Alex Marlowe is here. Alex is the author of the
Speaker 11: new book, Breaking Biden, exposing the hidden forces and secret
Speaker 11: money machine behind Joe Biden, his family, and his administration.
Speaker 11: The book will be a beginning this Tuesday, and we
Speaker 11: welcome Alex to the program. Thanks very much for being here. Alex,
Speaker 11: it's good to have you and I want to start
Speaker 11: off on this influence pedaling because many Democrats and the
Speaker 11: White House continue to say that there is not a
Speaker 11: direct link linking Joe Biden to the twenty shell companies
Speaker 11: to the twenty million plus money that have gone to
Speaker 11: the Biden family.
Speaker 9: But you say you're not going to find that, and
Speaker 9: you don't need to find that.
Speaker 5: It's more about the family.
Speaker 9: Tell us about it.
Speaker 12: Yeah, First of all, we already know that the finances
Speaker 12: are intertwined. We've seen the ample evidence of this going
Speaker 12: both directions. How about that Rosemont phone that Joe Biden
Speaker 12: was using, et cetera. But I do think we're asking
Speaker 12: the wrong question. Sometimes there is clearly the anatomy of
Speaker 12: a bribe that's taking place, where foreign entities and domestic
Speaker 12: entities are sending money to the Biden family members. We
Speaker 12: know this to be true and it's affecting US policy.
Speaker 12: The clearest examples of beisma one. I don't have to
Speaker 12: repeat all that to your audience, Maria, But there are
Speaker 12: some new ones that are in the book that I
Speaker 12: think are really explosive, and I think we need a
Speaker 12: deeper dive, for example, into the Hunter Biden art deals.
Speaker 12: Who is one of the main buyers of Hunter Biden's
Speaker 12: are it's Kevin Morris. Kevin Morris is Hunter's attorney, but
Speaker 12: he also controls the LLC that holds Hunter's steak in BHR,
Speaker 12: which a Chinese equity firm which is essentially run by
Speaker 12: the Bank of China.
Speaker 2: How about Sinapeck.
Speaker 12: Sinapeck got a bunch of our strategic oil. Why would
Speaker 12: Joe Biden send strategic oil to a Chinese company, Well, Sinapeck,
Speaker 12: there's a one point seven billion dollar steak BHR has
Speaker 12: in that company. BHR controlled by Kevin Morris and Hunter.
Speaker 5: That's unbelievable.
Speaker 11: So what you're suggesting is it could be still going
Speaker 11: on because he's selling the art and Kevin.
Speaker 5: Morris is in charge.
Speaker 11: The influence pedaling may be going on as we speak.
Speaker 12: There is no reason for Chinese to get US oil
Speaker 12: aside from to benefit the commercial interest of the Biden
Speaker 12: family via BHR. That's what's happening, and that's why we
Speaker 12: need to turn over every stone until it's proven beyond
Speaker 12: a reasonable doubt.
Speaker 1: Now I wish I could say that I personally am
Speaker 1: shocked by this, because what was just said there is shocking.
Speaker 1: I'm not shocked though, because I've actually read all of
Speaker 1: the intel that's been released. Suspicious activity reports the books
Speaker 1: that have been written, the things that were on the laptop.
Speaker 1: So this, to me is exactly what I would expect.
Speaker 1: But that's not all that was said, because now we
Speaker 1: got to move on to impeachment. And again the shawnee
Speaker 1: object was gonna be government shut down, all right.
Speaker 2: They lost that one.
Speaker 1: So now the shainty object is Donald Trump's going to jail,
Speaker 1: right He's in He's on trial for fraud. He's a fraudster.
Speaker 1: We're gonna finally know him for the fraud that he
Speaker 1: is in New York City. We wouldn't go to jail,
Speaker 1: by the way, but who cares for this one. We're
Speaker 1: gonna put him in jail eventually because he's gonna be
Speaker 1: We're gonna tie him up in court. We're going to
Speaker 1: bankrupt him with legal fees and appeals, and he's screwed.
