Speaker 1: The White House, in theory out of nowhere, came out
Speaker 1: and is halting the permitting process for several proposed liquefied
Speaker 1: natural gas LNG export terminal projects over they claim their
Speaker 1: potential impacts on climate change.
Speaker 2: It's an unprecedented.
Speaker 1: Move that environmentalists have demanded in recent months. Now, I
Speaker 1: want you to understand that the reason why that the
Speaker 1: Biden administration came out with this late last week and
Speaker 1: now it's being written about now people are talking about,
Speaker 1: is not actually because of the environmental issue that's the
Speaker 1: cover story here.
Speaker 2: This is also backfired quickly.
Speaker 1: And the reason why I say that is because the
Speaker 1: Washington Post has actually come out with a opinion piece.
Speaker 1: And this is the Washington Posts, the hardcore Washington Posts,
Speaker 1: liberal left, Marxist communist newspaper that has now come out
Speaker 1: and said buy liquid natural gas LNG. Decision is a
Speaker 1: win for political symbolism, not the climate. Now I'm going
Speaker 1: to get to that article in a minute, but I
Speaker 1: want you to understand the context of why this White
Speaker 1: House decided to announce this on Friday morning. The White
Speaker 1: House did not do this because the environment. What the
Speaker 1: White House was doing, in my opinion, was putting sanctions
Speaker 1: on a state that they were angry with, which is
Speaker 1: an unprecedented move in political.
Speaker 2: History, certainly in my lifetime.
Speaker 1: In fact, I went back to see has the White
Speaker 1: House ever done anything this brazen to sanction a state
Speaker 1: because they don't like what a state in this country
Speaker 1: is doing on another issue. And you may say, okay, well,
Speaker 1: what is that other issue. It's a great question. The
Speaker 1: other issue deals with the state of Texas. And why
Speaker 1: did the Biden administration come out on Friday with us?
Speaker 1: They came out with us on Friday for one reason
Speaker 1: only to punish, to punish Texas, to sanction Texas, because
Speaker 1: Texas has refused to comply with their demand, which is
Speaker 1: to stop securing the border. As you know, it went
Speaker 1: all the way to the Supreme Court, and Supreme Court
Speaker 1: in a five to.
Speaker 2: Four decision said.
Speaker 1: That the federal government can take down the bob wire
Speaker 1: in Texas that's been put up across the southern border.
Speaker 1: To be clear, that five to four decision did not,
Speaker 1: let me say that again, did not order Texas to
Speaker 1: take down the bob wire, and it also did not
Speaker 1: bar them from laying more bob wire to protect the
Speaker 1: southern border.
Speaker 2: All it said was is that the federal.
Speaker 1: Government could cut or gain access to the boarder if
Speaker 1: they needed to, going through the Bob wire.
Speaker 2: Now, a lot of people in the media also lie
Speaker 2: about that.
Speaker 1: Story, and you missed maybe the first time that you
Speaker 1: actually heard it the way that I just explained it
Speaker 1: to you.
Speaker 2: And so the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: And the five four decision, there was a lot of
Speaker 1: people that are very angry with I think it was
Speaker 1: Roberts and Amy Kobe Barrett for siding with the liberals
Speaker 1: and this five.
Speaker 2: To four decision.
Speaker 1: But if you read the decision, you understand what they
Speaker 1: said was it was an emergency decision.
Speaker 2: They didn't write an opinion.
Speaker 1: And to be clear, again, they didn't say that Texas
Speaker 1: couldn't keep doing it, and they didn't say that Texas
Speaker 1: had to take up what they had already done, and
Speaker 1: they didn't halt them from doing any further securing of
Speaker 1: the southern border.
Speaker 2: They also sent this back to the lower court.
Speaker 1: And they're going to figure it out and it may
Speaker 1: come back and to the Supreme Court in some capacity.
Speaker 2: So this is exactly.
