Speaker 1: Israel does defend itself with an extremely limited response. Other
Speaker 1: analysts have described the news reports as propaganda ma in
Speaker 1: comparison to official programming supporting the communist regime in the
Speaker 1: former Soviet Union, saying that they just are trying to
Speaker 1: make it look worse than it actually is. But the
Speaker 1: world has clearly decided now this is a very limited response.
Speaker 1: So what is the bigger threat in this country right now? Well,
Speaker 1: our biggest concern should be the number of those that
Speaker 1: have come across this southern border that are on the
Speaker 1: terrorists watch lists. Terrorism seems to be gaining speed around
Speaker 1: the world. Duran said two things. One is a lie.
Speaker 1: This is their first lie that Iran said. The Defense
Speaker 1: minister listen, how.
Speaker 2: Thought our objective was warn as to send a clear
Speaker 2: message to be received by the government of Israel and
Speaker 2: to let it know that we do have the means
Speaker 2: to respond. I will repeat again, we never seek the
Speaker 2: expansion of chaos and warfare intentions in the region.
Speaker 1: That's a lie. We know that they expand their tensions
Speaker 1: in the region. We know that they were in charge
Speaker 1: I'm killing American soldiers roadside bombs. We know they helped
Speaker 1: train the attackers for the attack on the Israeli people
Speaker 1: and the genocide that they created, and they shot three
Speaker 1: hundred plus missiles at Israel just last week. They then say,
Speaker 1: we don't want to do anything to escalate. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: The Iranian foreign minister also saying this about what Israel
Speaker 1: did this morning.
Speaker 2: In case the Israeli regime embarks on adventurism again and
Speaker 2: takes action against the interests of Iran, next response from
Speaker 2: US will be immediate and at a maximum level.
Speaker 1: So what they're saying is it sounds like they are
Speaker 1: not going to respond to this retaliatory strike at the
Speaker 1: hands of Israel. Now that that is good news because
Speaker 1: we do all want this to de escalate. The question
Speaker 1: is a Ran saying that now because they're afraid that
Speaker 1: Israel will then strike their nuclear sites. I think that's
Speaker 1: pretty clear. They're afraid that they can't defend themselves against
Speaker 1: an attack by Israel. They just prove that Israel can
Speaker 1: come in and go after them in a very big way.
Speaker 1: So that is also I think another serious part of
Speaker 1: their Okay, we're going to back down here, because they
Speaker 1: realized that they could what they could lose and what
Speaker 1: they could lose, could be a lot, all right. So
Speaker 1: that's that's part number two of this that people need
Speaker 1: to understand. There's also another part of this, and that
Speaker 1: is anti Semitic attacks and rhetoric are at an all
Speaker 1: time high right now. The American a d L excuse me,
Speaker 1: Anti Definition League representative went on MSNBC this morning and
Speaker 1: I played this for you, saying, in forty five years,
Speaker 1: we've never seen anything like this, and it's happening mostly
Speaker 1: starting on college campuses now. To also be clear, NBC
Speaker 1: News is still keeping up their anti Israel rhetoric this morning.
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example of that, Richard Haas saying
Speaker 1: this on MSNBC about the Biden administration.
Speaker 3: Listen, Richard has It was this just the latest final
Speaker 3: round of shadow boxing between Israel and Iran, trying to
Speaker 3: prove something to each other, to their constituencies, to regional
Speaker 3: friends and enemies, or do you expect more?
Speaker 4: I think we're all in violent or even nonviolent agreement
Speaker 4: this morning.
Speaker 5: This was carefully calibrated.
Speaker 4: The Israelis felt compelled to respond to show that they
Speaker 4: could reach Iran if need be, they could hurt them
Speaker 4: if need be, but they didn't hurt them this time.
Speaker 4: The fact that the Iranians are downplaying it at home
Speaker 4: suggests to me they don't feel compelled to retaliate against
Speaker 4: the retaliation. I think this showed the bb nets and Yahoo.
Speaker 5: Were often critical.
Speaker 4: I think in this case he resisted what he was
Speaker 4: getting pressured to do from his right.
Speaker 5: He did less rather than more.
Speaker 4: I think the Biden administration should feel pretty good in
Speaker 4: terms of calming down the reactions. And I think, excuse me,
Speaker 4: this is also a realization on the Israelis.
