Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is willing to testify before the House Oversight
Speaker 1: Committee on December the thirteenth, as lawyer has now said,
Speaker 1: but only if the hearing is public. Hunter Biden would
Speaker 1: be a key witness in the House's impeachment inquiry into
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden, pending the committee's approval. Abe Low hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's lawyer said his client would only be willing to
Speaker 1: testify in a public setting, but not behind closed doors
Speaker 1: as the committee had asked, implying that Republicans are trying
Speaker 1: to hide some of his testimony, and that's the way
Speaker 1: they're trying to at least frame this, saying quote, we
Speaker 1: have seen you use closed door sessions to manipulate, even
Speaker 1: distort the facts and misinform the public.
Speaker 2: We therefore propose opening the door.
Speaker 1: If, as you claim, your efforts are important and involve
Speaker 1: issues that Americans should know about, then let the light
Speaker 1: shine on these proceedings. Mister Biden will appear at such
Speaker 1: a public hearing on the date you notice, December the thirteenth,
Speaker 1: or any date in December that we can arrange. House
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee Chairman's James Comer has replied to the attorney
Speaker 1: for Hunter Biden via a post on Twitter saying this
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is trying to play his own rules instead
Speaker 1: of following the rules requested for everyone else that won't
Speaker 1: stand with House Republicans are lawfully issued subpoena to Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden requires him to appear for a deposition on December
Speaker 1: the thirteenth.
Speaker 2: We expect full cooperation with.
Speaker 1: Our subpoena for a deposition, but also agree that Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden should have the opportunity to testify in a public
Speaker 1: setting at a future date. House Republicans have subpoena both
Speaker 1: Hunter and James Biden in their probe of the President.
Speaker 1: James Biden is reportedly in communication with the committee about
Speaker 1: hitting his subpoena as well from the White House. So
Speaker 1: this is gamesmanship, just so you understand it, This is gainsmanship,
Speaker 1: with the Hunter Biden saying I'll only do it if
Speaker 1: in the White House, or I should say House Republicans
Speaker 1: are saying, you don't get to make the rules. We're
Speaker 1: the ones that get to do this with the subpoena. Now,
Speaker 1: the House Oversite Committee is obviously working with the attorneys
Speaker 1: to schedule another time for him to come to Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill if this date didn't work out. We also know
Speaker 1: that the Congressional deposition for Biden family business associate Rob
Speaker 1: Walker will reportedly not happen this Wednesday as schedule. The
Speaker 1: House oversite Committee, saying they are also working with Walker's
Speaker 1: attorneys to reschedule another time for him to come to
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. Now, this also comes as the White House
Speaker 1: is coming out playing offense, denouncing what they refer to
Speaker 1: as a irresponsible set of subpoenas from House GOP and
Speaker 1: say they should be withdrawn. The White House firing back
Speaker 1: on a recent slate of subpoena is issued by the
Speaker 1: House Republicans targeting members of President Joe Biden's family as
Speaker 1: well as inner circle of aide, describing the GOP's impeachment
Speaker 1: push as an illegitimate endeavor that has repeatedly failed to
Speaker 1: produce proof of wrongdoing. Notice how often the White House
Speaker 1: has been saying no proof of wrongdoing, even though we
Speaker 1: have the laptop from Hell and we now have direct
Speaker 1: payments going into Joe Biden's bank account. The four page
Speaker 1: letter from the top White House attorney to Republican Committee
Speaker 1: leadership portrays an overzealous House GOP majority that, according to
Speaker 1: the letter, has misrepresented the facts, ignored the overwhelming evidence
Speaker 1: disproving your claims, and repeatedly shift the rationale for your inquiry.
Speaker 1: That is the exact quote from the White House. It
Speaker 1: also calls on Representative James Comer, chairmer of the House
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee, and the House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan,
Speaker 1: to withdraw what the White House ascribed as an irresponsible
Speaker 1: set of subpoenas and requests for interviews. The White House
Speaker 1: argued that House Republicans will quote improperly weaponizing the oversight
Speaker 1: powers of Congress solely for political gain, and have quote
Speaker 1: consistently misrepresented the documents and testimony you've received, and then
Speaker 1: moved the goalpost when your claims have been quote debunked,
Speaker 1: saying this the pattern of distortions and falsehoods lays bare
Speaker 1: that no amount of truthful testimony or document productions will
Speaker 1: satisfy you and exposes the improper nature of your committee's effort.
