Speaker 1: Two major stories that I want to bring to your attention.
Speaker 1: One of them deals with Ukraine and the other deals
Speaker 1: with squad member alam Omar, and I'm going to start
Speaker 1: with that. In a shocking speech, not an English squad member,
Speaker 1: alam Omar slammed now for a disgraceful speech saying she
Speaker 1: is Somalia first and pushing an unrecognized deal with Ethiopia. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she's a United States congresswoman. Alam Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota,
Speaker 1: is now being accused of treason and calls to be
Speaker 1: removed from Congress. She faces fierce opposition for a speech
Speaker 1: where she unapologetically declares she is quote Somalia first.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The ambassador reposted the video of Omar's speech on X
Speaker 1: and called it regrettably unbecoming and lacking in common decency.
Speaker 1: That is what the Somalian ambassador said in the post
Speaker 1: on X. The leak video of Omar's speech from January
Speaker 1: twenty seventh quickly went viral and guarded widespread criticism, including
Speaker 1: from many conservatives like Marjorie Taylor Green, who accused her
Speaker 1: colleagues of using her position to protect people who hate
Speaker 1: America and also said she's clearly admitting to putting another
Speaker 1: country ahead of American interests, which, by the way, is
Speaker 1: against the job as a congress person. AmAm decried the
Speaker 1: criticism as completely off base, claiming she is saying that
Speaker 1: her top priority as a US member of Congress is
Speaker 1: to represent the best interests of Somali people in America,
Speaker 1: which is not what she actually said in the speech.
Speaker 1: The squad member was speaking in Somalian out a Minneapolis
Speaker 1: event on Saturday when the moment was captured on camera
Speaker 1: and then circulated quickly online after it was translated sleep
Speaker 1: and comfort knowing I'm here to protect the interests of
Speaker 1: Somalia from inside the US system. Omar said, quote unquot quote, Yes,
Speaker 1: let me read that again for you. A United States
Speaker 1: congresswoman speaking in Somalia said, sleep and comfort knowing that
Speaker 1: I am here to protect the interests of Somalia from
Speaker 1: inside the US system, now the US government, the US system.
Speaker 2: That's not all she said.
Speaker 1: She also uplifted Somalia's unity against Ethiopia and Somali Land,
Speaker 1: which is an unrecognized state considered part of Somalia, and
Speaker 1: supported Somalia forcibly retaking land around their country. Act for
Speaker 1: America founder and chairwoman Bridget Gabriel wrote on exelam Omar
Speaker 1: put Somalia first, Islam second, and America last. By the way,
Speaker 1: I couldn't agree more with that statement, saying this quote,
Speaker 1: we hope the House leadership and her caucus will take
Speaker 1: note of her public conduct on becoming of a United
Speaker 1: States congresswoman nor representative of the August House that she
Speaker 1: serves in. I couldn't agree more. Representative Green wrote, quote
Speaker 1: tera sympathizer alam Omar in her own words, Somalian first,
Speaker 1: Muslim second. She never mentions America. She flaunts using her
Speaker 1: position as congresswomen to protect Somalia's borders, while our border
Speaker 1: is invaded by millions of illegals who are a danger
Speaker 1: to America. She went on to add in her statement, saying, quote,
Speaker 1: these people hate America, and they're so emboldened by the
Speaker 1: Democrats sustain for our country they're not even trying to
Speaker 1: hide it anymore. Omar said in her speech that quote,
Speaker 1: the US government will only do what Somalians in the
Speaker 1: US tell them to do. They will do what we
Speaker 1: want and nothing else. They must follow our orders, and
Speaker 1: that is how we will safeguard the interests of Somalia.
Speaker 1: She added, We Somalians must have the confidence. No, she says,
Speaker 1: I'm not an American. I'm just an American congresswoman, But
Speaker 1: I'm not an American. We Somalians must have the confidence
Speaker 1: in ourselves that we call the shots in the US
Speaker 1: acting like it's a foreign country to her. Together, we
Speaker 1: will protect the interests of Somalia. Again, those are her
Speaker 1: exact words, not the interests of America. Together, we will
Speaker 1: protect the interests of Somalia. So the question is is
Speaker 1: she a registered foreign agent? If you're in the US
Speaker 1: government and your lobbying on behalf of Somalia, you're supposed to, well,
Speaker 1: number one, not be a member of Congress because obviously
Speaker 1: you're not working.