Speaker 5: They got their handsful, They've still.
Speaker 4: Got the Gaza, and they'll make some big decisions about
Speaker 4: Rafa and occupation they face. As the Atma was talking
Speaker 4: about the massive threat from his bullet still and it.
Speaker 5: Got active a few days ago.
Speaker 4: It's possible the West Bank will get more militarized. They
Speaker 4: got problems there. So I think this is really an
Speaker 4: interesting case. You see it sometimes short during the Cold
Speaker 4: War Joe, that adversaries figure out.
Speaker 5: How to signal.
Speaker 4: There's nothing formal, there's nothing explicit. But I think what
Speaker 4: we saw here there's some actually sophisticated signaling and messaging
Speaker 4: by Israel and Iran.
Speaker 1: So the Biden administration this morning. Seems to be pretty
Speaker 1: happy with this. They seem to be pretty happy with
Speaker 1: what they're seeing. They seem to be pretty happy with
Speaker 1: how this is going down. What we also know is
Speaker 1: officials in Tehran initially played down the attack, first telling
Speaker 1: Reuters that the explosions heard wire a result of the
Speaker 1: activation of Iran's air defense system. They realized once the
Speaker 1: pictures were leaking out of their country they couldn't stick
Speaker 1: with that plan, so then they changed it. Then they
Speaker 1: said that five hundred suicide drones and missiles were fired
Speaker 1: at US, and that Israel was subjecting subjected to the
Speaker 1: world's largest drone attack. That then didn't work out either,
Speaker 1: because there weren't that many attacks. Israeli's military told the AFP,
Speaker 1: we don't have a comment at this time. However, a
Speaker 1: former Israeli Defense Forces spokesmans that Iran hadn't accurately assessed
Speaker 1: the damage caused by the strike, Shet saying, quote, it
Speaker 1: will take them time to work out what happened. We
Speaker 1: also now know that the Department of Homeland Security knew
Speaker 1: that Lake and Riley's accused killer had a criminal record.
Speaker 1: We also now have been told that Department of Homeland
Speaker 1: Security knew that they in fact gave a work permit
Speaker 1: anyways to that individual so that that individual could stay
Speaker 1: in America and work. And we also now know that
Speaker 1: my orcis lied to Congress coming out overnight, claiming that
Speaker 1: he had no derogatory information on the individual. President Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's Department of Homeland Security approved a work permit for
Speaker 1: Jose Antonio of Venezuela, who was accused of murdering the
Speaker 1: twenty two year old Lacoln Riley, even after discovering he
Speaker 1: had a prior criminal history. According to federal documents detailed
Speaker 1: by Senator Josh Hawley, on February the twenty second, Lincoln
Speaker 1: Riley went for a morning jog around the University of
Speaker 1: Georgia campus in Athens. Riley Her body was bludgeon and
Speaker 1: it was found later that day in a wooded area.
Speaker 1: The following day, the illegal immigrant Jose Antonio was arrested
Speaker 1: in charge with her murder. During a Senate budget hearing yesterday,
Speaker 1: Holly read aloud the DHS file on the illegal immigrant,
Speaker 1: which he said senators only recently obtained. According to documents
Speaker 1: that Holly read, the individual was encountered but at the
Speaker 1: United States Mexico border near El Paso, Texas on September
Speaker 1: the eighth of twenty twenty two. DHS official sited detention capacity,
Speaker 1: according to Holly, as the reason that he was rewarded parole.
Speaker 1: You and I both know lack of detention capability capacity
Speaker 1: is not a valid reason for parole under the statue,
Speaker 1: Holly said to the Department of Home and Security Secretary
Speaker 1: of MYORCIS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement known as ICE, status
Speaker 1: shows about eighty one hundred available detention beds at the
Speaker 1: time the individual was encountered at the border meeting. That
Speaker 1: they lied. Okay, they lied. It's called gross negligence. MAJORCIS
Speaker 1: says freeing lake in Riley's accused killer into the US
Speaker 1: was warranted even after he was asked about the detention
Speaker 1: center and that lie Biden's expansive catch and release network.
