Speaker 1: There's a new report out that the transcripts now confirm
Speaker 1: that the January sixth Committee straight up lied about Trump
Speaker 1: attacking the Secret Service. You may remember that story that
Speaker 1: was leaked where they said that Donald Trump attacked the
Speaker 1: Secret Service. Well, the newly released transcripts of secret testimony
Speaker 1: at the January sixth committee showed that a witness testified
Speaker 1: then President Donald Trump had not wrestled with a Secret
Speaker 1: Service agent and had indeed requested troops to protect the capital.
Speaker 1: So they lied to you about January sixth on multiple issues.
Speaker 1: The transcript of a closed door interview with Deputy Chief
Speaker 1: of Staff or Notoh, and then representatively Liz Cheney, a
Speaker 1: useful idiot for the left. She was technically a Republican
Speaker 1: from Wyoming on January the twenty eighth. The twenty twenty
Speaker 1: two was hidden by the committee, we now know, as
Speaker 1: it played up sensational claims that the testimony clearly refuted. Now,
Speaker 1: In particular, Cheney boosted the accusations by former Trump aid
Speaker 1: Cassie Hutchinson, who claimed publicly and a great media fanfare,
Speaker 1: that Trump had tried to commandeer his presidential vehicle to
Speaker 1: drive to the Capitol Riot. Well, guess what it was
Speaker 1: reported on, and note at the time that Hutchinson's dramatic
Speaker 1: testimony in June of twenty twenty two and several people,
Speaker 1: including Ornado, were prepared to testify publicly to refute her claims,
Speaker 1: which were debunked in other ways as well. Cheney and
Speaker 1: the other members of the committee did not take up
Speaker 1: Ornado's offer, repeating the tactic that Representative Adam Schiff, the
Speaker 1: hardcore lying leftist Democrat from California, had used during the
Speaker 1: first impeachment inquiry of leaving inconvenient witnesses behind. Moreover, Cheney
Speaker 1: and the committee claimed in their final report that there
Speaker 1: was no evidence that Donald Trump had requested ten thousand
Speaker 1: thousand National Guard troops to protect the Capitol in fact,
Speaker 1: or NATO had testified during the hearing that Trump did
Speaker 1: exactly that. Molly Hemingway of the Federalists report on the
Speaker 1: existence of the Ornato transcript, which was unearthed by the
Speaker 1: House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight led by Representative Barry Loudermilk,
Speaker 1: a Republican from Georgia former Representative Lim Cheney. That's Dick
Speaker 1: Cheney's daughter, who is again a Democrat masquerating as a
Speaker 1: Republican on the January sixth Committee, we now know suppressed
Speaker 1: evidence the President Donald Trump pushed four to ten thousand
Speaker 1: National Guard troops to protect the nation's capital. A previously
Speaker 1: hidden transcript attained by the Federalists.
Speaker 2: Shows this as well.
Speaker 1: Cheney and her committee then falsely claimed they had quote
Speaker 1: unquote no evidence to support Trump's officials, claimed that the
Speaker 1: White House had communicated its desire for those ten thousand
Speaker 1: National Guard troops. In fact, an early transcript transcribed interview
Speaker 1: conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from McKey source.
Speaker 2: The interview, which Cheney attended.
Speaker 1: And personally participated in, was suppressed from public a release
Speaker 1: until today. Asked if he ever heard anything about Trump's
Speaker 1: deciding to go to the Capitol that day or not,
Speaker 1: said he didn't or not, said Trump had driven by
Speaker 1: a previous rally, had flown over another, and that handlers
Speaker 1: had previously decided against him joining the day's events. Lettermick,
Speaker 1: who was also targeted unfairly by the January sixth Committee
Speaker 1: with false accusations that he had given a tour to
Speaker 1: Capital rioters before the event, found earlier that the committee
Speaker 1: had destroyed much of the evidence did it collected?
Speaker 2: Now let me say this again.
