Speaker 1: Shocking news coming out of Moscow, and there is an
Speaker 1: awful lot of people that are trying to use this
Speaker 1: to their advantage. And I want you to understand what
Speaker 1: I mean by that. Ukraine is now saying that their
Speaker 1: intelligence says that Russian special services were behind the attack
Speaker 1: on their own people. That does not match up with
Speaker 1: what we've been told from intelligence briefings. However, as Isis
Speaker 1: is also claiming responsibility. And the US embassy warned Americans
Speaker 1: to avoid Moscow concerts weeks before the attacks. And what
Speaker 1: did Vladimir Putin say about that? He said, it was
Speaker 1: propaganda from the West, that's right, propaganda from the West
Speaker 1: and dismissed it. Now, three days ago, Putin dismissed US
Speaker 1: warnings about a possible terrorist attack in Masa at crowded venues.
Speaker 1: He said, and I'm quoting Putin now, it was quote
Speaker 1: outright blackmail by the West and an attempt to intimidate
Speaker 1: and destabilize our society yet again, and this is an
Speaker 1: example of Vladimir Putin not caring about his own people.
Speaker 1: The UK and the US warning Russia of an imminent
Speaker 1: attack in Moscow, and Putin said it was the West
Speaker 1: that was just putting out the propaganda to undermine Russia
Speaker 1: and that everything was totally fine. It is hard to
Speaker 1: watch this happen. The White House also saying that there
Speaker 1: is no indication Ukraine was connected to the Russian shooting.
Speaker 1: I want you to hear what they said at the
Speaker 1: White House briefing about this earlier today.
Speaker 2: We've all seen the reports in the video coming out
Speaker 2: of Moscow, this violent shooting at a looks like a
Speaker 2: shopping mall. Can't speak much to the details of it.
Speaker 2: I mean, this was all just breaking before I came
Speaker 2: on out here, so we're trying to get more information,
Speaker 2: but really would refer to Russian authorities to speak to it.
Speaker 2: The images are just horrible and just hard to watch.
Speaker 2: There is no indication at this time that Ukraine or
Speaker 2: Ukrainians were involved in the shooting. But again this just
Speaker 2: we we're taking a look at it, but I would
Speaker 2: disabuse you at this early hour of any connection to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Now, Ukraine is already blaming Russia for doing this, saying
Speaker 1: this is an essence and inside job and they killed
Speaker 1: their own people. Isis is claiming responsibility for this attack,
Speaker 1: so that is undermining Ukraine's standpoint is iceis is saying,
Speaker 1: uh uh, this is us. Now. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: what the reports say. Early reports said it was between
Speaker 1: forty to seventy people that had died and well over
Speaker 1: one hundred that were wounded. Reports, however, coming from RT
Speaker 1: which is Russia today, this is Russian state television, are
Speaker 1: saying something different at this hour. I'm gonna give you
Speaker 1: what they're saying, and this is what we have coming
Speaker 1: out of Russia from basically the Russian government. The terrorist
Speaker 1: attack on the Krocas City concert Hall and mal in
Speaker 1: Moscow on Friday night has reportedly not concluded at press time.
Speaker 1: This is coming from Russia today and has left over
Speaker 1: one hundred casualties. The Russian outlet RT is reporting. The
Speaker 1: Russian FSB security service announced it had documented at least
Speaker 1: forty killed and over one hundred injured in the attacks.
Speaker 1: Earlier in the day. Multiple reports in Russian media have
Speaker 1: reported the presence of at least three gunmen participating in
Speaker 1: the attack, and you can see those now on videos
Speaker 1: that gone viral of the actual attack in the concert hall.
Speaker 1: The terrafts, reportedly dressed in camouflage, stormed the venue and
Speaker 1: open fire at the audience. Inside the concert hall with
Speaker 1: what some reports indicate were automatic weapons. Now watching the videos,
Speaker 1: it's very obvious they are automatic weapons. The Terrats also
Speaker 1: reportedly detonated a grenade, setting the Kracus City complex on fire.
