Speaker 1: We have got some breaking news that deals with the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family and now new testimony to Congress from
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolinski. We also have something else that just happen,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to tell you something about the Super
Speaker 1: Bowl that directly relates to the Biden family and you're
Speaker 1: going to be shocked by this connection. We have found
Speaker 1: out that the Super Bowl Sunday was the most watched
Speaker 1: program in television history. CBS Sports is now confirming the
Speaker 1: Super Bowl nabbed one hundred and twenty three point four
Speaker 1: million viewers. That is the most watched telecast in history.
Speaker 1: That is amazing. The part that's the most shocking about
Speaker 1: that is what I'm about to tell you, and it
Speaker 1: deals with the economy. And you've seen what's happened on
Speaker 1: Wall Street in the last twenty four hours with major
Speaker 1: sell offs because Biden inflation has come roaring back. We
Speaker 1: now been told that the CBS owner Paaramount has cut
Speaker 1: a eight hundred jobs two days after the record setting
Speaker 1: Super Bowl numbers. Pairamount Global, the parent company of CBS,
Speaker 1: is planning to cut hundreds of jobs just days after
Speaker 1: airing the most watched Super Bowl in history. According to
Speaker 1: the latest reports the job cuts will result in a
Speaker 1: reduction of the company's workforce by about three percent. The
Speaker 1: Guardian reported, noting staff had been notified on the decision.
Speaker 1: To those with whom we are parting ways, we are
Speaker 1: incredibly grateful for your hard work and dedication. The Paaramount
Speaker 1: top executive wrote an internal memo obtained by the outlet.
Speaker 1: Your talents have helped us advance our mission of unleashing
Speaker 1: the power of content around the world. We are a
Speaker 1: better company because of you. Now you may be asking yourself,
Speaker 1: why am I telling you this and how does this
Speaker 1: relate to the Biden crime family.
Speaker 2: I'm going to explain it right now.
Speaker 1: The only main stream journalist who's been covering the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family is a woman at CBS News, Katherine Heritage.
Speaker 1: Catherine Heritage apparently has been laid off. In fact, her
Speaker 1: last tweet twenty hours ago at the time I'm recording
Speaker 1: this said this House GOP seeks transcripts recordings a Biden
Speaker 1: interview with special Counsel. Then two hours before that she
Speaker 1: posted this, The committees require this Biden slash her interview transcript.
Speaker 1: There is concern that President Biden may have retained sensitive
Speaker 1: documents related to specific countries involving his family's foreign business
Speaker 1: dealings by February the nineteenth. She then says, I'm reaching
Speaker 1: out to the White House and House Dems and Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's legal team for comment. Now, let me reed to
Speaker 1: you what she posted and why her layoff is well,
Speaker 1: isn't it interesting? The timing of it? This is what
Speaker 1: she put out. There was a letter to Merrick Garland,
Speaker 1: and in this letter it says, from the House Judiciary,
Speaker 1: please produce the information as soon as possible, but no
Speaker 1: later than five pm on February the nineteen, twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: Given the seriousness of these matters, the Committees are prepared
Speaker 1: to compel the production of this material if necessary. It
Speaker 1: also says in these documents that she put out, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to quote for this quote this for you again.
Speaker 1: It says throughout mister Herr's report, there is reference to
Speaker 1: a transcript of an interview conducted with President Biden on
Speaker 1: October eighth and October the ninth of twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: The Committees require this transcript and any other records of
Speaker 1: this interview, including but not limited to, any recordings, note
Speaker 1: and summaries of the interview. As explained to mister Hearn October,
Speaker 1: there is concern that President Biden may have retained sensitive
Speaker 1: documents related to specific countries involving his families foreign business dealings. Further,
Speaker 1: we seek to understand whether the White House or President
Speaker 1: Biden's personal attorneys placed any limitations or scoping restrictions during
Speaker 1: the interview that would have precluded a line of inquiry
Speaker 1: regarding evidence emails, text messages, or witness statements directly linking
Speaker 1: the President to troublesome foreign payments. Additionally, the Committee on
Speaker 1: the Judiciary requires these documents for its ongoing oversight of
Speaker 1: the Department's commitment to impartial justice and its handling of
Speaker 1: the investigation and prosecution of President Biden's presumptive opponent, Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump.