Speaker 2: For the American people.
Speaker 1: You're representing a foreign country, and you're supposed to register
Speaker 1: as a foreign agent if you're working on behalf of
Speaker 1: a foreign nation. Americans for Prosperity Tennessee Ambassador Robbie Starbuck
Speaker 1: accused of marv openly admitting allegiance to a foreign nation
Speaker 1: in to using her position and government to put the
Speaker 1: foreign nation first. Again, I couldn't agree more, saying, quote,
Speaker 1: this is treason, he declared, Alama mar is an agent
Speaker 1: for Somalia. Based on her words, that would be accurate.
Speaker 1: It's all about in the open. We should she let
Speaker 1: me be as market quote, she should be removed from
Speaker 1: co Congress at the very least absolutely insane. As I
Speaker 1: mentioned a moment ago, the Ambassador Elmi said, quote, we
Speaker 1: are profoundly surprised, even shocked, on discovering the remarks made
Speaker 1: by Congresswoman Omar of Minnesota in a recent public forum
Speaker 1: widely circulated on most social media platforms and attached below
Speaker 1: for your reference. The language she employed was regrettable, unbecoming
Speaker 1: of both the office she holds and the constituents she represents.
Speaker 1: This is our ambassador. By the way, her expressions were
Speaker 1: lacking in common decency and revealed a significant lack of
Speaker 1: understanding of basic facts. Specifically troubling where her endeavors to
Speaker 1: revive the once violent and dangerous ideology of Greater Somalia
Speaker 1: or Somali Ween, which caused so much death, destruction and
Speaker 1: conflict in the Horn of Africa. Furthermore, her use of
Speaker 1: ethno racist rhetoric didn't escape attention and left many with
Speaker 1: a deep sense of disappointment. This was particularly the ambassador
Speaker 1: goes on to write belitterally for those who recall similar
Speaker 1: racist attacks. She endured not long ago of being quote
Speaker 1: unquote not American enough, and was baffling to see her
Speaker 1: take a similar approach and accuse the entire Somaliland nation
Speaker 1: of falsely claiming Somali identity. Moreover, her ignorance of US
Speaker 1: Somaliland cooperation and the fight against terror in piracy and
Speaker 1: the Gulf of Eden and the Gulf of Verbera was shocking,
Speaker 1: to say the least. We hope the House leadership and
Speaker 1: her caucus will take note of her public conduct unbecoming
Speaker 1: of a United States congresswoman and not representative of the
Speaker 1: August House she serves in. That's the full statement from
Speaker 1: the Somaliland ambassador that and again, I'm glad she reposted
Speaker 1: the video for the world to see it now. This
Speaker 1: isn't the first time she has endured the idea of
Speaker 1: her being removed from her position. Omar's previous anti Semitic remarks,
Speaker 1: as well as her demanding Israel stop defending itself against
Speaker 1: the os Terras and Gaza, has led to calls from
Speaker 1: Republicans that she'd be removed from Congress and Spark Center
Speaker 1: resolutions from her colleagues. She's part of that progressive squad
Speaker 1: of anti American lawmakers. She also is the same woman
Speaker 1: who also said in her remarks about the nine to
Speaker 1: eleven terrorists, she referred to them as some things that happened.
Speaker 1: You remember that when she said some things like it's
Speaker 1: just no big deal, it's just you know, some things
Speaker 1: happened on nine to eleven. Here she is saying those
Speaker 1: anti American comments back in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 2: Air was founded after nine eleven because they recognized that
Speaker 2: some people did something.
Speaker 1: Some people did something nine to eleven, some people did something,
Speaker 1: and since that happened, she says, they were losing their liberty.