Speaker 1: That's what the Special Counsel the President wrote in the
Speaker 1: letters sent Friday to James Comber and Jim Jordan. Moving along,
Speaker 1: he says, congressional harassment. Oh so, now, if you try
Speaker 1: to investigate the President of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: It is congressional harassment. I wonder what the media would
Speaker 1: have said if Donald Trump would have used those exact
Speaker 1: words when they were investigating him for charges they knew
Speaker 1: were trumped up.
Speaker 2: Congressional harassment.
Speaker 1: Quoted the president to score political points is precisely the
Speaker 1: type of conduct that the Constitution.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: Now the Democrats and White House are fans of the Constitution.
Speaker 1: This is getting fun and it separatestion of powers was
Speaker 1: meant to prevent quote unquote. In a long anticipated move,
Speaker 1: James Comber this month issued s to penis to Biden's
Speaker 1: son Hunter and brother James Biden, insisting that the committee
Speaker 1: has found indications of influence peddling by members of the
Speaker 1: President's family in their business dealings. But after nearly a
Speaker 1: year House Republicans, the AP Rights has yet to provide
Speaker 1: evidence that directly implicates Joe Biden in any wrongdoing. See
Speaker 1: this is where you know the AP is filled with scumbacks.
Speaker 1: They have provided evidence of direct payments going into the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family coffers, and then those payments have been
Speaker 1: moved to the big guy written direct checks to the
Speaker 1: President of the United States of America. After foreign funds
Speaker 1: have come in. We also have multiple whistleblowers who have
Speaker 1: described the crimes committed by the Biden crime family and
Speaker 1: the cover up from the deep state, including the Justice
Speaker 1: Department as well as the FBI. Comer, by the way,
Speaker 1: responded Friday that if the President had nothing to hide,
Speaker 1: then he should make his aids quote unquote available to
Speaker 1: the Committee for interviews on the classified documents probe, saying
Speaker 1: this President Biden and the White House are seeking to
Speaker 1: obstruct our investigation at every turn. We are not deterred
Speaker 1: by this obstruction and will continue to follow the facts
Speaker 1: and hold present by an accountable to the American people.
Speaker 1: That is obviously Comer's way of saying, screw you. We're
Speaker 1: going to keep moving forward now. Hunter Biden's representatives, while
Speaker 1: dismissing the subpoena as a political stunt, have now said
Speaker 1: we're going to do our own political stunt. That's why
Speaker 1: they're now saying that they want to make sure that
Speaker 1: everything's done in a public forum and quote at the
Speaker 1: right time. An attorney for James Biden said a subpoena
Speaker 1: was unnecessary because the committee had already reviewed private bank
Speaker 1: records and transactions between the two brothers concerned two loans,
Speaker 1: it took place when Biden was not in office, or
Speaker 1: they say a candiate for president, So therefore they want
Speaker 1: you to believe the case is close. The attorney noted
Speaker 1: that all those targeted for subpoenas and voluntary interviews last
Speaker 1: week are private citizens, including Hallie Biden, the widow of
Speaker 1: the president's son Bo and Sarah Biden, the President's sister
Speaker 1: in law. Earlier this week, James Comer also subpoena former
Speaker 1: White House Council Dana Remus and other White House aides
Speaker 1: to speak with a committee on whether Biden had mishandled
Speaker 1: classified information, an issue currently under investigation also by the
Speaker 1: Special Council.
Speaker 2: Robert Herb quote, these.
