Speaker 1: We have got a lot of breaking news, including the
Speaker 1: fact that Donald Trump has now got a number that's
Speaker 1: a little bit more palatable to pay the bond. Now,
Speaker 1: the question is, why did they give him a better number?
Speaker 1: You know, instead of a half a billion, it's just
Speaker 1: one hundred and change million dollars he's got to come
Speaker 1: up with for this bond.
Speaker 2: Now, why do they give him a better number.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna explain that to you in just a moment,
Speaker 1: and it's one hundred percent political. Also, the Biden Whitehouse
Speaker 1: has now come out and made it very clear at
Speaker 1: the United Nations they are taking their hand off of Israel,
Speaker 1: and Israel is in total shock that America is now
Speaker 1: treating their ally the way that we are with a
Speaker 1: ceasefire demand from the United Nations. Are going to have
Speaker 1: more on that in just a moment as well. And
Speaker 1: one other thing, some shocking news coming out of the
Speaker 1: southern border that we're gonna deal with how many illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants are now coming across the border and how many
Speaker 1: Americans are now saying and it's the majority that they
Speaker 1: believe that the border is the number one issue going
Speaker 1: into this election for the presidency. I'm going to have
Speaker 1: all that for you in just a moment. Let me
Speaker 1: tell you by my friends at Amo Squared. They are
Speaker 1: here to help you stay stocked up on ammunition automatically.
Speaker 1: AMMO is delivered on demand or automatically when you need it,
Speaker 1: and it's stored for free when you don't. It's a
Speaker 1: budget friendly way to build a stockpile of AMMO, and
Speaker 1: it's customizable to your budget. Ammo Square was founded over
Speaker 1: eight years ago in the freedom loving state of Idaho,
Speaker 1: and AMO Square is truly automated. Set it and forget it.
Speaker 1: Amo purchasing. You get to pick your caliber, set your budget,
Speaker 1: select a shipping trigger, and that's it. AMO builds up
Speaker 1: over time and is delivered automatically when you say I'm
Speaker 1: ready for it. In twenty twenty, when the store shelves
Speaker 1: went empty and prices went up three four, five, six, seven, eight,
Speaker 1: nine acts depending on what caliber you were looking for
Speaker 1: or everybody, including those that sell Ammo, could not find it. Well,
Speaker 1: Amo Square customers they just need to ship their amos
Speaker 1: stored at AMO Squared and they got it all immediately
Speaker 1: delivered with one click of a button. Now, maybe you
Speaker 1: want to get AMO and maybe look as an investment.
Speaker 2: Well, guess what if prices.
Speaker 1: Go through the roof again, you can sell your AMMO
Speaker 1: back to AMO squared. It's truly automated. Set it and
Speaker 1: forget it AMMO purchasing. So go to amosquared dot com
Speaker 1: slash ben that's AMO squared dot com slash ben, and
Speaker 1: you can sign up and get some free AMO in
Speaker 1: your account right now. Set it and forget at AMO purchasing.
Speaker 1: Amosquared dot com slash ben. Sign up and get your
Speaker 1: your free AMMO in your account today. All right, let's
Speaker 1: start first with Donald Trump. Donald Trump has come out
Speaker 1: swinging in New York talking about what's happening to him
Speaker 1: as the bond for New York Appeals Court has reduced
Speaker 1: Trump's bond in a civil fraud case where no one
Speaker 1: was defrauded to one hundred and seventy five million. That
Speaker 1: is a big victory for the former president when you're
Speaker 1: and I hate even saying victory because this is such
Speaker 1: a ridiculous injustice. The court also gave Trump an additional
Speaker 1: ten days to post the bond, which the former president
Speaker 1: said Monday he would pay because they're holding him hostage.
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what he has to do to keep
Speaker 1: going forward. Now, I want you to hear what Donald
Speaker 1: Trump had to say about this trial and the other
Speaker 1: trials going on.
Speaker 2: Take a listen, and if.
Speaker 3: You read the Andy Recarthy articles or Jonathan Charlie for
Speaker 3: many of the.
