Speaker 1: No bump. That is what we're being told now from
Speaker 1: the State of the Union for Joe Biden, as Democrats
Speaker 1: are now terrified that even when the president's at his best,
Speaker 1: and when don't we say best, we mean the best
Speaker 1: he can do under his cognitive decline, that it's not
Speaker 1: enough to connect with the American voters. A new Yahoo
Speaker 1: News Yuga Pohle says the Stay of the Union did
Speaker 1: not in fact help the President of the United States
Speaker 1: of America at all. Pundits may have fawned over the
Speaker 1: President Say of the Union last Thursday, praising it as
Speaker 1: a home run performance. If you were watching MSNBC, it
Speaker 1: was fiery, powerful, vigorous, is what they said on CNN.
Speaker 1: But when you look at what the voters thought, they
Speaker 1: really weren't that impressed. How bad was it? Well? An
Speaker 1: extensive survey of one thousand, four hundred and eighty two
Speaker 1: US adults conducting the days immediately following Biden's big speech
Speaker 1: shows zero improvements of President Biden. Yes, his standing with
Speaker 1: the American people, well, it's basically barely average. And what
Speaker 1: did it do is against for his standing against Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: Nothing at all. Before the State of the Union, Trump
Speaker 1: had a forty five to forty four lead and a
Speaker 1: head to head twenty twenty four matchup. According to the
Speaker 1: previous Yahoo News poll from January, they remain tied today
Speaker 1: at Trump at forty six and Biden at forty four,
Speaker 1: a gap that's well within the margin of air. Is
Speaker 1: what the left wants you to understand. But before the speech,
Speaker 1: forty percent of Americans approved that was it of the
Speaker 1: job Joe Biden was doing as president. His disapproval he
Speaker 1: was underwater. Fifty six percent of Americans say they disapprove
Speaker 1: of the job he was doing. Where are those numbers today, Well,
Speaker 1: they're not much better today. He's at thirty nine percent
Speaker 1: approval with the American people in fifty five percent against
Speaker 1: Joe Biden saying they disapprove of the job that he's doing.
Speaker 1: So what does this boil down to. Well, the media
Speaker 1: is trying to turn into solely an age issue. It's
Speaker 1: not just an age issue. But let's look at that
Speaker 1: for a moment. Biden would be eighty six years old
Speaker 1: at the end of his second term, and voters have
Speaker 1: consistently said now to pollsters that they worry about his
Speaker 1: advanced age and ability to handle the job. For another
Speaker 1: four years, but far from moving the needle in Biden's
Speaker 1: favor on the age issue. His State of the Union
Speaker 1: a widely viewed and by most accounts, his most energetic
Speaker 1: display that people thought would be possible from him. That
Speaker 1: is where he did, in fact hit a home run.
Speaker 1: It appears to have had no effect whatsoever. Now let
Speaker 1: me tell you about my friends real quick at Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile before I get into even more of these details.
Speaker 1: If you're like me and you are tired of giving
Speaker 1: your mind awoke companies, especially ahead of this election coming up,
Speaker 1: will then stop giving your money to Big Mobile. Big
Speaker 1: Mobile has gone all in to support Democrats in the
Speaker 1: upcoming election. They've gotten all in to support democratic causes
Speaker 1: and organizations that are backing hardcore lefties in this election
Speaker 1: that is going to happen in November. If you are
Speaker 1: sick and tired of your money going to corporations that
Speaker 1: hate your values, then switch your cell phone provider today.
Speaker 1: Why because they're also giving donations to Plan Parenthood. That's right,
Speaker 1: you may be with a phone coming right now that
Speaker 1: their biggest donations are going year after year to Plan Parenthood.
Speaker 1: So stop giving your money to people that are fighting
Speaker 1: against your values. Switch to Patriot Mobile. You get to
Speaker 1: keep your same cell phone number you have right now.
Speaker 1: You can keep the same cell phone you have in
Speaker 1: your hand, or upgrade to a brand new one. And
Speaker 1: every time you pay your bill, this is what happens.