Speaker 1: Requests appear to be motivated by desire to boost your
Speaker 1: subpoena numbers, as Chairman Jordan tweeted just this week, rather
Speaker 1: than any legitimate investigative interests, the White House Council wrote Now,
Speaker 1: Jordan emphasized that more than twenty people had received subpoenas
Speaker 1: and interview requests on their impeachment efforts, and that there
Speaker 1: would be more to That's what he said on Twitter
Speaker 1: that the White House is now using saying you're just
Speaker 1: trying to boost your numbers. In his letter, the attorney
Speaker 1: for the Bidens also stressed the House has not authorized
Speaker 1: a formal impeachment and querer inquiry by a vote to
Speaker 1: the full House, and that the new Speaker, Mike Johnson
Speaker 1: should have done that. When former President Donald Trump was
Speaker 1: facing the prospect of impeachment by Democrat Ledhouse, they said,
Speaker 1: guess what happened. There was a vote, and therefore they
Speaker 1: say without a House vote, this is quote a sham.
Speaker 1: For ten years, Patriot Mobile has been America's only Christian
Speaker 1: conservative wireless provider.
Speaker 2: And when I say the only one, I mean it.
Speaker 2: They're the only one.
Speaker 1: They make a huge difference every time that you pay
Speaker 1: your bill because they actually get back to conservative causes
Speaker 1: and organizations to help you stand up for what you
Speaker 1: believe in while you're paying a bill you're going to
Speaker 1: have anyways. This is the part that I love about
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile. They're making a difference every time you pay
Speaker 1: your bill, every time you make a phone call, every
Speaker 1: time that you send a text message. Patriot Mobile actually
Speaker 1: gives money back to protect First and Second Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: to protect the lives of unborn children, and that's what
Speaker 1: they're doing right now, is they celebrate their tenth anniversary.
Speaker 1: If you switch right now to Patriot Mobile, they are
Speaker 1: going to give a donation to help protect life and
Speaker 1: to help mothers choose life, to an organization that does
Speaker 1: everything they can to protect the lives of unborn children.
Speaker 1: Then every month when you pay your bill, they're going
Speaker 1: to continue to support the causes that I just mentioned.
Speaker 1: And this is exactly why you need to make the switch.
Speaker 1: If you're tired of woke companies, switch your cell phone
Speaker 1: to Patriot Mobile. Whether you are a business, a small business,
Speaker 1: or just a family, you can switch, and they make
Speaker 1: switching easy. They have a one hundred percent US based
Speaker 1: call center making switching extremely easy. You're gonna get nationwide coverage,
Speaker 1: unlimited talking texts, and usually save real money on your bill.
Speaker 1: Nine seven to two Patriot. It's nine seven to two Patriot,
Speaker 1: nine seven to two Patriot. Or go online to Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ben. That's Patriot Mobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash ben or nine seven to two Patriot James Comer.
Speaker 1: By the way, and let me go back to just
Speaker 1: refute another point in this letter from Biden's lawyers. They
Speaker 1: said there's been no evidence, no facts to back up
Speaker 1: this inquiry into the Biden crime family. Let me remind
Speaker 1: you what we've already found out about the Biden crime family.
Speaker 2: Financially this summer.
Speaker 3: Joe Biden said, where's the money, Well, we found so
Speaker 3: we're still digging into evidence. Subpoena from bank accounts belonging
Speaker 3: to Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, and
Speaker 3: James and Sarah Biden, the brother and sister in law
Speaker 3: of the president. A document that we're releasing today raises
Speaker 3: new questions about how President Biden personally benefited from his
Speaker 3: family shady influence of his last name, and their access
Speaker 3: to him. Bank records obtained by the House Committee on
Speaker 3: Oversight have revealed a two hundred thousand dollars direct payment
Speaker 3: from James and Sarah Biden to Joe Biden in the
Speaker 3: form of a personal check. Here's some important context about
Speaker 3: this check we've obtained in our investigation. In twenty eighteen,
Speaker 3: James Biden received six hundred thousand dollars in loans from Americrps,
Speaker 3: a financially distressed and failing rural hospital operator. According to
Speaker 3: bankruptcy court documents, James Biden received these loans quote based
Speaker 3: upon representations that his last name Biden could open doors
Speaker 3: and that he could obtain a large investment from the
Speaker 3: Middle East based on his political connections end quote. On
Speaker 3: March first, twenty eighteen, AMERICRPS wired a two hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars loan into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account,
Speaker 3: not their business of bank account, and then on the
Speaker 3: very same day, James Biden wrote a two hundred thousand
Speaker 3: dollars check from this same personal bank account to Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: James Biden wrote this check to Joe Biden as a
Speaker 3: quote loan repayment. AmeriCorps, a distressed company, loaned money to
Speaker 3: James Biden, who then sent it to Joe Biden. Even
Speaker 3: if this was a personal loan repayment, it's still troubling
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden's ability to be paid back by his
Speaker 3: brother depended on the success of his family's shady financial dealings.