Speaker 1: The fire is so large that the Russian government had
Speaker 1: to put a water discharging helicopter to end it and
Speaker 1: has prepared two more to fly in, according to Riia
Speaker 1: Media out of Russia. Videos on social media shared by
Speaker 1: Russian news outlets such as RT and and RHEA, as
Speaker 1: well as others, show panic concertgoers attempting to hide under
Speaker 1: seats and the sounds of gunfire. Reports indicated that one
Speaker 1: one of the assailants that neated the grenade, causing the
Speaker 1: ongoing fire inside of the hall. They're shooting from a
Speaker 1: machine gun. They're shooting from in the crowd. One person's
Speaker 1: heard saying in Russian on the video. The footage from
Speaker 1: the Kracas City Hall in Moscow is now everywhere. This
Speaker 1: is where it took place, and there are dead and wounded.
Speaker 1: You can clearly see all over the concert hall. Now.
Speaker 1: They say that at least three men wearing camouflage open
Speaker 1: fire inside the Krocas City Hall, a popular concert venue.
Speaker 1: In Moscow suburbs. The state run Riot Novisti news agency
Speaker 1: is confirming that now at least twelve people they said
Speaker 1: were killed instantly in the first reports, and now the
Speaker 1: reports from RT are saying it's over one hundred. The
Speaker 1: fire was massive by the way, and there was an explosion.
Speaker 1: They don't know if that was a gas line or what.
Speaker 1: That took place after the initial fire was and like
Speaker 1: I said, they had to fly in water from helicopters.
Speaker 1: People in the hall laid down on the ground to
Speaker 1: avoid the fire, lighing there for about fifteen to twenty minutes.
Speaker 1: Afterwards they began to crawl out. Many managed to get out.
Speaker 1: The Russian outlets reported They said that at least one
Speaker 1: hundred people have been evacuated, but quote the Russian Health
Speaker 1: Ministry saying that it was responding to the incident with
Speaker 1: over seventy ambulances, suggesting that there are a significant number
Speaker 1: of casualties that may not have even been counted yet. Now.
Speaker 1: As a press time, the latest update from RT indicated
Speaker 1: that the terrorists have reportedly barricade themselves inside of the
Speaker 1: burning building. The group has apparently not attempted to take
Speaker 1: hostages or make any statements shooting people on site. Instead,
Speaker 1: the attackers are at large in the complex as of
Speaker 1: press time from RT again Russia today. Now we also
Speaker 1: have a new update, and this is what we're being
Speaker 1: told now is that isis is claiming responsibility for the attack.
Speaker 1: Russian authorities have not given at the time I'm recording
Speaker 1: this any public statements blaming any individuals or groups for
Speaker 1: the incident. Now, obviously we're expecting that at some point,
Speaker 1: but as the time that I'm recording that, we've not
Speaker 1: gotten that yet. That may change by the time that
Speaker 1: you obviously hear this, So I want to let you
Speaker 1: know that as well. Some reports indicated that less than
Speaker 1: a week ago that this was something that was absolutely
Speaker 1: imminent and going to happen. The US Embassy in Moscow
Speaker 1: warned that it had information suggesting Terris would target concert
Speaker 1: venues in the near future, and warning Americans, especially in Moscow,
Speaker 1: to stay clear of concert venues and large venues. Now,
Speaker 1: it is not clear at this point whether the warning
Speaker 1: was prompted by threats to the Crocus city or similar
Speaker 1: venues like this. What we do know is Russian TV
Speaker 1: is reporting shortly before the terrorist attack occurred that Russian
Speaker 1: law enforcement authorities had arrested seven men accus of attempting
Speaker 1: to create an armed cell, allegedly to fight against the
Speaker 1: Russian military in Ukraine. No reports at that news agency
Speaker 1: or elsewhere at press time have linked the bus to