Speaker 1: Senator Rand Paul noted purported to give parole to migrants
Speaker 1: on a case by case basis for public benefit or
Speaker 1: humanitarian reasons. Senator Paul asked my ORCIS if detention capabilities
Speaker 1: and capacity is a reason migrants are given parole by
Speaker 1: Biorcus said he would not comment on the case. Then
Speaker 1: he said, well, why was this man paroled? Paul repeatedly asked,
Speaker 1: my orcis. On July the nineteenth, the last year, Holly said,
Speaker 1: the DHS file stated that the illegal immigrant reported to
Speaker 1: agency officials in New York City for a biometric appointment
Speaker 1: where he was fingerprinted. The results of those fingerprints, according
Speaker 1: to the documents, showed that the illegal immigrant, had a
Speaker 1: prior criminal history. Then, on September the fourteenth of twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, the illegal immigrant was arrested for acting in
Speaker 1: a manner that could injure a child. This is in America.
Speaker 1: Despite the charge, the man was not prosecuted and the
Speaker 1: arrest was expunged from his record two months later, in
Speaker 1: November of twenty twenty three, the Department of Home Security
Speaker 1: file states that the illegal immigrant applied for an employment
Speaker 1: authorization document known as an EAD with the US Citizenship
Speaker 1: and Immigration Services on December the ninth, just days later,
Speaker 1: Holly said. The DHS file states that the individual the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrant, and the work permit application was then approved,
Speaker 1: and less than three months after securing that work permit,
Speaker 1: the man was charged with Lake and Riley's murder. I
Speaker 1: want you to hear some of this back and forth
Speaker 1: from Holly listen, Uh.
Speaker 6: Mister Secretary, let's just come back to Jose Ibarra if
Speaker 6: we can you know who that is. That's a question.
Speaker 6: You know what he did.
Speaker 7: I know what he's accused of doing, which is murdering
Speaker 7: a young woman.
Speaker 6: And that wasn't the first crime that he committed in
Speaker 6: this country.
Speaker 5: Was it?
Speaker 7: Senator. As I've articulated previously, I'm not going to speak
Speaker 7: about the facts of the case because there is an
Speaker 7: ongoing criminal investigation.
Speaker 6: Have you read his parole file?
Speaker 7: Senator the same answer.
Speaker 6: So you're not going to say whether or not you've
Speaker 6: read the profile. I've got it right here. Have you
Speaker 6: read this?
Speaker 7: A Senator, I do not want to speak to the
Speaker 7: particulars of the case given depending criminal in you.
Speaker 6: I find this interesting because this is a new answer today.
Speaker 6: You've changed your answers all over the map on this
Speaker 6: and it looks like to me you just don't want
Speaker 6: to answer the question. Two days ago, two days ago,
Speaker 6: you were asked about this in the Househomeland Security Committee.
Speaker 6: I've got the transcript right here in front of me.
Speaker 6: You were asked the same question, Jose Ibara, why was
Speaker 6: he paroled? You said, I don't know you said, I
Speaker 6: don't know. I don't have the case details with me. Today,
Speaker 6: Congressman Bishop says you don't know, and you said, I
Speaker 6: don't know. I don't have the details with respect to
Speaker 6: that individual's case, but I would be pleased to provide
Speaker 6: them to you. Congressman, you didn't know two days ago. Now, interestingly,
Speaker 6: on April the tenth, six days before that, you gave
Speaker 6: Senator Katie Britt a different answer. She asked you the
Speaker 6: same question. She said, why was Jose Iberra paroled into
Speaker 6: the United States? You said, and I quote Ranking Member Britt,
Speaker 6: there was no derogatory information of which we were aware,
Speaker 6: so you were happy to comment on the case. Then
Speaker 6: on April the tenth. By April the sixteenth, you had
Speaker 6: developed amnesia. And today you say you just won't comment.
Speaker 6: So which is it, mister Secretary. Now that we have
Speaker 6: the file, I tell you what the difference is. Congressman
Speaker 6: Bishop didn't have the profile and Senator Britt didn't have
Speaker 6: the profile. And now we do have the parole file,
Speaker 6: and now we all know that the reason he was
Speaker 6: paroled into this country was because lack of detention capacity, which,
Speaker 6: as you and I both know, is not a valid
Speaker 6: reason under the statute. And now that we know that
Speaker 6: for sure, this is right out of the parole file
Speaker 6: here it is subject was paroled due to detention capacity
Speaker 6: at the Central Processing Center in l Paso, Texas. Now
Speaker 6: suddenly you don't want to talk about it. This is extraordinary.