Speaker 3: Some immediate questions President Biden was answered for the American people.
Speaker 3: Does he have documents proving he lent such a large
Speaker 3: sum of money to his brother and what were the
Speaker 3: terms of such financial agreement? Did he have similar financial
Speaker 3: agreements with other family members that led them to make
Speaker 3: similar large payments to him. And did he know that
Speaker 3: the same day James Biden wrote him a check for
Speaker 3: two hundred thousand dollars, James Biden had just received the
Speaker 3: loan for the exact same amount from business dealing with
Speaker 3: a company that was in financial distress and failing. The
Speaker 3: House Oversight Committee will soon announce our next investigative actions
Speaker 3: and continue to follow the money. The bank records don't
Speaker 3: end here.
Speaker 2: There's more to come, more to come.
Speaker 1: There's the reason why they want them to come in
Speaker 1: and answer questions under oath. And this is exactly why
Speaker 1: you hear Hunter Biden stalling by saying, well, I'll come in,
Speaker 1: but only if the hearing is public. There are many
Speaker 1: questions they need to ask him that in a closed
Speaker 1: door setting that I'm sure deal with information that's not
Speaker 1: needed for the public.
Speaker 2: Yet.
Speaker 1: This is also the way these investigations go and the
Speaker 1: way that they described it. We're more than happy to
Speaker 1: have a open setting to ask you questions in the future,
Speaker 1: but right now, we're going to continue to do business
Speaker 1: the way that we've been doing it and the way
Speaker 1: that Democrats have been doing it, and the Republicans have
Speaker 1: been doing it for decades, which is closed door subpoenas.
Speaker 1: This is, by the way, no different than what they
Speaker 1: were doing when they were going after Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump.
Speaker 1: You would see the videos in wall to wall footage,
Speaker 1: which you don't see this time, of Republicans and former
Speaker 1: White House staff going into Capitol buildings and then leaks
Speaker 1: that would immediately come out from those meetings, all of
Speaker 1: that being done by who the Democrats, and so now
Speaker 1: when the Republicans have in control of the House and
Speaker 1: actual buildings that are literally on fire, this is no
Speaker 1: longer a smoking gun scenario, and actual payments going directly
Speaker 1: to the President of the United States of America. They
Speaker 1: don't like what's happening right now, so now they're trying
Speaker 1: to play the game differently, and that is the biggest
Speaker 1: problem with all of this. Let me also remind you
Speaker 1: about what Jim Jordan had to say about some of
Speaker 1: these payments as well, and he's one that's been looking
Speaker 1: into this for quite some time. Remember the White House
Speaker 1: said that he was wasting America's time, not really doing
Speaker 1: a America's work. And if there's nothing here for the
Speaker 1: American people to see. Well, let me remind you about
Speaker 1: David Weiss. You let the statute of limitations expire on
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's most egregious tax charges. The same guy that's
Speaker 1: the special Counsel's supposed to be looking the Biden crime family.
Speaker 4: While Hunter's criminal charges play out. In course, the congressional
Speaker 4: investigation into his business dealings continues, leading the charge there
Speaker 4: is call us from Jim Jordan, who joins us now
Speaker 4: wants the state of play in the Hunt of Biden investigation.