Speaker 1: So therefore, care organization that she was speaking at said, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: you hate America too, Come on over, we'd love for
Speaker 1: you to speak. And she referenced the nine to eleven
Speaker 1: terrorist attackers, those terrorists that killed countless Americans and innocent men,
Speaker 1: women and children, as some people that did something, some
Speaker 1: people that did something. That's what she believes, is there
Speaker 1: just some people that did something. Now, while Alamomar is
Speaker 1: saying all these things, there's also another story that you
Speaker 1: have to ask about other people in Congress about whose
Speaker 1: side are they on. Let me give you an example
Speaker 1: of where your tax dollurs are going now, and it
Speaker 1: deals with Ukraine. Ukraine says that the US money that
Speaker 1: we are sending is not going to Ukraine and instead,
Speaker 1: you ready for this is benefiting American interests.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: So far, we have spent one hundred and thirty billion,
Speaker 1: that's how much money. And it's more than that because
Speaker 1: we've had to borrow the money to send to Ukraine
Speaker 1: and we're paying interest on that money. One hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty billion has been sent to Ukraine so far for
Speaker 1: its war against Russia, is apparently not actually going to Ukraine,
Speaker 1: but has really benefiting American interest A spokesperson for Ukraine
Speaker 1: AID said publicly. The new shot claim was in response
Speaker 1: to a request for information by Breitbart News on whether
Speaker 1: or not any American tax dollars had gone specifically to Uman,
Speaker 1: a city in the war torn Eastern European nation that
Speaker 1: is currently seeing a condo built on a Jewish mass grave.
Speaker 1: As previously reported, it's in violation of a bilateral agreement
Speaker 1: which apparently means nothing with the US, and also in
Speaker 1: violation of international law, but Hey, who cares, right, you
Speaker 1: just keep moving forward. Breitbart reported on January the ten
Speaker 1: that a city in Ukraine is proceeding with building a
Speaker 1: condo on a Jewish mass grave, despite three letters from
Speaker 1: members of Congress from both parties to the Ukrainian government
Speaker 1: demanding a cemetery be protected. Replying to an inquiry about
Speaker 1: whether or not US dollars are going to the city
Speaker 1: where this is taking place, a spokesperson for the Ukrainian
Speaker 1: Embassy told Breitbart News that quote funds authorized by American
Speaker 1: lawmakers to support Ukrainian's armament are not directly allocated to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: After claiming the Ukrainian Embassy did not receive a request
Speaker 1: sent by Brabar News eight months ago for information on
Speaker 1: the construction project, which requires desecrating the remains of victims
Speaker 1: of the seventeen sixty eight Haydamac massacre, spokesman explained that instead, quote,
Speaker 1: a significant portion of the billions of dollars to Ukraine
Speaker 1: is utilized in the United States for the construction of
Speaker 1: new weapons or to replenish those dispatched to Kiev from
Speaker 1: US reserves, adding that an analysis not specifically cited found
Speaker 1: that quote nearly ninety percent of aid granted by Congress
Speaker 1: is first benefiting American interest. The email continues, the allocation
Speaker 1: of funds doesn't imply immediate expenditure American interest quote unquotes
Speaker 1: in this context presumably means weapons manufacturers who are putting
Speaker 1: pressure on people in Congress on the Republican side as
Speaker 1: well as Democrats to keep the money flowing. This on
Speaker 1: top of the fact that The Associated Press reported Sunday
Speaker 1: that employees from a Ukrainian arms firm quote conspired with
Speaker 1: Defense Ministry officials to embezzle more than forty million dollars
Speaker 1: allocated to weapons purchases. I'm going to read that for
Speaker 1: you again, your tax dollars. The Associated Press reporting on
Speaker 1: Sunday that employees from a Ukrainian arms firm conspired with
Speaker 1: Defense ministry officials to bezel almost forty million dollars allocated
Speaker 1: for weapons purchase. Instead, they're rich now. The news also
Speaker 1: comes months after The New York Times reported on the
Speaker 1: sacking of Ukraine's Minister of Defense due to well financial
Speaker 1: mismanagement and the departure amid an avalanche of cash coming
Speaker 1: from the United States of America to fund the war effort,
Speaker 1: and as the Ukrainian president, Zelensky asked for more money
