Speaker 1: The Biden crime family today is having a really tough day.
Speaker 1: There are new reports out that Hunter Biden and his
Speaker 1: press conference, which has been seen as a backfire even
Speaker 1: by the Democratic Leeds, are now saying that Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: is a real problem for the presidency. New report also
Speaker 1: says Hunter is a quote loose speedball on Joe's sinking
Speaker 1: USS reelection. On Wednesday, while defying a legal congressional subpoena,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden decided to hold that news conference that we
Speaker 1: played for you, and if you missed it, you can
Speaker 1: go back and grab that podcast from yesterday. And the
Speaker 1: White House's reelection team was not happy about it at all. Now,
Speaker 1: let me just read for you what they reported on
Speaker 1: this in Axios. Now, the Axios is a publication online
Speaker 1: that is a far left publication. They're not looking for
Speaker 1: conservative readers. They're base is like MSNBC or even more
Speaker 1: extreme than that.
Speaker 2: But let me just read for you.
Speaker 1: And look, Exos has extensive tentacles into the Biden White
Speaker 1: House and the Biden apparatus at every level of government.
Speaker 1: That's why them writing this means that there's a lot
Speaker 1: of people that are really upset about this that work
Speaker 1: for the president of United States of America and within
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: Hunter's new strategy has caused tension between his team and
Speaker 1: the White House.
Speaker 2: Top aids the President.
Speaker 1: Biden originally crafted a plan to largely not respond to
Speaker 1: attacks and conservative media coverage of Hunter Biden, a risk
Speaker 1: adverse approach to avoid giving stories more oxygen. But Hunter's
Speaker 1: team ultimately wasn't satisfied the media coverage didn't die down.
Speaker 1: His team has come to believe that his lack of
Speaker 1: a response was alienating potential Democratic allies and hurting his
Speaker 1: father politically. Hunter's team keeps quote the White House and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden informed of his plans. The report continues, but
Speaker 1: the President's team has far less control over hunter strategy
Speaker 1: than it once had. Yet, Hunter, the deadbeat Dad is
Speaker 1: a loose speedball on Joe's sinking reelection ship. It gets better.
Speaker 1: The White House is concerned that if voters believe Hunters corrupt,
Speaker 1: they'll see Joe Biden as a suspect too.
Speaker 2: You think now.
Speaker 1: After that disastrous Wednesday afternoon news conference, Hunter ran to
Speaker 1: his pals and defenders at Axios to unleash this beauty,
Speaker 1: saying quote Republicans quote unquote have weaponized my dad's love
Speaker 1: for me and turned his greatest strength, his compassion, his
Speaker 1: empathy is authenticity into evidence of corrupt complicity. Weaponize my
Speaker 1: dad's love for me. That was the main line. Who
Speaker 1: do you get that from some twelve year old girl?
Speaker 1: Poetry journal? That's what one writer said. What is even
Speaker 1: more laughable is the idea that Hunter is doing all
Speaker 1: of this to help his father. This is a hormonger,
Speaker 1: so selfish that while he was spending eight hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy two thousand dollars on sex, he was fighting paying
Speaker 1: child support payments for his own daughter, an innocent baby girl.
Speaker 1: Just to put it in perspective, and notice how the
Speaker 1: media has not made that point. So let's pause there
Speaker 1: and just really go into that for a second. At
Speaker 1: the same time that he was spending one hundred and
Speaker 1: eighty seven thousand dollars on sex trafficking okay, on prostitutes,
Speaker 1: he refused to pay and was fighting to pay child
Speaker 1: support and even acknowledging that his child was his own child,
Speaker 1: an innocent child in Arkansas. The same Biden family that
Speaker 1: claims they care about you as an American citizen and
Speaker 1: whatever you're dealing with right now, refuse to allow that
Speaker 1: child to take the Biden last name. Never forget that
Speaker 1: they then refused to give the adequate and appropriate documentation
Speaker 1: for the amount of money that he was making, and
Speaker 1: then every indication was that he was lying about his
Speaker 1: income to the point where she had to lawyer up
Speaker 1: and drag his again, this deadbeat dad's aas into court.