Speaker 5: We got a handful of more depositions to the Stewart
Speaker 5: we want to talk to We want to talk to
Speaker 5: Hunter Biden. We want to talk to James Biden who
Speaker 5: did all this business together, and we want to talk
Speaker 5: to his business partners Eric Sayeran Bob a Lensky, Rob Walker,
Speaker 5: and then frankly, we just sent a subpoena two. This
Speaker 5: this Kevin Morris individual. He's the guy who stepped forward
Speaker 5: and paid Hunter Biden's like two point five million dollars
Speaker 5: in back taxes. EO just I guess out of the
Speaker 5: goodness of his heart. So we want to talk to
Speaker 5: him as well. But the plan is to do those
Speaker 5: final depositions and then make a decision on we're in
Speaker 5: the an impeachment inquiry, do we move forward with actual
Speaker 5: articles of impeachment? And I think we will present this
Speaker 5: to the conference and we'll make a decision as a
Speaker 5: conference if the facts warrant going to actual articles and
Speaker 5: moving into full impeachment of the president.
Speaker 4: So they're both moving forward, albeit at a slow pace.
Speaker 4: Investigation of Hunta and the impeachment of the President Biden.
Speaker 4: It's going forward, but it's slow.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, the idea is to finish up all the
Speaker 5: depositions and the documents that we So we've got three
Speaker 5: committees working on You got the ways it means committee
Speaker 5: where whistleblowers came forward and told us about how bad
Speaker 5: the investigation was run, how unusual, how it was slow
Speaker 5: walked the investigation to Hunter Biden. Then you have Chairman
Speaker 5: Comber's committee who are looking at this sufficious activity reports,
Speaker 5: the bank records, the sub poena doots.
Speaker 2: They're compiling that information.
Speaker 5: That's where we learned about the two hundred thousand dollars check,
Speaker 5: the forty thousand dollars check that initially came from China.
Speaker 5: They're working on that. And then our committee is actually digging.
Speaker 5: We've now to post seven different people who were a
Speaker 5: part of the Hunter Biden investigation. I think the overall
Speaker 5: picture Stewart is pretty basic. This is as you know,
Speaker 5: this is his story as old as the hills. You've
Speaker 5: got a politician who takes certain action that benefits his
Speaker 5: family financially, and then there's an effort to sweep it
Speaker 5: under the rug to conceal it. And that's exactly what
Speaker 5: we saw, particularly with David Weiss. We saw him let
Speaker 5: the statute of limitations expire for the tax years.
Speaker 2: Twenty fourteen and twenty fifteen.
Speaker 5: Regarding Hunter Biden, because those are the tax years he
Speaker 5: got all the money from the Ukrainian energy company Barisma,
Speaker 5: and that if he digs into that, that takes him
Speaker 5: right to the White House, right to Joe Biden and
Speaker 5: his involvement in Barisma back when he was Vice president of.
Speaker 2: The United States culture.
Speaker 1: So now you understand exactly why this White House.
Speaker 2: Is playing the games that they're playing.
Speaker 1: Now you understand exactly why this White House is also
Speaker 1: attacking the Republicans because they have to attack, They have
Speaker 1: to go all in on this. They are terrified that
Speaker 1: the truth is going to come out and part of
Speaker 1: this is just a simplistic stall tactic. It's all about stalling,
Speaker 1: and the more that you can stall, the better off
Speaker 1: it is. The more that you canstall and hold out,
Speaker 1: the better things are.
Speaker 2: Because it gets closer to election day.
Speaker 1: Let me remind you, the same media that is telling
Speaker 1: you now that there's nothing to see is the same
Speaker 1: media that looked you in the face and lied to
Speaker 1: you and band a story and band it on social
Speaker 1: media the story of the hunter byden laptop, which they
Speaker 1: said was Russian disinformation. And all of the people in
Speaker 1: our intelligence community wrote that letter right sign their.
Speaker 2: Names to it. And what do they say in that letter.
Speaker 1: They said in that letter that this had all the
Speaker 1: markings of Russian disinformation, and then Hugh use that letter
Speaker 1: the media. The media then used that letter to continue
Speaker 1: to push that narrative. And as they were pushing that narrative,
Speaker 1: then social media was able to use that letter to
Speaker 1: then ban you from sharing that information to influence the election.