Speaker 1: while also suspending elections in his country, which is exactly
Speaker 1: what dictators do. The New York Times report said some
Speaker 1: repayments for weapons had quote vanished in the bank accounts
Speaker 1: of weapons dealers, among about nine hundred and eighty million
Speaker 1: in weapons contracts that missed their delivery dates in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three. Breitbart previously reported in October of twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: a letter was sent to Zelensky personally by of Gregory Meeks,
Speaker 1: a Democrat from New York, and Jerry Naveler, a Democrat
Speaker 1: from New York, expressing quote concerns about desecration of a
Speaker 1: Jewish cemetery in Uman in violation of existing cultural heritage
Speaker 1: protection agreements, emphasizing that the cemetery and other important historical
Speaker 1: and culturally significant sites are provided with legal protection under
Speaker 1: the nineteen ninety four bilateral Agreement between the United States
Speaker 1: and Ukraine on Protecting and Preserving Cultural Heritage. Not to
Speaker 1: be clear, we can just stop the money going to
Speaker 1: Ukraine and they would protect this area, but they know
Speaker 1: we have a present that's going to keep the money
Speaker 1: coming in. Now, that's not all that they've been doing,
Speaker 1: and these are Democrats that are getting walked all over
Speaker 1: because later the same month, another letter addressed as Zelenski
Speaker 1: personally was sent by Representative Richie Torres, another Democrat from
Speaker 1: New York, Marcy Captour, a Democrat from Ohio, Susan Wilde,
Speaker 1: another Democrat from Pennsylvania, Mike Quinley, another Democrat from Illinois Illinois,
Speaker 1: and Doug Lamborne, a Republican from Colorado, as well as
Speaker 1: Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, raising more alarms about
Speaker 1: the cemetery's quote destruction and desecration, again reiterating that the
Speaker 1: act is in violation of that ninety four agreement between
Speaker 1: the US and Ukraine. I'm protecting and preserving cultural heritage.
Speaker 1: This on top of the fact that President Obama's Protect
Speaker 1: Cemeteries Act of twenty fourteen ensured the International Religious Freedom
Speaker 1: Acts of ninety eight accounts for the desecration of cemeteries
Speaker 1: as an assault on the fundamental rights to freedom of
Speaker 1: religious groups, especially egregious when tolerated by local national governments
Speaker 1: in the countries in which the offense has occurred. Now,
Speaker 1: this was a mass grave for people that were Jewish
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people that associate themselves with Nazis
Speaker 1: in the Ukraine, to be clear, and so now they're
Speaker 1: desecrating a mass grave of Jewish people that were killed
Speaker 1: by the people and their people, to be clear, And
Speaker 1: our government dollars are going to this country now the
Speaker 1: next year. In September of twenty twenty two, there was
Speaker 1: also a letter signed by twenty three members of Congress
Speaker 1: that was sent to the Ukraine Ministry of Affairs to
Speaker 1: raise issues of several legal construction projects continuing unabated within
Speaker 1: the protected zones of the burial place despite stop work orders.
Speaker 1: The letters say, the lawmakers look forward to hearing from
Speaker 1: you on steps to stop the illegal construction in Uman.
Speaker 2: Well, guess what.
Speaker 1: According to photos obtained by Breitbart of the project location
Speaker 1: this month, construction of the condo is.
Speaker 2: Moving forward at a rapid pace.
Speaker 1: Ukrainian embassy insists this was a city council issue, despite
Speaker 1: the bilateral agreement regarding the preservation of cemeteries signed by
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian President and three letters from US Congress addressed
Speaker 1: to the President and Foreign Affairs Minister. In other words,
Speaker 1: they don't give a crap. The Biden administration is now
Speaker 1: seeking an additional sixty four or billion for Ukrainie aid
Speaker 1: for American interests. They claim, however, are facing some resistance
Speaker 1: in Congress. But what does this tell you when you
Speaker 1: really break this down, what it tells you is this,
Speaker 1: the Biden administration doesn't give a crap about giving money
Speaker 1: to people that are desecrating mass grades of Jewish people
Speaker 1: that were killed in Ukraine. And the people in Ukraine
Speaker 1: don't give a crap what they're doing either, and they
Speaker 1: know that we're going to keep seeing them the money.