Speaker 1: The same time all of that was going on, and
Speaker 1: this lady who he had a child with, was having
Speaker 1: to fight this legal battle and refusing to acknowledge the
Speaker 1: existence of his kid. Do not forget that the President
Speaker 1: of the United States was also refusing to acknowledge the
Speaker 1: existence of his own grandchild that he knew obviously was his.
Speaker 1: We also know that he refused to pay child support
Speaker 1: to the point where he was forced to take a
Speaker 1: DNA test so that then he would finally start having
Speaker 1: to pay some sort of child support, and he has
Speaker 1: fought every step of the way to stop the money
Speaker 1: going to that child. Now, during Hunter's news conference, where
Speaker 1: he took no questions, not that he would have been
Speaker 1: asked anything difficult, right, the House of Representatives voted to
Speaker 1: open that impeachment inquiry into Hunter's dat for a whole
Speaker 1: host of alleged crimes and misdemeanors. Additionally, the House Overside
Speaker 1: Committee has also launched a contempt of Congress charges against
Speaker 1: Hunter for ignoring their subpoena after former White House aide
Speaker 1: Peter Navarro and Stephen K. Bann ignored their respective stupid
Speaker 1: January sixth Committee subpoenas. Both of them guess what were
Speaker 1: indicted by the DOJ, which brings me to the contempt
Speaker 1: of Congress proceedings that have been initiated against Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: and it does have the potential idea of jail time
Speaker 1: as well as a fine. That's only if the DOJ
Speaker 1: will take up these charges the same way they did
Speaker 1: against Stephen K.
Speaker 2: Bannon.
Speaker 1: The others I just mentioned the House Overside Committee Chairman
Speaker 1: James Comer and the Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan initial
Speaker 1: she had the contempt to Congress proceedings against Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: after the President's sun failed to appear for that subpoena
Speaker 1: of that closed door deposition on Wednesday, the same type
Speaker 1: of definite deposition that the children of the then sitting
Speaker 1: President United States of America Donald J. Trump had to
Speaker 1: sit for and did sit for now I have prosecuted
Speaker 1: and convicted to contempt to Congress. Hunter's punishment could be
Speaker 1: up to one hundred thousand dollars fine, as well as
Speaker 1: time in jail. A deposition is a standard procedure used
Speaker 1: by Congressional investigators. The two men stated Democrats use depositions
Speaker 1: in their investigations regularly, including the Adam Schiff impeachment inquiry,
Speaker 1: as well as the partisan January sixth Committee. The House
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee ranking member Jamie Raskins, a Democrat, emphasized the
Speaker 1: importance of standard closed door depositions.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: We will not provide special treatment because his last name
Speaker 1: is Biden. Coleman and Jordan wrote in their latest letter,
Speaker 1: as our committees were today prepared to oppose Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: he chose to make a public statement on Capitol Hill instead,
Speaker 1: where he said his father, Joe Biden, was not financially
Speaker 1: involved in his father's business dealings. Now Representative Matt Gates
Speaker 1: came out and he said this. Peter Navarro and Steve
Speaker 1: Bannon were indicted on contempt charges for not complying with
Speaker 1: the illegitimate January sixth Committee. There was no basis to
Speaker 1: comply with the Democrats fake Committee. I believe Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: should be held in contempt to Congress for defying a
Speaker 1: subpoena from the House Oversight Committee. But it's clear the
Speaker 1: corrupt White House and CORRUPTDJ will protect their own from
Speaker 1: prosecuting prosecution while shamelessly targeting their political enemies. Matthew Graves,
Speaker 1: the DC attorney who prosecuted Navarro and Bannon, worked on
Speaker 1: the presidential campaign for Joe Biden and other Democrats. I
Speaker 1: doubt we'll see what we'll be seeing the same indictments
Speaker 1: against Hunter. This process will not be fixed until we
Speaker 1: initiate total retribution against the deep state for what they're
Speaker 1: doing to our country. And not disagree, by the way,
Speaker 1: with what Matt Gates put out there in his statement
Speaker 1: on X and here goes. Let's go back to the
Speaker 1: other question here, number one. Exactly how was Joe Biden involved?