Speaker 2: And they lied. That's what they did.
Speaker 1: So when they want me to believe them now with
Speaker 1: the same issue and the same intel they already said
Speaker 1: was that Russian disinformation, No, I do not and will
Speaker 1: not believe them. I also want to move to something
Speaker 1: else that's really important, and that is dealing with Israel.
Speaker 1: Right now, we are getting word now from sources that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is putting pressure on Israeli tactics and he
Speaker 1: wants to leave Hamas intact and more importantly, in power
Speaker 1: in Palestine. A source within the Israeli government has now
Speaker 1: leaked to Bright bartin News that US President Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: pressure will lead to Hamas surviving the war intact, rather
Speaker 1: than allowing Israel to destroy Hamas or remove its military
Speaker 1: and governing capabilities. By the way, did I not warn
Speaker 1: you that that's exactly what was going to happen? Did
Speaker 1: I not tell you that? I said, watch how fast
Speaker 1: they will give them weeks. Then they'll give him a
Speaker 1: few more weeks, and then they're going to start putting
Speaker 1: pressure internally, and then that pressure will start coming externally
Speaker 1: for Israel to stop.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: In recent days, the White House is acknowledge that Israel
Speaker 1: intends to continue fighting Hamas after the current pause sought
Speaker 1: by Biden to allow the release of hostages and ends
Speaker 1: later this week. The Israelis have been pretty clear that
Speaker 1: once the pauses are complete, and the hostage exchanges are over,
Speaker 1: they intend to continue their military operations against Hamas. That's
Speaker 1: what the White House Advisor John Kirby said on Monday,
Speaker 1: saying Israel does not hold hostages. It is real leasing
Speaker 1: convicted Palestinian terrorists. Even though there's been some misinformation by
Speaker 1: the way on that issue as well, the White House
Speaker 1: is no longer clearly stating that it shares that goal,
Speaker 1: and the Israeli government privately believes Biden is preparing to
Speaker 1: quote tolerate the survival of Hamas, despite the fact that
Speaker 1: Hamas and other terrorist groups would see that as a
Speaker 1: huge victory. The reason Israel believes this is Biden's goal
Speaker 1: is that the US administration is imposing onerous conditions on
Speaker 1: the Israeli defense forces regarding its operations in Gaza, such
Speaker 1: that defeating Hamas has become almost impossible quote unquote. The
Speaker 1: New York Times also described it this way on Tuesday.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: The United States has warn Israel that it must fight
Speaker 1: more surgically and avoid further mass displacement of Palestinians and
Speaker 1: its war against Amas to avoid a humanitarian crisis that
Speaker 1: overwhelms the world's ability to respond. According to senior Byids
Speaker 1: administration officials. American officials have told the Israelis that any
Speaker 1: coming military operation should not hamper the flow of power
Speaker 1: and water or impede the work of humanitarian sites such
Speaker 1: as hospitals and un supported shelters in south and central Gaza.
Speaker 1: All right, So to be clear, what this would do,
Speaker 1: all right, is they would say, and these new rules
Speaker 1: of engagement that apparently the Biden administration is pushing behind
Speaker 1: the scenes, would allow for the tunnels that the Terrists
Speaker 1: use in and out of the hospitals to stand, and
Speaker 1: that you could not go into those hospitals and clear
Speaker 1: them out. They also are saying that you cannot explode
Speaker 1: the tunnel system which would go underneath so many of
Speaker 1: these buildings. In other words, saying, let them keep their
Speaker 1: tunnels for their protection of the terraces Humas you understand
Speaker 1: how problematic and unrealistic this is for Israel. And if
Speaker 1: I was Israel, I go back to what I said earlier.
Speaker 1: Israel needed to unload as fast as they possibly could.
Speaker 1: Because I knew, and I called it, and I said
Speaker 1: this would happen, that America would start to falter, that
Speaker 1: America would start to say Okay, now, you can't do
Speaker 1: this anymore, that they would eventually start to turn in
Speaker 1: the Biden administration, which is exactly what they're doing now.