Speaker 4: Legals, I think almost every single one of them, that's
Speaker 4: not even a crime. You're being tried for something that's
Speaker 4: not even a crime.
Speaker 3: They say it most it's a misdemeanor, but there's no
Speaker 3: misdemeanor either. So we have violent criminals that are murdering people,
Speaker 3: killing people.
Speaker 4: We have drug dealers all.
Speaker 3: Over the place and they go free and they can
Speaker 3: do whatever they want. But they go after Trump when
Speaker 3: there's not even a crime. And did you see the
Speaker 3: number of people were there. You had Colangelo and behind him,
Speaker 3: And remember this, Colangelo was a DOJ guy. He's a
Speaker 3: Biden DOJ guy. Why is seeing in the Manhattan DA's
Speaker 3: office trying the case that in itself is a conflict.
Speaker 3: He's in the Manhattan DA's office trying the case.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's called a conflict. And then remember what
Speaker 4: I told you.
Speaker 3: Also, Mark Pomerantz, when Breg heard about it, he went
Speaker 3: openly hostile. He said that's one of the worst things
Speaker 3: I've heard, and you all covered that. Then all of
Speaker 3: a sudden time goes by, you know, the great Healer's time.
Speaker 3: Time goes by, and all of a sudden they forget that.
Speaker 3: But that's a terrible thing. Colangelo and Pomerant's terrible thing.
Speaker 3: And the judge didn't want to rule on that. He
Speaker 3: said everything was fine, that what they did was fine.
Speaker 3: I don't think it's fine when they take a Hillary
Speaker 3: Clinton lawyer put him into prosecute me.
Speaker 4: I don't think that's fine. I think it's very bad.
Speaker 4: And he does it on the house, he does it
Speaker 4: without fee. I don't want any fee. I don't want
Speaker 4: any fee. Our country has gone down a long way.
Speaker 1: Our country has gone down a long way. He's absolutely
Speaker 1: right now. The State appeals Court ruled that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and his co defendants in New York City civil fraud
Speaker 1: case have an additional ten days to post one hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy five million dollar bond, down from the four
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty four million judgment he was originally due
Speaker 1: to pay today. The eleventh hour ruling from a panel
Speaker 1: of State Appellate Division judges, all appointed by Democratic governors.
Speaker 2: Is a massive victory. Some would argue for law and order.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure I would go that far, because we
Speaker 1: should have never even gotten to this point. But it
Speaker 1: is certainly major relief for the former president, who said
Speaker 1: it would be his honor to now pay the one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy five million dollar bond. Now, former President
Speaker 1: Trump's attorneys said coming up with a large bond was
Speaker 1: practically impossible, referring to the half a billion. The ruling
Speaker 1: also means the State Attorney General James's office cannot yet
Speaker 1: begin collecting on the judgment by seizing his properties. Again,
Speaker 1: this is the official decision, and this is what Trump said.
Speaker 2: I greatly respect the decision.
Speaker 1: Of the Appellate Division, and I'll post a one hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy five million dollars in cash or bonds or
Speaker 1: security or whatever is necessary very quickly within the ten days.
Speaker 1: And I think the Appellate Division for acting quickly, Trump
Speaker 1: said in front of the cameras after he left a
Speaker 1: New York courtroom for a hearing in the hush money
Speaker 1: case that he's dealing with as well.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: Before Monday's ruling, Trump was liable for four hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty four million plus interests most of the fraud judgment,
Speaker 1: but the amount he oede had been increased by more
Speaker 1: than one hundred and eleven thousand a day because of
Speaker 1: the added interest, which is totally insane. Trump claimed on
Speaker 1: social media Friday that he had nearly five hundred million
Speaker 1: in cash and that he planned to use it towards
Speaker 1: his twenty twenty four presidential campaign. The former president, however,
Speaker 1: hasn't used his own money towards his presidential campaign since
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. He had also floated the idea last week
Speaker 1: of mortgaging or selling off his property, saying he would
Speaker 1: be forced to do so at fire sell prices because
Speaker 1: any buyer would know how desperate he was to get
Speaker 1: the money within days or hours. His lawyers noted in
Speaker 1: court filings last week that the bond companies typically require
Speaker 1: collateral of approximately one hundred and twenty percent of the
Speaker 1: amount of the judgment, which in this case would have
Speaker 1: totaled five hundred and fifty seven million dollars. Trump's lawyers
Speaker 1: set in one filing a week ago that they hadn't
Speaker 1: been able to do at that point secure a bond
Speaker 1: and believed it was a practically impossibility that they would
Speaker 1: be able to pull it off because they'd already approached
Speaker 1: thirty companies through four separate brokers, trying to negotiate with
Speaker 1: the world's largest insurance companies.