Speaker 1: The January sixth committee, the committee they said was so important,
Speaker 1: it was like hunting down al Qaeda terrists, and that
Speaker 1: those on January the sixth, right, those at the Capitol
Speaker 1: on January sixth, were a domestic terrorist.
Speaker 2: They were terrorists.
Speaker 1: So difference in al Qaeda or isis the same committee
Speaker 1: and the same people that wouldn't answer the basic question
Speaker 1: or ask questions about, hey, how many FBI informants and
Speaker 1: how many different people in our government were masquerating to
Speaker 1: help support the idea of a riot on January sixth.
Speaker 1: Within the crowd, right, those people that won't answer those questions,
Speaker 1: they are sitting there saying, well, January sixth was not
Speaker 1: just an insurrection, but Donald Trump should be disqualified from
Speaker 1: being president because he supported it, advocated for it, and
Speaker 1: he didn't protect the American people even though he asked
Speaker 1: for ten thousand National Guard troops and guests who said
Speaker 1: no to it, you guessed it the Democrats in Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: because Nancy Pelosi was.
Speaker 2: The one that said no to it.
Speaker 1: Targeted conservative members of Car of Congress like Laudermilk who yes,
Speaker 1: gave tours but not to the rioters. And they hid
Speaker 1: all of this from you, all of this happening, and
Speaker 1: it happened because they knew the media would allow them
Speaker 1: to get away with it. They knew that you wouldn't
Speaker 1: be able to see the information if they destroyed it.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what we've now found. They went after
Speaker 1: the president. They had the January sixth Select Committee. They
Speaker 1: found two fake Republicans and Kenzinger who was auditioning for
Speaker 1: job at CNN, and Liz Cheney who hates Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and any other real conservative and they threw them on
Speaker 1: a committee and they had what was no different than
Speaker 1: a kangaroo court against the president. Yet again, and now
Speaker 1: we know that on only you do they know they
Speaker 1: were lying to you. But then they decided to destroy
Speaker 1: much of the evidence they collected because they knew it
Speaker 1: wouldn't back up their claims, and then they wouldn't let
Speaker 1: us see the tape. Yes, now they also and we
Speaker 1: found out today and this is really really important, that
Speaker 1: they destroyed this evidence despite being told by the then
Speaker 1: incoming Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, in late twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two, to preserve all of the evidence it had collected,
Speaker 1: so they knew the incoming speaker had already said, hey,
Speaker 1: you don't get rid of anything relating to January sixth,
Speaker 1: any of the evidence.
Speaker 2: We want to see it all. And what did the
Speaker 2: Democrats do?
Speaker 1: They said, okay, sure, and then destroyed much of the
Speaker 1: evidence that they had on January the sixth because they
Speaker 1: knew that if we saw it, and Republicans saw it
Speaker 1: and the public saw it, that they knew that they
Speaker 1: would be busted for lying to the American people. What
Speaker 1: they claim happened on January the sixth actually didn't happen.
Speaker 1: What they claimed happened in the days before January the
Speaker 1: sixth didn't actually happen. What they claimed about Donald Trump
Speaker 1: didn't actually happen. And Donald Trump actually did ask for
Speaker 1: National Guard troops before Jane Nuary the six to secure
Speaker 1: the capital and antiplos and the Democrats said no.
Speaker 2: Why do they say no?
Speaker 1: Well, now we understand why they said no, because they
Speaker 1: knew there were FBI in foremants and other bad actors
Speaker 1: who were going to be in around the Capitol and
Speaker 1: they wanted something bad to happen on January sixth so
Speaker 1: they could blame it on Donald J. Trump and the
Speaker 1: Republican Party. And by the way it worked, and once
Speaker 1: Republicans got back in charge, and once the election happened,
Speaker 1: the midterm election, they knew they had to get rid
Speaker 1: of the evidence, and the destroyed I'm quoting here much
Speaker 1: of the evidence from January the sixth, even though the
Speaker 1: House Speaker, the incoming House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, had said,
Speaker 1: preserve all the evidence that was collected. What's even more ironic,
Speaker 1: as Donald Trump still faces federal charges of mishandling government documents,
Speaker 1: Yet the people that destroyed the January sixth evidence will
Speaker 1: not be held accountable for not preserving all of the
Speaker 1: evidence they had collected, even though they have a doubles
Speaker 1: standard for Donald Trump that they would even abide by.