Speaker 1: And the reason why I do this is because there's
Speaker 1: so much anti Semitism within the leftist communist movement within
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. Remember, the Democratic Party is dead. The
Speaker 1: Democratic Party is now masquerading as Democrats when they are
Speaker 1: full blown communists and socialists, and that's what they believe in.
Speaker 2: That is what they have always believed in.
Speaker 1: These are communists, and now they're just getting to be
Speaker 1: honest about their communist ideals, which is also again very
Speaker 1: very very sad. Now Democrats are also working with this
Speaker 1: White House to change the way that we give funding
Speaker 1: to Israel, putting conditions on that funding. Moments ago, the
Speaker 1: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was asked about those conditions. Aka,
Speaker 1: you do all these things and we'll give you more money.
Speaker 1: Here is what McConnell had to say on Israel funding.
Speaker 6: Senate Democrats are currently debating this idea of whether to
Speaker 6: place conditions on the funding. One of the arguments in
Speaker 6: favor is that Congress does this or nearly every other
Speaker 6: country that it gets foreign military assistance to What is
Speaker 6: your response to that.
Speaker 7: I think it's ridiculous. Our relationship with Israel is the
Speaker 7: closest national security relationship we have with any country in
Speaker 7: the world. And to condition in effect our as systems
Speaker 7: to Israel owned they're meeting our standards, it seems to
Speaker 7: me is totally unnecessary. This is a democracy, a great
Speaker 7: ally of ours, and I do not think we need
Speaker 7: to condition the support that hopeful we'll give to Israel
Speaker 7: very soon.
Speaker 1: So clearly the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell making it
Speaker 1: obvious that he does not believe there should be conditions here,
Speaker 1: as Democrats are straight up moving to demand different conditions.
Speaker 1: We also know that far left media is standing with
Speaker 1: Hamas and being their apologists.
Speaker 2: How bad is it?
Speaker 1: Even Dan Abrams of News Nation used to be over
Speaker 1: at NBCMSNBC had this to say about what the left
Speaker 1: is doing to basically be apologists for a terrorist organization.
Speaker 8: As Israel and Hamas extend that truce for two more
Speaker 8: days with the promise of more hostages released in exchange
Speaker 8: for Palestinian prisoners, so many in the media around the
Speaker 8: world seem to be falsely equating innocent civilians, toddler's grade
Speaker 8: schoolers taking high stage, often from or with their parents.
Speaker 8: On October seventh, if those parents are still alive with
Speaker 8: the accused and in most cases, convicted, Palestinian criminals, they're
Speaker 8: being traded for. You see, both the Israeli hostages and
Speaker 8: the Palestinian prisoners being released are women and children. In
Speaker 8: the case the Palestinians, they're teenagers, almost all sixteen year older.
Speaker 8: The comparisons just don't work. And yet what so many
Speaker 8: are choosing to ignore is that the Palestinians have all
Speaker 8: been convicted or charged with violent, even terror related attacks.
Speaker 8: So yeah, they're women and children, but it is not
Speaker 8: the same. That didn't stop model Jigi Hadid from posting
Speaker 8: to her nearly eighty million followers eighty million eight on
Speaker 8: social media quote Israel is the only country in the
Speaker 8: world that keeps children as prisoners of war. She posts
Speaker 8: that alongside the story of Ahmed manas Rah Palestinian, who,
Speaker 8: when he was thirteen, along with his cousin, stabbed and
Speaker 8: severely injured a thirteen year old Jewish boy in a
Speaker 8: twenty year old security guard. In fact, the attack was
Speaker 8: caught on video. You can see Manasra and his cousin
Speaker 8: running after people with knives on surveillance footage. You want
Speaker 8: to compare that now twenty one year old with I
Speaker 8: don't know four year old Abigailidhn, who saw her parents
Speaker 8: killed right in front of her before she was taken
Speaker 8: hostage and swept away to Gaza. She turned four while
Speaker 8: being held hostage toward nine year old Emily Hand, whose
Speaker 8: father prayed she was dead because the alternative was torture
Speaker 8: at the hands of terrorists.