Speaker 2: Also, other bond companies will not.
Speaker 1: Accept hard assets such as real estate as collateral, but
Speaker 1: will only accept cash or cash equivalents such as marketable securities,
Speaker 1: his lawyers stated to the court. Trump's lawyers had asked
Speaker 1: the state appeals court to either reduced the amount of
Speaker 1: money he had to post or stay the award without
Speaker 1: him posting any security while he appealed the decision by
Speaker 1: this egregious judge that clearly was out to.
Speaker 2: Get him from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: I want you to hear also what Donald Trump had
Speaker 1: to say and just putting it in perspective of this witch
Speaker 1: hunt against him, with new polling out saying Democrats got
Speaker 1: it wrong. Now, I'm going to dive into the politics
Speaker 1: of this in a moment, but the new poll number
Speaker 1: out says this, fifty six percent of American voters say
Speaker 1: Biden's prosecution of Trump are politically motivated. This polled on
Speaker 1: March twentieth and twenty first saying the majority of American
Speaker 1: voters believe that the government has been weaponized to go
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump. That is exactly why I believe they
Speaker 1: reduced his bond by so much, because I think they
Speaker 1: understood that if they actually started seizing his properties, that
Speaker 1: there are many Americans that are not paying attention to
Speaker 1: what's happening right now that would then start paying attention
Speaker 1: to it because it would be wall to wall media coverage.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine the government going in and seizing, for example,
Speaker 1: Trump Tower in New York City and what that would
Speaker 1: mean for America. I think people would then start to say, Okay,
Speaker 1: this is what communists do. This has been in republic acts,
Speaker 1: this is socialism. This is when a government has gotten
Speaker 1: too big when they start seizing the property of former presidents.
Speaker 1: And then Americans start turning because they saw the same
Speaker 1: polling that I.
Speaker 2: Just gave you.
Speaker 1: Fifty six percent of Americans believe that the United States
Speaker 1: government has been weaponized to go after Donald Trump. Now,
Speaker 1: Trump said, look, this government needs to focus on going
Speaker 1: after actual violent criminals and stop going after me.
Speaker 3: For example, case is a hoax and it's something that
Speaker 3: shouldn't have It's not even a crime.
Speaker 4: They said, there's no crime, and there is no crime.
Speaker 3: So I just say, it's a sad day for this
Speaker 3: country when you have something like this. And remember the
Speaker 3: words should have been started three years ago if they
Speaker 3: were going to start it at all, and.
Speaker 4: Then you wouldn't be quibbling over what week.
Speaker 3: It's going to daze, equibbling over days and hours. They
Speaker 3: wouldn't be criibbling at all. They never started it. And
Speaker 3: you know why they didn't start it because they didn't
Speaker 3: know I'd be running, and they didn't know how well
Speaker 3: I do. And if I were not running, or if
Speaker 3: I were doing poorly like everyone else has done, because
Speaker 3: they're all gone, they're all knocked.
Speaker 4: Out except for Crook and Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: If I were doing poorly, this wouldn't be happening, and
Speaker 3: none of these trials would have been happening.
Speaker 4: If I wasn't running, they wouldn't be happening.
Speaker 3: So it's a sad day in our country in many respects.
Speaker 4: But the good day is that the appellate division was fair.
Speaker 3: It's a lot of money still, but the judges corrupted.
Speaker 3: In my opinion, he's the most overturned judge. He's been
Speaker 3: overturned five times in this case alone. He ruled against
Speaker 3: me before he even knew anything about the case.
