Speaker 1: Nine to zero.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to remember the last time a major ruling
Speaker 2: came down from a very divided Supreme Court where it
Speaker 2: was a nine to nothing decision. The media having a
Speaker 2: hard time dealing with the fact that the US Supreme
Speaker 2: Court says former President Donald Trump is eligible to be
Speaker 2: on the ballot everywhere and states cannot take away your
Speaker 2: right to decide who you want to be the president of
Speaker 2: the United States. Is only apparently Congress can do that,
Speaker 2: ABC News when the news broke this is what they said.
Speaker 3: A rare moment of unanimity on a usually divided court.
Speaker 3: All nine justices of the Supreme Court agree that states
Speaker 3: cannot kick candidates off the ballot under the fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 3: That clause which you mentioned, which passed after the Civil War,
Speaker 3: held that people who had sworn an oath to uphold
Speaker 3: the Constitution and then engaged in insurrection are banned from
Speaker 3: hold in federal office.
Speaker 1: Further, and what.
Speaker 3: Supreme Court said is that states can't enforce that that
Speaker 3: it requires Congress to pass a law to it outline
Speaker 3: how that clause should be enforced, concluding very simply that
Speaker 3: responsibility for enforcing that part of the Constitution rests with
Speaker 3: Congress and not with the states.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court expressing.
Speaker 3: Real concern that states could go different ways. Some states
Speaker 3: would perhaps ban one candidates, some states perhaps ban another candidate,
Speaker 3: other states keep them both on the ballot, and they
Speaker 3: express concern about the disruption that that would work.
Speaker 2: There by the way, the disruption would be that we
Speaker 2: would basically not have a democracy anymore in this country.
Speaker 2: Also NBC News breaking into their coverage. Here's what it
Speaker 2: sounded like on NBC.
Speaker 4: Again, the Court, you're saying, because the Constitution makes Congress
Speaker 4: rather than the states, responsible for enforcing Section three against
Speaker 4: federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse. So again a clear
Speaker 4: win for the Republican front runner. The Colorado case was
Speaker 4: the one that was in front of them right now,
Speaker 4: but other states had tried to ban him from the ballot,
Speaker 4: including Maine and Illinois.
Speaker 1: With the Court doing.
Speaker 4: This right now, those essentially will also be wiped.
Speaker 1: Away, wiped away.
Speaker 2: So what this means is the communist Marxist Socialist Party
Speaker 2: masquerading as Democrats just got slapped hard by.
Speaker 1: A Supreme Court with liberal justices.
Speaker 2: It said, this is the United States of America, This
Speaker 2: is not Russia. This is not China, this is not Venezuela,
Speaker 2: this is not Cuba. You cannot take candidates that you
Speaker 2: don't like off the ballot. Now, what does this mean
Speaker 2: moving forward? It means Democrats in the Senate are going
Speaker 2: to move with the House to try to figure out
Speaker 2: a way to get rid of Donald Trump. In fact,
Speaker 2: they're already trying to do it. And I'm going to
Speaker 2: play that for you in just a moment. But first,
Speaker 2: let me tell you about my friends at Ammo Squared.
Speaker 2: If you're like me and you want to make sure
Speaker 2: that you have enough Ammo stocked up that if there's
Speaker 2: ever another moment where all the Amo disappears, We've seen it.
Speaker 2: We saw it during COVID, We've seen it in Wars,
Speaker 2: We've seen it multiple times in my lifetime, where the
Speaker 2: price of Ammo will double, triple, quadruple. You don't have
Speaker 2: to deal with that if you do what I do
Speaker 2: with Ammo Squared. Ammo is delivered on demand and automatically
Speaker 2: when you need it, or stored for free when you don't.
Speaker 2: Ammo Square is customizable to your budget. You can buy
Speaker 2: as little as a few dollars a month of Ammo
Speaker 2: and then let it grow over time, or you can
Speaker 2: buy a bunch all at once and you have it
Speaker 2: when you need it.
Speaker 1: It's truly automated.