Speaker 1: Why on Friday, the White House came out with this
Speaker 1: random I would argue out of nowhere halting the permitting
Speaker 1: process for several proposed liquefied natural gas export terminal projects
Speaker 1: because it was going to hurt specifically Texas. You want
Speaker 1: to know how many jobs it's going to impact. The
Speaker 1: initial numbers and these are early numbers, are seventy thousand
Speaker 1: jobs that are going to be affected because of this
Speaker 1: move by the White House. Now, this did not happen
Speaker 1: the way that the White House reported. The White House
Speaker 1: said this happened as a result of climate activists. In
Speaker 1: recent weeks and months, the White House's climate team also
Speaker 1: reportedly made a crucial decision to delay approval of a
Speaker 1: major natural gas project called the CP two as well.
Speaker 1: Why this is no joke. This is what the news
Speaker 1: media is saying.
Speaker 2: Is the reason. They say the.
Speaker 1: Decision took place after the White House had a meeting
Speaker 1: with a twenty five year old social media influencer, and
Speaker 1: then key climate advisors and decision makers within the White
Speaker 1: House after meeting with a twenty five year old reportedly
Speaker 1: met with this TikToker, an actual TikToker from Colorado who
Speaker 1: would organized an online campaign demanding that the administration killed
Speaker 1: this project, and the White House said that's why we
Speaker 1: did it. I don't believe for a second that a
Speaker 1: twenty five year old killed this project. I believe the
Speaker 1: White House was so desperate for a cover story that
Speaker 1: they said it was a twenty five year old that
Speaker 1: they were listening to that helped them kill the project
Speaker 1: because they couldn't admit honesty honestly with the American people
Speaker 1: with integrity. Hey, we just sanctioned a major state in
Speaker 1: the United States of America for not doing what we
Speaker 1: told them to do, which was to stop laying bob
Speaker 1: wire and stop securing the southern border.
Speaker 2: That's what this is really all about here.
Speaker 1: The Biden administration, by the way, not only is fighting
Speaker 1: against this liquid natural gas and fighting against Texas, but
Speaker 1: they're now fighting against the use of American natural gas.
Speaker 1: Employees of this project alone, they say, will eradicate at
Speaker 1: least seventy thousand jobs projects involving, by the way, billions
Speaker 1: of dollars that will also be disrupted. And there's something
Speaker 1: else that just happened because of this. Because these projects
Speaker 1: are going to be paused and stopped and not developed.
Speaker 2: Do you know what they're also doing.
Speaker 1: They are also sending countless dollars, billions of dollars to
Speaker 1: our enemy Russia. The same Russian government that is invading
Speaker 1: and killing innocent people in Ukraine, the same Russian government
Speaker 1: that has their hands in terrorism in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: The same Russian government that sent literally millions of dollars
Speaker 1: through the richest woman in Russia, that Russian oligark whose
Speaker 1: husband was the mayor of Moscow, who is best friends
Speaker 1: with Vladimir Putin. You know, those same Russia that sent
Speaker 1: three million to the Biden crime family are now going
Speaker 1: to get their hands on billions of dollars in profit,
Speaker 1: not millions, billions of dollars in profit, which will then
Speaker 1: help them with their war effort and helping tarists around
Speaker 1: the world. But the White House and the media is
Speaker 1: telling you no, no, no, this is really just about
Speaker 1: the environment. Now, there was an update to this story
Speaker 1: that happened, and I want to read for you another headline.
Speaker 1: It says the White House halts enormous natural gas projects
Speaker 1: and victory for environmentalists.
Speaker 2: The former FERC chairman.
Speaker 1: Said, this isn't just bad policy, it's also bad politics.
Speaker 2: The White House halting.
Speaker 1: The permitting process for several proposed liquified natural gas export
Speaker 1: terminal products over their potential impact on climate change. An
Speaker 1: unprecedented mo of environment is demanded in recent months. The
Speaker 1: article reads, and a joint announcement the White House Department
Speaker 1: of Energy said the pause would occur while federal officials
Speaker 1: conduct a quote rigorous environmental review assessing the project's carbon emissions,
Speaker 1: which could take you, ready for this more than a
Speaker 1: year to complete, meaning it would be after election day.