Speaker 1: So, now this isn't just about the money. It's now
Speaker 1: which countries own the President and the woman who was
Speaker 1: doing this amazing reporting on it all of a sudden
Speaker 1: gets laid off from CBS News after these last two
Speaker 1: tweets that she put out, including a CBS News report
Speaker 1: that it was headlined.
Speaker 2: House GOP seeks.
Speaker 1: Transcripts recordings of Biden's interview with a special counsel all
Speaker 1: of this happening under the CBS just had the most
Speaker 1: watched show in history of news, and then they cut
Speaker 1: three percent of their workforce and they cut their top
Speaker 1: reporter in washingt d C. That's reporting on the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family. And we're supposed to believe that she's just
Speaker 1: one of the random people and the you know, and
Speaker 1: the cutbacks and the layoffs that happened, and we wish
Speaker 1: all of you well all of this happening. Let that
Speaker 1: just sink in for a second while we now know
Speaker 1: more about what Tony Bobolinsky was going to say Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolinsky said had plausible deniability and the family business
Speaker 1: while compromised, he now says, by the Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: and the linked companies that were paying the family.
Speaker 2: Quote.
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden maintained plausible deniability while his family business
Speaker 1: rated in millions from several foreign entities, including the CEFC
Speaker 1: China Energy Company, which compromised the president. That is a
Speaker 1: testimony from former Biden family business partner Tony Bobolinsky and
Speaker 1: what he said to the House Impeachment inquiry on Tuesday.
Speaker 1: Bobolinsky's testimony is significant also because we now know even
Speaker 1: more about how involved Joe Biden was in the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family business. We know that he met Joe Biden
Speaker 1: in the law of the Beverly Hilton in May of
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen to discuss business with his CCP company CEFC,
Speaker 1: an entity closely and directly linked to the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 2: Bobolinsky is also the whistleblower.
Speaker 1: And if you miss this, go back and listen to
Speaker 1: yesterday's show, because I played for you the audio where
Speaker 1: Bobolinsky was talking and was whistleblowing who confirmed the infamous
Speaker 1: message about a stake of quote ten percent being held
Speaker 1: for h meaning hunter for the big guy, and the
Speaker 1: big guy we know who that is. That is the
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden. All of that came from him. The whistleblower.
Speaker 1: Miranda Devine also putting out she is the author of
Speaker 1: the Laptop from Hell book, which if you haven't read it.
Speaker 2: Go back and read it.
Speaker 1: It says this from Tony Bobolinsky's opening statement House Oversight
Speaker 1: in Judiciary. From my direct personal experience, it is clear
Speaker 1: to me that Joe Biden was the brand being sold
Speaker 1: by the Biden family. His family's foreign influence pedaling operation
Speaker 1: from China to Ukraine and elsewhere, sold out to foreign
Speaker 1: actors who were seeking to gain influence and access to
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and the United States government. Now I have
Speaker 1: his opening statement, and I am going to read it
Speaker 1: to you so you understand just how much he clearly
Speaker 1: believes that Joe Biden is owned and compromised by the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party. All right, I want to tell you
Speaker 1: real quick about Patriot Mobile. For ten years, Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: has been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. And when
Speaker 1: I say only trust me, they're literally the only one.
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability
Speaker 1: to access all three major networks. What does that mean
Speaker 1: to you? It means you get the same coverage that
Speaker 1: you're accustomed to, but you're doing it without funding.
Speaker 2: The Left.
Speaker 1: You may not know the Big Mobile gives massive donations
Speaker 1: to Planned Parenthood, to Democratic candidates, causes and organizations. Why
Speaker 1: give your money to a group of people that literally
Speaker 1: hate your values, hate what you stand for, hate your family,
Speaker 1: traditional Christian values. That is why I switch the Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: And when you switch, you're sending a message that you
Speaker 1: support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment, as well as our military, our veterans, and
Speaker 1: our first responder heroes. They make switching easy one hundred
Speaker 1: percent US based customer service team. Plus, you can keep
Speaker 1: your same cell phone number, upgrade your phone to a
Speaker 1: new phone, or keep the one you've got in your
Speaker 1: hand as well. And the most important part, every time
Speaker 1: you pay your bill. They take a percentage of your
Speaker 1: bill every month and give it back to conservative causes
Speaker 1: that you help choose to support. So check them out.