Speaker 1: Is what the question that we all are asking and
Speaker 1: the question that should be answered, because evidence shows that
Speaker 1: Biden met with Hunter's business associates and his name was
Speaker 1: at the center of the family business strategy the entire time.
Speaker 1: What was the product? What were they getting from Hunter Biden?
Speaker 1: Was he giving them widgets?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Was he an expert in any of the fields that
Speaker 1: he was operating in. No, was Hunter Biden actually giving
Speaker 1: them a product that they were purchasing for millions and
Speaker 1: millions and millions of dollars. No, So what was the business?
Speaker 1: The business was selling access to the father. The business
Speaker 1: didn't exist without Joe Biden's position of power in the government,
Speaker 1: and it doesn't exist without Joe Biden being the Vice
Speaker 1: President and now the President of United States of America.
Speaker 1: So the two men, Jordan and Comer, said this. Today,
Speaker 1: the House will vote on an impeachment inquiry resolution to
Speaker 1: strengthen our legal case in the court as we face
Speaker 1: obstruction from the White House and witnesses. And that's the
Speaker 1: real takeaway here, what we are seeing now and the
Speaker 1: reason why you move forward this impeachment inquiry resolution is
Speaker 1: in their right to strengthen the legal case in the
Speaker 1: courts because they are facing obstruction from the White House
Speaker 1: and from witnesses.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: Today's obstruction by Hunter Biden reinforces the need for a
Speaker 1: formal vote. For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile has
Speaker 1: been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. They stand behind
Speaker 1: their values and they stand behind exceptional service They're an
Speaker 1: example of putting the cause ahead of profit, and that
Speaker 1: is why I am proud to.
Speaker 2: Partner with him.
Speaker 1: Starting today, Patriot Mobile is extending their Black Friday deal
Speaker 1: with the Every Friday Matters deal, and you can get
Speaker 1: a free smartphone when you switch today. Patriot Mobile offers
Speaker 1: dependable nationwide coverage, giving you access to all three major networks,
Speaker 1: which means you get the same what coverage you've been
Speaker 1: accustomed to without funding the radical left. Now, when you
Speaker 1: switch to Patriot Mobile, you're supporting free speech, religious freedom,
Speaker 1: the sanctity of life, are veterans and first responders, and
Speaker 1: more than just that. They are actually a one hundred
Speaker 1: percent US based company with customer service teams that make
Speaker 1: switching easy, so you can keep your same number you
Speaker 1: have Right now, you can keep your existing phone, or
Speaker 1: for a limited time, get a free smartphone from Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: Go to Patriot Mobile dot com, slash ferguson or call
Speaker 1: them ninety seven to two Patriot use the promo code
Speaker 1: Friday seven to six.
Speaker 2: That's Friday seven to six. Again.
Speaker 1: Get a free smartphone with promo code Friday seven to six.
Speaker 1: That's the limited time offer. Join me make the switch today.
Speaker 1: At Patriot mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot mobile
Speaker 1: dot com slash Ferguson or ninety seven to two Patriot
Speaker 1: Senator Ted Cruz and I set down with James Comer
Speaker 1: for a three part series. You can hear in its
Speaker 1: entirety by downloading Verdict with Ted Cruz and hear everything
Speaker 1: he had to say in uninterrupted, long format. It was
Speaker 1: incredible to hear about the corruption of the Biden crime
Speaker 1: family and what they've uncovered. And look, we did this
Speaker 1: three part series for over an hour and a half.
Speaker 2: It's unbelievable. I wanted to play part of.
