Speaker 1: Now, as you may know, Michigan Supreme Court is allowing
Speaker 1: and this is the most disgusting headline of the year
Speaker 1: so far from the Washington Post is allowing Donald Trump
Speaker 1: to appear on the twenty twenty four ballot. Now, I've
Speaker 1: spoken about this before, how disgusting it is that a
Speaker 1: newspaper would write such a communist headline, right, allowing Trump
Speaker 1: to appear on the ballot. It's not the job of
Speaker 1: the government's decide who our candidates are. I've said that
Speaker 1: before over and over again. That's what dictators and tyrants do, Right.
Speaker 1: They allow you to vote for someone like Vadimir Putin
Speaker 1: and no one else, or Kim Jong Ung and no
Speaker 1: one else, or Fredel Castro and no one else. Right,
Speaker 1: they don't allow for people that the government doesn't pick
Speaker 1: to be in charge of the government. That's what fake
Speaker 1: elections look like. And this is what fake elections sound like.
Speaker 1: More importantly, what you're listening to now and what you're
Speaker 1: witnessing this country is a communist, socialist Marxist media putting
Speaker 1: out propaganda on behalf of those in the government that
Speaker 1: they support, which is the Biden regime. When they write
Speaker 1: headlines like Michigan Supreme Court allows Trump to appear. You know,
Speaker 1: we've lost this country and it's under attack.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Thank goodness, Donald Trump's name is going to appear on
Speaker 1: Michigan's primary ballot. The fact that I'm even having to
Speaker 1: have this conversation is also insane. But Colorado and other
Speaker 1: states are still going all out anti democratic, trying to
Speaker 1: tell you who you can vote for, who you even
Speaker 1: should have the option of voting for. Take a listen
Speaker 1: to this. Kaylie Mcananny talking about this right now on
Speaker 1: Fox News, and it was a very interesting conversation that
Speaker 1: she had with Weisenberg.
Speaker 2: Listen carefully.
Speaker 3: Russia's giving the angle a serious case of deja vu
Speaker 3: after it's now banning an anti war candidate from challenging Putin,
Speaker 3: the Electoral Commission voting unanimously to reject an independent candidate's
Speaker 3: candidacy just three days after her application, citing one hundred
Speaker 3: mistakes on her forms, because that's what happens in autocracies,
Speaker 3: that's what happens in dictatorships. In fact, the Electoral Commission
Speaker 3: of Russia acknowledged that twenty nine people have filed to
Speaker 3: run for the Russian presidency, but just one candidate is
Speaker 3: actually able to register. I wonder who it is that's
Speaker 3: right putin. Meanwhile, here in the United States and Colorado,
Speaker 3: in a four to three ruling, justices declared Donald J.
Speaker 3: Trump ineligible for the ballot, citing Section three of the
Speaker 3: fourteenth Amendment. To be clear, this is an eighteen sixty
Speaker 3: eight amendment that was passed in the wake of the
Speaker 3: Civil War. It's been used only a handful of times
Speaker 3: to go after Confederates. But bring in Donald J. Trump
Speaker 3: and let's delegitimize him from the bench with a novel
Speaker 3: and bogus legal theory. The ruling is sure to be
Speaker 3: appealed to the Supreme Court. But is it yet another
Speaker 3: attempt at election interference? First it was Russian collusion, then
Speaker 3: to impeachments, then the so called unverified Hunter laptop. Oh wait,
Speaker 3: they verified that one, and then you got the four indictments,
Speaker 3: and now just qualification from the ballot. Sensing a pattern,
Speaker 3: I certainly am. And if you think you could just
Speaker 3: write in Donald J. Trump, well think again. The Colorado
Speaker 3: decision reads the secretary may not list President Trump's name
Speaker 3: on the twenty twenty four presidential primary ballot, nor may
Speaker 3: she count any write in votes cast for him. That
Speaker 3: sounds like Russia, not the United States of America. Joining
Speaker 3: US now is former Deputy Independent Council and Fox News
Speaker 3: contributor Saul Weisenberg saw. I mean, you can't even write
Speaker 3: in the guy's name. What's going on here in the
Speaker 3: Supreme Court? What do you think is the trajectory to
Speaker 3: hopefully overturning this?