Speaker 2: That's what the Democrats are doing.
Speaker 1: An attorney general of the state that ran on indicting
Speaker 1: Donald Trump just because and there was a bunch of
Speaker 1: whack job liberals like, yeah, and I'll vote for that.
Speaker 1: I'll vote for that lady after she got blown out
Speaker 1: running for governor. No problem there. Listen, the second part
Speaker 1: of what he had to say the again. This is
Speaker 1: the author of a book, Breaking Biden, exposing the hidden
Speaker 1: forces in secret money machine behind Joe Biden, his family,
Speaker 1: and his administration.
Speaker 2: This book's by Alex Marlow.
Speaker 11: Listen, we've been talking about the fact that the family
Speaker 11: of Joe Biden made very well be still doing influence
Speaker 11: pedaling through Hunter Biden's art.
Speaker 9: What else do they need?
Speaker 11: The evidence has been overwhelming to impeach this guy.
Speaker 12: Will they no, We have ample evidence, and you can
Speaker 12: go back to all of these Chinese business deals where
Speaker 12: there's still so many stones on turn Maria. For example,
Speaker 12: that Hunter sold Rosemont Realty to an entity that was
Speaker 12: known by Sijen Ping as the dragon Head because of
Speaker 12: his strategic importance. Hunter got paid off for it, but
Speaker 12: he also retains a stake in this company. We have
Speaker 12: no idea how much that steak is and the executive
Speaker 12: branch is not going to be forthcoming.
Speaker 2: That's why we.
Speaker 5: Need to pursue impeachment.
Speaker 12: Because the executive branch is trying to obfuscate and try
Speaker 12: not to answer questions, try not to turn over documentation,
Speaker 12: communications and bank records. They have to do all of this.
Speaker 12: This all has to get done right away. Because the
Speaker 12: deals are limitless and they are ongoing. Remember, if you
Speaker 12: hear Kevin Morris making a deal, do not hear Kevin Morris.
Speaker 2: Hear BHR, and BHR.
Speaker 5: Means the Bank of China.
Speaker 12: So if Kevin Morris is involved, you have to know
Speaker 12: that this is perhaps the Bank of China and Chinese involvement.
Speaker 5: And that's just one place.
Speaker 2: How about Ukraine?
Speaker 12: The ties between Jim Biden, the former nightclub owner, who
Speaker 12: is not only tied into the effing spy chief of China,
Speaker 12: which is Hunter's word, is not mine, he also has
Speaker 12: deep ties in Ukraine. All of these are constellations of
Speaker 12: corruption regarding Biden's entire family.
Speaker 5: The world is figured out.
Speaker 12: You pay the Biden family, you get stuff in return
Speaker 12: from Joe.
Speaker 1: The world figured it out all right, to the tune
Speaker 1: of what thirty forty fifty million dollars that we add
Speaker 1: actually know about this. On top of the fact that
Speaker 1: Taylor Green, congress woman said this weekend, Joe Biden can't
Speaker 1: deny involvement in family business after these Chinese bankwires, the
Speaker 1: new evidence showing this Chinese NST wired money to Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden with Joe Biden's home address as the beneficiary while
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was not living there but actually living in
Speaker 1: California at the time. Means the President can no longer
Speaker 1: claim that he was not involved in the family business.
Speaker 1: That's what represented MAJORI. Taylor Green said in an interview
Speaker 1: over the weekend. Hunter Biden received not one but two wires.
Speaker 1: This is a fact, totally two hundred and sixty thousand
Speaker 1: and twenty nineteen originating from Beijing from Chinese business partners
Speaker 1: directly tied to the Chinese Communist Party who listed Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's Delaware home as the beneficiary address.
Speaker 2: For the fraud.
Speaker 1: Now the House Oversight Committee also has confirmed these payments.
Speaker 2: They backed it up with other paperwork.