Speaker 1: Climate activists have been demanding and taking aim at liquid
Speaker 1: natural gas export projects in recent weeks, arguing that they
Speaker 1: would lead to a large up ticket at missions and
Speaker 1: worse than global warming. Energy Secretary Jennifer Grhant Hoolms said,
Speaker 1: as our exports increase, we must review export applications using
Speaker 1: the most comprehensive, up to date analysis of the economic, environmental,
Speaker 1: and national security considerations.
Speaker 2: This action includes a pause.
Speaker 1: On penning applications for exports of US natural gas as
Speaker 1: liquid natural gas to non free trade agreement countries until
Speaker 1: the Department can update the underlying analysis for authorizations. Okay,
Speaker 1: I know that Secretary Grahmall didn't write that statement, and
Speaker 1: the reason why is it was actually well worded, so
Speaker 1: she's out, so somebody else wrote it. And what I
Speaker 1: know that they were doing when they were running to
Speaker 1: that statement to all of us is they were lying
Speaker 1: to us.
Speaker 2: And how do I know that?
Speaker 1: Because they said they were going to look at a comprehensive,
Speaker 1: up to date analysis on national security considerations. You don't
Speaker 1: need an exhaustive and comprehensive analysis to know that if
Speaker 1: you turn off these projects, the money is immediately going
Speaker 1: to flow out of Russia, and you know that it's
Speaker 1: going to go to China, and you know that China
Speaker 1: is also going to make money, another one of our adversaries.
Speaker 1: So there's two really big problems here with this lie.
Speaker 2: The other thing that they also know.
Speaker 1: Is that pausing this is going to cost seventy thousand
Speaker 1: plus jobs in an election year, which goes back to
Speaker 1: exactly what I said. They were sending a loud message
Speaker 1: to every other state in America that if you do
Speaker 1: what Texas is doing at the southern border, if you
Speaker 1: do what Texas is just on it, with the backing
Speaker 1: of twenty five different governors who have sent aid and
Speaker 1: support and National Guard troops to help with the southern
Speaker 1: border in Texas, that we will do this to you next.
Speaker 1: We will find the industry that your state depends on
Speaker 1: and we will punish you. If this was about national
Speaker 1: security concerns, you never would have made this ruling.
Speaker 2: You never would have made this announcement.
Speaker 1: And the reason why is because you already knew that
Speaker 1: the only person that was going to get rich off
Speaker 1: this was Russia, and that would allow them to be
Speaker 1: involved in more terrorism and you would allow and it
Speaker 1: would also enrich China. So if they gave a crap
Speaker 1: about national security, I assure you they would not have
Speaker 1: even thought about this project. So when you see the
Speaker 1: media and everybody that I've seen in the media, and
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to be mean, I'm being serious here,
Speaker 1: they have all gotten this story wrong. This is that,
Speaker 1: for the first time in our lifetimes, the United State
Speaker 1: States federal government sanctioning the same way that we sanction Iran,
Speaker 1: the same way that we sanction the Axis of Evil
Speaker 1: back in the day after nine to eleven, the same
Speaker 1: way that we sanctioned Russia.
Speaker 2: After they invaded Ukraine.
Speaker 1: The United States government under the Biden regime, it's not administration,
Speaker 1: it is a communist dictatorship. They have now sanctioned the
Speaker 1: people of Texas. Let that sink in because this is
Speaker 1: what dictators and tyrants do. And this government, the Biden regime,
Speaker 1: just did this and no one is reporting on it accurately.
Speaker 1: All right, I want to tell you real quick about
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile. For ten years, Patriot Mobile has been America's
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. And when I say only
Speaker 1: trust me, they're literally the only one. Patriot Mobile offers
Speaker 1: dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all
Speaker 1: three major networks. What does that mean to you? It
Speaker 1: means you get the same coverage that you're accustomed to,
Speaker 1: but you're doing it without funding.