Speaker 2: Set it and forget it Ammo purchasing, and you can
Speaker 2: store it for free. You can pick your calibers, you
Speaker 2: can set your budget, you can select a shipping trigger,
Speaker 2: all of that by click of a button. Ammo builds
Speaker 2: up over time, and it's delivered automatically when you say
Speaker 2: I want it now. In twenty twenty, when the store
Speaker 2: shelves were empty and everyone was having trouble finding Ammo,
Speaker 2: trust me, I know I owned a gun store at
Speaker 2: the time, and and it was impossible to find Ammo.
Speaker 2: Well Amo Squared customers. All they had to do was
Speaker 2: ship their Ammo store to Amo Square and guess what
Speaker 2: they didn't have to pay four or five, six times
Speaker 2: what it was actually worth the day before everything happened.
Speaker 2: With COVID, you get it immediately delivered with just the
Speaker 2: click of a button. Plus, you can forget about dealing
Speaker 2: with moving heavy case of.
Speaker 1: Ammunition in your garage.
Speaker 2: You can literally exchange your amoscrit inventory for one caliber
Speaker 2: to another and seconds with just a few clicks, or
Speaker 2: close your account and you can even sell all your
Speaker 2: AMMO back if you need the money.
Speaker 1: It's effortless ammunition management.
Speaker 2: Go to amosquare dot com slash ben to sign up
Speaker 2: and get some free AMO in your account right now
Speaker 2: ammosquared dot com slash ben. That's amosquared dot com slash ben.
Speaker 2: Democrats now are immediately taking this Supreme Court SmackDown, and
Speaker 2: they're saying, all right, screw you, Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: We hate you.
Speaker 2: We want to pack the court because you guys don't
Speaker 2: do what we think you should do. They're furious with
Speaker 2: the liberal justices that obviously cited clearly on the side
Speaker 2: of the Constitution in this insane abuse of power by
Speaker 2: these Marxists and communists and socialists at masqueraders is Democrats.
Speaker 2: But I want you to hear how fast? All right,
Speaker 2: I want you to hear how fast. Democrats came out
Speaker 2: and said, okay, fine, if you're going to do this,
Speaker 2: then we're going to come back and we're going to
Speaker 2: hit you, and we're going to hit you hard. We're
Speaker 2: going to come out and we're going to go to
Speaker 2: Congress and we're going to try to change the rules
Speaker 2: as fast as we possibly can, because we believe the
Speaker 2: American people do not, in fact have a right to
Speaker 2: decide who they're president of the United States of America
Speaker 2: should be. Representative hardcore liberal Jamie Raskin, he's a Democrat
Speaker 2: ranking member of Oversight and Accountability Committee. This is what
Speaker 2: he said on CNN about it.
Speaker 5: I am working with a number of my colleagues, including W.
Speaker 5: Wasserman Schultz and Eric Swalwell, to revive legislation that we
Speaker 5: had to set up a process by which we could
Speaker 5: determine that someone who committed insurrection is disqualified by section
Speaker 5: three the fourteenth Amendment. And the House of Representatives already
Speaker 5: impeached Donald Trump for participating in insurrection by inciting it,
Speaker 5: so the House is already pronounced upon that.
Speaker 2: So this is on CNN right after the ruling comes down.
Speaker 2: They're like they're locked and loaded, all right, Raskin, Who
Speaker 2: you working with? I'm working with Eric Swalwell, who literally
Speaker 2: slept for years with the Chinese communist enemy that was
Speaker 2: spying on us. That's to who we're working with, and
Speaker 2: we're going to figure out a way to disqualify Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: I believe, by the way, that's exactly what they are
Speaker 2: going to try to do. They are going to try
Speaker 2: to do this and look representative. Raskin also said that
Speaker 2: Scotus has an opportunity to quote rehabilitate its very tarnished image. Now,
Speaker 2: to be clear, this is election interference. This is intimidation
Speaker 2: of judges supposed to be against the law, but apparently
Speaker 2: it's not. Because the Supreme Court rejected the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaker 2: The most liberal justices that the leftist put on there
Speaker 2: said no to this. They said Trump is on the ballot.
Speaker 2: You can't do this in a democracy. And the Democrats
Speaker 2: come out the leadership they're like, oh, yes we can, Yes.