Speaker 4: Oh, I think the Supreme Court is going to take
Speaker 4: the case, and I think they're going to reverse the
Speaker 4: Colorado Supreme Court fairly quickly.
Speaker 3: Fairly quickly. So do you think, you know, history serves
Speaker 3: you have all of these five to four decisions very narrow.
Speaker 3: Do you think we could see a nine to zero
Speaker 3: reversal some of those justices move over.
Speaker 4: I would certainly like to see that, Kaylie. You know,
Speaker 4: they're going to have to look at a lot of
Speaker 4: things this term that relate to President Trump. They're going
Speaker 4: to have I think they're going to take a look
Speaker 4: at presidential immunity in the context of criminal prosecutions. I
Speaker 4: think they may take a look at the gag order.
Speaker 4: And I think it's very important that they try to
Speaker 4: decide this with as much unanimity as they can and
Speaker 4: I really think this will not be a particularly close decision.
Speaker 4: This section of the fourteenth Amendment that the Colorado Supreme
Speaker 4: Court utilized the majority is simply not self executing in
Speaker 4: my view, and that was a position of the then
Speaker 4: Chief Justice of the United States, Salman Chase, in eighteen
Speaker 4: sixty nine, less than one year after the fourteenth Amendment
Speaker 4: was radic I don't see this as much so much
Speaker 4: as an issue of election interference, though it is as
Speaker 4: another example of Trump derangement syndrome, this time in the judiciary.
Speaker 2: And I point out I.
Speaker 4: Say this not as a political supporter of President Trump.
Speaker 4: I've never politically supported President Trump. But these efforts are very,
Speaker 4: very disturbing and they're very anti democratic.
Speaker 3: And you know, I would love to know your theory
Speaker 3: on this, but I've heard other legal analysts say, and
Speaker 3: you know this. You know, I went to law school, textualism.
Speaker 3: You've got history, you've got president, and a lot of
Speaker 3: folks say, there's a reason the president is enlisted in
Speaker 3: this section. They list all these other officeholders, but they
Speaker 3: don't list the president. And you read that with intention,
Speaker 3: by design. Our founders thought about each and every single word.
Speaker 3: So do you think this Section three of the Fourteenth
Speaker 3: Amendment even applies to a former president.
Speaker 4: You know, that's very much disputed. I think they're good
Speaker 4: arguments on both sides. It's certainly not clear to me
Speaker 4: that it does apply to the president. And then if
Speaker 4: it's not clear, as you know, if the text isn't clear,
Speaker 4: then you get to go to history and structure and
Speaker 4: things like that. So some of these questions are close
Speaker 4: on this issue of what the clause means. But to me,
Speaker 4: the critical, the critical thing which was discussed in one
Speaker 4: of the cents. I believe it was Justice centaur or
Speaker 4: Sam Dorr who focused on Innrie Griffin and the fact
Speaker 4: that this is not self executing. What that means is
Speaker 4: Congress must put teeth into this section of the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 4: Congress must say here is how we are going to
Speaker 4: enforce this disqualification clause. Now, they did that, they passed
Speaker 4: the criminal law. It's still on the books eighteen USC.
Speaker 4: Twenty three eighty three. Jack Smith did not indict President
Speaker 4: former President Trump for that. So that's one critical thing.
Speaker 4: It's not a self executing portion of the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 4: And two, you have to provide due process. You have
Speaker 4: to provide due process to somebody that you're going to
Speaker 4: take off the ballot, and the process provided here was
Speaker 4: an absolute joke. President Trump's people didn't have the right
Speaker 4: to subpoena documents, they didn't have the right to subpoena witnesses.
Speaker 4: There was not a fair trial in any sense of
Speaker 4: the word here.