Speaker 1: Five percent of that bill goes back to support conservative causes,
Speaker 1: candidates and organizations. We're talking about causes like supporting the
Speaker 1: rights of unborn children. We're talking about supporting our veterans,
Speaker 1: our wounded warriors, our first responders, talking about supporting candidates
Speaker 1: and organizations. That's what they do that support our First
Speaker 1: and our Second Amendment rights. So vote with your dollars
Speaker 1: every day when you make a phone call, every day,
Speaker 1: when you pay that bill, when you send a text,
Speaker 1: and make a difference. Go to Patriotmobile dot com slash
Speaker 1: ben that's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ben. Or call
Speaker 1: them at nine to seven to two Patriot that's nine
Speaker 1: seven to two Patriot. Use promo code ben. You'll get
Speaker 1: free activation and the best deals of the year. Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ben are nine to seven to
Speaker 1: two Patriot. All right, let's get into these age issues.
Speaker 1: When it comes to what the poll numbers are saying
Speaker 1: just twenty nine percent of Americans now say Biden, who's
Speaker 1: eighty one, is fit to serve another term as president.
Speaker 1: That is unchanged from twenty nine percent in January. Most
Speaker 1: Americans now fifty one percent still say Biden's age is
Speaker 1: a big problem affecting his fitness to be president. That
Speaker 1: has also been unchanged since January. Democrats were hoping that
Speaker 1: because of the say of the Union, these numbers would change.
Speaker 1: They have not. Only thirty percent of Americans say Biden
Speaker 1: has been mostly in charge quote unquote as president, while
Speaker 1: fifty three percent say he's been mostly passive, compared to
Speaker 1: just twenty eight percent and fifty four percent when the
Speaker 1: question was asked last November, meaning they have not rehabilitated
Speaker 1: him at all with the American people. The American people
Speaker 1: believe that Joe Biden is not in charge, and they
Speaker 1: believe he's not doing a good job. They believe that
Speaker 1: he is that he is a huge liability to the
Speaker 1: stability of this country. Now you look at all that,
Speaker 1: and the Democrats are trying to figure out now what
Speaker 1: they're going to do to counter that. Well, let me
Speaker 1: give you an example of what's going to happen. GOP
Speaker 1: representative kin Buck, a guy who hates Donald Trump, is
Speaker 1: now screwing the Republican Party and walking out the door
Speaker 1: early from his time in Congress. GOP Representative kin Buck
Speaker 1: is resigning, and he's set to resign in about ten
Speaker 1: days on March to twenty second. Why is he doing it?
Speaker 1: He was asked as he did his exit interview with CNN.
Speaker 2: Listen to this of the fact that you are leaving
Speaker 2: March my second, next Friday, how much does it have
Speaker 2: to do with the fact that Trump is the presumptive
Speaker 2: nominee and you're not exactly a fan.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't think whether he was a nominee or not.
Speaker 3: I think our system is broken and how we choose candidates,
Speaker 3: and I want to get involved in that process.
Speaker 2: Is it really that miserable right now to be I mean,
Speaker 2: from the outside in, it doesn't look that fun from
Speaker 2: the inside in. Is it that bad that you're saying
Speaker 2: I'm done?
Speaker 3: It is the worst year of the nine years and
Speaker 3: three months that I've been in Congress, and having talked
Speaker 3: to former members, it's the worst year in forty fifty
Speaker 3: years to be in Congress. But I'm leaving because I
Speaker 3: think there's a job to do out there that I
Speaker 3: want to go do.
Speaker 1: So there it is. He's saying, you know what, I'm
Speaker 1: taking my toys. I'm going home. I'm leaving Congress, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to screw the Republicans on the way out
Speaker 1: the door. This is significant because the Republican majority in
Speaker 1: the House is so tiny and this Republican, Kim Buck,
Speaker 1: did this solely to help Joe Biden and solely to
Speaker 1: help the Democrats. He is not, by the way a
Speaker 1: CNN described him, a hardline conservative. If you were, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't hate Donald Trump. He is not a hardline conservative,
Speaker 1: even though their first headline reads this way. Republican Representative
Speaker 1: Ken Buck of Colorado, a hardline conservative who has classed
Speaker 1: with his own party at times, announced on Tuesday that
Speaker 1: he will leave Congress at the end of next week.
Speaker 1: If they think kN Buck is a hard line conservative,
Speaker 1: I want to know what they would say about me.
Speaker 1: For example, Buck criticizing dysfunction on Capitol Hill in discussing
Speaker 1: his decision to leave, telling Cen and Xana Bash, it
Speaker 1: is the worst year of the nine years and three
Speaker 1: months that I've been in Congress, and having talked to
Speaker 1: former members. It's the worst year in forty or fifty
Speaker 1: years to be in Congress. But I'm leaving because I
Speaker 1: think there's a job to do out there. Translation, I
Speaker 1: want to screw Conservatives when I walk out the door.