Speaker 2: It's not just celebrities, ei there.
Speaker 8: You see it too often in the far left media.
Speaker 8: MSNBC host i'm On Moyadine tweeting on the first day
Speaker 8: of the Truth and Hostage release quote you're about to
Speaker 8: see in real time over the next four days, how
Speaker 8: the media can choose who it humanizes and who it villainizes.
Speaker 8: Who is a child and who's a miner, Who is
Speaker 8: a mother and who is an accomplice, Who is a
Speaker 8: hostage and who is a prisoner? In short, who is
Speaker 8: innocent and who is not? See he doesn't want to
Speaker 8: distinguish between them because the reality is hard for apologists
Speaker 8: of Hamas to accept. Remember this is from a guy
Speaker 8: who the day of the attack, said on the air
Speaker 8: that the October seventh murders were the quote deadly consequences
Speaker 8: of failed policies on the American administration's part and the Israelis.
Speaker 8: It's really not hard to distinguish between a four year
Speaker 8: old kidnapped from the arms of her murdered parents and
Speaker 8: a sixteen year old at the very least accused of,
Speaker 8: if not convicted of a serious crime.
Speaker 2: Here in the United.
Speaker 8: States, teenagers charged with violent defenses are often prosecuted as adults.
Speaker 2: I don't know what Jiji Hadid is.
Speaker 8: Talking about, but children stolen from their parents they're called
Speaker 8: crime victims. Here are some of the so called women
Speaker 8: and children released by Israel. Seventeen year old Mohammad Abu Katish,
Speaker 8: who stabbed and paralyzed a twenty year old Jewish man,
Speaker 8: nourhan Awad, who was seventeen when she was arrested in
Speaker 8: twenty seventeen for attempting to stab an Israeli soldier with
Speaker 8: a pair of scissors. Sixteen year old Nufud Hamad, who
Speaker 8: stabbed an Israeli woman nearly to death death in front
Speaker 8: of her five children. Or thirty eight year old Israd Javis,
Speaker 8: a Palestinian woman who attempted to set off a car
Speaker 8: bomb that wounded an Israeli police officer. She was disfigured
Speaker 8: in the explosion, and her homecoming this weekend was covered extensively,
Speaker 8: with the New York Times headline from this weekend reading quote,
Speaker 8: a disfigured woman whose case has become well known is
Speaker 8: among the Palestinian released, not convicted suicide bomber, and completely
Speaker 8: ignoring that she became disfigured when she tried to blow
Speaker 8: herself up with gas canisters at a West Bank checkpoint.
Speaker 8: There was widespread celebration of the release of now twenty
Speaker 8: three year old Mara Bakir, who was sixteen when she
Speaker 8: was sentenced for attempting to stab and Israeli border police officer.
Speaker 2: The list goes on and on and on.
Speaker 8: Look it is true there is controversy around the judicial
Speaker 8: proceedings surrounding some of those arrested in the West Bank
Speaker 8: and Gaza, because they faced military courts with higher conviction
Speaker 8: rates than in the typical Israeli civilian justice system.
Speaker 2: And you can absolutely question that. I have questions about that,
Speaker 2: but I'll tell.
Speaker 8: You this, that system as a whole is still more
Speaker 8: democratic by far than any of the systems in any
Speaker 8: of the Arab countries which neighbor Israel.
Speaker 1: Let me just stop there and say I appreciate when
Speaker 1: people like Dan Abrams take moments like that to explain
Speaker 1: what's happening, because at least there's some journalistic integrity, And
Speaker 1: when they say things like this, I will always play
Speaker 1: it for you because it's important that at least some
Speaker 1: on the left are calling out the absurdity of what
Speaker 1: we're witnessing with the majority of our media in this
Speaker 1: country and around the world, and people need to know
Speaker 1: the truth. Make sure you share this podcast with your
Speaker 1: family and your friends. I'll see you back here tomorrow.