Speaker 1: And the reason why is because, as they basically said,
Speaker 1: we dare you to screw with us. This is a
Speaker 1: shout across the bow from Ukraine, will expose the corruption
Speaker 1: in America. If you guys don't shut the hell up,
Speaker 1: if you want to bother US Democrats and cut off
Speaker 1: the money, then we'll expose the corruption that is happening
Speaker 1: in your country with the money that you guys are
Speaker 1: allocating for us that's going to American contractors first. That
Speaker 1: is what they are saying very clear Lee Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: speech about firing Victor Sooken, the man who was investigating Barisma,
Speaker 1: you may remember he was investigating Barisma.
Speaker 2: This also comes as new information coming out about Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Yes, Hunter Biden now and even more trouble with the
Speaker 1: federal government.
Speaker 2: What do I mean by that?
Speaker 1: Well, get ready and start taking notes, folks, because you're
Speaker 1: gonna love this one.
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden. We now know lied about his art.
Speaker 1: We also know that his sugar Daddy and this is
Speaker 1: just one weirdest hell relationship was not only giving him
Speaker 1: millions of dollars, but we also have now learned that
Speaker 1: he holds his ten percent steak and the Chinese energy
Speaker 1: company CEFC.
Speaker 2: We also know.
Speaker 1: That Biden's business associate and the Chinese companies party Link company.
Speaker 1: He met Joe Biden and take write this down and
Speaker 1: paid three million dollars after Joe Biden left the presidency.
Speaker 1: Now this is somewhat complicated, but I know Mark's audience
Speaker 1: is brilliant, so you guys can handle this. They couldn't
Speaker 1: do this on cable on most cable channels because it's
Speaker 1: above the audience's IQ. CEFC is that Chinese energy company.
Speaker 1: It's a Chinese energy company direct directly linked to the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party. We now know that they this is
Speaker 1: for a fact, met with President Joe Biden and paid
Speaker 1: the Biden family business three million dollars in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: How do we know this because under oath, Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: good friend, an associate business associate, Rob Walker, told the
Speaker 1: House Oversight Committee this on Friday. The timing of the
Speaker 1: payments are now raising serious suspicions about whether or not
Speaker 1: the payments were deliberately and purposely delayed to obscure Joe
Speaker 1: Biden as the quote unquote brand of the business that
Speaker 1: sold access to Joe Biden to receive the millions of dollars.
Speaker 1: We also know that the Bidens earned tens of millions
Speaker 1: of dollars from foreign business deals for which Hunter offered
Speaker 1: no real work.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no work at all.
Speaker 1: Walker, who described himself as acting as a surrogate for
Speaker 1: Hunter around the country and abroad pursuing opportunities, knows he
Speaker 1: didn't say business opportunities, just pursuing opportunities. He said that
Speaker 1: CEFC paid the Biden family business three million dollars specifically
Speaker 1: after Joe Biden left the vice presidency in twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: delaying the payments right for the big guy for more
Speaker 1: than a year until Joe Biden became a quote private citizen.
Speaker 1: In addition, Rob Walker told the committee on Friday that
Speaker 1: the now missing chairman, because the guy who was the
Speaker 1: chairman of CEFC, his name was g met with Joe
Speaker 1: Biden in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2: He says.
Speaker 1: The meeting occurred at the Washington, DC Four Seasons Hotel
Speaker 1: and included about ten others that according to an FBI
Speaker 1: interview recently released by the House Ways and Means Committee,
Speaker 1: so much for the narrative that Joe Biden never talked
Speaker 1: business right, never one time, and he lied to you
Speaker 1: when he was running for president in twenty seventeen or
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, I should say, during those final months before
Speaker 1: you voted, Joe Biden said he never talked business with
Speaker 1: his family period. Joe Biden lied to you and said
Speaker 1: that he never his family never made it took a
Speaker 1: dime from China. Rob Walker under oath now saying that
Speaker 1: the Biden family business did in fact receive a three
Speaker 1: million dollar wired transfer and subsequent payments from CEFC between
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen and twenty seventeen. The House Oversight Committee revealed
Speaker 1: in March this information that's now been confirmed from these
Speaker 1: suspicious activity reports, known as SARS, and then subpoenaed records
Speaker 1: from the Bank of America to back that up. Quote
Speaker 1: and again, I hope you're taking notes, folks. The Chinese
Speaker 1: company paid Hunter Biden and his associates three million dollars
Speaker 1: shortly after Joe Biden left office as a thank you.