Speaker 1: It for you here so you could hear some of
Speaker 1: those highlights of what Center Cruise and I learned by
Speaker 1: sitting down with James Comer.
Speaker 3: Take a listen, uh, to really get into the substance.
Speaker 3: And and a lot has been happening lately. We just
Speaker 3: had Hunter Biden defy a congressional subpoena. We just had
Speaker 3: the full House of Representatives vote to authorize formally the
Speaker 3: impeachment inquiry. And this week there's some breaking news. You're
Speaker 3: you're you're sending your investigative team on the road. Why
Speaker 3: don't we start by tell us about that.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so obviously a lot of these people that we've
Speaker 4: asked for interviews and depositions, they're trying to use the
Speaker 4: holiday as an excuse why they can't come in and
Speaker 4: do it. So we decided we would make it more
Speaker 4: convenient on them and send our staff to depose them
Speaker 4: or interview them in their home area. So the first
Speaker 4: one we're doing is with the owner of Americorp Health,
Speaker 4: and America War Health was the healthcare company where James Biden,
Speaker 4: the President's brother, approached them because he heard they were
Speaker 4: financially distressed and said that because he's a Biden and
Speaker 4: because of his brother's contacts in the Middle East, that
Speaker 4: he could help them acquire all the capital they needed
Speaker 4: to get back on their feet from the Middle East.
Speaker 5: But they were going to have to.
Speaker 4: Pay JOm Biden first, and they gave him six hundred
Speaker 4: thousand dollars and by all accounts, Jim Biden completely defrauded
Speaker 4: American War Health. He never provided any funding or anything else.
Speaker 4: But what I about this for Joe Biden, Not only
Speaker 4: was that a pure example of influence pedaling, Joe Biden
Speaker 4: received the last payment from Americal Health. They sent a
Speaker 4: check to Jim Biden for two hundred thousand dollars. The
Speaker 4: exact same day that Jim Biden received that two hundred
Speaker 4: thousand dollars check from America Health, they wrote Joe Biden
Speaker 4: a check for the exact same amount, two hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 4: So that was the first example of evidence that we
Speaker 4: found where Joe Biden directly benefited from the Biden family
Speaker 4: influenced peddling scheme. So we're going to have our deposers
Speaker 4: down there talking to them about how this started and
Speaker 4: what role Joe Biden may have played, and if they
Speaker 4: ever met Joe Biden and all of that.
Speaker 5: So that should be very interesting.
Speaker 1: It's interesting you didn't mention the name Hunter Biden in
Speaker 1: that story of influence pedaling. That is the part that
Speaker 1: I think many Americans have maybe not understood, which is
Speaker 1: this is the entire family that's been involved in getting paid.
Speaker 1: Can you go into that a little bit more about
Speaker 1: about James Biden, not just Hunter.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think James Biden probably committed just as many
Speaker 4: crimes as Hunter Biden. The only reason we don't know
Speaker 4: about James Biden is he didn't leave a laptop Linery.
Speaker 4: We've been able to subpoena his bank records, and I
Speaker 4: can tell you there's a lot of questions we have
Speaker 4: for Jamis Biden.
Speaker 5: That's why he received the subpoena.
Speaker 4: We're working with his attorney and we hope to have
Speaker 4: him in in January. But at the end of the day,
Speaker 4: this example with AmeriCorps Help sure looks like securities fraud.
Speaker 4: I mean, I don't know how else you would you
Speaker 4: would describe it. But obviously they deserve due process and
Speaker 4: they're gonna have due process. But we know from court
Speaker 4: records this americ WARP Help is in federal bankruptcy court.
Speaker 4: They obviously have accused Jim Biden of a lot of things.
Speaker 4: So this is all public record, and you know it
Speaker 4: shows that it wasn't just hunder Biden, this was the
Speaker 4: whole Biden family.
Speaker 5: America Jim Biden Hunterman.