Speaker 3: Now, no due process, not self executing. Fascinating analysis, Saul,
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 1: You listen to his words there right, Maybe not the
Speaker 1: most entertaining way of putting it, but their important words, nonetheless,
Speaker 1: which is why I wanted to play it for you.
Speaker 1: This is a man that's explaining how our constitution works,
Speaker 1: how the program works, how all of this is supposed
Speaker 1: to actually work. And what you heard from him is
Speaker 1: you have people that are trying to do exactly what
Speaker 1: they just did in Russia. Oh, you can't be on
Speaker 1: the ballot for these reasons. We're going to take everybody
Speaker 1: off the ballot that we don't like.
Speaker 2: That's what we're gonna do.
Speaker 1: Even David Showing on CNN said this about removing Trump
Speaker 1: from the Colorado ballet, talking about how bad it would
Speaker 1: be and saying you can't do this in a democracy. Now, again,
Speaker 1: this is on CNN. All right, listen carefully to what
Speaker 1: he had to say.
Speaker 5: There have been a handful of key points that people
Speaker 5: who don't believe this will carry the day. Point two,
Speaker 5: what do you think is the most effective argument for
Speaker 5: Trump's legal team when they do appeal.
Speaker 6: That's a great question, and you're right, you know, you
Speaker 6: even see Trump haters saying, now, this is just terrible.
Speaker 6: It's an abuse of the political process in a sense.
Speaker 6: I think the most important point probably is that it
Speaker 6: doesn't apply to president. If you look at the language
Speaker 6: of the you know, the text of the language in
Speaker 6: section three, they had an opportunity to say president, they didn't.
Speaker 6: Colorado Court focuses on a discussion between two members of
Speaker 6: the of Congress at the time. I don't think that
Speaker 6: carries the day. And I think ultimately the substance of
Speaker 6: issue is we don't take away the right to vote
Speaker 6: and the right of a candidate to stand for election
Speaker 6: under the First and fourteenth Amendments based on a finding
Speaker 6: by a single state judge on insurrection. Is they again,
Speaker 6: they had the chance to charge him. I think Griffin's
Speaker 6: case is important. The eighteen sixty nine decision that says
Speaker 6: you need federal legislation to effectuate this provision in the Constitution.
Speaker 6: And frankly, I think also Article two, Section one really
Speaker 6: controls what the qualifications are for a president fourteen years,
Speaker 6: a resident thirty five years of age at least, and
Speaker 6: the born US citizen. So I think it'd be a
Speaker 6: terrible decision, and I think it's a terrible move quite
Speaker 6: frankly politically, and that's why many of the Trump enemies
Speaker 6: also don't like it in this thing at a straightforward election, is.
Speaker 5: It not a contradiction? In the New York DA case,
Speaker 5: they make Trump's lawyers make the argument that he is
Speaker 5: an officer. You're saying, in this case, making the argument
Speaker 5: that he is not is the most effective argument. Does
Speaker 5: that contradiction matter at all? Or is that just the
Speaker 5: reality of making legal arguments depending on domain?
Speaker 6: But it depends on the context the use of the
Speaker 6: term officer. But I think the question is even more
Speaker 6: direct here, and that is whether it applies to president.
Speaker 6: So the fallback position is, well, even though president isn't said,
Speaker 6: it's included an officer. I don't think that's a sound argument.
Speaker 6: They clearly knew president was a unique office. It's a
Speaker 6: unique office. In many ways they speak about electors for
Speaker 6: president and vice president, but I think if they intended
Speaker 6: for it to apply to president, they would have said so.
Speaker 6: And remember, this is a very specialized movement at the
Speaker 6: time in the Hill on the heels of the Civil War.
Speaker 6: But anyway, they're all very interesting arguments.
Speaker 1: Did you notice how fast after he said this was
Speaker 1: a terrible thing they jumped in immediately changed the conversation to, well,
Speaker 1: hold on, let's talk about context here. Did you did
Speaker 1: you notice that, like, oh wait, you're saying this is
Speaker 1: a bad thing. We shouldn't do it, all right? How
Speaker 1: do we change this real quick? How do we get
Speaker 1: rid of this? How do we move on to something else?