Speaker 2: The Left.
Speaker 1: You may not know the Big Mobile gives massive donations
Speaker 1: to Planned Parenthood, to Democratic candidates, causes, and organizations. Why
Speaker 1: give your money to a group of people that literally
Speaker 1: hate your values, hate what you stand for, hate your family,
Speaker 1: traditional Christian values. That is why I switch the Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: And when you switch, you're sending a message that you
Speaker 1: support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment, as well as our military, our veterans, and
Speaker 1: our first responder heroes. They make switching easy one hundred
Speaker 1: percent US based customer service team. Plus you can keep
Speaker 1: your same cell phone number, upgrade your phone to a
Speaker 1: new phone or keep the one you've got in your
Speaker 1: hand as well. And the most important part, every time
Speaker 1: you pay your bill, they take a percentage of your
Speaker 1: bill every month and give it back to conservative causes
Speaker 1: that you help choose to support.
Speaker 2: So check them out.
Speaker 1: Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot mobile dot com
Speaker 1: slash ferguson or nine to seven to two Patriot get
Speaker 1: free activation when you use the offer code ferguson. That's
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven to
Speaker 1: two Patriot.
Speaker 2: So what did the White House do?
Speaker 1: They decided and of course in the cover saying oh,
Speaker 1: it's all about an environmental study that we're going to
Speaker 1: stop the liquid natural gas terminals that are being used
Speaker 1: built in Texas. We're going to stifle them with seventy
Speaker 1: thousand jobs.
Speaker 2: That are going to be stopped in this country.
Speaker 1: On top of that, all in an election year, and
Speaker 1: they say it could take well over a year folks
Speaker 1: to do their study. They also claim it was for
Speaker 1: national security reasons. If that was true, then you wouldn't
Speaker 1: have done this at all. And the reason why is
Speaker 1: because immediately the person that makes the most money, because
Speaker 1: this is decision is communist Russia. But then again, in
Speaker 1: my opinion, they have the president compromised. Why do I
Speaker 1: say that because the Russian oligarch, the former mayor of
Speaker 1: Moscow's wife send it three million dollars to the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family. These are the same Russians, of course, that
Speaker 1: they used claiming that Russia had colluded with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: We know that never happened, and we know they know
Speaker 1: that because they made the story up, and they paid
Speaker 1: to make the story up from the Hillary Clinton campaign
Speaker 1: and the Democrat National Committee. Let me also say this
Speaker 1: because I just want to remind people of this Biden administration.
Speaker 1: This is another example of what I say and why
Speaker 1: I say. The Democratic Party is dead. It doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party is not a democratic party. The Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is a communist, socialist Marxist party masquer rating as Democrats.
Speaker 1: When you see the word the D next to a candidate,
Speaker 1: when you see a Democratic primary take place, it's not
Speaker 1: a Democratic party anymore.
Speaker 2: They are socialists and communists.
Speaker 1: They should just be called the Communist Party, and the
Speaker 1: sooner we all start to refer to them as that
Speaker 1: and just say what it is. Because if you listen
Speaker 1: to what they say, and you listen to and watch
Speaker 1: what they do, just like this where they help communists
Speaker 1: in Russia and China and then take away seventy thousand
Speaker 1: American jobs and sanction a state because that state refuses
Speaker 1: to give in, refuses to allow for unlimited number of
Speaker 1: legal immigrants to come into their state, and terrorists, by
Speaker 1: the way, to come in their state, which I'm going
Speaker 1: to deal with in a minute, the number of terrorists
Speaker 1: coming across the southern border. And so because Texas stood
Speaker 1: up for their state rights, which they should and every
Speaker 1: other state in America should, the Biden administration said, we
Speaker 1: will send you a loud and clear message.
Speaker 2: We will crush you Texas.
Speaker 1: You minions, you peons, you little people of Texas. And
Speaker 1: we're going to send a message to you other twenty
Speaker 1: five yahoo governors who just sent your national guards and
Speaker 1: your state troopers to Texas to help them at the border.