Speaker 3: So Americal Health paid Jim Biden six hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 3: As best you can tell, did Jim Biden perform any
Speaker 3: any service for them, do anything of value for them?
Speaker 4: According to the court records, America or Health says no
Speaker 4: other than he went there and you know, made all
Speaker 4: these promises that you know, Joe Biden's contacts, they would
Speaker 4: work together and.
Speaker 5: Help them get all the money from the Middle East,
Speaker 5: but they never got any This is.
Speaker 4: They never got a penny. They never got one penny.
Speaker 4: And it looks like Senator on Jim Biden's bank statements,
Speaker 4: they tried to say that six hundred thousand dollars payment
Speaker 4: was a loan. And I think that's a very important
Speaker 4: aspect of our investigation because from the notes that the
Speaker 4: whistleblowers have turned over, we know that you know, sometime
Speaker 4: in twenty eighteen, the Bidens figured out that the IRS
Speaker 4: was breathing down their necks. They knew that they had
Speaker 4: all these suspicious activity reports from the banks that were
Speaker 4: accusing them money laundering and having shell companies and potentially
Speaker 4: taking bribes, and they changed the way they were operating.
Speaker 4: They went from receiving wires directly through the shelves to
Speaker 4: receiving payments and calling them loans.
Speaker 5: So do you do that.
Speaker 3: I want to stop and unpack a lot of that.
Speaker 3: So we hear from the Democrats, we hear from the
Speaker 3: corrupt corporate media. There's no evidence, no evidence, no evidence,
Speaker 3: especially no evidence of Joe Biden's involvement. So I want
Speaker 3: to break down because you had a lot of substance
Speaker 3: there on the shell companies. How many Biden shell companies
Speaker 3: did y'all uncover?
Speaker 5: Twenty?
Speaker 4: And let me make sure everyone understands this. A shell
Speaker 4: company is a company with no assets and no known purpose.
Speaker 4: So the bank email that we released two weeks ago
Speaker 4: showed the bank examiners saying, you know, they got this
Speaker 4: wire from China, and he says it's an investment company,
Speaker 4: but it's an investment company with no investments. And then
Speaker 4: the account that it went through was essentially a dormant account.
Speaker 4: So there's evidence that the bank examiners, and if you
Speaker 4: look at and also the suspicious activity reports, the banks
Speaker 4: knew these were shell companies, and the banks did everything
Speaker 4: they were supposed to do by notifying Treasury that wait
Speaker 4: a bit, this politically exposed family.
Speaker 5: They're getting wires from our enemies around the world.
Speaker 4: We don't know what these wires are for, and they're
Speaker 4: going through companies that have no known purpose or no acres.
Speaker 3: So shell companies, they're not real businesses. This is not
Speaker 3: a dry cleaner, this is not a gas station. They're
Speaker 3: no employees there are no paychecks. They're not a business
Speaker 3: in any sense. This is a legal entity, and it's
Speaker 3: a legal entity created to send money to and it's
Speaker 3: what is often used for money laundering. It's what's often
Speaker 3: used to hide the source of the money. And you
Speaker 3: mentioned the suspicious activity reports. So let me ask for
Speaker 3: our listeners what is a suspicious activity report and how
Speaker 3: many of them were filed on the Bidens.
Speaker 4: A suspicious activity report is when the bank notifies the
Speaker 4: Treasury Cabinet that they believe their client may.
Speaker 5: Have committed a crime. Now, I want everyone to understand this.
Speaker 4: Banks don't just do this nonchalantly, like the Washington Post
Speaker 4: tried to say, No bank wants to file a suspicious
Speaker 4: activity report center because when you do, that invites the
Speaker 4: bank examiners to come in and investigate you. And the
Speaker 4: last thing a bank wants to do is the bank
Speaker 4: examiners walked through the front door. The Bidens had one
Speaker 4: hundred and seventy suspicious activity reports filed against them, which
Speaker 4: is unprecedented.
Speaker 5: I was the director of a bank for over a decade.