Speaker 1: Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriotmobile dot com slash
Speaker 1: ferguson or nine to seven to two meter Patriot get
Speaker 1: free activation when you use the offer code ferguson. That's
Speaker 1: Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine to seven to
Speaker 1: two Patriot at the very Top. Tony Bobolinski's opening statement
Speaker 1: to the House Oversight Judiciary Committee read like this quote.
Speaker 1: I want to be crystal clear from my direct personal
Speaker 1: experience and what I have subsequently come to learn, it
Speaker 1: is clear to me that Joe Biden was quote unquote
Speaker 1: the brand being sold by the Biden family. His family's
Speaker 1: foreign influence pedaling operation from China to Ukraine and elsewhere
Speaker 1: sold out to foreign actors who were seeking to gain
Speaker 1: influence and access to Joe Biden and the United States government.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was more than a participant in and beneficiary
Speaker 1: of his family's business. He was an enabler, despite being
Speaker 1: buffered by a complex scheme to maintain plausible deniability. Babbolensky
Speaker 1: goes on to say this the only reason any of
Speaker 1: these international business transactions took place, with tens of millions
Speaker 1: of dollars flowing directly of the Biden family was because
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was in high office. The Biden family business
Speaker 1: was Joe Biden period. Other key players have made this
Speaker 1: point clear as well. Hunter Biden himself has adamantly stated
Speaker 1: it in a variety of communications, as did another Biden
Speaker 1: family business associate, Devin Archer, in his testimony last year.
Speaker 1: Foreign nationals on the other side of these transactions, including China, Ukraine,
Speaker 1: and Romania, have also explained how and why these transactions
Speaker 1: took place. Once again, I would call that extensive evidence.
Speaker 1: The Chinese Communist Party, through its surrogate, Babylinski states, China
Speaker 1: Energy Company Limited or CEFC, a CCP link Chinese energy conglomerate,
Speaker 1: successfully sought to infiltrate and compromise Joe Biden and the
Speaker 1: Obama Biden White House. The process started in the fourth
Speaker 1: quarter of twenty fifteen and continued through when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: left office in January twenty seventeen to March twenty eighteen,
Speaker 1: when the CEFC chairman Ye was detained for corruption in China,
Speaker 1: never to be seen again. Note that on October the
Speaker 1: twenty first, twenty fifteen, Joe Biden announced that he would
Speaker 1: not seek the presidency in twenty six sixteen. It is
Speaker 1: not a coincidence that CEFC's aggressive approach to the Biden
Speaker 1: family happened around the same time. It is also not
Speaker 1: a coincidence that CEFC used the Biden family's weakest link,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, and the promise of large sums of money
Speaker 1: to the tune of tens of millions of dollars initially
Speaker 1: and eventually the profits. And this is the part that
Speaker 1: the public doesn't understand. So I'm going to I want
Speaker 1: you to listen carefully to what Bobylinsky's saying. He's saying
Speaker 1: it's not just the upfront tens of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: they got instantly, but eventually, he says, the real money
Speaker 1: you need to be talking about is the profits from
Speaker 1: investing billions of dollars in the United States and around
Speaker 1: the world. Then Tony Bobolinsky says, this number one, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was aware of the CEFC transaction, enabled it, and
Speaker 1: had a constitutional responsibility and obligation to the American people
Speaker 1: to shut to shut it down before it begins. This
Speaker 1: is because CEFC had been identified as a known surrogate
Speaker 1: of the Chinese Communist Party by the US government and
Speaker 1: prosecutors in the Southern District of New York as far
Speaker 1: back as twenty sixteen and possibly earlier. I would encourage
Speaker 1: Congress to gather all the exact facts and dates. It
Speaker 1: is clear to me. It's clear to me. Bobolinski says
Speaker 1: that alarm bells should have been going off in the
Speaker 1: Obama Biden White House and that Joe Biden should have
Speaker 1: been aware that his own administration, his own administration, everybody
Speaker 1: let that sink in had read flagged CEFC as a
Speaker 1: tool of.