Speaker 2: We don't. We don't, we don't.
Speaker 1: We don't need this this conversation to move that way
Speaker 1: that quickly. Let's just let's let's run in the other
Speaker 1: direction real fast and talk about it from a completely
Speaker 1: separate and different perspective. They don't want to have this
Speaker 1: conversation because they don't want you to understand what they're doing.
Speaker 1: This is no different than what they just did in Russia.
Speaker 1: What they did in Russia is exactly the same thing
Speaker 1: that they're doing right now.
Speaker 2: What they did in Russia.
Speaker 1: Saying that that a anti war candate filled out the forums
Speaker 1: wrong one hundred and fifty different ways, and you can't
Speaker 1: be on the ballot so that the only person you
Speaker 1: can vote for is Vladimir Putin is no different than
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do the communist Socialist Marxist Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is trying to do in America. You don't get
Speaker 1: to vote for anybody that we don't handpick. We'll let
Speaker 1: you have a Republican, but it's got to.
Speaker 2: Be a lame one.
Speaker 1: It's got to be a weak one. It's got to
Speaker 1: be one that's uninspiring. It's got to be somebody that's
Speaker 1: easy for us to beat. That's what it really comes
Speaker 1: down to. Right, we'll give you a Chris Christy, Right,
Speaker 1: we'll let you vote for someone like a I don't know,
Speaker 1: Nikki Hayley, like. We'll let you have that moment. But
Speaker 1: outside of that, no, we're not going to let you
Speaker 1: have a moment. We're not gonna let you decide who
Speaker 1: you really can or cannot vote for, who you should
Speaker 1: or should not vote for. That we won't do. We're
Speaker 1: not gonna let you do that. And the reason is
Speaker 1: I think very obvious. They're afraid that too many Americans
Speaker 1: are gonna pick Donald Trump, the same way that they
Speaker 1: were afraid that that was gonna happen last time.
Speaker 2: They were terrified.
Speaker 1: They are let me let me rephrase that, they are
Speaker 1: terrified that Donald Trump could become president the United States
Speaker 1: of America yet again. And if he does, he will
Speaker 1: have a mandate. The mandate will be number one to
Speaker 1: secure the southern border. That that that is gonna happen,
Speaker 1: all right, Like that that's just a that that's that's
Speaker 1: that is going to happen. Securing that southern southern border
Speaker 1: is going to be part number one on this one.
Speaker 2: It's gonna matter.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be what he runs on and I think
Speaker 1: connects with voters on the most. It's gonna be about
Speaker 1: the economy, right, that's gonna matter too. But what it
Speaker 1: really is going to bow down too. What really is
Speaker 1: going to matter here is that you've got a candidate
Speaker 1: that the Democratic Party won't be able to control, and
Speaker 1: a candate that has a mandate to go in and
Speaker 1: blow up the deep state and to get rid of
Speaker 1: the people that are not protecting and running this country
Speaker 1: the right way and following the law like this is
Speaker 1: also just a simple issue of following the law. And
Speaker 1: if you don't follow the law, this is what happens.
Speaker 1: You have a lawless society in a lawless country. By
Speaker 1: the way, the White House lying this morning trying to
Speaker 1: convince you that everything is strong with the economy. White
Speaker 1: House President Jean Pierre on The Today Show saying this.
Speaker 5: A recent CNBC survey found nearly two thirds of Americans
Speaker 5: disapprove of the President's handling of the economy.
Speaker 2: What's the disconnect here?
Speaker 5: What does the president have to do differently so people
Speaker 5: approve of his handling of you?
Speaker 1: So I love that loaded question there from the Today Show?
Speaker 1: What do they have to do to change their mind? Well,
Speaker 1: how about just fix the damn economy? How about that?
Speaker 1: How about you lower inflation and get interest rates back
Speaker 1: down to affordable letter level?
Speaker 2: Anybody want to talk about that? How about we talk about.