Speaker 4: He ruled against me.
Speaker 3: The whole case was all about damages and there were
Speaker 3: no damages.
Speaker 4: And perhaps you'll get him to.
Speaker 3: Tell you about what took place in terms of a
Speaker 3: settlement negotiation, because there was weren't the numbers he was discussing.
Speaker 3: Those weren't the numbers. It's a disgrace what's happening in
Speaker 3: our country, and we have to get our country back,
Speaker 3: and we're going to get.
Speaker 4: Our country back. That's what's going to happen November.
Speaker 2: We got to get our country back.
Speaker 1: I think many Americans are paying attention now, and that
Speaker 1: goes back to the politics. These judges understood how bad
Speaker 1: this was polling for the Democratic Party, and they realized
Speaker 1: they had taken us to the and they needed to
Speaker 1: pull back a little bit. They weren't going to let
Speaker 1: him off the hook, right, They weren't going to do
Speaker 1: the right thing.
Speaker 2: Actually would be a better way of putting it.
Speaker 1: But they are going to make him come up with
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty million dollars, which is a hell
Speaker 1: of a lot better than a half a billion dollars.
Speaker 1: With one hundred and ten one hundred eleven thousand dollars
Speaker 1: every day in interest it's accruing, which is insane. Now
Speaker 1: this president, i argue, is going to have an army
Speaker 1: of conservatives behind him and Americans that say, if they
Speaker 1: can do this to him, they can do it to
Speaker 1: you too.
Speaker 2: That is what everyone needs to understand.
Speaker 1: If they can do it to Donald Trump, if they
Speaker 1: will do it to Donald Trump, and look, the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is dead. I've been telling you guys this it is.
Speaker 1: They are Marxists, they are socialists, they are communists. They
Speaker 1: were excited about going after Trump, not just with the money.
Speaker 1: They wanted to seize his properties. There's a wet dream
Speaker 1: in New York by the New York Age in this case,
Speaker 1: in the very beginning, that he wouldn't be able to
Speaker 1: pay the money, and that they would then look at
Speaker 1: them and go, okay, go take the tower. Go take it,
Speaker 1: and we'll take the name off of it, and.
Speaker 2: We'll show you.
Speaker 1: I firmly believe that was their obsession from the very beginning,
Speaker 1: was make sure that Donald Trump's tower was taken, make
Speaker 1: sure his assets were taken. They wanted to take mar
Speaker 1: Lago from him because they wanted people to sit there
Speaker 1: and the Democratic Party and to celebrate the demise and
Speaker 1: the destruction of Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Now Donald Trump is saying that something else that I
Speaker 2: think is absolutely right on.
Speaker 1: And I'm going to end on this before I move
Speaker 1: on to the other issues that are really important that
Speaker 1: they need to get on your radar screen. But they
Speaker 1: would not have done this to him if it wouldn't
Speaker 1: have been for him running. They're afraid he's going to win.
Speaker 1: And once he announced he was going to run, that's
Speaker 1: when they came after him. They didn't come after him before.
Speaker 1: But they're like, all right, hold on, Donald Trump's going
Speaker 1: to run again, and Biden's week and we barely won
Speaker 1: last time, and we had COVID on our side, and
Speaker 1: we altered the way we did our elections. All right,
Speaker 1: hold on, everybody, calm down, whoa go? We gotta get
Speaker 1: Trump out of this race. How are we gonna do it?
Speaker 1: All right, Let's try to lock him up, Let's try
Speaker 1: to bankrupt him, Let's go after him for fraud, and
Speaker 1: let's get some convictions against him, and that'll turn the
Speaker 1: American people against him.
Speaker 2: Now, the reality is that's not what has happened.
Speaker 1: The in fact, the complete opposite of that is what
Speaker 1: has happened. What has happened is the American people are
Speaker 1: now rallying behind him because they understand the egregiousness of
Speaker 1: this injustice. All right, before I continue with this, I
Speaker 1: want to tell you about my friends over at Freedom Gold.
Speaker 2: And if you are like me and you.