Speaker 1: I hate him and I'm going to basically do what
Speaker 1: Liz Cheney did. And whatever that guy, that congressman out
Speaker 1: of Chicago, Illinois was that screwed Republicans on the January
Speaker 1: sixth Committee. I can't remember his name, which makes me happy.
Speaker 1: This is ken Buck's way of doing that. This is
Speaker 1: his Mike Drop moment. I'm going to screw the Republicans.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to be a team player until November.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna shake it up right now, and the Colorado
Speaker 1: Republicans departure from the House will in fact shape up
Speaker 1: the chambers partisan breakdown, where Republicans control only a very
Speaker 1: narrow majority, a majority challenge to Speaker Mike Johnson, who
Speaker 1: has frequently been forced to rely on votes from Democrats
Speaker 1: as well as Republicans to get major pieces of legislation
Speaker 1: across the finish line. Now. When Dana Bash pressed him
Speaker 1: on whether Donald Trump's status as the presumptive GOP nominee
Speaker 1: influenced his decision. Buck said, whether he was the nominee
Speaker 1: or not, I think our system is broken in how
Speaker 1: we choose candidates, and I want to get involved in
Speaker 1: that process. Everywhere I go in Colorado day and I
Speaker 1: hear the people are not happy with Trump and they're
Speaker 1: not happy with President Biden. I'm going to find the
Speaker 1: right organization to join and I'm going to start working
Speaker 1: on that issue. We have to We have to have
Speaker 1: better candidates up and down the ballot. Now Buck announced
Speaker 1: last year that he would not seek reelection, citing stagnation
Speaker 1: in Congress and his party's election and his party's election
Speaker 1: denialism as factors for his decision. That have not run
Speaker 1: again for re election twenty twenty four. Now Buck is
Speaker 1: a former prosecutor with the Department of Justice. He was
Speaker 1: first elected to Congress a decade ago in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 1: and I think the reason that he's really getting out
Speaker 1: now in early is because he's basically saying, I don't
Speaker 1: care about the people in Colorado that I said, please
Speaker 1: elect me for two years. I'm bailing on you because
Speaker 1: I'm not getting my way and I've been marginalized in
Speaker 1: Congress and many of the hardcore conservatives aren't listening to me.
Speaker 1: That's what this is honestly about. It is about him
Speaker 1: basically saying I'm not getting my way, and if I'm
Speaker 1: not getting my way, then I'm gonna take my toys
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna go home. And when CNN comes out
Speaker 1: and they call him, what was a staunch conservatives. I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to be mean, but no, he's not. Okay, like,
Speaker 1: he's not a stanch conservative. If he was a stanch conservative,
Speaker 1: what he would have done is stayed in through November
Speaker 1: instead of screwing the voters who voted for him less
Speaker 1: than two years ago. But again, this goes back to
Speaker 1: what I said earlier. This is not about what's good
Speaker 1: for him. Okay, this is not about let me rephrase that.
Speaker 1: This is not about what's good for the people. This
Speaker 1: is about him being selfish saying I'm not getting to
Speaker 1: do what i want to do, so I'm leaving and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be a little baby and I'm gonna pout
Speaker 1: and I'm going to go home and I'm out of this.
Speaker 1: That's what this is. Now, this is going to be
Speaker 1: a problem for Republicans because I also would not be surprised.
Speaker 1: And I want to be clear about this on the
Speaker 1: front end, I would not be surprised if this actually
Speaker 1: happens again. I wouldn't be surprised. I think there's a
Speaker 1: very good chance that other Republicans that are not getting
Speaker 1: their way are going to be more than willing to
Speaker 1: do exactly this again, that they're going to say I'm out, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to run for reelection, and this will
Speaker 1: be the way you pout. And also you hold people hostage.
Speaker 1: If you don't get me what I want, I'll quit
Speaker 1: Congress earlier than I said I was going to. If
Speaker 1: you don't do what I want, I'm going to quit early,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to say I'm out of here and
Speaker 1: i'm gonna take my toys. I'm gonna go home. It's
Speaker 1: gonna screw you. That's what worries me about all of
Speaker 1: this is that there's a real chance, a really really
Speaker 1: really good chance, that he will not be the last
Speaker 1: one before November to do this in the Republican party.