Speaker 1: Those basic things that you can do, the lowering the
Speaker 1: costs of goods and services. Can we go with that?
Speaker 1: Maybe this, by the way, is just not hard. Okay,
Speaker 1: But notice that they're not acting like the economy is bad, right,
Speaker 1: They're not doing that. They're not acting like the economy
Speaker 1: is in it, We're not working well. They're acting like
Speaker 1: there's a simple disconnect that things are great and the
Speaker 1: White House just isn't telling the story the right way. Prices,
Speaker 1: by the way, and I'm going to play for you
Speaker 1: what the White House presecutor, he says, But I want
Speaker 1: you to understand the data. Okay, prices are up seventeen
Speaker 1: point four percent, Real wages are down two point eight
Speaker 1: percent under Biden. Gas prices remain thirty seven cents a
Speaker 1: gallon higher than when Biden took office. So with that
Speaker 1: in your head, listen to the law.
Speaker 7: There's a lot there, right. We have seen some great
Speaker 7: data this week that showed that consumer sentiment is up
Speaker 7: fourteen percent this month, which is the largest jump that
Speaker 7: we have seen in over a decade. And what that
Speaker 7: means is that people are spending money right, whether it
Speaker 7: is on toys and appliances that they need for themselves
Speaker 7: or for the holidays. And so that is important, critically important.
Speaker 7: And I think the second piece too is that as
Speaker 7: families are traveling across the country going home, going back
Speaker 7: to see the families for the holidays, we have seen
Speaker 7: gas prices under three bucks at the pump per gallon
Speaker 7: in twenty seven states. So this is the work that
Speaker 7: the President has done. It's incredibly important. Fourteen million jobs created.
Speaker 7: That matters, especially as we're going into twenty twenty four,
Speaker 7: Folks are going to probably be looking for jobs. If
Speaker 7: you think about wages going up, unemployment is under four percent.
Speaker 7: All of these things matter. So we're going to continue
Speaker 7: to have those conversations. And the President has said he
Speaker 7: understands that people still feel like it's still things are
Speaker 7: still unaffordable. That's why we're working really hard to lower costs.
Speaker 2: Going to work really hard to lower costs? Are they?
Speaker 1: This is the same white House that lies to you
Speaker 1: about immigration? Where does immigration fall on the presidents to
Speaker 1: do list? Listen to the White House lie to you
Speaker 1: about immigration at the southern border as well?
Speaker 8: Where does immigration fall on President Biden's to do lists?
Speaker 2: I was thinking about a second term.
Speaker 3: He doesn't have a Congress on his side for this.
Speaker 7: Where does it fall in terms of a second It
Speaker 7: is a priority. We know that as it relates to
Speaker 7: the border security specifically, it is a priority for Americans.
Speaker 7: That's why let's not forget on day one of this
Speaker 7: president's administration, the first legislation that he put forth to
Speaker 7: Congress was on immigration reform, a comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker 2: So it's about three years and we.
Speaker 7: Have not seen any action on that, and we want
Speaker 7: to work with Congress on that.
Speaker 2: And so right now, as you.
Speaker 7: All have reported, there's this bipartisan hopefully a by person
Speaker 7: agreement that we will get to to deal with border
Speaker 7: security because it's so important when Congress comes back, we
Speaker 7: hope Congress takes action on that. But the President is
Speaker 7: taking this very very seriously.
Speaker 1: He's taking it very very seriously. You have record numbers
Speaker 1: coming across now, not per month, but per day across
Speaker 1: the southern border. And you want me to believe that
Speaker 1: he's taking it seriously. And notice that there's zero pushback
Speaker 1: from the Today Show. Hey, we're going to give you
Speaker 1: a chance to lie the American people for five to
Speaker 1: seven minutes.
Speaker 2: Will you come on? Sure?
Speaker 1: Love to great? All right, So when you come on,
Speaker 1: we're going to ask you this question. But you can
Speaker 1: say whatever you want to and we won't challenge you
Speaker 1: at all. We won't challenge you with facts or figures.