Speaker 2: We'll do it to you too.
Speaker 1: We will find the industry that matters to you, and
Speaker 1: we will destroy you. Now, it's going to hurt the
Speaker 1: economy in an election year that doesn't make sense politically.
Speaker 1: It's going to cut seventy thousand jobs, and it may
Speaker 1: be even more than that when we at the end
Speaker 1: of the day. And it's not for national security reasons
Speaker 1: which they claim, because the two countries that immediately profit
Speaker 1: significantly in the billions of dollars from this decision is
Speaker 1: Russia and now Europe is going to be in a
Speaker 1: bad spot, so they're going to be dependent on Russia,
Speaker 1: which gives Russia not just money, but leverage over Europe
Speaker 1: because they have to have liquified natural gas to keep
Speaker 1: the lights on. And also China. China is going to
Speaker 1: make a crap ton of money off this decision as well.
Speaker 1: And the only reason why they did this is because
Speaker 1: they were wanting to sanction the state of Texas for
Speaker 1: refusing to lay down and allow more terrorists on the
Speaker 1: terrorists watch list.
Speaker 2: To come across the southern border. And I'm going to
Speaker 2: deal with those new stats coming out in a minute.
Speaker 1: But also they wanted to send a message to every
Speaker 1: other state that is coming to the aid of Texas,
Speaker 1: and there are a lot of states coming to the
Speaker 1: aid of Texas right now, sending national Guard members and
Speaker 1: state troopers to help at the border, and they were
Speaker 1: sending a clear message to those other governors in those
Speaker 1: other twenty five states. Do not screw with us, because
Speaker 1: if you do screw with us, we will crush you
Speaker 1: the same way we are about to crush liquefied.
Speaker 2: Natural gas in Texas.
Speaker 1: This is a dictator tyrant communists move.
Speaker 2: That's what this is, plain and simple.
Speaker 1: The other reason why you know they were lying to
Speaker 1: you is because they needed a cover story so quickly
Speaker 1: to justify this move on Friday, which is how you
Speaker 1: know they weren't planning on doing this until they needed
Speaker 1: to sanction Texas. And then they said, oh, it's because
Speaker 1: we met with a guy on TikTok who's twenty five
Speaker 1: years old, and then we just had this moment of
Speaker 1: clarity and we decided to change America's energy policy because
Speaker 1: of a TikToker that we met with who's twenty five. Like,
Speaker 1: I know they're dumb at the White House, but I
Speaker 1: know they're not dumb enough to listen to a twenty
Speaker 1: five year old TikToker and change our entire liquified natural
Speaker 1: gas policy.
Speaker 2: They needed a cover story and.
Speaker 1: They couldn't find one, so they said, all right, well
Speaker 1: we'll just use this twenty five year old kid and
Speaker 1: the media will report it that way, and they're dumb
Speaker 1: enough to report it that way, and sure enough, guess
Speaker 1: what happened. The media reported this story that way. That
Speaker 1: is this administration. How easy it is, by the way
Speaker 1: for them, And it is easy. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a joke. Like they can make up anything they want to.
Speaker 1: They can make up things that are like I don't
Speaker 1: know Donald Trump was colliding with Russians with no evidence, right,
Speaker 1: And who's going to check them?
Speaker 2: Who's going to check them? Nobody?
Speaker 1: We need to stop calling the Democratic Party the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: and one of the ways you have to fight is
Speaker 1: by telling the truth.
Speaker 2: You know, AOC and the squad. I actually like them.
Speaker 1: Some people have said we need to get them out
Speaker 1: of office and raise funds and fight against them.
Speaker 2: I couldn't disagree more. I love them there.
Speaker 1: You won't know why, because they're actually man enough to
Speaker 1: tell you exactly what their intent is. A great example
Speaker 1: is the vote that just happened in the House where
Speaker 1: they said that anyone that was involved in supporting and
Speaker 1: or planning the attacks on Israel that were that come
Speaker 1: into this country or in this country will be kicked
Speaker 1: out of this country.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: That's like that are immigrants. And there was two people
Speaker 1: that voted against it just too. But you look at
Speaker 1: these that this vote was unanimous. Right, this is not hard.