Speaker 1: We can. Listen.
Speaker 6: Finally, Congressman, I want to look ahead to another case
Speaker 6: the Supreme Court is going to hear. They're going to
Speaker 6: hear arguments next month in April about the question of
Speaker 6: whether or not the former president can claim absolute immunity
Speaker 6: in criminal charges against him. Does today's decision give you
Speaker 6: any indication on how they will navigate that issue?
Speaker 5: Well, of course, the treatment of one case on a
Speaker 5: discrete legal issue does not theoretically affect the treatment of
Speaker 5: another case dealing with a different theoretical issue. On the
Speaker 5: other hand, a lot of people have suggested that because
Speaker 5: this was a unanimous decision that the Court wanted to
Speaker 5: do enter into some kind of gram constitutional bargain that
Speaker 5: would restore some of the lost legitimacy of the Court,
Speaker 5: and they would say, therefore, nine to zero, this can't.
Speaker 1: Be up to the states.
Speaker 5: They can control only access to the state ballot, not
Speaker 5: the federal ballot. It's up to Congress. And then in
Speaker 5: the presidential community case, stick with the unanimous bipartisan ruling
Speaker 5: from the DC Circuit, saying, of course, we don't have
Speaker 5: any kings here, we don't have dictators. No, a president
Speaker 5: cannot assassinate his political opponents and escape any kind of
Speaker 5: criminal consequences unless he's impeached in the House and convicted
Speaker 5: in the Senate, which was the argument that Trump's lawyers
Speaker 5: actually made before the DC Circuit. So I would hope
Speaker 5: that would happen. Unfortunately, there are at least three justices
Speaker 5: who were appointed or nominated to the Court by Donald
Speaker 5: Trump who appear not to be veering very far from
Speaker 5: what the mega element wants them to do. But let's
Speaker 5: hope that this is the case where they can vindicate
Speaker 5: themselves and also rehabilitate the very tarnished image of the
Speaker 5: Supreme Court at this point.
Speaker 2: You listen to just CNN's coverage that I played for you,
Speaker 2: and it's clear they knew that a bad ruling was
Speaker 2: coming down. And when I say bad, I want to
Speaker 2: be clear what I mean by that. They believe Donald
Speaker 2: Trump should be in prison right now. They want to
Speaker 2: lock up their political opponents. They hate Donald Trump, They've
Speaker 2: hated him from the very beginning. This the same communist
Speaker 2: network that spread lies and never apologized. The lies they
Speaker 2: spread were that there was Russian collusion and they knew
Speaker 2: that there wasn't. But they are now just full blown
Speaker 2: communists propagandists, and you see this in their coverage, are like, well,
Speaker 2: there's also other rulings, and they're now attacking Amy Komy
Speaker 2: Barrett and she's implying that she shouldn't even be on
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court and that she's kind of making her
Speaker 2: own way and under trying to undermine her.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can hear it in their disdain.
Speaker 2: But they're also mad at these other liberal judges for
Speaker 2: doing this because I think they believed the left believe
Speaker 2: when they put these side of my orders and others
Speaker 2: on the Supreme Court, that they would be activists for them,
Speaker 2: and I want to give real credit here to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court liberal justices they side my are Rar, Kagan, etc.
Speaker 2: They deserve this. They deserve for all of us to
Speaker 2: applaud them. Not because they sided in favor of Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: They cited the way that legally you're supposed to with
Speaker 2: the Constitution. That's why they deserve to be applauded, because
Speaker 2: we should always want the justices to decide on behalf
Speaker 2: of the of the democracy of what the Constitution actually says.
Speaker 2: And so whether this is a Republican or a Democrat here,
Speaker 2: because remember there's Republicans that could have done this to
Speaker 2: democrats too. If this is the new standard that hey,
Speaker 2: we don't like a candate, we'll figure out a way
Speaker 2: to take them off the ballot in some state, and
Speaker 2: therefore will he can't run or she can't run like
Speaker 2: this is what happens in their world countries. I'm not
Speaker 2: in favor of today's ruling because it helps Trump. I'm
Speaker 2: in favor of today's ruling because it was the right
Speaker 2: thing to do based on our constitution, and these liberal
Speaker 2: justices did the right thing today unanimously ruling that states
Speaker 2: cannot disqualify Trump or any other candate because you don't
Speaker 2: like them politically from the ballot.