Speaker 6: It's also a pattern with you. So let me just
Speaker 6: try one more time. Have you read the parole file?
Speaker 7: Senator, I'm going to give the same answer, and let
Speaker 7: me say it, well.
Speaker 6: Which one are you going to give me the answer
Speaker 6: you gave to Senator britt Are you going to give
Speaker 6: the answer you gave to Congressman Bishop or the answer
Speaker 6: you gave to Senator Paul Or do you want to
Speaker 6: try a fourth one?
Speaker 7: Senator, I will not speak to the particulars of the
Speaker 7: case given the pending criminal process.
Speaker 6: Oh, I'm sure, well you certainly, of course you don't
Speaker 6: want to because it is an absolutely damning indictment of
Speaker 6: your policies. Let's just review Jose Berrera and how Ibarra
Speaker 6: rather and how he came to be here. On September
Speaker 6: the eighth, twenty twenty two, he was encountered by the
Speaker 6: United States Border Patrol in El Paso, Texas, and was
Speaker 6: paroled into the United States due to lack of detention capacity.
Speaker 6: A provision, a proviso, a rule that is not permitted
Speaker 6: under the statute. You and I both no, you know this.
Speaker 6: You knew it when you were talking to Congressman Bishop,
Speaker 6: you knew it when you were testifying to Senator Britt,
Speaker 6: and you know it today. You just never wanted to
Speaker 6: cop to it because the statue doesn't permit it. And
Speaker 6: so you lied to Congressman Bishop, and you lied to
Speaker 6: Senator Britt. And now you are hiding behind the ongoing
Speaker 6: prosecution excuse because it's the last one left to you,
Speaker 6: because you testified falsely under oath. Then on July nineteenth,
Speaker 6: twenty twenty three, Ebara reports for a biometric appointment and
Speaker 6: was finger printed. This is now in New York. The
Speaker 6: results come back and indicate he has a criminal history,
Speaker 6: so he's in this country. He has a criminal history.
Speaker 6: September fourteenth, he is arrested in New York by NYPD
Speaker 6: for what injuring a child. September fourteenth, twenty twenty three,
Speaker 6: he is arrested for injuring a child. What happens? The
Speaker 6: offense was never prosecuted and the arrest was expunged. I'm
Speaker 6: reading right out of the profile expunged. Nothing is done
Speaker 6: to this guy. He had a criminal record to start with.
Speaker 6: He's in the country on the illegal grounds. You have
Speaker 6: falsely and illegally allowed him in. He commits a crime
Speaker 6: against a child. He's not prosecuted, it's expunged. In November,
Speaker 6: get this. In November it Borrow files an application for
Speaker 6: employment authorization, and unbelievably, on December the ninth, twenty twenty three,
Speaker 6: it's approved. So this is your policies in action, mister secretary.
Speaker 6: A criminal is permitted into this country on grounds flatly
Speaker 6: not permitted, flatly contradictory to the statute. He commits a
Speaker 6: crime against a child, and then he gets a work permit.
Speaker 6: He gets a work permit. You want to know why
Speaker 6: all of the jobs in the last two or three
Speaker 6: years have gone to illegal migrants. Working people in this
Speaker 6: country can't get a job, their unemployment rates high white
Speaker 6: because of things like this. And then what's he did?
Speaker 6: Well we all know. Then in February he commits the
Speaker 6: heinous crime against Laken Riley. Is this a record that
Speaker 6: you are proud of, Senator?
Speaker 7: You've mistated some facts.
Speaker 6: I have read from the parole file, which you have
Speaker 6: said you don't recall, don't have you mis cited. I'm
Speaker 6: reading from it. It is right here, and I've just
Speaker 6: pursued to the speech and debate clause. I have just
Speaker 6: read it into the record. And the reason is you
Speaker 6: have lied repeatedly to Congress and to the American people
Speaker 6: about this. They deserve to know, and the only way
Speaker 6: they're going to know is if I tell them. I've
Speaker 6: just told them. It's in the record now. I've read
Speaker 6: it verbatim from the profile verbatim. I just want to
Speaker 6: know why did you change your story so often? Why
Speaker 6: didn't you just answer honestly to Congressman Bishop and Senator
Speaker 6: Brett Senator.