Speaker 1: This is also something you don't see with Democrats, but
Speaker 1: the Republicans are having to do it now. I bring
Speaker 1: this up because I think we need to learn from this,
Speaker 1: and this is the takeaway I want you to get
Speaker 1: from my point today, and that's this, we need to
Speaker 1: do a better job of candidates selection and stop electing
Speaker 1: people to Congress like ken Buck, when as soon as
Speaker 1: they don't get their way, they literally just take their
Speaker 1: toys and go home. Like, we need to actually elect
Speaker 1: real conservatives. You know, Adam Kinsinger, the guy from Illinois,
Speaker 1: I was trying to remember his name earlier, Liz Cheney,
Speaker 1: another one now, ken Buck, Like, what the hell are
Speaker 1: we doing electing these people in the first place, because
Speaker 1: they are no different. In fact, I would like there
Speaker 1: as bad as the Democrats actually, if not worse, because
Speaker 1: they make us water down every conservative value and we're
Speaker 1: putting legislation together. They walk in and they're basically negotiating
Speaker 1: as a Democrat, not as a Republican. They're walking in
Speaker 1: before we even have to negotiate with the Democrats. We're
Speaker 1: having to negotiate with the likes of these yahoos. Okay,
Speaker 1: these idiots who act like they're conservatives, but really they're
Speaker 1: the worst people for the conservative movement. It's a massive problem.
Speaker 1: And this is the issue that I have with all
Speaker 1: of them. Now. While all of this is going on
Speaker 1: in Capitol Hill. Let me also bring you up to
Speaker 1: date on what's been happening with a Special counsel Robert Hurr,
Speaker 1: who is now defending his Biden lack of memory comments
Speaker 1: and the reason to not hold them accountable for his actions.
Speaker 1: The Washington Post. Okay, the Washington Post has a story now,
Speaker 1: I kid you not where they're now saying that Her
Speaker 1: defended his decision to not charge President Biden and did
Speaker 1: it vigorously because he says, dude, the guy's just too
Speaker 1: old to charge with any crime, so no one would
Speaker 1: find him guilty. Now, this is the same guy that's
Speaker 1: the President United States of America and the same guy
Speaker 1: that's running for reelection to the same office for another
Speaker 1: four years. So think about how insane this entire idea
Speaker 1: actually is. Lawmakers spent hours, we're being told, Tuesday, drilling
Speaker 1: the former Special Counsel Her about his decision. Quote the
Speaker 1: Post says, not to seek charge against President Biden for
Speaker 1: mishandling classified materials solely based on cognitive decline and age.
Speaker 1: Democrats focus on her decision, including disparaging details about Biden's memory.
Speaker 1: You made a choice. It was a political choice. It
Speaker 1: was the wrong choice is what Adam Scheff, a Democrat
Speaker 1: from California said, This is this is insane. By the way,
Speaker 1: largely Republicans use their turns at the microphone to question
Speaker 1: why Her opted not to recommend charges after fighting some
Speaker 1: evidence that Biden willfully retained government material after his vice presidency.
Speaker 1: Her defended the entirety of his report, repeatedly arguing that
Speaker 1: the details about memory were necessary to explain his decision.
Speaker 1: He also said his conclusions do not exonerate Biden, but
Speaker 1: rather determined there was not a proof to meet federal
Speaker 1: prosecution thresholds. Is what he said. Now you think about this, okay.
Speaker 1: HER's report was three hundred and forty five pages. It
Speaker 1: concluded that Biden carelessly kept countless times classified documents and
Speaker 1: notebooks at his home, but said the evidence wasn't strong
Speaker 1: enough to charge the president with crimes because well, one,
Speaker 1: he was old and no one would find him guilty
Speaker 1: of it. Now Democrats are mad that he put that
Speaker 1: in writing, which is the reason why I mentioned for
Speaker 1: you what Adam Shipp said saying that this was politically
Speaker 1: He's basically saying, how dare you say the presence old?
Speaker 1: How dare you say that the president's memory is bad?