Speaker 1: Are worried about your financial future and protecting your hard
Speaker 1: earned dollars, you need to do what so many are
Speaker 1: doing around the world, and that is turning to gold
Speaker 1: and silver as a hedge against inflation and the much
Speaker 1: higher consumer prices we're dealing with right now. You need
Speaker 1: a financial plan that ensures that you the money you
Speaker 1: save today will be enough for you tomorrow. And that's
Speaker 1: where gold and silver come in. Gold and silver have
Speaker 1: historically been amazing hedges against inflation and a great way
Speaker 1: to protect your hard earned retirement funds. And when it
Speaker 1: comes to buying gold and silver, you need a trusted partner.
Speaker 1: You need Freedom Gold USA. Let me tell you why.
Speaker 1: On average, they charge twenty five to thirty percent less
Speaker 1: than most major gold and silver firms.
Speaker 2: What does that mean.
Speaker 1: It means you could literally get twenty five to thirty
Speaker 1: percent more gold or silver when buying from Freedom Gold
Speaker 1: over their competitors just by picking a partner that you
Speaker 1: can trust. Freedom Gold USA is all about educating their
Speaker 1: clients on how to invest in precious metals, and that's
Speaker 1: why I use them, and this is why I want
Speaker 1: you to call them. So take control of your financial
Speaker 1: future now, matter what happens in the world, no matter
Speaker 1: what happens with banking, no matter what happens with hackers,
Speaker 1: if you have real tangible assets gold and silver, you
Speaker 1: know you are protected. One eight hundred sixty five five
Speaker 1: eight eight four three. Take control of your financial future.
Speaker 1: Now visit FREEDOMGOLDUSA dot com slash ben. That's Freedom Goold
Speaker 1: USA dot com slash Ben, or call them one eight
Speaker 1: hundred sixty five five eight eight four three Freedom Goold
Speaker 1: Usa dot comtem Benferguson sent you. Now, I gotta get
Speaker 1: to Israel because this is also extremely important and I
Speaker 1: want you to understand what the Bidenman administration just did
Speaker 1: hanging Israel out to dry. There was a un cease
Speaker 1: fire vote. It took place at the United Nations, and
Speaker 1: this vote was a vote where the world turned on
Speaker 1: Israel publicly. For I would argue the first time in
Speaker 1: a long time, but what's even more shocking is America
Speaker 1: didn't vote yes, America abstain from voting. The Israeli Prime
Speaker 1: Minister fighting back and saying this also about the terrorst
Speaker 1: attack in Russia that just happened, and I want you
Speaker 1: to hear how he came out and condemned not just
Speaker 1: the world for this, but also talking about America as
Speaker 1: his ally.
Speaker 2: In total shock at the outset.
Speaker 5: I want to express my deepest condolences to the Russian
Speaker 5: people and to the families of all the victims of
Speaker 5: the heinous terror attack on Friday. Terror must always be
Speaker 5: condemned in the harshest terms. The Security Council was justifiably quick,
Speaker 5: very quick to condemn Friday's terror attack in Russia, just
Speaker 5: as it was waited no time to condemn the terror
Speaker 5: attack in Iran against a police station back in December.
Speaker 5: Yet still to this day, the Council refuses to condemn
Speaker 5: the most widespread and barbaric massacre suffered by the Jewish
Speaker 5: people since the Holocaust. At least one hundred and thirty
Speaker 5: seven people were murdered at Krokus City concert Hall in
Speaker 5: Russia on Friday by radical jihadist and yet almost six
Speaker 5: months ago, nearly four hundred people were murdered at the
Speaker 5: Nova Music festival in Israel by the radical jihadist of Hamas.
Speaker 5: Why does the Security Council discriminate? Discriminate between Russians murdered
Speaker 5: at a concert and Israelis murdered at a music festival. Civilians,
Speaker 5: dear colleagues, no matter where they live, deserve to enjoy
Speaker 5: music in safety and security. Security Council should have the
Speaker 5: moral clarity to condemn such acts of terror equally without discrimination. Sadly,
Speaker 5: today as well, this Council refused to condemn the October
Speaker 5: seventh massacre. This is a disgrace, colleagues. It was the
Speaker 5: Hammas massacre that started this war. I repeat, it was
Speaker 5: the Hammas massacre that started this war. Nearly six months
Speaker 5: have passed and the Security Council still has not condemned
Speaker 5: the child murdering rapists that began this war. The resolution
Speaker 5: just voted upon makes it seem as if the war
Speaker 5: started by itself. Well, let me set the record straight.