Speaker 4: Never has anyone received more than one or two that
Speaker 4: was affiliated with my bank. And the fact that this
Speaker 4: family got a one hundred seventy from six different banks
Speaker 4: on dozens of different accounts, showed that there's something bad
Speaker 4: going on here because the banks are notifying the Treasury.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, Treasury, we believe the vice president's family are
Speaker 4: involved in some top of fraud.
Speaker 3: Well, and James, let me make let me make sure
Speaker 3: I understand this. Suspicious activity reports are relatively rare. There's
Speaker 3: something that the bank files with the Treasury Department when
Speaker 3: they believe there may be evidence of criminal conduct. And
Speaker 3: if you or I or Ben went and created a
Speaker 3: shell company, a company that did nothing, that had no employees,
Speaker 3: that was not a going business, and that shell company
Speaker 3: began getting multimillion dollar wires from China, from Russia, from Ukraine,
Speaker 3: that would be the sort of conduct that would trigger
Speaker 3: a suspicious activity report if any of us did that.
Speaker 2: Is that right?
Speaker 5: That's exactly right.
Speaker 4: And we released an email last week that kind of
Speaker 4: showed the thought process by a bank examiner. He was
Speaker 4: communicating with his superior and in the end they filed
Speaker 4: a suspicious activity report, and this email kind of outlines it.
Speaker 4: The Banker's Center said, wait a minute, you know this
Speaker 4: account is pretty much dormant We don't know what this
Speaker 4: company is. All we know is that the president's son
Speaker 4: owns it. He got a five million dollar wire from China.
Speaker 4: We had to contact him to prevent a thar. We said,
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, mister Biden, we need to know what this
Speaker 4: wire was, and he said it was a loan, and
Speaker 4: there's like, oh, a loan from China.
Speaker 5: Well, we need the loan.
Speaker 4: Documentation and he said, I don't have any which is ridiculous.
Speaker 4: No one would loan anyone five million dollars without having
Speaker 4: some type of loan documentation. So then he said, We
Speaker 4: feared this could be a bribe because we know China
Speaker 4: influences politicians through vulnerable family members, and we've seen in
Speaker 4: the news where his ex wife said he was on drugs,
Speaker 4: he was in financial trouble. We believe this could be
Speaker 4: a national security threat.
Speaker 3: One of the things that you mentioned a minute ago
Speaker 3: that I want to stop and drill down on a
Speaker 3: little bit. You said early on the Biden family business,
Speaker 3: they would just get wires from overseas that were payments
Speaker 3: through these shell companies. But then there came a time
Speaker 3: when the irs started coming after them, when they changed
Speaker 3: how they did business and they began instead of getting
Speaker 3: wires that were straight out payments, they began calling them loans.
Speaker 2: Explain that a little bit.
Speaker 3: More about when they did that and why they would
Speaker 3: have done that.
Speaker 4: That change started happening somewhere mid twenty eighteen, and from
Speaker 4: twenty fourteen to twenty eighteen they were pretty consistent. They would,
Speaker 4: you know, after Joe Biden would meet with these people,
Speaker 4: or a hunter would fly on Air Force two, or
Speaker 4: Joe would talk to him on the phone or have
Speaker 4: lunch with him, then money would flow through the shell companies,
Speaker 4: and then they would disperse the money through the show
Speaker 4: companies to ten different Biden family members. Once twenty eighteen
Speaker 4: rolled in and they realized the IRS was rolling in
Speaker 4: on them, and they knew this because the Irish was
Speaker 4: talking to them and the Irish was the lower notes
Speaker 4: confirmed this. They changed the way they were doing business.
Speaker 4: Then they started taking money in, some of it directly
Speaker 4: through their personal account, some of it still through shell companies,
Speaker 4: but they were calling them loans. And the reason you
Speaker 4: do this is twofold number one. You don't report a
Speaker 4: loan on your taxes. So theoretically, if you got five
Speaker 4: million dollar wire from China, and you said it was
Speaker 4: a loan, you didn't have to put that on your
Speaker 4: taxes and the RS would never know about it.