Speaker 2: The Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 1: This should have made any business transaction with ce FC
Speaker 1: a non starter. Babolinski then writes, I personally met with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden Los Angeles in May of twenty seventeen, multiple
Speaker 1: times to discuss the broad contours of our business dealings.
Speaker 1: The only reason Joe Biden met with me privately during
Speaker 1: his conference out there and seated me at his head
Speaker 1: table was because I was a business associate of the
Speaker 1: Biden family. Number two, Babolinsky says, Joe Biden's immediate family
Speaker 1: members were enrich to the tune of tens of millions
Speaker 1: of dollars from some of our most dangerous adversaries, including
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party and players from Russia, Ukraine, Romania,
Speaker 1: Kazakhstan and other foreign nations and entities. It is my
Speaker 1: educated belief, dating back to Q clearance brief I received
Speaker 1: in the Navy, and continuing through recent discussions with experts,
Speaker 1: that under US corruption laws, political office holders can be
Speaker 1: held as responsible as the immediate family members who are
Speaker 1: receiving money directly. This makes common sense, and Americans understand this.
Speaker 1: The facts we are going to discuss today appear to
Speaker 1: me to present disturbing evidence. Babolensky rights and testifies to
Speaker 1: Congress which these committees should thoroughly investigate with respect to
Speaker 1: possible violations by Joe Biden of the Foreign Agents Registration
Speaker 1: Act known as Pharaoh, Anti Corruption and Public Integrity Statues,
Speaker 1: the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the Racketeer Influence and
Speaker 1: Corruption Organizations Act known as RICO number three. The Biden family,
Speaker 1: Joe's son Hunter and his brother Jim knowingly and aggressively
Speaker 1: defrauded me as the CEO of Senahak Holdings and as
Speaker 1: a member of the Lenita Holdings LLC at the end
Speaker 1: of July twenty seventeen. They put Joe Biden in the
Speaker 1: rest of the Biden family smack in the middle of
Speaker 1: a nine billion dollar transaction between Russia and China involving Katar.
Speaker 1: And then in parentheses, he says specifically the Guitar Investment
Speaker 1: Authority and helped CEFC navigate through various issues before Patrick Hoe,
Speaker 1: a CEFC executive, was arrested for corruption in New York
Speaker 1: in November of twenty seventeen, and this is who the
Speaker 1: Bidens were doing business with everyone. He then writes Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's status as the head of the family served an
Speaker 1: enforcement role. For example, when Hunters stated deliberately that his father,
Speaker 1: Joe was sitting right next to him while demanding immediate
Speaker 1: payment of ten million from CEFC and had committed to
Speaker 1: the Biden family as well as when Hunter demanded CEFC
Speaker 1: circumvent Senahawk holdings, the Biden family violated their friduciary duties
Speaker 1: to Sinahawk and Anita as they enriched themselves at the
Speaker 1: CEFC troft. There is more of what Tony Bobolinski has said,
Speaker 1: but I want to just take a moment and really
Speaker 1: look at what I just gave you From his testimony,
Speaker 1: he's saying that Joe Biden is the kingpin. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: knew what he was doing, and they were deliberately seeking
Speaker 1: out the worst actors in the world and the biggest
Speaker 1: adversaries in the US and willing to sell America out
Speaker 1: to our adversaries to enrich themselves not just for upfront millions,
Speaker 1: but from the billions of investments that came afterwards and
Speaker 1: the profits from those those investments. Tony Bobolenski is clearly
Speaker 1: laying out massive crimes that are far beyond even impeachment
Speaker 1: of a president of the United States of America. To
Speaker 1: the House Oversight in Judiciary committees. In his opening statement,
Speaker 1: what he is describing are crimes that would put any
Speaker 1: normal American in prison, and quite possibly in prison for decades.