Speaker 1: You just put out your propaganda and we'll check the
Speaker 1: box as quick as we possibly can. I want to
Speaker 1: get to one other aspect of what also is happening
Speaker 1: right now in this in the country, in the world,
Speaker 1: and it doesn't deal with Israel, it doesn't deal with
Speaker 1: a Ran, and I'm going to keep monitoring that for you.
Speaker 2: But it deals with the economy.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of people over the holidays that
Speaker 1: we're talking about the economy and how things are changing.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has come out and he was asked a
Speaker 1: simple question about the economy and just how bad the
Speaker 1: economy is right now and how things are turning. Listen
Speaker 1: to what Joe Biden had to say about the current
Speaker 1: economic conditions.
Speaker 4: About the economy through what's your outlook on the of
Speaker 4: founding up here?
Speaker 2: All goods, thank you, look got report of the right way,
Speaker 2: Go start reporting it the right way.
Speaker 1: He's mumbling his words there, but he said with the economy,
Speaker 1: it is all good, nothing wrong with the economy, Go
Speaker 1: and report it the right way.
Speaker 2: The problem is Democrats are now.
Speaker 1: Moving the opposite of that, as Democratic colleague dodging questions
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump's economy, admitting Rocanna, saying food and gas
Speaker 1: prices are high, along with the rent and interest rates.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: On Friday's broadcast on Fox Soution Channel America reports Representative Rocana,
Speaker 1: Democrat from California, told the truth about where the economy is,
Speaker 1: especially as newpolon that is showing that many Americans feel
Speaker 1: very uneasy heading into next year.
Speaker 2: Take a listen.
Speaker 8: Americans have mixed feelings about the state of the economy
Speaker 8: heading into twenty twenty four, and it's causing some alarm
Speaker 8: among Democrats over President Biden making Bidenomics a major focus
Speaker 8: of his reelection campaign. Let's bring in California Democratic Congressman
Speaker 8: Rote Coana for more on this. Congressman, thanks so much
Speaker 8: for being here. I want to start off with just
Speaker 8: some graphics of the price change on some big sectors
Speaker 8: since the president took office.
Speaker 2: And now, I mean, if you look at.
Speaker 8: Gas, it's up twenty seven percent over this period of
Speaker 8: time that he's been in office, Electricity twenty three percent,
Speaker 8: food twenty percent, rent eighteen percent, and if you go
Speaker 8: over to borrowing rates, the thirty year fixed rate mortgage
Speaker 8: is one hundred and forty percent, car loans nearly sixty.
Speaker 8: The list goes on. So that's really what's being reflected
Speaker 8: in the polls why people are not happy about the
Speaker 8: state of the economy. Do you think that the president
Speaker 8: should stick with Bidenomics.
Speaker 5: Well, I think we have to knowledge that rents are high,
Speaker 5: interest rates are high, food and.
Speaker 2: Gas prices are high.
Speaker 5: But wages also have gone up, and this president has
Speaker 5: ushered in a manufacturing revolution to bring back jobs.
Speaker 2: I was encouraged today.
Speaker 4: That Sethtary Romando said no, we're not going to allow
Speaker 4: this nip.
Speaker 2: On a steel company to buy us deal. We're going
Speaker 2: to look into it. That's a big issue.
Speaker 4: I think the administration needs to reject.
Speaker 8: That deal and emphasize bringing manufacturing home. But does Bidenomics
Speaker 8: itself work. I mean, if you ditch Bidenomics, it might
Speaker 8: look like a failure on his big reelection initiative, but
Speaker 8: it does to a lot of people seem out of touch.
Speaker 8: Do you think he should stick with the Moniker Yes
Speaker 8: or no?
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, Bidenomics about bringing manufacturing back. I think most
Speaker 2: people would agree about that.
Speaker 5: Many dynamics is about increasing wages for the work class.
Speaker 2: That doesn't mean you say everything is rosy. Obviously you
Speaker 2: acknowledge interest rates are high, caused by the Fed. Obviously
Speaker 2: you acknowledge that prices are.