Speaker 1: the krakuss City attack, so it may have been something
Speaker 1: completely different. And again ISIS is claiming a responsibility for
Speaker 1: this attack, and they have not taken hostages. The gunmen
Speaker 1: are still in the venue that is on fire. That
Speaker 1: was what we are being told. A lot of this
Speaker 1: will obviously change. What we do know is the death toll,
Speaker 1: depending on which agencies you look at, varies, but it
Speaker 1: is significant, and the number of wounded is well above
Speaker 1: one hundred, and there's it's a very good chance the
Speaker 1: death toll will also be, depending on which reports you
Speaker 1: look at, over one hundred. Now there is politics involved
Speaker 1: in this already, as you can tell. Russia's wanting to
Speaker 1: blame Ukraine, Ukraine saying that this is Russia that did
Speaker 1: it to themselves, and then ISIS saying no, no, no,
Speaker 1: it was us. Both sides, Russian Ukraine are going to
Speaker 1: try to use this for propaganda. Vladimir Putin, I'm sure
Speaker 1: is hoping to use this to rally the Russian people
Speaker 1: against Ukraine and to use it as a is probably
Speaker 1: provocation to be able to do a major strike in
Speaker 1: Ukraine claiming it's in retaliation for this. It will also
Speaker 1: be very interesting to see what ISIS does, as in
Speaker 1: videos and or showing proof that if they did do this,
Speaker 1: that it was actually them. But regardless of this, the
Speaker 1: next twenty four to forty eight hours are going to
Speaker 1: be very interesting to see how all of this plays out.
Speaker 1: There is some big breaking news that I want to
Speaker 1: get to you and it's important and it deals with
Speaker 1: the CIA covering up some of the crimes of the
Speaker 1: Biden crime family. The CIA, and this is now coming
Speaker 1: from whistleblowers, blocked the FEDS from interviewing Hunter Biden's sugar daddy,
Speaker 1: that is that attorney Kevin Morris, who has lent him
Speaker 1: millions of dollars that aren't going to have to start
Speaker 1: being paid back until after the election. That's right. The
Speaker 1: CIA blocked federal investigators from interviewing Hunter Biden's sugar daddy,
Speaker 1: Kevin Morris, during a five year probe into the suns
Speaker 1: alleged tax crimes. That is what new whistleblowers have come
Speaker 1: forward and told the House impeachment leaders. House Oversight and
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee chairman says the whistleblower informed them the Intelligence
Speaker 1: Agency stopped IRS and stopped Justice Department investigators from interviewing
Speaker 1: Morris in August of twenty twenty one. Now, Morris is
Speaker 1: that Hollywood lawyer. He was interviewed by the House Ways
Speaker 1: and Means Committee and the Oversight Judiciary Committees on January
Speaker 1: the eighteenth. But never before did we know about the
Speaker 1: CIA stopping him from being interviewed. This Hollywood lawyer and
Speaker 1: BFF for the first son has now admitted, Yeah, I've
Speaker 1: loaned him a bunch of money. Now, before we get
Speaker 1: to that cash, let me tell you about the whistleblower
Speaker 1: and that informed the House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer
Speaker 1: and the Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan that not one, but
Speaker 1: two Department of Justice officials were apparently summoned to the
Speaker 1: CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Now at this meeting, apparently
Speaker 1: what happened was they were told that Morris could not
Speaker 1: be a witness quote unquote for the investigation into Hunter.
Speaker 1: You have to ask yourself the reason why was the
Speaker 1: CIA blocking federal investigators from interviewing Hunter Biden's sugar daddy,
Speaker 1: Kevin Morris. Like, that doesn't seem normal, right, It's a
Speaker 1: five year probe. Why is it all of a sudden
Speaker 1: they're being summoned to go to the CIA headquarters at
Speaker 1: Languy and said, hey, you can't talk to this guy. Quote.