Speaker 2: Let me read that again, the.
Speaker 1: Quote the Chinese company paid Hunter Biden and his associates
Speaker 1: that would be his dad, three million dollars shortly after.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden left office as a.
Speaker 1: Quote, quote thank you for the work they did while
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was in office. That's what the House Oversite
Speaker 1: Committee stated on Friday. Quote members of the Biden family
Speaker 1: received payments for the Chinese deal even though they did
Speaker 1: not work on it. That's called bribery, folks, that's called
Speaker 1: money laundering. This is the type of swampy influence pedaling
Speaker 1: the American people want us to end, the House Oversite
Speaker 1: Committee said. Now Walker claimed during his Friday deposition that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden quote was never involved in any.
Speaker 2: Of the business activities.
Speaker 1: However, Miranda Divine, the author of the Laptop from Help,
Speaker 1: pointed out saying this, of course, Joe Biden wasn't involved
Speaker 1: in the business. Why was he not involved in the business,
Speaker 1: because he was the entire reason the business existed. Without
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and his position of power, this money never
Speaker 1: would have made it into their bank accounts.
Speaker 2: She went on to.
Speaker 1: Say, quote Maria Devine, and she knows this stuff better
Speaker 1: than anybody.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: He was the product referring to Joe Biden that was
Speaker 1: being sold. He was the brand right, the brand that
Speaker 1: was being sold, and he frequently made himself as well
Speaker 1: as Air Force two available for marketing purposes for the
Speaker 1: brand that was being sold, which was Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Now the three million dollars.
Speaker 1: From CEFC through Rob Walker is now also confirmed as
Speaker 1: a link to the forty thousand dollars that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: received in twenty seventeen a direct payment from the account
Speaker 1: of his brother James Biden and his sister in law,
Speaker 1: Sarah Biden. It was in the form of a personal
Speaker 1: check that, of course in the memo line was labeled
Speaker 1: as a quote loan repayment. The forty thousand dollars money
Speaker 1: trail began on July thirtieth of twenty seventeen, at the
Speaker 1: same exact time when that famous now What's App message
Speaker 1: when I think it was five different times if I
Speaker 1: remember correctly, Hunter Biden invoked his father and demanded a
Speaker 1: ten million dollar payment from CEFC associate Raymonds. How of course,
Speaker 1: with his dad sitting right next to him. That's what
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden said in the text message. And guess what happened.
Speaker 1: They got the ten million dollars within days of him
Speaker 1: sending that text message demanding the money, which brings me
Speaker 1: back to that forty thousand dollars check. That forty thousand
Speaker 1: dollars check. In the second instance, Joe Biden personally accepted
Speaker 1: a suspicious personal check from his brother, James Biden. That's
Speaker 1: what the Oversight Committee is now saying, and the discovery
Speaker 1: of the checks justified concerns that the Biden business compromise
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, who is now the President of the United
Speaker 1: States of America. It lends further credence to the impeachment
Speaker 1: inquiry into the president. The House Oversight Committee also states,
Speaker 1: House investigators, just to put a perspective for you, launched
Speaker 1: this probe into the Biden family in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: They have now revealed and confirmed that Joe Biden received
Speaker 1: direct payments from James Biden and direct payments from Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: meaning that the President of United States America lied to
Speaker 1: you on countless occasions. They also show that nine additional
Speaker 1: Biden family members, and they have proof of all this,
Speaker 1: received payments from the family's foreign business ventures.
Speaker 2: In those nine.
Speaker 1: We also know that two of the nine are Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's grandchildren, another way to launder money. Joe Biden, of course,
Speaker 1: has yet again denied any involvement in the Biden family
Speaker 1: business ventures, and he did it at least nine different
Speaker 1: times on the record. He lied to the American people
Speaker 1: over and over and over and over and over again.
Speaker 2: Let me remind you of Joe Biden's lies to you.