Speaker 2: Just think about all of that.
Speaker 1: So when you look forward to this election and you
Speaker 1: go back over these stories, you go back over what
Speaker 1: I just said a moment ago. Right, You've got a
Speaker 1: president that's in cognitive decline, and the American people clearly
Speaker 1: see it. You have her who's out there saying I
Speaker 1: would have charged him if he was of clear mind
Speaker 1: and sound mind. But I didn't charge the president with
Speaker 1: mishandling classified documents because a feeble old man. You look
Speaker 1: at what they're doing to Donald Trump. You look at
Speaker 1: Representative Ken buck leaving Congress at the end of next week,
Speaker 1: screwing Republicans. Yet again, you add all these stories up.
Speaker 1: Do you understand what's happening right now? Let me just
Speaker 1: give you one last example of this. Daily Mail just
Speaker 1: had an article that came out and says Biden forgot
Speaker 1: the year that Bo, Biden's son died when Trump was elected.
Speaker 1: He forgot that and said, quote, I don't recall, I
Speaker 1: don't remember, and I have no g D idea more
Speaker 1: than one hundred times. The damning transcript of the interview
Speaker 1: with Robert Hurr Now reveals, according to the transcript of
Speaker 1: the two day interview, Biden brought up Bo's death, not
Speaker 1: the other way rounds the media reported it. The mix
Speaker 1: up of Bo's death date during the interview directly contradicts
Speaker 1: Joe Biden the White House's fiery denial that it ever occurred.
Speaker 1: He was often confused by the dates he served, even
Speaker 1: as the Vice president, didn't know the years and how
Speaker 1: classified documents ended up in his home. The transcripts confirm
Speaker 1: her is well looking at all of this and then saying, hey,
Speaker 1: we've got evidence here. But Biden was elderly his words,
Speaker 1: and forgetful his words, and had diminished faculties his words.
Speaker 1: But this is what we know. The President was angry.
Speaker 1: He was yelling, I have no idea, I have no
Speaker 1: GD recollection of this, I have no GD idea more
Speaker 1: than one hundred times in his interview. Does that sound
Speaker 1: like a man that can handle the job of being
Speaker 1: president of United States of America?
Speaker 2: Forget his politics.
Speaker 1: I'm just talking about handling it from a cognitive perspective.
Speaker 1: I think the answer is pretty clear.
Speaker 2: Hell no.
Speaker 1: This election coming up, the Democratic Party and the media
Speaker 1: are going to have to be perfect to convince enough
Speaker 1: people fifty plus one percent to vote for the president
Speaker 1: of the United States of America. Yet again, they are
Speaker 1: going to have to be perfect. They're going to have
Speaker 1: to give you and throw doubt on everything whenever they
Speaker 1: can twenty four to seven. I'm going to tie this
Speaker 1: story to another important story. There is an Illinois judge.
Speaker 1: They removed Donald Trump from the primary ballot over January
Speaker 1: the sixth.
Speaker 2: The judge's name is Tracy Porter.
Speaker 1: You are not going to believe what I'm about to
Speaker 1: tell you about Tracy Porter and how insignificant of a
Speaker 1: judge Tracy Porter was until this move came down to
Speaker 1: remove Donald Trump from the primary ballot over January sixth.
Speaker 1: This judge in Illinois who had the power, and you
Speaker 1: want to talk about an abuse of power to take
Speaker 1: Donald Trump off the ballot in Illinois, is in fact,
Speaker 1: are you ready for this? A traffic court judge who
Speaker 1: presides over and I'm quoting from the website minor traffic
Speaker 1: violations and Class A misdemeanors quote unquote, a traffic court
Speaker 1: judge is the is the woman who somehow gained power
Speaker 1: and access to then take Donald Trump off of the ballot.