Speaker 1: Now, Hunter Biden did not reside with Joe Biden Delaware
Speaker 1: when the Chinese business partners wired that money to his
Speaker 1: father's address.
Speaker 2: How do we know that?
Speaker 1: Because the court documents show that from his plea deal.
Speaker 1: They can't hide behind. You know, Hunter Biden was going
Speaker 1: through a tough time, is what Green said. The reality
Speaker 1: is that all the evidence that we're coming up with
Speaker 1: through subpoenas of actual bank statements and wire transfers proved
Speaker 1: the money trail is leading to Joe Biden quote unquote.
Speaker 1: Let me also remind you real quick of what came
Speaker 1: out in the last week. The forensic accountant that was
Speaker 1: one of the first witnesses called in this impeachment inquiry
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden in the House went on TV to
Speaker 1: put in perspective the amount of money that Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: was getting while working for some of these foreign companies.
Speaker 6: Listen carefully, Urbiden was receiving a million dollars a year
Speaker 6: to be on the board of ARISSMA with no expertise,
Speaker 6: no known expertise, for an oil company. I just went
Speaker 6: and looked at the same year twenty fifteen corrects Mobile,
Speaker 6: their average compensation for their directors, their independent directors was
Speaker 6: about three hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year. So
Speaker 6: you have to ask yourself almost two and a half
Speaker 6: times the rate. What is Parisa paying Hunter Biden for
Speaker 6: and why and what's being given in exchange for that?
Speaker 6: Was it just the illusion of access to Washington that's
Speaker 6: the story now or was there something more? Again, the
Speaker 6: American people deserve the truth and we need to find
Speaker 6: that out.
Speaker 1: Barisma paid Hunter Biden two and a half times the
Speaker 1: rate that exce on Mobile executives are getting during the
Speaker 1: same time period. It wasn't for his expertise. And then
Speaker 1: this comes after you have the Speaker of the House,
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy saying this about Hunter Biden and his involvement
Speaker 1: in the Biden crime family.
Speaker 5: The president he's been gone.
Speaker 7: He's been in California, he's been everyplace else.
Speaker 9: So one plays he hasn't been at the border.
Speaker 5: He has gone to more dinners with Hunter.
Speaker 7: Biden's business associates, that he has to the border in
Speaker 7: fift years.
Speaker 2: One hell of a point. He's not lying.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has gone to more dinners with Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: Bidess says it, and he is to the border in
Speaker 1: fifty years.
Speaker 2: You want to talk about priorities.
Speaker 1: There's an issue with priorities in Congresswoman Nancy Mats she
Speaker 1: said this about Joe Biden, talking about how we know
Speaker 1: now that Joe Biden got paid, said.
Speaker 11: That you want to subpoena the bank records of Joe Biden.
Speaker 11: The chairman of your committee, overside Committee, James C. Comer,
Speaker 11: has already subpoenaed some of that. What do you need
Speaker 11: to come up with or look at to confirm your
Speaker 11: findings and your suspicions here.
Speaker 10: Well, we want to show as much evidence as possible
Speaker 10: because the left in the mainstream media, they want to
Speaker 10: hide it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist.
Speaker 10: But it needs to be overwhelming. We need to show
Speaker 10: and connect all of the dots and how Joe Biden
Speaker 10: got paid because we know he got paid through text
Speaker 10: messages and emails accounts from Hunter Biden.
Speaker 9: We know that that exists.
Speaker 10: Connecting the dots for the American people because don't trust us.
Speaker 10: I want the American people to trust the evidence.
Speaker 2: Trust the evidence.
Speaker 1: When you have the facts on your side, you can
Speaker 1: talk the way that Congresswoman Nancy Mace is talking. You
Speaker 1: can say it that way because it actually makes sense now.
Speaker 1: GOP Representative Fitzgerald also said this about the Oversight Committee
Speaker 1: and what they're going to be doing and issuing these subpoenas.
Speaker 5: What I would say is the big.