Speaker 1: He started those lies back in Des Moines, Iowa, on
Speaker 1: September twenty first of twenty nineteen, in the closing days
Speaker 1: of the presidential election.
Speaker 2: We're talking my son about his overseas for the service.
Speaker 3: I have never discussed with my son or mine brother
Speaker 3: or anyone else, and they had any other businesses period.
Speaker 2: Do you stand by your statement that you did not
Speaker 2: discuss any of your son's overseas business.
Speaker 3: Stand by that stated, add that I thought the article
Speaker 3: at least has been not online.
Speaker 2: Is going to be prints a long time, is good?
Speaker 4: I mean you clear, and.
Speaker 3: Anyway, begin a chance to any call.
Speaker 2: I love it.
Speaker 1: That last voicemail that you just heard was a voicemail
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden left on Hunter Biden's cell phone.
Speaker 2: Hey pal, it's Dad.
Speaker 1: I thought the article released online it's going to be
Speaker 1: print tomorrow in the Times, right, was really good.
Speaker 2: Thought. It was clear. Thought, it was a good article.
Speaker 2: I think you're clear in.
Speaker 1: Any ways, if you get a chance to get me
Speaker 1: a call, I.
Speaker 2: Love you that.
Speaker 1: By the way, forget all the money, forget all the
Speaker 1: suspicious activity reports, forget all of that. The voicemail alone
Speaker 1: is not a smoking gun.
Speaker 2: It's a bomb going off.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden did discuss with his son, with his brother
Speaker 1: and everybody else his businesses. Even though Joe Biden said
Speaker 1: to you, quote, I never discussed with my son or
Speaker 1: my brother anyone else anything having.
Speaker 2: To do with businesses, with their businesses. Well, if that
Speaker 2: was the case, and why did you leave that voicemail?
Speaker 1: Joe Biden said it multiple times, I never spoke to
Speaker 1: my son about his overseas business dealings. And then he said,
Speaker 1: by the way, in the second half of that statement,
Speaker 1: he said this. Here's what I know. I know Trump
Speaker 1: deserves to be investigated. You should be looking at Trump.
Speaker 1: Trump's doing this because he knows I'll beat him like
Speaker 1: a drum. You can't make this up. Let me go
Speaker 1: back to the laptop I mentioned for a second. Remember
Speaker 1: when Joe Biden said the emails on Hunter Baden's laptop
Speaker 1: were also lies, They were Russian plans, they were a
Speaker 1: smear campaign. We now know that the deep state admits
Speaker 1: the laptop's real, when they knew it all along. But
Speaker 1: what did he say during the campaign on the debate stage?
Speaker 3: Fifty former national intelligence folks who said that what this
Speaker 3: he's accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have
Speaker 3: said that this has all the four five former heads
Speaker 3: of the CIA. Both parties say he's saying is a
Speaker 3: bunch of garbage. This is classic Trump. We have four
Speaker 3: days left and all of a sudden, there's a laptop.
Speaker 3: There's overwhelming evidence.
Speaker 2: That folks all of.
Speaker 4: Yes, yes, yes, I know you that that what this
Speaker 4: he's accusing me of is a Russian plant. They have
Speaker 4: said that this is has all the four five former
Speaker 4: heads of the CIA.
Speaker 1: Both parties say, over and over and over and over, again.
Speaker 1: He lied to you, over and over and over again.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden looked you in the eyes and lied to
Speaker 1: your face. He kept saying, over and over again, this
Speaker 1: is a Russian plant. Come on, man, you're smarter than
Speaker 1: this America. You're not stupid, you're not dumb, you're not
Speaker 1: an idiot. Come on, man. This is smear campaign. Man,
Speaker 1: this is all a smear campaign. Guess what he was
Speaker 1: lying to you, then he's lying to you. Now, make
Speaker 1: sure you hit that subscribe, auto download, or follow button,
Speaker 1: especially if you're on Apple. As the algorithms have changed,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to check and make sure you're still
Speaker 1: getting every episode in that top right corner. If you're
Speaker 1: on an iPhone, make sure you get that follow button
Speaker 1: and it goes to a check mark and I'll see
Speaker 1: you back here tomorrow.