Speaker 1: Tracy Porter, the Chicago area judge who declared that former
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump would be ineligible topeal to appear on
Speaker 1: the Illinois primary ballot, joining a contentious national fight, was
Speaker 1: first appointed the position in twenty twenty one and ran
Speaker 1: as a Democrat for a full term in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: Judge Porter, who has been the circuit court position for
Speaker 1: less than three years, said she agreed with the Colorado
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, which also ruled Trump could not appear in
Speaker 1: the state's twenty twenty four primary because the post Civil
Speaker 1: War Fourteenth Amendment bars people who have engaged in insurrection
Speaker 1: rebellion from holding office. A native of Chicago's South Side,
Speaker 1: this is coming from Forbes by the way, who is
Speaker 1: licensed to practice law in Illinois, New York. Porter earned
Speaker 1: her bachelor's degree in international business from Cornell College in
Speaker 1: Iowa before earning her law degree from Drake University. Porter
Speaker 1: then spent four years as a litigation attorney with the
Speaker 1: Office of Solicitor in the US Department of Labour in
Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties before working in private practice and then academia.
Speaker 1: She was then appointed You ready for this long career
Speaker 1: dating back to the nineties, she finally gets her big
Speaker 1: break in twenty twenty one when she was appointed to
Speaker 1: a traffic court position. She then won an election for
Speaker 1: a full term as the Cook County Circuit Court judge
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two. She is a traffic court lawyer,
Speaker 1: or I should say, let me rephrase that, a traffic
Speaker 1: court judge.
Speaker 2: Porter by the way said.
Speaker 1: After twenty twenty appointment quote, my motto is impacting lives
Speaker 1: and changing communities, and that is how I will approach
Speaker 1: this position.
Speaker 2: Uh huh Okay.
Speaker 1: So taking a former president off the ballot apparently fits
Speaker 1: in that got it. A group of five Illinois residents
Speaker 1: filed a challenge to Trump's candidacy in Illinois in January,
Speaker 1: in coordination with the Free Speech for People, the same
Speaker 1: group that tried to have Trump removed from ballots to Michigan, Minnesota,
Speaker 1: in Oregon. The States Born of Elections dismissed the case
Speaker 1: in January and ruled Trump counds down the Republican primary ballot,
Speaker 1: but the Prisi Janners immediately appealed the decision. Then this
Speaker 1: judge comes in and does this. The media would be
Speaker 1: going berserk if some random Republican judge did this to,
Speaker 1: for example, keep Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton or Barack
Speaker 1: Obama off the ballot. They're not even covering and telling
Speaker 1: you that this judge is a traffic court judge who
Speaker 1: just decided to go rogue and take the American people's
Speaker 1: right to choose who their leader is in Illinois and
Speaker 1: could have precedent on these other states. They're not going
Speaker 1: to tell you the truth behind this at all. This
Speaker 1: is the same, by the way, media that will tell
Speaker 1: you that Joe Biden, who's at the border right now,
Speaker 1: that he's got it under control with the border. This
Speaker 1: is the same president who has insisted there was not
Speaker 1: a crisis. This is the same president that laughed as
Speaker 1: the border crisis rage when people were concerned about it.
Speaker 1: This is the same president who has said that there's
Speaker 1: nothing he can do to stop the flow of I
Speaker 1: legal immigrants at the border, even though they even bragged
Speaker 1: about how many executive orders they undid from Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: The first day was an office that dealt with the border.
Speaker 1: Let me remind you of this president lying to you
Speaker 1: back in April of twenty twenty one. Then the second clip,
Speaker 1: you're gonna hear us from March of twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: Then you're gonna hear a clip from May of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, and then another one in January of this year.
Speaker 1: Here's the president on the border.
Speaker 3: In April alone, this president one hundred and seventy thousand
Speaker 3: people migrants appring it at the border.