Speaker 1: It is unknown why or on what basis the CIA
Speaker 1: allegedly intervened to prevent investigators from interviewing mister Morris. Comer
Speaker 1: and Jordan have now written a letter, which was obtained
Speaker 1: by The New York Post. However, these allegations track with
Speaker 1: other evidence showing how the Department of Justice deviated from
Speaker 1: its standard practices, their standard investigative practices during the investigation
Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden. Yet again, now let me read for
Speaker 1: you this letter, and it's an important letter, and I
Speaker 1: want you to understand exactly what is being said here
Speaker 1: by by James Comer and Jim Jordan. It's important. This
Speaker 1: letter was written to the Director of the CIA, the
Speaker 1: Honorable William J. Burns, says, Dear Director Burns, the House
Speaker 1: Committee on Oversight and Accountability, the Oversight Committee, and the
Speaker 1: House Committee on the Judiciary Judiciary Committee collectively, and the
Speaker 1: committees are investigating whether sufficient grounds exist to draft articles
Speaker 1: of impeachment against President Biden for consideration by the Full House,
Speaker 1: along with the House Committee on Ways and Means. The
Speaker 1: committees set forth in a September the twenty seventh, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three memorandum, the evidence justifying the inquiry and scope
Speaker 1: of the impeachment investigation. The letter then says, on December thirteenth,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, the House Representative adopted a resolution directing
Speaker 1: the Committee to continue this investigation. Recently, the Committee's received
Speaker 1: information from a whistleblower alleging that the Central Intelligence Agency
Speaker 1: CIA intervened in the investigation of Hunter Biden to prevent
Speaker 1: the Internal Revenue Service IRS and the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: the DOJ investigators from interviewing a witness. We therefore write
Speaker 1: to request relevant materials from the CIA. The letter goes
Speaker 1: on to say, as part of the impeachment inquiry, the
Speaker 1: committees are investigating, among other things, whether President Biden abused
Speaker 1: his power as president to impede, obstruct, or otherwise hinder
Speaker 1: investigations or the prosecution of Hunter Biden. As background, for years,
Speaker 1: the IRS and DJ have been investigating Hunter Biden for
Speaker 1: tax crimes. The committees have documented how the DOJ deviated
Speaker 1: from its standard processes to afford preferential treatment to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: The committees learned about the deviation in the spring of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, after Too Brave was a Blow was
Speaker 1: testified to Congress that the DOJ officials deviated from the
Speaker 1: normal process that provided preferential treatment in the case to
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Among other deviations, the letter continues, DOJ officials
Speaker 1: restricted that investigative step and the investigators what they could pursue.
Speaker 1: They also tipped off Hunter Biden's attorneys about investigative steps
Speaker 1: and even prevented investigators from conducting witness interviews. The whistleblower
Speaker 1: testimony about the preferential treatment provided to Hunter Biden has
Speaker 1: been cooperated by testimony from other witnesses and the documents
Speaker 1: that the Committee has received. The information we recently reviewed
Speaker 1: and recently received from the whistleblower seems to cooperate our
Speaker 1: concerns about the Department of Justices deviations from standard process
Speaker 1: to provide Hunter Biden with preferential treatment. So there is
Speaker 1: a pattern here, by the way, and I think that's
Speaker 1: why it's so important that you look at this letter
Speaker 1: in the way that it's being talked about. It's very
Speaker 1: clear that there is an obvious pattern here, and it
Speaker 1: is a pattern by this Department of Justice, and a
Speaker 1: pattern by the IRS, and a pattern by the FBI,
Speaker 1: and a pattern by the CIA when they were instructed
Speaker 1: by whoever in the Biden administration, etc. To not pursue
Speaker 1: areas that they were going to be extremely problematic for
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. And that's what they're slaying out
Speaker 1: here in this letter to the CIA director. Now, I
Speaker 1: want to go back to this letter and read this.