Speaker 1: If you're killing innocent people, if you're if you're literally
Speaker 1: cooking children in a stove and you're beheading children, you shouldn't.
Speaker 1: If you're a part of that, you shouldn't be around, right,
Speaker 1: you shouldn't. And these lefties they'll tell you, and they'll
Speaker 1: sit there and go, no, we disagree with this, Like
Speaker 1: they're not America first, They're they're they're they're in favor
Speaker 1: of the terrorists first, folks, like they are, Like, we
Speaker 1: need to understand and really get our head around this.
Speaker 2: This is who they actually are. Believe them.
Speaker 1: And I'm glad that we had the squad because that's
Speaker 1: what the Democratic Party actually is.
Speaker 2: They're dead.
Speaker 1: They are communists, they are socialists, they are uh, they
Speaker 1: are they are one hundred percent terrorist sympathizers.
Speaker 2: Look at Corey Bush this week, and look at what
Speaker 2: she has done this week. Look at what she is, you.
Speaker 1: Know, just just the exact sample she now says. If
Speaker 1: you criticize her and the money that she was giving,
Speaker 1: apparently to her husband for security in the investigation around her.
Speaker 1: They're like, oh, you're now a sexist, right and racist
Speaker 1: if you criticize her.
Speaker 2: Now I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm criticizing you because you misappropriated funds and you funneled
Speaker 1: them into basically your own pocket. You're a horrible human being.
Speaker 1: But they'll sit there and they tell you. And now
Speaker 1: I got the name, so I was pulling out my notes,
Speaker 1: so I want to make sure I have this right.
Speaker 2: It was Corey Bush and Rashid Ta Leed who.
Speaker 1: Opposed barring October seventh terrorists from the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Corey Bush, the Democrat from Missouri, and Rashida Lead, the
Speaker 1: Democrat from Michigan, were two votes against the bill in
Speaker 1: the US House of Representatives on Wednesday that would ban
Speaker 1: Palestinian to join in the Hamas terr attacks on Israel
Speaker 1: on October the seventh from entering the United States of America.
Speaker 2: I'm glad they're there.
Speaker 1: I'm glad they're there because that is the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: The other Democrats are smart enough to be one of
Speaker 1: the two hundred forty four, but Corey Bush and Rashid
Speaker 1: ta Leib are still the Democratic Party. That's who they
Speaker 1: are right now. They're and they're just saying no, we're
Speaker 1: not going to even fake it. Now, think about these
Speaker 1: two people that are in our government, these two communists,
Speaker 1: these two Marxists, these two terrorists, advocates, supporters are in
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, and they are sitting there saying, no,
Speaker 1: we will not ban, we will not bar participants in
Speaker 1: the October seventh attacks on Israel if you were an
Speaker 1: actual participant, not a supporter.
Speaker 2: I want to make that clear, not.
Speaker 1: A supporter, but an actual participant in the October seventh
Speaker 1: attacks from inner United States of America.
Speaker 2: And both them said hell no.
Speaker 1: By the way, there was another representative, a Democrat from Illinois, Ramirez,
Speaker 1: who voted president on the bill.
Speaker 2: So he's even like, nah, I kind of I don't know,
Speaker 2: hold on, I.
Speaker 1: Might want some of these terrorists who killed innocent Jews
Speaker 1: allowed into the United States of America. Corey Bush and
Speaker 1: Rashida Leib, members of the squad. This is who the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party is.
Speaker 2: It's dead and they're communists or socialists, are Marxists.
Speaker 1: They said the bill was something they could.
Speaker 2: Not support, right because they support the terrorists.