Speaker 1: How dare you say these things? You made a choice
Speaker 1: to this, You did this for political reasons. It was
Speaker 1: the wrong choice, and you should have not said this
Speaker 1: to the American people because you're trying to slander the president. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm sure HER's like, hold on a second. I just
Speaker 1: saved the presence a double ass from prosecution. And this
Speaker 1: is how you guys are gonna treat me, Like, are
Speaker 1: you kidding me? Like you're gonna treat me this way? Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: and the Special Council let me go to another article
Speaker 1: about this. USA Today had their article and this is
Speaker 1: It was a little different than the post. But let
Speaker 1: me read this a part to you, suys. Special Counsel
Speaker 1: her to defends Biden memory comments. And then it goes
Speaker 1: in this way. It says the Special Counsel Robert hur
Speaker 1: went before the House Judiciary Committee to discuss his report
Speaker 1: on Biden's handling classified documents, his explosive commentary on Biden's
Speaker 1: memory and his demeanor. In the report release early last month,
Speaker 1: Her did not recommend the Justice Department charge Biden with
Speaker 1: any crimes for his classified documents found in his former
Speaker 1: White House or former actually say Washington DC office and
Speaker 1: Delaware home, saying the evidence did not establish his guilt
Speaker 1: beyond a reasonable doubt. But the report also described Biden
Speaker 1: as a well meaning, quote unquote elderly man with a
Speaker 1: poor memory and said he couldn't remember important details about
Speaker 1: his own life, something Biden's team forcefully pushed back on,
Speaker 1: saying that's not true. Her appearance before Congress was rife
Speaker 1: with fingerpointing from both sides of the aisle, Republicans accusing
Speaker 1: her of going easy on the present Democrats attacking Republicans
Speaker 1: for using what he says the report for political gain. Now.
Speaker 1: Democrats decried HER's depiction of Biden as an elderly man
Speaker 1: with quote diminished capabilities and capacities and memory loss issues.
Speaker 1: Many argue the characterization was inappropriate and politically motivated, noting
Speaker 1: that Her was the principal Associate Deputy Attorney General at
Speaker 1: the United States Department of Justice under Trump, who later
Speaker 1: appointed him to be the lead attorney the US Attorney
Speaker 1: for the Maryland District. Now Attorney General Garland appointed her
Speaker 1: as a special counsel to retain the independence of the
Speaker 1: Justice Department, and the investigation is what he claimed at
Speaker 1: the time. Now, let me just hit pause on her
Speaker 1: for a moment, and I want to go back to
Speaker 1: the other problem that we have, and this is a
Speaker 1: bigger issue with government right now and not trusting people.
Speaker 1: All Right, I'm going to give you this headline and
Speaker 1: this story that I think directly ties into her. There's
Speaker 1: a new report out that the transcripts now confirm that
Speaker 1: the January sixth Committee straight up lied about Trump attacking
Speaker 1: the Secret Service. You may remember that story that was
Speaker 1: leaked where they said that Donald Trump attacked the Secret Service. Well,
Speaker 1: the newly released transcripts of secret testimony at the January
Speaker 1: sixth Committee showed that a witness testified then President Donald
Speaker 1: Trump had not wrestled with a Secret Service agent and
Speaker 1: had indeed requested troops to protect the capital. So they
Speaker 1: lied to you about January the six on multiple issues.
Speaker 1: The transcript of a closed door interview with Deputy Chief
Speaker 1: of Staff Ornano and then representatively Liz Cheney, a useful
Speaker 1: idiot for the left. She was technically a Republican from
Speaker 1: Wyoming on January the twenty eighth to twenty twenty two
Speaker 1: was hidden by the committee. We now know as it
Speaker 1: played up sensational claims that the testimony clearly refuted. Now.
Speaker 1: In particular, Cheney boosted the accusations by former Trump aid
Speaker 1: Cassie Hutchison, who claimed publicly and a great media fanfare
Speaker 1: that Trump had tried to human deer his presidential vehicle
Speaker 1: to drive to the Capitol Riot. Well, guess what it
Speaker 1: was reported on and note at the time that Hutchinson's
Speaker 1: dramatic testimony in June of twenty twenty two, and several
Speaker 1: people including Ornado, were prepared to testify publicly to refute
Speaker 1: her claims, which were debunked in other ways as well.