Speaker 7: I am confident that justice will be vindicated in the
Speaker 7: criminal prosecution of the case.
Speaker 6: Well, hopefully he'll get more of a trial than you got.
Speaker 6: Otherwise there'll be no justice for anyone at all. Let
Speaker 6: me ask you something else. Travis Wolf, do you know
Speaker 6: that name?
Speaker 7: Not off the top of my head.
Speaker 6: Travis Wolf is a twelve year old boy from Missouri.
Speaker 6: This is him. Travis was killed on December twenty, twenty
Speaker 6: twenty three year. I should say he was in a
Speaker 6: tragic attack on that night. He died some weeks later
Speaker 6: head on collision. The person driving the vehicle, who's now
Speaker 6: been charged with six criminal counts, is in Drina, Braco.
Speaker 6: Do you know who that is?
Speaker 7: I do not, but let me communicate that I know
Speaker 7: that all of our hearts break for the family of
Speaker 7: this young boy who died in that accident.
Speaker 6: Well, she's an illegal migrant here from Venezuela. Local law
Speaker 6: enforcement tell me that she was detained briefly at the
Speaker 6: border in twenty twenty three and then released, and then
Speaker 6: she commits this crime. Multiple people have been stabbed in O'Fallon,
Speaker 6: Missouri by illegal migrants. As a secretary, I know that
Speaker 6: you think your policies are a success. You've sat right
Speaker 6: there in that chair and you've told me over and
Speaker 6: over our policies are working. You're on the record years
Speaker 6: and years saying that maybe they're working for you, maybe
Speaker 6: they're working for your political objectives, whatever they may be.
Speaker 6: I don't know, but they're not working for Laken Riley
Speaker 6: or Travis Woolf or the people of my state.
Speaker 1: Democrats laughing in the face of Americans. After my Orchis
Speaker 1: was able to get away with not following the American
Speaker 1: laws when it comes to southern border. He's also an
Speaker 1: individual that lied to the American people. Just one year ago.
Speaker 1: He said the border is secure. The border is secure.
Speaker 1: That is what he said when talking to Congress about
Speaker 1: a wide open border that he admits now, well, there's
Speaker 1: major problems and isn't secure. So how did he get
Speaker 1: away with it? And how were they able to cut
Speaker 1: this trial to just a single day? Join me now
Speaker 1: to talk about this. It wasn't even a trial. Actually,
Speaker 1: it was just like they could even get to a trial.
Speaker 1: Join me now to talk about this. As US cenator
Speaker 1: from Tennessee. Marsha Blackburn sentator, always a pleasure to chat
Speaker 1: with you. This seems like a very big defeat for conservatives.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of frustration from conservatives right now because
Speaker 1: they feel like we're losing all over the place. We
Speaker 1: have infighting on the House, a real prospect of losing
Speaker 1: another speaker. Then we have the Maiorci's impeachment that doesn't
Speaker 1: go anywhere. Explain how this happened yesterday and what people
Speaker 1: need to know.
Speaker 8: Yes, Chuck Schumer did as we assembled and were sworn
Speaker 8: in into a Court of Impeachment. He made a point
Speaker 8: of order and then deemed that Article one was unconstitutional
Speaker 8: and did not meet the threshold for removal of may Orcus,
Speaker 8: and every single Democrat voted with him. Now, we sent
Speaker 8: a lot of time, about three hours trying to refute
Speaker 8: this and make our points of order, and then following
Speaker 8: the closure, we made certain that we went to the
Speaker 8: floor and spent another few hours laying out for may
Speaker 8: Orcus had done. But this has what Chuck Schumer did
Speaker 8: yesterday has never been done. Twenty one impeachments. In four
Speaker 8: of them the individual either died or resigned. And in
Speaker 8: seventeen when the impeachment by the House went to the
Speaker 8: Senate for trials, the trial was held. And so Senators
Speaker 8: Lee and Kennedy had organizing resolutions that mirrored the Trump
Speaker 8: one and Trump two impeachments. Senator Cruz had won that
Speaker 8: a motion that would have formed a trial committee, but
Speaker 8: Chuck Schumer would have none of it, and so Patty
Speaker 8: Murray was the presiding officer and repeatedly we were just
Speaker 8: we were shut out of trying to move to a trial.