Speaker 5: And secondly, and this.
Speaker 4: Is the most obvious, you don't have to pay taxes
Speaker 4: on it then if it's a loan.
Speaker 5: And that's why I always said, we're going to follow
Speaker 5: the bank records.
Speaker 4: We're going to go with the bank statements in lieu
Speaker 4: of the tax returns, because there's nowhere on your tax
Speaker 4: return does it show you have a loan. There's a
Speaker 4: place on your tax return to show where you loan interest,
Speaker 4: mortgage interest, or if you loan someone money, you receive interest,
Speaker 4: but there's nowhere on your tax returns would it say alone.
Speaker 4: So if you just got to Biden's tax return, you
Speaker 4: would never know about fourteen million dollars that we found
Speaker 4: because they didn't report it to the RS.
Speaker 5: They called it loan.
Speaker 3: So fourteen million was the amount of loans you found so.
Speaker 5: Far, Yes, for Jim and Hunter Biden.
Speaker 3: And look, just to underscore what you said, because it's important.
Speaker 3: By calling it a loan, Number one, you don't have
Speaker 3: to report it to the IRS. Number two, you don't
Speaker 3: have to pay taxes to the IRS. But but of
Speaker 3: course it's got to be a real loan. It can't
Speaker 3: be just fraud. And all right, I've gotten loans over
Speaker 3: the course of my life. I've got a mortgage on
Speaker 3: my house. Now, the mortgage on my house, the collateral
Speaker 3: is my house. I've gotten car notes. I borrow money
Speaker 3: to buy a car. The collateral on the car note
Speaker 3: is the car. If I don't pay the payments, they
Speaker 3: take the car back. Is there any indication that Hunter
Speaker 3: or or Jim Biden had any collateral fourteen million dollars
Speaker 3: of loans? Did they own fourteen million dollars of collateral
Speaker 3: that that would serve as the basis for those loans?
Speaker 4: Well, and I understand loans. Thank god, there's no loan documentation.
Speaker 4: We've asked for loan documentation. They won't produce loan documentation.
Speaker 4: It doesn't appear they had anywhere near fourteen million dollars
Speaker 4: in assets.
Speaker 5: So if you get fourteen million.
Speaker 4: Dollars in loans, you really need to have about eighteen
Speaker 4: or nineteen million dollars in assets, because that's the way
Speaker 4: that the banking rules are. You've got to have more
Speaker 4: than enough or you would be underwater. So but here's
Speaker 4: the most concerning thing. Going through their bank records, they've
Speaker 4: received all this money that they call loans.
Speaker 5: There are hardly any loan.
Speaker 4: Repayments, any principal payments, and no interest payments.
Speaker 3: All right, so this goes back to twenty eighteen principal payment.
Speaker 3: Twenty eighteen, they start getting loans. They get fourteen million
Speaker 3: dollars of loans. You're saying from twenty eighteen to twenty
Speaker 3: twenty three, that's five years. There are very very few
Speaker 3: loan repayments at all, either principal or interest. In other words,
Speaker 3: this is some sort of magic loan that you don't
Speaker 3: need collateral for, you don't have to pay back, and
Speaker 3: it sure is helpful if you want to, say, buy
Speaker 3: a lot of crack and prostitutes, if you don't have
Speaker 3: to pay the loan back. Is that? Am I being
Speaker 3: fair and characterizing that?
Speaker 5: That's exactly right?
Speaker 4: It looked like one loan for half a million dollars
Speaker 4: to one of the bidens. They may have paid one
Speaker 4: hundred and ten thousand dollars back with no interest. The
Speaker 4: rest of the fourteen million dollars we can't find where
Speaker 4: they've made a single payment and not a kinny.
Speaker 3: Of interest But by the way, do they dispute this.