Speaker 1: We can't have that in America.
Speaker 2: We should all be extremely excited about this. This is
Speaker 2: a good day for freedom and democracy. Now, before I
Speaker 2: give you all those details, inflation is heavily eroding your
Speaker 2: purchasing power, putting your savings, retirement accounts, and future legacy
Speaker 2: at risk. With more taxes, the continuous threat of war,
Speaker 2: a national debt now exceeding thirty four trillion, and the
Speaker 2: push for central bank digital currencies, our financial freedom.
Speaker 1: Is at stake.
Speaker 2: You have fifty thousand dollars or more in retirement savings,
Speaker 2: you may be at risk in times of economic uncertainty.
Speaker 2: Securing your family's financial future is essential, and freedom goold
Speaker 2: USA is here to empower you. You can act now
Speaker 2: by calling them at one eight hundred sixty five y
Speaker 2: five eight eight four three or visit Freedomgoldusa dot com
Speaker 2: slash ben. The team at freedom Goold USA is ready
Speaker 2: to help you preserve your wealth and provide stability at
Speaker 2: uncertain times. Learn how to add gold and silver to
Speaker 2: your irair habit shipped to your home. Safeguard your wealth
Speaker 2: for physical gold and silver and take control of your
Speaker 2: financial future today one eight hundred sixty five five eight
Speaker 2: eight four three or visit Freedomgoldusa dot com backslash ben
Speaker 2: to see if you qualify for up to ten thousand
Speaker 2: dollars in free silver. Now let me move to MSNBC
Speaker 2: real quick so you can understand just how psycho and
Speaker 2: how evil they are over at MSNBC. MSNBC right after
Speaker 2: this happens, they went full bore, all out to give
Speaker 2: a microphone to this psycho woman activists in Colorado who
Speaker 2: brought this case, and they went to the Colorado Secretary
Speaker 2: of State, Griswold, and they're like, Oh my gosh, I
Speaker 2: can't believe this actually happened.
Speaker 1: Tell us what you think.
Speaker 2: Now, let me remind you this Colorado Secretary of State
Speaker 2: just found out that they were so far outside of
Speaker 2: the law that the Supreme Court said, you guys are
Speaker 2: crazy Nino decision, and you guys are basically a threat
Speaker 2: to democracy and free and fair elections and what is
Speaker 2: MSNBC though, they're like, oh, let's give them a platform.
Speaker 2: Let's give them a platform, and let's hear from that
Speaker 2: side that just got obliterated by the Supreme Court, including
Speaker 2: the liberal justice. Listen to this communist propaganda.
Speaker 7: Given how you see this case, given how a number
Speaker 7: of independent and some Republican voters in your state, the
Speaker 7: ones who brought this case see Donald Trump, as you said,
Speaker 7: notes breaking insurrectionist. You make of the voters in your
Speaker 7: state across the country that still believed that he should
Speaker 7: be president and that he's still qualified to be president.
Speaker 8: Ultimately that will be a voter's decision. I think there
Speaker 8: is a lot of reason for voters to look really
Speaker 8: hard at this upcoming election.
Speaker 2: And by the way, I love the pretext there right,
Speaker 2: the totally loaded question here. And then notice what the
Speaker 2: Secretary of States as well, this is what you know,
Speaker 2: the voter's going to have to decide exactly. It shouldn't
Speaker 2: be up to any state or any crazy secretary of
Speaker 2: State like Griswell or anyone else to decide who you
Speaker 2: can and who you can't vote for. And she just
Speaker 2: undermined her own case by saying, well, ultimately this is
Speaker 2: going to be at the voters socide.
Speaker 1: That's what it should be.