Speaker 8: And for the first time ever, they dismissed the impeachment
Speaker 8: articles and to the American people. But then I will
Speaker 8: tell you this. These Democrats that are up for reelection
Speaker 8: this year, and they have very tough, close races, and
Speaker 8: you're looking at New Mexico, Nevada, Montana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 8: these and the race in Maryland, the race in West Virginia.
Speaker 8: Democrats are going to have to answer for that because
Speaker 8: it was unprecedented. It plays into that two tiers of justice.
Speaker 8: If they keep pushing. There's one tier for the Democrats
Speaker 8: in the elite. There's a different tier if your name
Speaker 8: is Trump, or if you're a Republican or a Conservative.
Speaker 8: And people are sick and tired of this.
Speaker 1: Harry Reid said something that was very interesting that I
Speaker 1: do think should be used and I hope every Republican
Speaker 1: running for office in the Senate uses it especially, And
Speaker 1: he said about this impeachment, we're going to get through
Speaker 1: this quick. We're gonna move quickly to move past this.
Speaker 1: He also made a admission, and it was an important one.
Speaker 1: He said that you should never have someone impeached over
Speaker 1: a policy disagreement. Now what that means is he's admitting
Speaker 1: that the policy of the Democratic Party of the Biden
Speaker 1: administration is to have wide open southern borders and to
Speaker 1: allow as many illegal immigrants into this country as possible.
Speaker 1: That's the first time that he's ever admitted that publicly,
Speaker 1: and it was very very clear. He was saying, this
Speaker 1: is just a policy disagreement. Now they haven't said that
Speaker 1: before publicly. We knew it was their policy of the
Speaker 1: Biden administration to get rid of all the executive orders
Speaker 1: that secured our border. That was very clear, and Harry
Speaker 1: Reid was like acting like, oh no, this is just
Speaker 1: no big deal. This is just this is you know,
Speaker 1: just a normal day. You know, we just have a
Speaker 1: simple policy disagreement. Well, now we know they're admitting this
Speaker 1: is their policy chaos of the southern border.
Speaker 8: And they've been very clear and very intentional. And when
Speaker 8: I was with some of our Senate conservatives last night
Speaker 8: on the floor, I talked a little bit about the
Speaker 8: intentionality that they have used in opening this southern border.
Speaker 8: We do exactly what they're doing. These big boo states
Speaker 8: have lost population. That affects the amount of money you
Speaker 8: get from the federal government. It effects your congressional seats,
Speaker 8: that effects the electoral college. So they are quickly moving
Speaker 8: the people into these areas. Why do you think the
Speaker 8: California is saying, hey, illegal aliens, come here, we will
Speaker 8: give you free health care. It is because California laws
Speaker 8: seven hundred and seventy thousand people last year. That is
Speaker 8: just shy of the eight hundred and fifty thousand people
Speaker 8: that make up a congressional district. California has already lost
Speaker 8: a couple of congressional seats, so you know, we know
Speaker 8: what they're doing. We also are akin to the fact
Speaker 8: that some areas will allow those illegally in the country
Speaker 8: to get a driver's license, and we're concerned about they're
Speaker 8: having the ability to vote in those voter registrations, and
Speaker 8: we're looking at what we can do to be sure
Speaker 8: that that they are not voting in those federal elections,
Speaker 8: the presidential elections.
Speaker 1: I may have said the word Harry read earlier I
Speaker 1: met Chuck Schumer. I want people to hear what Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer had to say in his own words at this
Speaker 1: breast conference.
Speaker 7: If your palage so.
Speaker 5: You're going to offer emotion to dismiss Themitaris on Thursday,
Speaker 5: were you all concerned to sign the Democrats and to
Speaker 5: races that come back to talk of Andrew.
Speaker 7: Look, we're going to try and resolve this issue as
Speaker 7: quickly as possible. Impeachment should never be used to settle
Speaker 7: policy disagreements.
Speaker 1: Should never be used to settle policy disagreements. So if
Speaker 1: Republicans use it the right way, what you're basically saying is, yes,
Speaker 1: this was a big victory for Democrats yesterday, protecting my
Speaker 1: Orchis from impeachment and also having to admit and for
Speaker 1: the American people to see the disaster of the southern border.