Speaker 13: News that came out of Oversight yesterday and I talked
Speaker 13: to Congressman Calmer last night about it at length, is
Speaker 13: that they're issuing the subpoenas for both Hunter and James Biden.
Speaker 1: That's what matters, these subpoenas, and we'll see how hard
Speaker 1: they fight these sipenas because they understand now that the
Speaker 1: tide is turning on them. Representative Byron Donald's dissecting the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden text messages saying this about hey, is it
Speaker 1: maybe time to investigate?
Speaker 2: Listen?
Speaker 14: And this one is a famous one. Everybody knows this one.
Speaker 14: This is the famous one that says, I hope you
Speaker 14: all do what I did and pay for everything for
Speaker 14: this entire family for thirty years.
Speaker 2: It's really hard, but don't worry.
Speaker 14: Unlike Pop, I won't make you. I won't make you
Speaker 14: give me half your salary.
Speaker 1: That is Hunter Biden's own text message to his family members.
Speaker 1: I hope you can all do what I did for
Speaker 1: everything for this and pay for everything for this entire
Speaker 1: family for years. It's truly hard, but don't worry. I'mike Pop.
Speaker 1: I won't make you give me half your salary. Right,
Speaker 1: I mean Byron's absolutely right. And what he just said there.
Speaker 14: Mister Dobinski, if you saw a text message like this
Speaker 14: and a potential money laundering operation or a potential pay
Speaker 14: for play operation, would you be looking for information related
Speaker 14: to money going from son to father?
Speaker 9: Absolutely without a.
Speaker 1: Doubt, Absolutely without a doubt. So there are two things
Speaker 1: going on here, and you're gonna have to really pay attention.
Speaker 1: There's the shiny object, which is Donald Trump on a
Speaker 1: fraud trial by an activist attorney general the state of
Speaker 1: New York who lost her last race then said, if
Speaker 1: you go help me, I'll go after Donald Trump. This
Speaker 1: is a woman, the New York Attorney General, whose aim
Speaker 1: is to put Trump out of business in all of
Speaker 1: New York, shut down his family, shut down their name,
Speaker 1: and to officially declare he is a fraudster. Year after year,
Speaker 1: loan after loan defendants. The defendants misrepresented mister Trump's net worth.
Speaker 1: The lead attorney said, these people act like they were rich,
Speaker 1: but they were not. Donald Trump was right, and I
Speaker 1: played this for you at the very beginning when he
Speaker 1: came out and said there's people dying on the streets
Speaker 1: of New York and there was no body harmed here,
Speaker 1: yet they're coming after me.
Speaker 2: He is absolutely right.
Speaker 1: This is no different than the first impeachment trial when
Speaker 1: they sat when the Democrats knew the entire time they
Speaker 1: were impeaching him over something that never happened. They were
Speaker 1: impeaching him over Adalcia. The f I said was usualer
Speaker 1: generated by the Democrat National Committee in Hillary Clinton's campaign
Speaker 1: adossier that even the FBI said, to the guy who
Speaker 1: brought it to them, Hey, if you can corroborate any
Speaker 1: of what you're claiming in here, will give you a
Speaker 1: million dollars. And he never got a million dollars because
Speaker 1: he knew he couldn't corroborate it, because he knew he
Speaker 1: made it up out of thin air. You also had
Speaker 1: the forensic experts this week that said code names like
Speaker 1: the Big Guy commonly used in financial crimes. You also
Speaker 1: have a problem now with the President's story because Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden claimed he didn't receive one cent from Chinese associates
Speaker 1: to fight despite the wire transfers in the summer twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: But maybe he didn't receive a cent.
Speaker 1: Maybe Daddy got all of that money while he was
Speaker 1: out in California. And then there's one other thing I forgot.