Speaker 1: And by the way, there's many other Democrats who support
Speaker 1: the terrorists. Who support Hamas, who will not denounce what
Speaker 1: Hamas did and will not denounce Hezbolah. We saw these
Speaker 1: other by the way Democrats go. Let's go back to
Speaker 1: the universities. You had activists on college campuses that were
Speaker 1: chanting from the land of the Sea, talking about exterminating Jews,
Speaker 1: who were chanting death to Israel, who were supporting the
Speaker 1: terrorists who cooked infant children alive in ovens, who raped
Speaker 1: women to death, who beheaded children, infants were beheaded, found
Speaker 1: in their bodies, found in their cribs. And I'm sorry
Speaker 1: if that makes you uncomfortable with me saying it, but
Speaker 1: imagine being the people who will not then denounce it,
Speaker 1: who are elected in our government. The Democrats party is dead.
Speaker 1: They are dead. It doesn't exist. The party of even
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton back in the nineties is gone. Of Richard
Speaker 1: Geppart is gone, of tip O'Neil is gone. That party
Speaker 1: is seven feet under the ground, not even six feet,
Speaker 1: like it's settled some We are now dealing with a
Speaker 1: Marxist party masquerading as Democrats until you get your head
Speaker 1: around the idea. And Marxists do, by the way, what
Speaker 1: they're doing right now.
Speaker 2: They support terrorists.
Speaker 1: And they support changing a country through open borders, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, allow terrorists to come in across the border.
Speaker 1: I want you to think about the Southern border from
Speaker 1: one perspective only for a second, not the logistical nightmares
Speaker 1: that happen once all these people come into this country.
Speaker 1: I want you to think about from a national security standpoint.
Speaker 1: Do you want to know how bad it's gotten into
Speaker 1: southern border. The number of terrorists that have been caught
Speaker 1: coming across the Southern border has skyrocketed to the point
Speaker 1: now where border patrol apprehended fifty illegal immigrants on the
Speaker 1: terrast watch list between October, November and December of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three. Now that number skyrocketed right during the time
Speaker 1: when the terroist attack happened in Israel. That number also
Speaker 1: skyrocketed the exact same time that the FBI warned and
Speaker 1: the intelligence agencies warned of a Israeli style attack, the
Speaker 1: Hamas attack on Israel happening in America, which of course
Speaker 1: the media is completely downplayed. Now you may say, well, Ben,
Speaker 1: it's fifty people.
Speaker 2: They caught him. Okay, let's deal with that.
Speaker 1: When you're on a terrorist watch list, you're not running
Speaker 1: to America's border patrol agents saying here I am, give
Speaker 1: me my free stuff. You're actually trying to get across
Speaker 1: the border undetected. You're trying to be a what they
Speaker 1: referred to as they got away because you're on a
Speaker 1: tarists watch list and they know that they check it.
Speaker 2: You're on the tariffs watch list.
Speaker 1: So if you're a terrorist trying to come across to
Speaker 1: the border, you are trying to come across undetected and
Speaker 1: then just disappear into the shadows in this country. To
Speaker 1: put it in perspective, how bad it is right now,
Speaker 1: the fact that border patrol agents apprehented fifty illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: on the terror watch list between October and November December,
Speaker 1: three months last year. Let me just explain you the
Speaker 1: difference when Donald Trump was the president. In the four
Speaker 1: years that Donald Trump was president from January to January
Speaker 1: of twenty seventeen to twenty twenty one, there were a
Speaker 1: total of thirty such encounters. Under Donald Trump's Secure Border policy,
Speaker 1: we had thirty terrorists that came across the Southern board
Speaker 1: that were caught on the terrorists watch list in a
Speaker 1: four year period under the Trump administration and under the
Speaker 1: Biden administration. We had fifty that were caught in the
Speaker 1: last three months of the year. Make sure you hit
Speaker 1: that subscribe, auto download, or follow button, especially if you're
Speaker 1: on Apple. As the algorithms have changed, you're gonna have
Speaker 1: to check and make sure you're still getting every episode
Speaker 1: in that top right corner. If you're on an iPhone,
Speaker 1: make sure you get that follow button and it goes
Speaker 1: to a check mark and I'll see you back here tomorrow.