Speaker 2: Voters should go into a voting booth and decide who
Speaker 2: they want to be president of the United States of
Speaker 2: America or governor or whatever it may be that they're
Speaker 2: running for. It should not be disqualifying candidates based on
Speaker 2: the fact that you don't like a candidate. That's not
Speaker 2: how this country is supposed to work. It's not supposed
Speaker 2: to be run that way. And that is the part
Speaker 2: that people really truly need to understand. And she just
Speaker 2: made the argument for why her case is totally and
Speaker 2: utterly insane. She just said it the voters should decide. Well, then,
Speaker 2: why did you take away the right of the voters
Speaker 2: to decide.
Speaker 1: I think we can all answer that question.
Speaker 2: We can answer that question by saying very clearly she
Speaker 2: didn't trust the voters to pick the right candidate. The
Speaker 2: left and these communists and these socialists in these Marxists,
Speaker 2: they're not Democrats.
Speaker 1: The Democratic Party is dead.
Speaker 2: They don't believe that any of us have the right
Speaker 2: to decide who our candidate is. They believe they should
Speaker 2: be able to dictate to you, and they should be
Speaker 2: able to take off the table anybody they don't like.
Speaker 2: This is no different than what they did to Donald
Speaker 2: Trump in sixteen.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 1: Remember Russia collusion.
Speaker 2: Over and over again, they were talking about Russia collusion,
Speaker 2: Russian collusion, Russian collusion.
Speaker 1: They knew a lie. They knew it never happened.
Speaker 2: They knew that Russian collusion was a fake story.
Speaker 1: It was literally fake news. But they did anyway.
Speaker 2: And then the Democrats, right, they're dead, they're communists and Marxists,
Speaker 2: and Congress what do they do?
Speaker 1: They ran with a story they knew was a lie.
Speaker 2: They knew the Still dossier was paid for by the
Speaker 2: Democratic National Committee and by Hillary Clinton for President's campaign.
Speaker 2: The FBI, by the way, knew that it was user
Speaker 2: generated material, and they classified it as user generated material,
Speaker 2: meaning it was created by the person that brought it
Speaker 2: to our attention.
Speaker 1: It's not authentic.
Speaker 2: The FBI even offered Chris were Still a million dollars
Speaker 2: if he could corroborate any of the intel in the dossier,
Speaker 2: which he could not do. And he never collected the
Speaker 2: million dollars. Why because it was made up, was fabricated.
Speaker 2: Barack Obama knew it was a lie and still allowed
Speaker 2: for them to go on a witch hunt and spy
Speaker 2: on the Trump campaign. Never forget that, and then Congress
Speaker 2: impeached him over something. The entire time the Democratic Party
Speaker 2: knew was alie. They tried to overthrow the will of
Speaker 2: the people. They tried to overthrow you and I who
Speaker 2: elected Donald Trump as president.
Speaker 1: You want to know what insurrection looks like.
Speaker 2: That's what it looks like when you take away the
Speaker 2: will of the people, when you take away the people's
Speaker 2: right to vote, when you change their vote, when you
Speaker 2: say we don't like who you voted for, so therefore
Speaker 2: we are going to come after you and say you
Speaker 2: got it wrong, so you no longer your guy that
Speaker 2: you voted for is actually in office. That is insurrection,
Speaker 2: that is overthrowing the government. And the Supreme Court, by
Speaker 2: the way, agrees with me now. And these communists, they're angry,
Speaker 2: and that's why MSNBC throws her out. There's like, tell
Speaker 2: us everything, Secretary of State Griswel and she then challenges voters, Listen, what.
Speaker 8: We have seen in swing states stricts that in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 8: twenty twenty, and twenty twenty two American voters have stepped
Speaker 8: up to safeguard American democracy. Look, this upcoming election has
Speaker 8: will have a big impact on our fundamental freedoms, the
Speaker 8: idea that women should have control over our own bodies,
Speaker 8: the idea that our democracy should remain intact and some
Speaker 8: really basic.
Speaker 2: By the way, this is the Secretary of State of
Speaker 2: Colorado who's now talking like a political campaign operative against
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. If you want to know what their motive was,
Speaker 2: this was the motive.
Speaker 1: It's very transparent. This is it.