Speaker 1: What Joe Biden is being accused of doing, and Tony
Speaker 1: Bobolenski's saying, I have the keys to the crime, and
Speaker 1: I'm showing it all to you as a whistleblower. He
Speaker 1: is saying that Joe Biden at some point decided I
Speaker 1: don't work for America. I work for America's adversaries in
Speaker 1: many ways, very much like a spy makes a decision
Speaker 1: to do it, except he was willing to sell favors
Speaker 1: to our adversaries to enrich himself financially, which is no
Speaker 1: different than what a spy is doing. Now, I don't
Speaker 1: think that Joe Biden was pledging allegiance to run Usia,
Speaker 1: or Romania or China. But what I do think you
Speaker 1: was willing to do is say give me money and
Speaker 1: I'll give you access. I'll give you political favors. Now,
Speaker 1: China is an advisary of the US, so is Russia.
Speaker 1: Why the hell are you doing business with them when
Speaker 1: you're the Vice president of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Why is your family selling access to America because they
Speaker 1: were willing to enrich themselves. This wasn't some and I
Speaker 1: say the only difference is many times spies have a
Speaker 1: hatred for America and they fake it right that they
Speaker 1: love America, and then they're actually working.
Speaker 2: For another government. Sometimes spies just like making the money.
Speaker 1: Some of them are just narcissists, and they honestly just
Speaker 1: liked the moment of the excitement, the rush of screwing
Speaker 1: this country. Joe Biden and Joe Biden's family what they
Speaker 1: decide to do is they got into a position of
Speaker 1: power and they realized, Wow, we can make millions, and
Speaker 1: then we can make millions off of the upfront millions
Speaker 1: with the investments that we're making in these companies. And
Speaker 1: remember Hunter Biden's you know whatever that creep is in California,
Speaker 1: His sugar daddy is holding his ten percent stake in
Speaker 1: this Chinese company. From what we understand now, let me
Speaker 1: keep reading from Tony Boblensky's opening statement. He says, number
Speaker 1: four United States law enforcement appears to have been singularly
Speaker 1: unwilling to speak with me or to hear the facts
Speaker 1: we will be discussing today. I have never been contacted
Speaker 1: to provide testimony, nor asked to speak with anyone connected
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden's administration, including his Department of Justice, the
Speaker 1: Federal Borough of Investigations, the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service IRS.
Speaker 1: There's been whistleblowers there that stopped the plea deal really
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden, or he says, local law enforcement. He said,
Speaker 1: that includes the US Attorney David Weiss for the District
Speaker 1: of Delaware, right, who's the special prosecutor that's been involved
Speaker 1: in all of this or any of these several grand
Speaker 1: juries I now know were convened after my name became
Speaker 1: publicly known. So what he's saying is the FBI, the DOJ,
Speaker 1: the IRS, all of them, they weren't actually investigating any
Speaker 1: crimes by the Biden crime filming. Because they were, they
Speaker 1: would have had to have talked to me. I'm the whistleblower.
Speaker 1: They would have had to have interviewed me. They didn't
Speaker 1: want to talk to me. They didn't want to know
Speaker 1: what I knew. They didn't want to see what I
Speaker 1: had because they were not actually investigating the president. They
Speaker 1: were covering for the president. He goes on to write,
Speaker 1: this that includes the US Attorney David Weiss for the
Speaker 1: District of Delaware in any of this several grand juries
Speaker 1: I now know we're convened after my name became publicly known.
Speaker 1: In fact, on October the twenty third of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: I voluntarily walked into the Washington Field office of the
Speaker 1: FBI was several phones containing years of encrypto communit medications
Speaker 1: between me and numerous members of the Biden family and
Speaker 1: their associates. That conversation, which was subject to false statement statues,
Speaker 1: lasted many hours and was never followed up upon by
Speaker 1: anyone in government or law enforcement.
Speaker 2: In any way.
Speaker 1: Rather, when the House Ways and Means Committee recently released
Speaker 1: the FBI three h two report of that meeting, Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's lawyers laughably tried to use a single note taking
Speaker 1: error by a junior FBI agent to accuse me falsely
Speaker 1: of lying about my attendance at a meeting with Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden and CEFC in Miami. I was crystal clear to
Speaker 1: the agent in my interview that I was physically in
Speaker 1: Miami during that time for other things and did not
Speaker 1: attend the actual CEFC meeting. Hunter Biden's lawyers should focus
Speaker 1: their energy on the facts and the extensive indictments. Hunter
Speaker 1: is fighting versus creating smoke screens and distractions where their
Speaker 1: empty threats.