Speaker 2: This is twenty twenty one April.
Speaker 3: Listen, it's a twenty year record that summons to most
Speaker 3: folks like a crisis.
Speaker 4: Well, look it's way down now, we've now gotten control.
Speaker 2: Is there is there a crisis at the border sir, No,
Speaker 2: we'll be able to handle it. That's what he said.
Speaker 2: In March twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: Move forward to May twenty twenty three, things.
Speaker 2: Are gonna have a border, sir, much tighter than much burden.
Speaker 1: You all expect it, much better than you all expected,
Speaker 1: he laughs at you. In May of twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: that was around the time he fell off his bicycle
Speaker 1: not kidding in Delaware. And then January of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: you hear a reporter mister president.
Speaker 4: Which she called the southern border of flight.
Speaker 1: Would you call the situation at the southern border a crisis? No, no, no,
Speaker 1: there it is the President United States of America. No,
Speaker 1: this is not a problem at the border. Everything is fine,
Speaker 1: Everything is okay. They will look at you and they
Speaker 1: will lie to your face. I'll go back to the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family for a second, just to give you
Speaker 1: another example of the media. Representative Dan Goldman, a Democrat
Speaker 1: from New York, came out and he was delusional. Dan
Speaker 1: Golden insisted there's actually a quote, a very understandable, coherent
Speaker 1: business explanation for the Bidens families corrupt foreign business schemes.
Speaker 1: Listen to what he said. A press conference earlier on that.
Speaker 3: There is a very understandable, coherent business explanation for every
Speaker 3: single thing that they asked for. And now that all
Speaker 3: of this China stuff or Romania or Kazakhstan is clearly
Speaker 3: clearly baseless and bogus, the only thing that the Republicans
Speaker 3: have left are these barisma allegations.
Speaker 1: These guys, I mean Eric Swearin, the guy who was
Speaker 1: literally sleeping with the enemy of Chinese spy standing over
Speaker 1: his left shoulder. These are the same people that stand
Speaker 1: there and they tell you that it that it is,
Speaker 1: that there's very and actually very understandable coherent business explanation. Okay,
Speaker 1: what were they then? What was the business of the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family? I'm serious, what was it they were doing?
Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, back to the border real
Speaker 1: quick again part of.
Speaker 2: The lies the media.
Speaker 1: Just on Monday alone, on Monday alone, five hundred and
Speaker 1: eleven illegal immigrants were encountered at the Eagle Pass station
Speaker 1: where President Trump is visiting. Just twelve illegal immigrants were
Speaker 1: encountered at the Brownsville station where Biden is visiting. You
Speaker 1: notice even where they go, it's disingenuous. On Monday, five
Speaker 1: hundred and eleven illegal immigrants are encountered where Trump is
Speaker 1: going today, and just twelve illegal immigants are encountered at
Speaker 1: the Brownsville station where Biden's visiting, so he can go
Speaker 1: down there and say, see.
Speaker 2: There's not really a problem here.
Speaker 1: You want to know how many illegal immigrant apprehensions there
Speaker 1: were on Monday four thousand, seven hundred and fifty two
Speaker 1: human beings listen.
Speaker 5: Customs and Border Protection Forces told Fox News that nearly
Speaker 5: five thousand illegals were apprehended along the southern border from
Speaker 5: California through Texas in a single day on Monday. The
Speaker 5: Eagle Pass station in the Del Rio sector where Trump
Speaker 5: is headed, and Brownsville, Texas reported five hundred eleven apprehensions
Speaker 5: on Monday. Brownsville station in the Rio Grande Valley sector,
Speaker 5: where President Biden will be only twelve were reported. Texas's
Speaker 5: lieutenant governor is going after Biden's well location.
Speaker 6: He doesn't care. This is all about the politics of
Speaker 6: the future. They want millions to come here become citizens
Speaker 6: than voters so they can control the country, and they
Speaker 6: don't care. It's obvious they don't care who dies to
Speaker 6: meet those goals.