Speaker 2: There's also two worlds here that are colliding.
Speaker 1: There's this like sane world and it's very small.
Speaker 2: Where news organizations are having to admit that they thought
Speaker 2: this was going to happen, but then they immediately turned
Speaker 2: into propagandists when they're like, all right, let's have on
Speaker 2: the guests who are going to tell you why Donald
Speaker 2: Trump should not be the president, why it should be
Speaker 2: in jail. CBS News when this Supreme Court ruling came
Speaker 2: out that Trump cannot be disqualified from the twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four Colorado ballot under the fourteenth Amendment, no state can
Speaker 2: do it. In a nine zero decision, with all the
Speaker 2: liberals doing the right thing here for our democracy, even
Speaker 2: CBS when they came out, this is what they said.
Speaker 9: The bottom line is they all agreed that Trump's arguments
Speaker 9: would carry the day in this case. I don't think
Speaker 9: that is a surprising result after the arguments, where I
Speaker 9: think they all signaled they were highly skeptical of state
Speaker 9: efforts to disqualify presidential candidate. The Chief Justice, for example,
Speaker 9: saying that essentially you would let one state dictate or
Speaker 9: a handful of states dictate the outcome of the election.
Speaker 9: So I don't think this is a surprise that Colorado
Speaker 9: Supreme Court was kind of off on a trip of
Speaker 9: their own with this ruling. Other state courts that had
Speaker 9: decided it had went a different outcome. So here we are,
Speaker 9: the decision now unanimous in agreement that Trump's arguments will
Speaker 9: carry the day. He cannot be disqualified from state ballots.
Speaker 1: Forty four seconds of truth from CBS News. And then
Speaker 1: what do they do.
Speaker 2: They immediately go to all right, well, let's tell you
Speaker 2: how Democrats are going to try to figure out a
Speaker 2: way to get rid of him again on the House
Speaker 2: side and ban him from being the president. And they're
Speaker 2: going to try to do this in the future. That's
Speaker 2: the whole ballgame here. You look at what they've tried
Speaker 2: to do to this president and how they've tried to
Speaker 2: lock him up. They've tried to bankrupt him, they've tried
Speaker 2: to lock up his family banker. Then they've tried to
Speaker 2: lock up associates, some of them they have they've tried
Speaker 2: to raid people's houses that work for him and will
Speaker 2: not tried. They did it in the middle of the night.
Speaker 2: People that were around him. They don't like, like the
Speaker 2: deep state is doing everything they can to alter America
Speaker 2: while allowing for an open border that absolutely will alter
Speaker 2: America if we allow twenty plus million illegal immigrants to
Speaker 2: be able to vote, that's how you change a nation
Speaker 2: and you destroy our democracy. And this is all happening
Speaker 2: while they're defending Joe Biden, an incompetent president that it
Speaker 2: clearly is on a massive cognitive decline.
Speaker 1: Let me just say this real quick before I play Trump.
Speaker 2: Okay, Biden's Monday schedule includes absolutely nothing. The White House
Speaker 2: put it out for immediately immediate release on Sunday for
Speaker 2: the next day. Right March third, they put out Monday's
Speaker 2: schedule since daily guidance and press schedule for Monday, March fourth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four. In the morning, the President will receive
Speaker 2: the President's Daily Brief. This meeting will be closed press,
Speaker 2: no pool calls, meaning for the press, and that's it.
Speaker 2: That's the entire day today, Monday, for the President of
Speaker 2: the United States of America is actually nothing. It's nothing.
Speaker 2: Our president is doing nothing today. They'll let that go
Speaker 2: though we know he's a guy and decline. They don't
Speaker 2: care because it's all about power and winning. Now, let
Speaker 2: me let you hear from Donald Trump and what Trump
Speaker 2: had to say about the Supreme Court ruling to keep
Speaker 2: him on the ballot unanimously.