Speaker 1: Cheney and the other members of the committee did not
Speaker 1: take up Ornado's offer, repeating the tactic that Representative Adam Schiff,
Speaker 1: the hardcore lying leftist Democrat from California, had used during
Speaker 1: the first impeachment inquiry of leaving inconvenient witnesses behind. Moreover,
Speaker 1: Cheney and the committee claimed in their final report that
Speaker 1: there was no evidence that Donald Trump had requested ten
Speaker 1: thousand thousand National Guard troops to protect the capitol. In fact,
Speaker 1: or Nado had testified during the hearing that Trump did
Speaker 1: exactly that. Hemingway of the Federalists report on the existence
Speaker 1: of the Ornano transcript, which was unearthed by the House
Speaker 1: Administration Subcommittee on Oversight, led by Representative Barry Loudermilk, a
Speaker 1: Republican from Georgia former Representative Lim Cheney. That's Dick Cheney's daughter,
Speaker 1: who is again a Democrat masquerating as a Republican. On
Speaker 1: the January sixth committee, we now know suppressed evidence the
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump pushed four to ten thousand National Guard
Speaker 1: troops to protect the nation's capital. A previously hidden transcript
Speaker 1: attained by the Federalists shows this as well. Cheney and
Speaker 1: her committee then falsely claimed they had quote unquote no
Speaker 1: evidence to support Trump's officials claims that the White House
Speaker 1: had communicated its desire for those ten thousand National Guard troops.
Speaker 1: In fact, an early transcript transcribe interview conducted by the
Speaker 1: committee included precisely that evidence from McKey source. The interview,
Speaker 1: which Cheney attended and personally participated in, was suppressed from
Speaker 1: public release until today. Asked if he ever heard anything
Speaker 1: about Trump's deciding to go to the Capitol that day
Speaker 1: or not, said he didn't or not, said Trump had
Speaker 1: driven by a previous rally, had flown over another, and
Speaker 1: that the handlers had previously decided against him joining the
Speaker 1: day's events. Lettermick, who was also targeted unfairly by the
Speaker 1: January sixth Committee with false accusations that he had given
Speaker 1: a tour to Capital rioters before the event, found earlier
Speaker 1: that the committee had destroyed much of the evidence that
Speaker 1: it collected. Now, let me say this again. The January
Speaker 1: sixth Committee, the committee they said was so important, it
Speaker 1: was like hunting down al Qaeda terrace, and that those
Speaker 1: on January the sixth, right, those at the Capitol on
Speaker 1: January sixth, were domestic terrorists. They were terrorists. So difference
Speaker 1: in al KaiA or isis the same committee and the
Speaker 1: same people that wouldn't answer the basic question or ask
Speaker 1: questions about, hey, how many FBI informants and how many
Speaker 1: different people in our government were masquerading to help support
Speaker 1: the idea of a riot on January sixth. Within the crowd, right,
Speaker 1: those people that won't answer those questions, they are sitting
Speaker 1: there saying, well, January sixth was not just an insurrection,
Speaker 1: but Donald Trump should be disqualified from being president because
Speaker 1: he supported it, advocated for it, and he didn't protect
Speaker 1: the American people, even though he asked for ten thousand
Speaker 1: National Guard troops and guests who said no to it.
Speaker 1: You guessed it the Democrats in Nancy Pelosi, because Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi was the one that said no to it. They
Speaker 1: then targeted conservative members of Car of Congress like Laudermilk,
Speaker 1: who yes, gave tours, but not to the rioters. And
Speaker 1: they hid all of this from you, all of this happening,
Speaker 1: and it happened because they knew the media would allow
Speaker 1: them to get away with it. They knew that you
Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to see the information if they destroyed it,
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what we've now found. They went after
Speaker 1: the president. They had the January sixth Select Committee. They
Speaker 1: found two fake Republicans and Kenzinger who was auditioning for
Speaker 1: job at CNN and Liz Cheney who hates Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and any other real conservative and they threw them on
Speaker 1: a committee and they had what was no different than
Speaker 1: a kangaroo court against the president. Yet again, and now
Speaker 1: we know that on only you do they know they
Speaker 1: were lying to you. But then they decided to destroy
Speaker 1: much of the evidence they collected because they knew it
Speaker 1: wouldn't back up their claims, and then they wouldn't let
Speaker 1: us see the tapes. Now they also and we found
Speaker 1: out today, and this is really really important that they
Speaker 1: destroyed this evidence despite being told by the then incoming
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House, ca Evan McCarthy in late twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two to preserve all of the evidence it had collected.
Speaker 1: So they knew the incoming speaker had already said, hey,
Speaker 1: you don't get rid of anything relating to January sixth,
Speaker 1: any of the evidence. We want to see it all.