Speaker 2: I have only told the truth. I continue to tell
Speaker 2: the truth.
Speaker 1: I have the facts, and as we will discuss today,
Speaker 1: I also have the receipts to back them up. Now
Speaker 1: let's go back to something else, he said in this
Speaker 1: opening statement. And I want to read this part again
Speaker 1: because I think it's so chilling. He said, from my
Speaker 1: direct personal experience, it's clear to me that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was the brand being sold by the Biden family, his
Speaker 1: family's foreign influence pedaling operation from China to Ukraine and elsewhere,
Speaker 1: keyword elsewhere. I want to know what else we're missing here.
Speaker 1: Sold out to foreign actors who were seeking to gain
Speaker 1: influence and access to Joe Biden and the United States government,
Speaker 1: and they cast the checks, folks, the Biden family enriched them,
Speaker 1: says the tune of tens of millions of dollars by
Speaker 1: selling and those countries gaining influence and access to the
Speaker 1: United States of America. He then said Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: more than a participant in and beneficiary of his family's business.
Speaker 1: He says, don't act like Joe Biden and This goes
Speaker 1: back to, by the way, what I said last week
Speaker 1: when they came out and said they couldn't charge the
Speaker 1: President United States of America with willfully taking classified documents
Speaker 1: because any jury would not look at him as mentally competent.
Speaker 1: That he's old in senile. They're going to use that
Speaker 1: as a pretense for this testimony to say, well, we
Speaker 1: could hold Joe Biden accountable, but we really can't because
Speaker 1: he's already been declared by the DOJ is just being
Speaker 1: too old in senile to be held accountable for anything. Wow,
Speaker 1: by the way, he's the acting president of the United
Speaker 1: States of America. Quote, Joe Biden was more than a
Speaker 1: participant in and beneficiary of his family's business. He was
Speaker 1: an enabler, despite being buffered by a complex scheme to
Speaker 1: maintain plausible deniability. Now this goes back to the shell companies.
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan's has said this. I played it for you
Speaker 1: on this show. James Comer, who's also I played for
Speaker 1: you on this show. And if you miss those those
Speaker 1: multi part interviews that I did with them, go back
Speaker 1: and listen to them.
Speaker 2: That's exactly what they said.
Speaker 1: It was a complex scheme of money laundering of fake companies,
Speaker 1: right of shell companies paying shell companies that were paying
Speaker 1: shell companies that had no assets, had no business, weren't
Speaker 1: selling anything, didn't have offices, didn't have day to day
Speaker 1: expenditures where they could funnel the money into.
Speaker 2: The Biden crime family.
Speaker 1: And that's how they were going to keep their plausible deniability,
Speaker 1: or at least Joe Biden was. Tony Babolinski says, the
Speaker 1: only reason any of these international business transactions took place
Speaker 1: with tens of millions of dollars falling directly the Biden
Speaker 1: family was because Joe Biden was in high office. The
Speaker 1: Biden family business was Joe Biden period. Okay, so Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is the business. Joe Biden knew everything. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: understood it because without Joe Biden, it didn't exist. It
Speaker 1: didn't exist, folks, it didn't exist. He was involved in
Speaker 1: all of it at the highest level. He had to
Speaker 1: be involved in all of it at the highest level.
Speaker 1: And the reason why is because he was the brand,
Speaker 1: He was the product. He was everything. Tony Bobolinski and
Speaker 1: what he is saying to Congress is massive. It is
Speaker 1: beyond just an impeachment. It is about a president of
Speaker 1: the United States of America that looked to our adversaries
Speaker 1: to enrich him.
Speaker 2: That's what this was. That's what the whole thing was, folks,
Speaker 2: that's the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Go back listen to James Comer, Go back and listen
Speaker 1: to Jim Jordan what I and the conversations I had
Speaker 1: with them, because when you hear what they say now
Speaker 1: with what is being told by Tony bob Olinsky, it
Speaker 1: is going to be so eye opening to you.
Speaker 2: It is going to be massive.
Speaker 1: Make sure you share a podcast please, everywhere you're on
Speaker 1: social media. Write us a five star review, and I'll
Speaker 1: see you back here tomorrow morning.