Speaker 1: I mean, you think about this president. This president will
Speaker 1: lie to you. He will find the part of the
Speaker 1: border that has the least number of interactions of illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants and go there and he'll tell you that, hey,
Speaker 1: it's not really that bad. And you'll have the Democrats
Speaker 1: come out and they'll tell you the same thing. Hey, guys,
Speaker 1: it's really just not that bad. They'll tell you there's
Speaker 1: a legitimate reason for the Biden crime family to make
Speaker 1: millions and millions and millions and millions of dollars, millions
Speaker 1: and millions of dollars, and then they won't tell you
Speaker 1: what the legitimate reason actually is. Department of Homeland Security
Speaker 1: Secretary of my Orchis, by the way, claims there is
Speaker 1: no executive action Biden can take to fix the border crisis,
Speaker 1: saying this at the southern border, listen on your.
Speaker 7: Known executive actions that the president can take to reduce
Speaker 7: the number the large number of migrants that are coming
Speaker 7: to the US Mexico border that we saw in twenty
Speaker 7: twenty three and continue this year.
Speaker 8: The fact of the matter is that the only enduring
Speaker 8: solution is legislation. Congress needs to act. We have a
Speaker 8: bipartisan piece of legislation that three senators worked on intensely
Speaker 8: for a number of months. I was very privileged to
Speaker 8: be at the table to provide technical and operational expertise.
Speaker 8: The administration was represented at the table. We need Congress
Speaker 8: to act.
Speaker 2: There's your last and final lie of the show. Today.
Speaker 2: He's sitting there telling you there's nothing he can do.
Speaker 2: There's nothing you can do, There's nothing can do. He
Speaker 2: knows your something can do.
Speaker 1: He knows that the border was secure, and the number
Speaker 1: one thing that changed that was the executive actions that
Speaker 1: were rescinded when he became president of what Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was doing. And they will lie to your face and
Speaker 1: tell you, well, the only way to fix this problem
Speaker 1: is Congress act. Because they know that Congress isn't going
Speaker 1: to act, and therefore they can keep flooding the southern border.
Speaker 1: And they are lying to you. The White House keep
Speaker 1: saying over and over again, there's nothing they can do.
Speaker 1: Their hands are tied. They can't stop the illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: coming across the border. Congress must act. Now, let me
Speaker 1: remind you Myorcus has been impeached. There were two impeachment
Speaker 1: articles that were approved against my Orcus by the Household
Speaker 1: d Security Committee. One accused him of having refused to
Speaker 1: comply with federal immigration laws, and the other of having
Speaker 1: violated public trust. He was found to be those articles
Speaker 1: impeachment that he was found guilty of in the House. Well,
Speaker 1: now see what the Senate does. Obviously controlled by the Democrats.
Speaker 1: I bet you can guess what they're going to do.
Speaker 1: Let me just remind you that Biden rescinded all of
Speaker 1: Trump's policies that worked, and now he claims there's nothing
Speaker 1: in do through executive order that would stop the problem
Speaker 1: of the border. Take a listen to what John Handy
Speaker 1: said about this just a couple of days ago.
Speaker 9: This weekend, may Orcus tried to deflect responsibility for his
Speaker 9: role in the crisis, claiming, oh, the system has been
Speaker 9: broken for years and repeating the lie that they need
Speaker 9: Congress to fix it.
Speaker 2: No, they don't.
Speaker 5: Take a look, do you bear responsibility for what is
Speaker 5: happening at the border with the President himself has called
Speaker 5: a crisis.
Speaker 10: It certainly is a crisis, And well, we don't bear
Speaker 10: responsibility for a broken system, and we're doing a tremendous
Speaker 10: amount within that broken system. But fundamentally, fundamentally, Congress is
Speaker 10: the only one who can fix it.
Speaker 9: Joe Biden would just have to undrescind the ones he
Speaker 9: rescinded when he got the most secure borders in history.