Speaker 1: I almost forgot to bring this up. James Comber has
Speaker 1: now subpoenaed twenty wire transfers totaling one point three million,
Speaker 1: received by the President's brother, James Biden. The House Oversight
Speaker 1: Committee Chairman James Comber subpoena James Biden's line haul group
Speaker 1: and JBBSR inc entities because the committee could not identify
Speaker 1: quote legitimate services provided by James Biden's companies. Now, comber
Speaker 1: subpoena appears to be directed obtaining records linked to President
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's corporation, Celtic Capri Corporation, which received nearly ten
Speaker 1: million dollars in twenty seventeen without specifying revenue line items. Quote.
Speaker 1: So that's an LLC account. It wasn't a shell company.
Speaker 1: That was a real LLC account with more earnings in
Speaker 1: there than what we could find. So that is an account.
Speaker 1: We planned a subpoena as we follow the money, Comber said.
Speaker 1: James Biden. An often overlook member of the Biden family
Speaker 1: is President Joe Biden's younger brother and Hunter Biden's uncle.
Speaker 1: James and Hunter were business partners with the CEFC China
Speaker 1: Energy Company, an organization closely aligned and has direct links
Speaker 1: to the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: While Hunter's complex web of wired transfers from CEFC received
Speaker 1: much attention in recent years, James Comer expanded its focus
Speaker 1: to James Biden's entities.
Speaker 2: Those entities received at least.
Speaker 1: Twenty wires totaling one point three nine to eight million
Speaker 1: dollars through Hunter Biden's entities, according to the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: Senate report by Senator Chuck Grassley and Senator Ron Johnson
Speaker 1: quote there is also evidence that Hunter Biden's Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: moved large sums of money from his firm a wash Code,
Speaker 1: to James Biden's consulting firm, the lion Hal Group. Between
Speaker 1: August to fourteenth to twenty seventeen and August third of
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, alast Co sent twenty different wire transfers totally
Speaker 1: one point three nine eight nine niney nine million dollars
Speaker 1: to the Lion Group, a consulting firm that lists James
Speaker 1: Biden and his wife Sarah Biden on the bank account.
Speaker 1: This transaction was identified for potential criminal financial activity. These
Speaker 1: transfers began less than one week after CEFC Infrastructure Investment
Speaker 1: wired five million to the Hudson West and Hudson West
Speaker 1: sent its first payment of four hundred thousand dollars to Auasco. Now,
Speaker 1: most of the payments from Oasco to the Lion Hall
Speaker 1: Group had vague notes to the memo line and fifteen
Speaker 1: of which simply indicated that they were for further credit
Speaker 1: to James Biden. However, the memo line for one of
Speaker 1: the payments reads w or excuse me HW three, which
Speaker 1: indicates some of the transferred money could be from Hunts
Speaker 1: and West the third. When the bank contacted Sarah Biden
Speaker 1: regarding the overall wired activity, she stated that the lion
Speaker 1: Hall Group in Owasco provided international and business consulting, and
Speaker 1: that the lion Hall Group was assisting AUASCO with an
Speaker 1: international client through a contract that had since been terminated.
Speaker 1: Sarah Biden then told the bank that she would not
Speaker 1: provide any supporting documentation, and she also refused to provide
Speaker 1: additional information to more clearly explain the activity. Consequently, consequently,
Speaker 1: the bank submitted the account for closure. Normal day, if
Speaker 1: you're money laundering, right, yeah, I won't tell you what
Speaker 1: you need to know to keep this legitimate. There's no
Speaker 1: reason to believe that this isn't a legitimate business. To
Speaker 1: Biden would say, okay.
Speaker 2: Prove it. They're like, no, never mind. They shut down
Speaker 2: the bank account. No problem.
Speaker 1: We'll find another bank that will do shady business with us.
Speaker 1: Not a problem at all. This is the Biden crime family.
Speaker 1: Now remember all of this. While they're talking about Donald
Speaker 1: Trump in New York this week on this other trial,
Speaker 1: which is garbage. Don't forget Share our podcast with all
Speaker 1: of your family and friends, shared on social media. Hit
Speaker 1: that forward button, please hit that light button, auto download
Speaker 1: or subscribe button, and I will see you back here
Speaker 1: tomorrow