Speaker 1: In August twenty twenty one, when IRS investigators were preparing
Speaker 1: to interview Patrick Kevin Morris, an associate of Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: the CIA intervened to stop the interview to DOJ officials
Speaker 1: or summoned to the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia for
Speaker 1: a briefing regarding mister Morris. At that meeting, it was
Speaker 1: communicated that mister Morris could not be a witness during
Speaker 1: the investigation. It is unknown why or on what basis
Speaker 1: the CIA allegedly intervened to prevent investigators from interviewing mister Morris. However,
Speaker 1: These allegations track with other evidence showing how the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice deviated from its standard investigative practices during the
Speaker 1: investigation of Hunter Biden. Now, accordingly, to further the Committee's
Speaker 1: ongoing oversight and impeachment inquiry, they're then saying this in
Speaker 1: the letter number one, please provide the following documents and information.
Speaker 1: One all documents and communications referring or relating to the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice and or Internal Revenue Service investigation of
Speaker 1: Robert Hunter Biden. And two all documents and communications referring
Speaker 1: or relating to Patrick Kevin Morris, including but not limited
Speaker 1: to efforts to interview mister Morris as part of the
Speaker 1: investigation of Robert Hunter Biden. Finally, they say, please provide
Speaker 1: the information request as soon as possible, but no letter
Speaker 1: than five pm on April fourth, twenty twenty four. If
Speaker 1: you have any questions about the request, please contract the
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee staff. And then it gives the phone number,
Speaker 1: signed James Comer and Jim Jordan. This is yet again
Speaker 1: another unprecedented moment in American history where we're finding out
Speaker 1: just how corrupt the deep state really is. Now the
Speaker 1: CIA is going on offense or they're trying to even
Speaker 1: though they're really on defense right now, they have come
Speaker 1: out with a classic deep state comment quote. The CIA
Speaker 1: does not comment on specific investigations, a spokesperson told The
Speaker 1: New York Post after this reporting, saying this, we can
Speaker 1: say that CIA cooperates with law enforcement partners. Sure they do,
Speaker 1: and does not obstruct investigations. Oh yeah, because you're the CIA,
Speaker 1: You've never obstructed anything. Ever. The CIA also fully and
Speaker 1: routinely cooperates with our oversight committees and will continue to
Speaker 1: do so. I don't believe that for a moment. Just
Speaker 1: so everyone knows where I stand on this. Now. This
Speaker 1: comes after two IRS whistleblowers alleged last year that the
Speaker 1: Justice Department ran interference for the President's son by preventing
Speaker 1: other witnesses from testifying and barring tax investigators from asking
Speaker 1: questions that could directly link Hunter Biden financially to the president,
Speaker 1: the big guy, Joe Biden. Now let's go back to Morris,
Speaker 1: this witness that was not allowed to be interviewed because
Speaker 1: the CIA said don't go there. Morris is now sixty
Speaker 1: years old. He has been in viewed by the House
Speaker 1: Ways and Means Committee and the Oversight and Judiciary committees
Speaker 1: on January eighteenth. But we from what we understand obviously
Speaker 1: and based on the questions that were asked of him,
Speaker 1: then they didn't know that the CIA was protecting him
Speaker 1: from being a witness. So that would have, obviously, I think,
Speaker 1: changed the interview significantly. Now, what did he say on
Speaker 1: January eighteenth? Morris said he had loaned the fifty four
Speaker 1: year old first son, Hunter Biden, at least five million
Speaker 1: dollars since meeting him at a political fundraiser for his
Speaker 1: father in Hollywood in late twenty nineteen. So let's talk
Speaker 1: about these loans and why would you be giving these
Speaker 1: loans to the present son. Well, apparently those loans began
Speaker 1: a month after he met Hunter, and they continued all
Speaker 1: the way until about two years ago, as the Justice
Speaker 1: Department was finalizing its tax investigation of the present son,
Speaker 1: which initially resulted in a pro only plea deal agreement
Speaker 1: that got busted up by a judge. Yeah, that plea
Speaker 1: agreement imploded, you may remember in that Delaware federal courtroom
Speaker 1: last July, under questions from the US district judge there
Speaker 1: who asked prosecutors why on earth they gave an immunity
Speaker 1: provision and why do they bury it in that deal?