Speaker 5: Israel did not start this war, nor did Israel want
Speaker 5: this war. Israel disengaged and withdrew from GUS eighteen years ago.
Speaker 5: We wanted a ceasefire and coexistence. You can repeat here
Speaker 5: slogans and purport to know for the Palestinians what the
Speaker 5: Palestinians seek, But this won't make it the truth or
Speaker 5: the reality. The Palestinian representative here is lying through his
Speaker 5: teeth when he says that his people want to live
Speaker 5: side by side with Israel. By the way, as you
Speaker 5: probably know, he does not represent Hamas, He does not
Speaker 5: represent the Gousens. They did not choose him to speak
Speaker 5: for them. His leader, President Abbas, refuses to even condemn
Speaker 5: the massacre, and he continued to pay terrorists.
Speaker 2: By the way, let's just talk about the last thing
Speaker 2: that he just said.
Speaker 1: The Palestinian leadership has refused to condemn the massacre. The
Speaker 1: Palestinian leadership has refused to go after the terrorists. In fact,
Speaker 1: they're funding the terrorists. And what did America do. We said, Nah,
Speaker 1: we're not going to vote. We're going to abstain from voting,
Speaker 1: which means we're taking our hand off of Israel.
Speaker 2: Make no mistake what this means.
Speaker 1: It means that we are getting rid of our alliance,
Speaker 1: our ally we're throwing under the bus with Israel. The
Speaker 1: United Nations, by the way, is also defending people that
Speaker 1: have done not only some of the most barbaric things
Speaker 1: that we've ever seen. We're talking about stabbing infant children
Speaker 1: in their cribs, letting them bleed out to death, beheading children,
Speaker 1: cooking them alive and ovens, killing defenseless, handicapped, elderly men
Speaker 1: and women, raping the young girls and the women taking
Speaker 1: some for hostage and some for rape. In their own
Speaker 1: words on their own videos, I've seen some of these videos.
Speaker 1: I've seen what happened on that day. I've been breathed
Speaker 1: at the Israeli console about what happened that day and
Speaker 1: seeing the faces of every single hostage that was taken,
Speaker 1: many of them that are believed to still be alive,
Speaker 1: who are being abused and tortured, and the United Nations
Speaker 1: can't condemn it. Let me just talk about the propaganda.
Speaker 1: Also for a second, Al Jazeera and Hamas are admitting
Speaker 1: that there were a bunch of stories that came out
Speaker 1: recently and they're all fake stories alleging that the IDF
Speaker 1: soldiers raped people in the Gaza hospital.
Speaker 2: Well, guess what, it's fake news.
Speaker 1: News outlet Al Jazeera has wiped a report alleging that
Speaker 1: IDF rapes in a Gaza hospital happen moving Monday. In
Speaker 1: a tactic, administration officials say, is yeah normal, and guess
Speaker 1: what they admitted The story was completely fabric The Jerusalem
Speaker 1: Post reports the deletion of the story came after more
Speaker 1: than twenty four hours of lating the fake news go
Speaker 1: viral online so that people would believe that IDF soldiers
Speaker 1: were raping people inside of the hospitals in Gaza.
Speaker 2: Well, the deleted.
Speaker 1: Page accused the soldiers of allegedly perpetrating rape against women
Speaker 1: during the IDF's latest excursion against Tamas and Islamic jihad
Speaker 1: terrists who barricade themselves inside the former hospital terror headquarters. Yes,
Speaker 1: there was a terror headquarters inside of the hospital. Because
Speaker 1: they have no problem using people as shields, as human shields,
Speaker 1: They're totally fine with it. Just so you know, though,
Speaker 1: the group of terrists have been in and out of
Speaker 1: the hospital for years and using it as cover because
Speaker 1: they knew Israel wouldn't bomb a hospital. Now we're hearing
Speaker 1: that the Katari outlet, this being Al Jazeera, has officially
Speaker 1: referred to the retraction as all content related to the allegations.