Speaker 8: High, Okay, so your team Bidenomics appreciate that. I want
Speaker 8: to go quickly to this news in Colorado.
Speaker 2: By the way, let's just stop there.
Speaker 1: I love how he's like, oh, everything's too high, but
Speaker 1: Bidenomics is somehow still working. Wait what well? I mean
Speaker 1: it's still working? How is it still working?
Speaker 2: Like? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: I think we have to acknowledge that rents are high,
Speaker 1: interest rates are high, food and gas prices are high,
Speaker 1: but wages have also gone up in the President has
Speaker 1: ushered in manufacturing revolution. We are now in a revolution,
Speaker 1: he said. He is upshered in a manufacturing revolution to
Speaker 1: bring back jobs.
Speaker 2: When did that happen?
Speaker 1: He said, I was encouraged by the Secretary saying, no,
Speaker 1: we're not going to allow this Asian, this Chinese steel
Speaker 1: company to buy a US steel We're going to look
Speaker 1: into it.
Speaker 2: That's a big issue.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that you manufactured are ushered in a
Speaker 1: manufacturing revolution to bring back jobs. By the way, I'm
Speaker 1: all in favor of bringing back job. But you listen
Speaker 1: to the host, they're asking, does Bidenomics itself work?
Speaker 2: Quote? If you ditch.
Speaker 1: Bidenomics, it might look like a failure on his reelection initiative,
Speaker 1: but it does to a lot of people seem.
Speaker 2: Out of touch. Do you think you should stick with it?
Speaker 1: Monikers yes or no, con saying, well, yeah, Bidenomics about
Speaker 1: bringing manufacturing back. Since when show me real and big
Speaker 1: manufacturing that's coming back. I'd love to see it. I
Speaker 1: don't see it. I don't believe you. The facts don't
Speaker 1: back it up. The facts don't adequately back up any
Speaker 1: of this. The idea that this is somehow working, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: The idea that Bidenomics isn't anything but a disaster. Not
Speaker 1: because I say it. I want to be clear about that.
Speaker 1: It is not because I say it. It's because that's
Speaker 1: the reality of the situation, based on data, based on stats,
Speaker 1: based on home prices, mortgage prices, interest rates, the list
Speaker 1: goes on and on. It's based on all of that.
Speaker 1: It's not based on politics or political ideology. Right that
Speaker 1: it could be good for one and bad for another. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's not the case at all. It's very clear. It
Speaker 1: is abundantly clear that it is because.
Speaker 2: Of a very simple thing.
Speaker 1: He has put in policies and put in programs that
Speaker 1: clearly do not work and have not worked. That is Bidenomics,
Speaker 1: whether you want to admit it or not. That's what
Speaker 1: Bidenomics is. That's what Bidenomics looks like. And the American
Speaker 1: voter is smart enough to understand now that things cost more.
Speaker 1: The American voters are smart enough to understand that the
Speaker 1: prices are high, and the reason why prices are high
Speaker 1: is because it is because of what I just mentioned.
Speaker 1: When your policies are failure. And notice this, the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is refusing.
Speaker 2: Okay, let's be very very very very very clear.
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party is refusing to admit that their policy
Speaker 1: is hurting Americans. And they'd rather stick by a slogan
Speaker 1: than tell you the truth. They would rather stick by
Speaker 1: Bionomics than admit that the policy isn't working and maybe
Speaker 1: we should be doing something different.
Speaker 2: That's how little they care about you and your family.
Speaker 1: What we do know is the southern border has become
Speaker 1: a real issue for the President of the United States
Speaker 1: of America. The Texas border wide open, as the sectors
Speaker 1: of the border have been shuttered their stations for catch
Speaker 1: and release to take place because there's an overwhelming surge
Speaker 1: of migrants crossing.
Speaker 2: The Rio grand has forced the busiest.