Speaker 1: Meaning anything he had done illegal in the past, he
Speaker 1: would be immune from prosecution in the future. That didn't
Speaker 1: work out well for them now. The Delaware US Attorney
Speaker 1: is a guy who works for the Bidens, David Weiss.
Speaker 1: He's the one that, in theory, brought the case. He
Speaker 1: was elevated as special council status by the Attorney General
Speaker 1: Merrit Garland shortly after. And guess what he did. He
Speaker 1: did pretty much only things that would go after Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden and protect Joe Biden. In his indictments, he indicted
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden Los Angeles for evading one point four million
Speaker 1: in tax payments. That is the perfect crime to charge
Speaker 1: Hunter with that would not connect him to his father
Speaker 1: in any real way. Then Weiss brought a separate indictment
Speaker 1: against the President's son in Delaware, what for for lying
Speaker 1: on a federal gun purchasing form about his drug abuse,
Speaker 1: a troubled time period that even Hunter wrote about in
Speaker 1: his twenty twenty one memoir Beautiful Thing, saying Yeah, I
Speaker 1: was a drug addict. Guess what lying on a federal
Speaker 1: gun pursing form is. The other singular crime that you
Speaker 1: could charge Hunter Biden with that wouldn't directly tie him
Speaker 1: in any way financially to his father or the rest
Speaker 1: of the Biden crime family. Now this is the part
Speaker 1: that's the most interesting. And you gotta wonder what the
Speaker 1: CIA knew, and when I have a feeling they know
Speaker 1: a lot more than all of us know, because well
Speaker 1: they're the CIA. A significant portion of the Sugar Daddy
Speaker 1: Morris's loans to Hunter covered his tax delinquency, and the
Speaker 1: lawyer told House Impeachment Panel members that the debt, meaning
Speaker 1: the loan was gonna start being repaid or was due
Speaker 1: and twenty twenty five after the twenty twenty four election cycle.
Speaker 1: Isn't that timing amazing? Now this lawyer, you may forget,
Speaker 1: and now remind you who he is. He's a big
Speaker 1: time lawyer. He repped the creators of South Park, and
Speaker 1: he's footing the bill for a documentary on the media
Speaker 1: frenzy surrounding Hunter Biden. He also apparently has the controlling
Speaker 1: stake in that Chinese energy company as well, and the
Speaker 1: windfall would replace foreign patrons from Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan and
Speaker 1: China that paid millions of dollars of Hunter Biden following
Speaker 1: conversations and meetings with his father that took place during
Speaker 1: and immediately after Biden's tenure as vice president. Now that's
Speaker 1: not all that has to deal with a corruption around
Speaker 1: this shady is hell. Lawyer Morris has admitted now that
Speaker 1: he visited the White House three times since Biden, who's
Speaker 1: eighty one, took office as president in January twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: and even made payments to Hunter's ex wife and a
Speaker 1: former stripper, the mother of his four year old daughter
Speaker 1: that they wouldn't allow to have the last name Biden.
Speaker 1: That the Bidens refused, it meant was their own that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden refused to make payments for. Yes, he has
Speaker 1: made payments to Hunter's ex wife on Hunter's behalf and
Speaker 1: to the former stripper as well. That's not shady at all, right,
Speaker 1: and this guy's being protected from being a witness by
Speaker 1: the CIA. He has also paid eight hundred and seventy
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars to Hunter Biden for Hunter's artwork and
Speaker 1: allowed the first son to fly coast to coast on
Speaker 1: his private jet pretty much on demand. House Republicans voted
Speaker 1: in December to approve their impeachment inquiry into the president,
Speaker 1: but have yet to indicate evidence from it that would
Speaker 1: result in the articles of impeachment against the president. As
Speaker 1: they're making their case right now. Democrats this week they
Speaker 1: got testy in a new way. One of those Democrats
Speaker 1: is a guy by the name of Representative Jared Moskowitz.