Speaker 9: In other words, he rescinded all the Trump policies that worked. Recently,
Speaker 9: Joe Biden repeated the same lie.
Speaker 2: Take a look all I could be the good. Give
Speaker 2: me the power the day I let it off, Give
Speaker 2: me the borders to give me the judgment.
Speaker 9: Joe, you have the power. With the stroke of a pen.
Speaker 9: You we rescinded the Trump policies that were working. With
Speaker 9: the stroke of a pen, you can put them back.
Speaker 2: In place now.
Speaker 9: If the system, by the way, has been broken for
Speaker 9: so long, then we have to ask ourselves, why did
Speaker 9: Joe Biden and the entire Biden administration, why did the
Speaker 9: country all of you for three years? How many times
Speaker 9: did they tell you that the border was secure and
Speaker 9: the border was closed or fresher.
Speaker 2: Summons to most folks like a crisis. Well, look it's
Speaker 2: way down now.
Speaker 4: We've now gotten.
Speaker 10: Control precisely that the border is closed. Nor could I
Speaker 10: have been clearer and continue to be so?
Speaker 2: Which is the border is closed.
Speaker 7: The United States will continue to enforce our laws and
Speaker 7: secure our border.
Speaker 10: The border we are working to make the border more secure.
Speaker 2: You're confident this border secure. We have.
Speaker 1: A secure border and that that is a priority for
Speaker 1: any nation, including hours in our administration.
Speaker 2: We agree that the border is secure.
Speaker 1: We agree that the border is secure. They were lying
Speaker 1: to you. Now, this is not working with the American voters.
Speaker 1: So now they're moving to their next phase of how
Speaker 1: they lie to the American people. Rus Murphy, he's on
Speaker 1: the Appropriations Committee. He is a Democrat. He went on
Speaker 1: CNN as the President was at the border, as Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was at the border, and he was asked now
Speaker 1: about the quote language that Donald Trump and other conservatives
Speaker 1: are using. So guess what if you're in favor of
Speaker 1: securing the border. Now they're going exactly back to the
Speaker 1: same rhetoric they use in twenty sixteen. Remember when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said that they are a race, they're rapists, there are.
Speaker 2: Murderers, there are drug.
Speaker 1: Dealers, there are gang members, there's bad actors. A lot
Speaker 1: of them coming across the southern border are bad actors.
Speaker 1: And what did the what did the media say, and
Speaker 1: what did Joe Biden say, and where the left say,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, Donald Trump is a racist. And if
Speaker 1: you vote for Donald Trump. You're a racist and you
Speaker 1: hate Mexicans.
Speaker 2: Right. That was the.
Speaker 1: Takeaway from Donald Trump telling the truth about who was
Speaker 1: coming across the southern border. He didn't say all of
Speaker 1: them rapists. He didn't say all of them were drug dealers.
Speaker 1: He didn't say all of them were gang members. He
Speaker 1: didn't say all of them were murderers. What he said
Speaker 1: was there were bad actors that were a part of
Speaker 1: the people that are coming across the border.
Speaker 2: Now we know how bad it is.
Speaker 1: Now it is the crime that was happening at the
Speaker 1: southern border is now happening everywhere in America. Look at
Speaker 1: the last week alone, the last week alone, you look
Speaker 1: at the list of people that have died. Within a week,
Speaker 1: five illegal immigrants have been arrested for raping a woman
Speaker 1: in Florida in another state, murdering a college student in
Speaker 1: Georgia in another state, murdering a two year old in
Speaker 1: Maryland in another state, sexually assault against a minor in Virginia,
Speaker 1: yes another state, raping a fourteen year old girl, and
Speaker 1: stabbing a man in Louisiana. And now three different police
Speaker 1: officers have been shot by an elite go immigrant in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: Was Donald Trump right with what he said when he
Speaker 1: ran in sixteen, Absolutely? But what are the Democrats doing now,
Speaker 1: Senator Chris Murphy coming out saying anyone that says that,
Speaker 1: you know they want to secure the border, they're racists.