Speaker 10: They worked long, they worked hard, and frankly, they worked
Speaker 10: very quickly on something that will be spoken about one
Speaker 10: hundred years from now and two hundred years from now
Speaker 10: extremely important. Essentially, you cannot take somebody out of a
Speaker 10: race because an opponent would like to have it that way,
Speaker 10: and it has nothing to do with the fact that
Speaker 10: it's the leading candidate, whether it was the leading candidate
Speaker 10: or a candidate that was well down on the totem pole,
Speaker 10: you cannot take somebody out of a race. The voters
Speaker 10: can take the person out of the race very quickly,
Speaker 10: but a court shouldn't be doing that. And the Supreme
Speaker 10: Court saw that very well. And I really do believe
Speaker 10: that will be a unifying factor because while most states
Speaker 10: were thrilled to have me, there were some that didn't
Speaker 10: and they didn't want that for political reasons. They didn't
Speaker 10: want that because the poll numbers, Because the poll numbers
Speaker 10: are very good. We're beating President Biden in almost every poll.
Speaker 10: New York Times came out yesterday with a very big
Speaker 10: poll for us. So they didn't like that, and you
Speaker 10: can't do that. You can't do what they tried to do.
Speaker 10: And hopefully Colorado is an example will unify.
Speaker 11: I know there's tremendous support.
Speaker 10: They brought our support up very strong in Colorado because
Speaker 10: people thought people in Colorado thought that was a.
Speaker 11: Terrible thing that they did. And while we're on the subject, and.
Speaker 10: Another thing that will be coming up very soon will
Speaker 10: be immunity for a president, and not immunity for me,
Speaker 10: but for any president. If a president doesn't have full immunity,
Speaker 10: you really don't have a president because nobody that is
Speaker 10: serving in that office will have the courage to make,
Speaker 10: in many cases, what would be the right decision, or
Speaker 10: it could be the wrong decision. It could be in
Speaker 10: some cases the wrong decision. But they have to make decisions,
Speaker 10: and they have to make them free of all terror
Speaker 10: that can be rained upon them when they leave office
Speaker 10: or even before they leave office.
Speaker 11: And some decisions are very tough.
Speaker 10: I can tell you that as a president that some
Speaker 10: decisions to make are very tough.
Speaker 11: I took out Isis.
Speaker 10: And I took out some very big people from the
Speaker 10: standpoint of a different part of the world, two of
Speaker 10: the leading terrors, probably the two leading terrors ever that
Speaker 10: we've ever seen in this world. And those are big decisions.
Speaker 10: I don't want to be prosecuted for it. Another president
Speaker 10: wouldn't want to be prosecuted for it. It had a
Speaker 10: tremendously positive impact. It stopped everything called and sometimes you
Speaker 10: have to make they were tough decisions.
Speaker 11: Sometimes you have to make decisions like that.
Speaker 10: When you make a decision, you don't want to have
Speaker 10: your opposing party or opponent, or even somebody that just
Speaker 10: thinks you're wrong bring a criminal suit against you or
Speaker 10: any kind of a suit when you leave office. I
Speaker 10: have that right now at a level that nobody's ever
Speaker 10: seen before. I have rogue prosecutors, and I have rogue judges.
Speaker 10: I have judges that are out of control, and it's
Speaker 10: a very unfair thing for me, but serving perhaps as
Speaker 10: a sample to others of what should not be happening
Speaker 10: when you make good decisions, and in my case, the
Speaker 10: economy was great. We didn't go into any wars. We
Speaker 10: totally defeated ISIS. We provided the largest tax cuts in history.
Speaker 11: We provided the largest regulation cuts in history. But think
Speaker 11: of it, no wars.
Speaker 10: We beat ISIS one hundred percent of the caliphe there
Speaker 10: were no wars. We did a job that was great.
Speaker 10: But maybe I wouldn't have done that the caliphate. Defeating
Speaker 10: them was very powerful. It was going to take four years.
Speaker 10: It took me four months, but it was a very
Speaker 10: strong dictum that I gave. I said, get them to
Speaker 10: feed him. Ended we were fighting for twenty years against ISIS,
Speaker 10: and we.
Speaker 11: Did it very quickly.
Speaker 10: I don't want to be prosecuted in that case.
Speaker 11: It worked out very well. There will be some things.
Speaker 10: That perhaps don't work out so well. But I don't
Speaker 10: want to be prosecuted. Prosecuted because I decided.