Speaker 1: He's a hardcore lefty kind of a tool from Florida.
Speaker 1: He's a Democrat and he was at one of these
Speaker 1: inquiries right where the witnesses were giving testimony on Wednesday. Now,
Speaker 1: if you would have watched this on Wednesday, before this
Speaker 1: information about the CIA that I just told you about broke,
Speaker 1: you may just have thought that Representative Jared Moskowitz was
Speaker 1: just being a punk, right, just being a snarky, little arrogant,
Speaker 1: you know the word I'm thinking in my head. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's exactly what he was doing. I
Speaker 1: think he was trying to hurry up and get them
Speaker 1: to an impeachment vote so that he can help protect
Speaker 1: the CIA and help protect from this information coming out
Speaker 1: that was about to be so damning for Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: and the President of the United States of America. Now
Speaker 1: he claims and listen carefully to what he says that
Speaker 1: they should just go ahead and have the vote on
Speaker 1: the impeachment because they know they're going to impeach him,
Speaker 1: and just hurry up and do it and save the
Speaker 1: taxpayers money. That's that's what he says. All right, listen
Speaker 1: to this, and Jim Jordan fight back with him.
Speaker 3: Let's just do the impeachment. I mean, why continue to
Speaker 3: waste millions of dollars of the taxpayers money if we're
Speaker 3: gonna impeach because you believe you've shown he's committed a
Speaker 3: high crime and misdemeanor. Let what are you waiting on him?
Speaker 1: Let's just do it.
Speaker 3: I mean, by the way, we've got Chairman Jordan here
Speaker 3: also the double chairman. Why aren't you guys calling for
Speaker 3: the vote in your committee? When when is it going
Speaker 3: to happen? When can we tell the American people you're
Speaker 3: gonna stop wasting their money and just call for the
Speaker 3: vote on impeachment. Gentlemen, gentlemen, you sure we don't do
Speaker 3: snap impeachments like you guys.
Speaker 1: We actually do the facts, We do oversight aqui.
Speaker 3: You're never You're never gonna call for it. You're never
Speaker 3: gonna call for it.
Speaker 1: I mean, now you can predict, you can predict the future.
Speaker 3: How do you know the chairman knows me well. I mean,
Speaker 3: I'm just here to help him, right, and so I
Speaker 3: just think we should do it today. Let's just call
Speaker 3: for it. I'll make the motion, mister chairman. I want
Speaker 3: to help you out. You can second it, right, like,
Speaker 3: make the motion to impeach President Biden. Go ahead, tore
Speaker 3: tune you second it. No nothing, okay, we got nothing,
Speaker 3: So I want it with my last couple of moments,
Speaker 3: show the American people that they're never gonna impeach Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: It's never gonna happen because they don't have the evidence.
Speaker 1: Okay, this is a show. It's all fake. Now you
Speaker 1: hear him there, and now you understand why he was
Speaker 1: probably doing that in context. He's now saying hurry up
Speaker 1: and doing it because the longer they do the investigation
Speaker 1: and the more whistle blowers that feel brave enough to
Speaker 1: come forward, the more damning it is for these president
Speaker 1: of the United States of America. And Jim Jordan's responds,
Speaker 1: by the way, it was absolutely perfect. We don't do
Speaker 1: snap impeachments here. We investigate first. We're gonna keep exposing them.
Speaker 1: Please make sure that you share this podcast with your
Speaker 1: family and your friends, and I will see you back
Speaker 1: here tomorrow