Speaker 1: We just deleted it, but it was up for twenty
Speaker 1: four plus hours of letting the story run freely. The
Speaker 1: mouthpiece for Al Jazeer to lead the page featuring their
Speaker 1: former story which accused Israeli soldiers of perpetrating rape against
Speaker 1: so many women at that Al Shifa hospital. So you've
Speaker 1: got a Palestinian Jordanian journalist who puts this crap out there.
Speaker 1: The headline was Hamas Al Jazeera admits story of IDF
Speaker 1: rapes and gods in hospital fabricated. The Post's report noted
Speaker 1: that Al Jazeera columnists and former director Yesshir also tweeted,
Speaker 1: admitting it was revealed through Hama's investigations that the story
Speaker 1: of the rape of women in the hospital by IDF
Speaker 1: soldiers was fabricated. The women who spoke about rape quote
Speaker 1: justify her exaggeration and incorrect talk by saying that the
Speaker 1: goal was to arouse the nation's.
Speaker 2: Fervor of brotherhood.
Speaker 1: So apparently it's okay to lie, right, because if you
Speaker 1: get everybody jacked up and you make Isra look bad,
Speaker 1: then you should understand why they're lying about what's going on.
Speaker 1: He went on to say this as if more than
Speaker 1: thirty thousand martyrs nine thousand wounded, about a million displaced people,
Speaker 1: and comprehensive destruction were not enough. The original and now
Speaker 1: discredit story published by Ajaser featuring a testimony by a
Speaker 1: gods and woman who claimed while she was under siege
Speaker 1: in the area of the hospital complex, she witnessed. She witnessed,
Speaker 1: how you have soldiers raping women then killing them and
Speaker 1: burning entire families alive. You know what, It was all lie,
Speaker 1: but it circulated to the world and the world responded,
Speaker 1: which goes back to what I was telling you about
Speaker 1: the Israeli through the UN after the ceasefire vote, As
Speaker 1: the world turns on Israel, he said, not only is
Speaker 1: this a travesty and I'm disgusted.
Speaker 2: He went on to say this.
Speaker 5: After Israel withdrew from Gaza, the Palestinians elected Hamas a
Speaker 5: terrorist organization. They elected a terror organization. Hamas converted every
Speaker 5: inch of Gaza into a terror war machine right under
Speaker 5: the UN's nose. Maybe with the help of some of
Speaker 5: the UN's agencies like Andra and Haramas, initiated ceaseless attacks
Speaker 5: on Israeli civilians throughout the past eighteen years, thousands and
Speaker 5: thousands of indiscriminate rockets and missiles at civilians. Today, Hamas
Speaker 5: is the most popular movement among Palestinians, and according to
Speaker 5: every poll, the vast majority of Palestinians support Hamas's massacre
Speaker 5: on October seventh, not only in Gaza, also in Judean Semi.
Speaker 5: This is the reality you should face and you should address.
Speaker 2: Colleagues.
Speaker 5: While the resolution fails to condemn Hamas, it does state
Speaker 5: something that should have should have been the driving moral force.
Speaker 5: This resolution denounces the taking of hostages, recalling that it
Speaker 5: is in violation of international law. Taking innocent civilian hostage
Speaker 5: is a war crime and there is no arguing that
Speaker 5: this is what Hamas has committed. The release of the
Speaker 5: hostages should have been the number one priority. When it
Speaker 5: comes to bringing the hostages home, the Security Council must
Speaker 5: not settle for words alone, but take action, real action.
Speaker 5: It is unfathomable that when it comes to releasing the hostages,
Speaker 5: we still only see in action. Not a single step
Speaker 5: has been taken by the Council, aside from symbolic worlds.
Speaker 2: Yet when it.