Speaker 1: We also had testimony yesterday on the same day that
Speaker 1: you guys are dealing with this coming from our Attorney
Speaker 1: General Garland on the issue of fetanols, saying it's the
Speaker 1: biggest threat to this country and the biggest killer for Americans.
Speaker 1: He's admitting that the fetanyl is flowing across the open
Speaker 1: border on the same day that they're saying, oh, no, no,
Speaker 1: everything's fine at the southern border.
Speaker 8: That's exactly right. The contradictory nature of all of that
Speaker 8: is really a standing, and you know, I think it
Speaker 8: is just a stamping for Chuck Humer to just push
Speaker 8: this aside as a policy difference. As I said, when
Speaker 8: we know the intentionality they've moved forward, and it is
Speaker 8: an unconstitutional move because we take an oath of office
Speaker 8: that we are going to defend this country. And when
Speaker 8: you have that border wide open and you do not
Speaker 8: know who is coming in, you do not know the threats.
Speaker 8: You know that China is literally invading us. They have
Speaker 8: pushed nearly twenty five thousand single adult males into this
Speaker 8: country since the beginning of the fiscal year. And this
Speaker 8: secretary does nothing. The Secretary comes to Congress and the
Speaker 8: Wise and says the border is secure and people can
Speaker 8: see with their own eyes this border is not secure.
Speaker 8: You have the Department of Job it's just telling us
Speaker 8: that Saint Paul is killing more Americans than anything else,
Speaker 8: and they're having a tough time running down these cartels
Speaker 8: and getting them off of American streets. You have the
Speaker 8: FBI director saying, I see flashing lights everywhere, flashing red
Speaker 8: lights every fare I look, and this border. We have
Speaker 8: three hundred plus known terrorist watchless names that have been
Speaker 8: apprehended at that southern border. We have thousands of people
Speaker 8: from countries of interests, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
Speaker 8: that does not believe in securing the homeland. The Democrats
Speaker 8: defend him. I hope every single one of them. Use
Speaker 8: is just horrendous. Last last question on this into this country.
Speaker 1: Is there any accountability? And I think this is part
Speaker 1: of the frustration center for so many. You know, you
Speaker 1: go to April of this year, and this is what
Speaker 1: my arc has said.
Speaker 7: Now, I have never minimized the challenge that the southern
Speaker 7: border presents.
Speaker 1: It is my I've never minimized the challenge of southern
Speaker 1: border presents. You go back to April twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: This is in testamony to Congress. So you're lying to Congress.
Speaker 7: He said this, since it is my testimony that the
Speaker 7: order is secure.
Speaker 1: That's a lie. He knew he was lying. He knew
Speaker 1: it was a wide open border. He's admitting it now
Speaker 1: that okay, I'm changing my story. But I guess you
Speaker 1: can just light to Congress sound there's zero accountability for that.
Speaker 1: That's what Democrats have basically said, when we're in charge,
Speaker 1: we can lie to the American people and lie to you,
Speaker 1: and our officials can lie to Congress about anything they
Speaker 1: want to with zero accountability. Is that the new world
Speaker 1: we live in.
Speaker 3: Thank you?
Speaker 8: Justice one for them and one for other people, and
Speaker 8: that's the way they look at it. And they just
Speaker 8: were so proud of themselves yesterday. You should have seen
Speaker 8: them smiling and rolling eyes. They were so happy to
Speaker 8: get off the floor and get on with their day.
Speaker 8: I'm sure they all had fancy DC cocktail parties to
Speaker 8: go to last night, and they were just so pleased
Speaker 8: they had handled this and talked to deplorables. Another lesson
Speaker 8: about how DC really works. It is sickening and people
Speaker 8: are suffering. We have Tennessee insteader losing their lives. Every
Speaker 8: sheriff I meet with tells me the number one issue
Speaker 8: they have, drugs and crime and communities cannot be addressed
Speaker 8: until the southern border is secured.
Speaker 1: As always, it's a pleasure to chat with you. We'll
Speaker 1: have you back again real soon, all right, don't forget.
Speaker 1: Please hit at the share button on this podcast, put
Speaker 1: it up wherever you are on social media so other
Speaker 1: people can hear. So makes you share it wherever you
Speaker 1: are on social media, and I'll see you back here tomorrow.