Speaker 1: And what did the Democrats do. They said, Okay, sure,
Speaker 1: and then destroyed much of the evidence that they had
Speaker 1: on January the sixth, because they knew that if we
Speaker 1: saw it, and Republicans saw it and the public saw it,
Speaker 1: that they knew that they would be busted for lying
Speaker 1: to the American people. What they claim happened on January
Speaker 1: the sixth actually didn't happen. What they claimed happened in
Speaker 1: the days before January the sixth didn't actually happen. What
Speaker 1: they claimed about Donald Trump didn't actually happen. And Donald
Speaker 1: Trump actually did ask for National Guard troops before January
Speaker 1: the sixth to secure the capital and antiplos and the
Speaker 1: Democrats said no. Why do they say no? Well, now
Speaker 1: we understand why they said no. Because they knew there
Speaker 1: were FBI in formants and other bad actors who were
Speaker 1: going to be in around the Capitol and they wanted
Speaker 1: something bad to happen on January sixth so they could
Speaker 1: blame it on Donald J. Trump and the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: And by the way it worked, and once Republicans got
Speaker 1: back in charge, and once the election happened, the midterm election,
Speaker 1: they knew they had to get rid of the evidence
Speaker 1: and destroyed I'm quoting here much of the evidence from
Speaker 1: January the sixth, even though the House Speaker, the incoming
Speaker 1: House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, had said preserve all the evidence
Speaker 1: that was collected. It's even more ironic ause Donald Trump
Speaker 1: still faces federal charges of mishandling government documents. Yet the
Speaker 1: people that destroyed the January sixth evidence will not be
Speaker 1: held accountable for not preserving all of the evidence they
Speaker 1: had collected, even though they have a double standard for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump that they would even abide by. Just think
Speaker 1: about all of that. So when you look forward to
Speaker 1: this election and you go back over these stories, you
Speaker 1: go back over what I just said a moment ago, right,
Speaker 1: You've got a president that's in cognitive decline. The American
Speaker 1: people clearly see it. You have her who's out there
Speaker 1: saying I would have charged him if he was of
Speaker 1: clear mind and sound mind. But I didn't charge the
Speaker 1: president with mishandling classified documents because the feeble old man.
Speaker 1: You look at what they're doing to Donald Trump. You
Speaker 1: look at Representative Ken buck leaving Congress at the end
Speaker 1: of next week, screwing a Republicans yet again. You add
Speaker 1: all these stories up, do you understand what's happening right now?
Speaker 1: There's still come all of the corruption of the Biden
Speaker 1: crime family. Let me just give you one last example
Speaker 1: of this. Daily Mail just had an article that came
Speaker 1: out and says Biden forgot the year that Bo Biden's
Speaker 1: son died when Trump was elected. He forgot that and said, quote,
Speaker 1: I don't recall, I don't remember, and I have no
Speaker 1: g D idea more than one hundred times. The damning
Speaker 1: transcript of the interview with Robert Hurr now reveals, according
Speaker 1: to the transcript of the two day interview, Biden brought
Speaker 1: up Bo's death, not the other way around. The media
Speaker 1: reported it The mix up of Bo's death date during
Speaker 1: the interview directly contradicts Joe Biden the White House's fiery
Speaker 1: denial that it ever occurred. He was often confused by
Speaker 1: the dates he served, even as the vice president, didn't
Speaker 1: know the years and how classified documents ended up in
Speaker 1: his home. The transcripts confirm her is well looking at
Speaker 1: all of this and then saying, hey, we've got evidence here.
Speaker 1: But Biden was elderly his words, and forgetful his words,
Speaker 1: and had diminished faculties his words. But this is what
Speaker 1: we know. The President was angry. He was yelling, I
Speaker 1: have no idea, I have no you know, GD recollection
Speaker 1: of this, I have no GD idea more than a
Speaker 1: hundred times in his interview. Does that sound like a
Speaker 1: man that can handle the job of being president United
Speaker 1: States of America? Forget his politics. I'm just talking about
Speaker 1: handling it from a cognitive perspective. I think the answer
Speaker 1: is pretty clear. Hell no. This election coming up, the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party and the media are going to have to
Speaker 1: be perfect to convince enough people fifty plus one percent
Speaker 1: to vote for the president of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: Yet again, they are going to have to be perfect
Speaker 1: they're going to have to give you and throw doubt
Speaker 1: on everything whenever they can. Twenty four to seven. Don't
Speaker 1: fall for it. We're going to keep exposing them. Please
Speaker 1: make sure that you share this podcast with your family
Speaker 1: and your friends, and I will see you back here
Speaker 1: tomorrow