Speaker 11: To do something that is very much for the good
Speaker 11: of the country and actually for the good of the world.
Speaker 10: The president shouldn't have that on his mind, and he
Speaker 10: has to have a free and clear mind when he
Speaker 10: makes very big decisions, or it's going to be nothing
Speaker 10: more than a ceremonial post. You'll be president, that'll be
Speaker 10: wonderful thing. And you won't do anything because you don't
Speaker 10: want to be hit by your opponent or hit by
Speaker 10: somebody else, because who wants to leave office and go
Speaker 10: through what I've gone through. I'm being prosecuted by Biden,
Speaker 10: my opponent. Because every one of these things, whether it's Fanny.
Speaker 11: Willis or Bragg, these are local.
Speaker 10: And state, but they're in total coordination with the White House.
Speaker 11: You can't do that. It shouldn't be done done. I
Speaker 11: mean a thing like that.
Speaker 10: In the case of the DA's office, they put one
Speaker 10: of the top people, maybe the second person in the
Speaker 10: Manhattan DA's office to get Trump. They had a Hillary
Speaker 10: Clinton lawyer leave the law firm, very prestigious, big law firm.
Speaker 11: Leave the law.
Speaker 10: Firm to go into the DA's office to get Trump.
Speaker 11: Pomarants. It's to Pomerants.
Speaker 10: So he goes in to become a prosecutor, worked for
Speaker 10: the Democrat Party. And Hillary Clinton goes into prosecute Donald
Speaker 10: Trump at a local level in total coordination with the
Speaker 10: Department of Justice, meaning Biden. And then you have the
Speaker 10: Fanny Willis, as she would say, Fannie, Fannie fa and
Speaker 10: I but Fannie and she hired somebody knew the person
Speaker 10: long before this horrible prosecution took place, and she went
Speaker 10: out and she paid him an unbelievable amount of money,
Speaker 10: more money than he ever dreampt possible, much more money
Speaker 10: than other people that are.
Speaker 11: That do that for a living.
Speaker 10: He never did it at all, had no experience at all,
Speaker 10: and they had obviously a conflict.
Speaker 11: We don't have to go into that.
Speaker 10: But they were able to get a lot of money
Speaker 10: because it was a high profile person. Me I'm a
Speaker 10: very high profile person, So they were able to pay
Speaker 10: him close to a million dollars when he was not
Speaker 10: equipped to do the job and she's not equipped to
Speaker 10: do the job.
Speaker 11: And that case should end immediately.
Speaker 10: That case is so conflicted, nobody's ever seen anything like it.
Speaker 10: And then you have deranged Jack Smith, who's a Trump
Speaker 10: paiter and represents all the Trump paiters, and he's going wild.
Speaker 11: He's just a wild man.
Speaker 10: He's been overturned unanimously by the Supreme Court when after
Speaker 10: other people over the years, he said, great failure.
Speaker 2: By the way, let's just end with this because you
Speaker 2: can hear I wanted you to hear just the reminder
Speaker 2: of like what all he's gone through since he left office.
Speaker 2: That doesn't even include the two impeachments while he was
Speaker 2: in office. That doesn't include the FBI coming the situation
Speaker 2: room trying to get people to flip on a General
Speaker 2: Flynn and entrap them.
Speaker 1: Does include the raids on.
Speaker 2: People's homes in and around him and people that work
Speaker 2: for him because they were trying to get him to
Speaker 2: give them something that he did wrong or illegals. They
Speaker 2: could nail him to the wall, right like they've never stopped.
Speaker 2: They've never stopped, and they clearly won't, and they are
Speaker 2: trying to intimidate. There's a lot of good people. They're saying,
Speaker 2: I'm not getting this game anymore. There's no way I'm
Speaker 2: not getting in this game. Why would I get in
Speaker 2: this game with all this going on? Why would I
Speaker 2: do it? It's not worth it. Make sure you share this
Speaker 2: podcast with your family and friends wherever you are on
Speaker 2: social media.
Speaker 1: Please, and I'll see you back here tomorrow.