Speaker 11: Listen, Senator, you led the bipartisan negotiations to reach some
Speaker 11: kind of a deal on enhancing border security and addressing
Speaker 11: some of the issues surrounding illegal immigration, particularly over the
Speaker 11: southern border. Yesterday, both President Biden and Donald Trump went
Speaker 11: to the border on the same day. Donald Trump, when
Speaker 11: he was speaking, used the language of invasion, talked about
Speaker 11: the United States being invaded. What do you think of
Speaker 11: that language?
Speaker 4: I just think it's disgusting. I think because racist, ha seenophobic.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump doesn't know what an invasion looks like. Go
Speaker 4: to Ukraine. See what happens when a neighboring country actually
Speaker 4: invades you and kills hundreds of thousand and tens of
Speaker 4: thousands of your citizens.
Speaker 1: You listen to that, the President called it an invasion.
Speaker 1: Here's the question I would ask Sner Chris Murphy. When
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand people come across the border illegally, what
Speaker 1: would you call that? When two hundred thousand people come
Speaker 1: across the border illegally, What would you call that? When
Speaker 1: three hundred thousand people come across the border illegally, what
Speaker 1: would you call that? When four hundred thousand people come
Speaker 1: across the southern border, what would you call that? I
Speaker 1: mean this sincerely, what would you call it? If it's
Speaker 1: not an invasion, then what is it?
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: Someone tell me what it is. I want to know
Speaker 1: what it is. I want to know exactly what you
Speaker 1: call it. When million of people are coming across the
Speaker 1: border illegally, the most important word is the word illegally.
Speaker 1: It is, by the way, an invasion. That's what it is.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Is it different than the invasion of the Russians and Ukraine?
Speaker 1: Sure you could say that it is. But how many
Speaker 1: Americans have been killed? You know what the number one
Speaker 1: killer is in this country fetanyl? And that is part
Speaker 1: of what is part of the invasion of those that
Speaker 1: are coming into the United States of America. The people that
Speaker 1: are invading are bringing fetanyl in at record rates.
Speaker 2: That is a fact.
Speaker 1: They are bringing in fetnol at rates that are killing
Speaker 1: the number one killer people in this country forty nine
Speaker 1: and under is fetanyl. There is an invasion by drug
Speaker 1: dealers who are killing Americans by the hundreds of thousands.
Speaker 1: Compare that to the invasion in Ukraine. More Americans are
Speaker 1: dying because of the open border, because of the invasion
Speaker 1: at the border, than at any other time in a
Speaker 1: modern American history. The number one killer people in this
Speaker 1: country is fetnyl and that is part of the invasion.
Speaker 1: And then he says, well, using the word invasion is
Speaker 1: is racist.
Speaker 2: And xenophobic and evil. Let me just be honest with you.
Speaker 1: I'll use the word invasion every single day because that's
Speaker 1: what it is. It's an invasion. We know it's an invasion.
Speaker 1: The numbers show it's an invasion. And in fact, we
Speaker 1: should all double down and use the word invasion because
Speaker 1: that's what it is. And this is how they're going
Speaker 1: to publicly shame us. They're hoping that what they did
Speaker 1: in sixteen will work again with voters. They're hoping if
Speaker 1: they say if you want to secure border, oh you're
Speaker 1: a racist, right, that you'll be silent and seeing guilty
Speaker 1: into saying okay, I'll be quiet, all right, I'll vote
Speaker 1: for I'll vote for Joe Biden. Don't fall for this.
Speaker 1: Fight back, this is going to trickle out. I have
Speaker 1: a feeling more. I'm gonna cover it all for you.
Speaker 1: Make sure that you download the Ben Ferguson Podcast every day.
Speaker 2: We'll keep you updated.
Speaker 1: Hit the share button on our podcast as well. If
Speaker 1: you miss a show, go back and listen. We're gonna
Speaker 1: cover it all and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Speaker 1: on the Ben Ferguson Podcast