Speaker 1: Border sector in Texas to close border patrol statetions so
Speaker 1: that the personnel that normally works there can be reassigned
Speaker 1: to migrant processing and what they're referring to as transportation
Speaker 1: duties chauffeurs for legal immigrants. According to a US Customs
Speaker 1: and Border Protection source, the announcement came on Friday, hoping
Speaker 1: that no one would notice, ordering managers to cease operations
Speaker 1: at stations and Correzo Springs, Cumstock, Evalde, and Brackettville, Texas.
Speaker 2: The move, they.
Speaker 1: Say, will leave more than ten thousand square miles within
Speaker 1: the sector without any border patrol presence. Let me say
Speaker 1: that again, this move by the Biden administration will leave
Speaker 1: more than ten thousand square miles ten thousand square miles
Speaker 1: within those sectors without any border patrol presence at all.
Speaker 1: In recent weeks, the Biden administration shuttered the Eagle Pass
Speaker 1: bridge one port of entry and the railroad bridge linking
Speaker 1: Eagle Pass to Mexico. What do they do? They reassigned
Speaker 1: personnel to address the continuing migrant surge. The railroad line
Speaker 1: was shut to slow the flow of migrants, as that
Speaker 1: is the primary mode of transportation for the group of migrants.
Speaker 2: Sometimes in the thousands to reach the US border for
Speaker 2: the interior of Mexico.
Speaker 1: The rail bridge reopened earlier Friday, signaling the flow of
Speaker 1: migrants may continued unabated in the coming days.
Speaker 2: The announcement on.
Speaker 1: Friday also included instructions to some Border Patrol agents and
Speaker 1: their managers that the holiday leave that was scheduled more
Speaker 1: than a year in advance may be canceled for a
Speaker 1: few employees that qualified. The sources said, as with previous
Speaker 1: migrant surges in the area, the Department of Home in
Speaker 1: Security has not put forth any solution to the massive
Speaker 1: crossings and has left the Border Patrol to deal with
Speaker 1: the monumental task of providing humanitarian care for thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands that are arriving and breaking into this country illegally
Speaker 1: every single day. Migrant crossings remain roughly two thousand per
Speaker 1: day in the Del Rio sector alone. They peaked at
Speaker 1: a new level last week, with those numbers at more
Speaker 1: than four thousand illegal immigrants coming across in the Del
Speaker 1: Rio sector in a twenty four hour period. Most of
Speaker 1: the migrants being encountered at the Del Rio sector, where
Speaker 1: four thousand people came across the border in a twenty
Speaker 1: four hour period are coming from Venezuela, Honduras, Colombia. According
Speaker 1: to local sources, most of them arrive at the border
Speaker 1: city on freight trains and immediately cross the Rio Grande
Speaker 1: into the neighboring city of Eagle Pass.
Speaker 2: Once they're there, there are problem.
Speaker 1: Law enforcement and military authorities on both sides of the
Speaker 1: border have remained powerless to slow the stop of the
Speaker 1: crossings because the United States government and our president is
Speaker 1: refusing to give them what they need to protect and
Speaker 1: defend themselves. So to be clear, this is a process
Speaker 1: that we're talking about right now that is avoidable. This
Speaker 1: is a process that not only is avoidable, this is
Speaker 1: a scenario that could be stopped with a simple change
Speaker 1: in policy, a simple change in policy that would take
Speaker 1: hours to begin to implement, hours nowadays hours. And we
Speaker 1: have a president of the United States of America who
Speaker 1: has come out and made it very clear, I'm not
Speaker 1: changing a damn thing. I'm not doing anything differently, I'm
Speaker 1: not doing anything to stop this. This is all being
Speaker 1: done by design, and that's part of what you need
Speaker 1: to understand.
Speaker 2: This is all being done by design.
Speaker 1: Finally, please share this podcast with your family and friends,
Speaker 1: on social media, hit that follow up, subscribe or auto
Speaker 1: download button. As some of the algorithms have changed in
Speaker 1: many of your apps, you may not realize it, but
Speaker 1: it may not be auto downloading anymore, so make sure
Speaker 1: you check to see if it's working the right way.
Speaker 1: I'll see you back here tomorrow