Speaker 3: Does Hunter claim no, no, I pay that back? Does
Speaker 3: Jim Biden claim no, no, I pay that back? Or do
Speaker 3: they dispute what you're saying?
Speaker 4: Well, we we're going to bring them in. You know,
Speaker 4: that's one reason we wanted to pose them. But you know,
Speaker 4: you can look at the records and there's no there's
Speaker 4: no payments back.
Speaker 1: Best case scenario, how much of the millions in loans
Speaker 1: eighteen million do you think they paid back?
Speaker 2: If you're being generous, fourteen million, fourteen.
Speaker 5: Million, I mean, one hundred and ten thousand.
Speaker 3: Wow, it's you know, good to be a Biden.
Speaker 4: So and look, at what point does the loan become income?
Speaker 5: You know, I don't know, that's a question.
Speaker 3: What is the low Look, if the intent is to
Speaker 3: defraud the IRS? If if it is a fraudulent vehicle,
Speaker 3: the IRS can bring it for tax fraud. You can't
Speaker 3: characterize something as a loan that is not in fact
Speaker 3: a loan that doesn't intend to be paid back. And
Speaker 3: I mean that on the face of it. I got
Speaker 3: to tell you I'd be ready to prosecute right now.
Speaker 3: Of course, you know, I don't work at the Biden
Speaker 3: Justice Department. And so my marching orders aren't protect the
Speaker 3: big guy, and the statute of limitations is not far
Speaker 3: from running on these too. They've already left the statute
Speaker 3: of limitations run on what Hunter did with China back
Speaker 3: in seventeen. And the clock is ticking now. Now we
Speaker 3: started with with your telling us your investigators are going
Speaker 3: to talk with AmeriCorps Health Company about the six hundred
Speaker 3: thousand dollars that was paid to Jim Biden. And you
Speaker 3: said two hundred thousand went straight to Joe Biden. Did
Speaker 3: that come from AmeriCorps or did that come from AmeriCorps
Speaker 3: to Jim and then Jim to Joe.
Speaker 2: What was the path of the money.
Speaker 5: Americ Corps to Jim, and Jim to Joe.
Speaker 2: So the big guys getting tot day.
Speaker 5: The same day, the same day.
Speaker 4: So in Jim Biden's bank account, the day he deposited
Speaker 4: that two hundred thousand dollars check, I think he had
Speaker 4: like four thousand dollars ballons, So he went from four
Speaker 4: thousand to two hundred and four thousand. Then he writes
Speaker 4: a check for two hundred thousand to Joe Biden. So
Speaker 4: he goes back down to four thousand. That wasn't real
Speaker 4: hard to trace. I would challenge anyone to debate me
Speaker 4: on tracing that check.
Speaker 2: I have one other question on this money in general.
Speaker 1: We talk about the loan payments, but can we talk
Speaker 1: about the total sub of money that was coming into
Speaker 1: the the Biden affiliated businesses. There were much bigger business
Speaker 1: deals that were done, and how hard is it to trace?
Speaker 2: Me They're not businesses.
Speaker 3: Call them shell corporate show corporate businesses do something. Yeah,
Speaker 3: these are just bank accounts to park.
Speaker 4: Money, right, and a lot of these shelves had multiple
Speaker 4: bank accounts. That's what's taken so long to get the
Speaker 4: bank records in.
Speaker 5: We find more bank accounts.
Speaker 4: I mean, we're always finding more bank accounts and more accounts.
Speaker 4: But you know, we've identified twenty four million dollars that
Speaker 4: we don't think they can explain what they did.
Speaker 5: There's more.
Speaker 1: Don't forget Share this podcast with your family and friends.
Speaker 2: Shared on social media.
Speaker 1: Please hit that follow button if you're listening on Apple,
Speaker 1: iTunes or subscriber auto download, depending on what you're listening
Speaker 1: on what platform, But make sure you follow us and
Speaker 1: we'll see you back here tomorrow morning.