Speaker 5: Comes to the situation in Gaza, the Council rushed, rush
Speaker 5: to take action. You appointed a special coordinator and established
Speaker 5: a monitoring mechanism. The Council visited Rafa to see the
Speaker 5: eight shipment's first hand, and the Secretary General has already
Speaker 5: visited Rafa, crossing twice. Why do our hostages not receive
Speaker 5: concrete action?
Speaker 2: What have you done to advance their release? Colleagues?
Speaker 5: Following this Council's adoption of UNSCR two seven one two
Speaker 5: and two seven to two zero, which both called for
Speaker 5: the release of the hostage all hostages, HAMAS did not
Speaker 5: stop to even contemplate for even one moment.
Speaker 2: It should be very.
Speaker 5: Clear that as long as Hamas refuses to release the
Speaker 5: hostages in the diplomatic channels, there is no other way
Speaker 5: to secure their return other than through a military operation. So,
Speaker 5: on the one hand, the resolution says that taking civilian
Speaker 5: hostages is in violation.
Speaker 2: Of international law.
Speaker 5: Yet on the other hand, despite the fact that you
Speaker 5: know Hamas won't listen to your calls and release the hostages,
Speaker 5: you demand a ceasefire. Take a moment and think about
Speaker 5: this moral contradiction.
Speaker 1: Moral contradiction is a mild way of putting it. I
Speaker 1: want you to understand that the entire world, at the
Speaker 1: United Nations in America just sat there on their hands
Speaker 1: and allow the world to do this. We just told
Speaker 1: Israel you need to stop going after the people that
Speaker 1: are holding over one hundred of your people hostage. Okay,
Speaker 1: over one hundred people hostage. Think about that number. So
Speaker 1: in other words, you better hurry up. If someone ever
Speaker 1: takes you hostage, you better hurry up and get your
Speaker 1: people out. You're on a stopwatch and after a certain
Speaker 1: time in the world. Now, if you're taking hostage, you're
Speaker 1: just their property. Is that how this works now? Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're just their property. Like, all right, you got seventeen
Speaker 1: days to get them back. And if you don't get
Speaker 1: him back in seventeen days, not trying to be mean.
Speaker 2: But we just got to let you know.
Speaker 1: After that's seventeen days, it's game over, folks. And those hostages,
Speaker 1: they're dead people walking.
Speaker 2: That's what they are now.
Speaker 1: They're just they're dead people walking and there's nothing that
Speaker 1: you can do. That's what the United Nations just said
Speaker 1: to Israel. And America was a part of it all
Speaker 1: because the Democratic Party is afraid that young voters who
Speaker 1: by the way, hate Israel. I want to say that again,
Speaker 1: young voters who hate Israel will leave the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: if they don't stop defending Israel. The President of United
Speaker 1: States of America has seen the polling data. The Democratic
Speaker 1: Party have seen the polling data, and what they have
Speaker 1: said is.
Speaker 2: We're sorry, Israel.
Speaker 1: We need young people to vote for us, and we
Speaker 1: need them to show up, and we're afraid they won't
Speaker 1: show up. We know they're not going to vote for Trump, right,
Speaker 1: but they may not vote for our guy if we
Speaker 1: keep defending Israel. And that's exactly why we've got to
Speaker 1: let you go. We've got to say goodbye to you.
Speaker 1: We've got to.
Speaker 2: Take our hand as your ally off of you.
Speaker 1: We're not going to defend you anymore at the United Nations.
Speaker 1: We're going to let the United Nations take you out
Speaker 1: for a walk because we care more about winning an
Speaker 1: election with radical young anarchists and the Democratic Party, the
Speaker 1: Marxists and socialists.
Speaker 2: Than we do about you and your hostages then.
Speaker 1: We do about the atrocities that were committed against you.
Speaker 2: That is the truth about this administration.
Speaker 1: My question is what happens if a bunch of Americans
Speaker 1: get taken somewhere in the world. How many days do
Speaker 1: I have before America gives up on getting me back
Speaker 1: There's some Americans around the world right now that are
Speaker 1: asking that exact question, including some in Russia.
Speaker 2: Let that sink in.
Speaker 1: Make sure you share this podcast with your family and
Speaker 1: your friends, please on social media as well, and I'll
Speaker 1: see you back here tomorrow