Speaker 1: The media is completely obsessed with the fact that there
Speaker 1: is another court case that deals with Donald Trump. Yes,
Speaker 1: they want you to obsess over the one in New
Speaker 1: York where they're hoping that Donald Trump is somehow going
Speaker 1: to be sent to jail because of.
Speaker 2: This gag order. And I'm going to deal with that
Speaker 2: in a moment.
Speaker 1: But there's a bigger and much more important case that's
Speaker 1: happening right now at the Supreme Court. Now, the US
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices in the Trump case clearly seem to
Speaker 1: be leaning towards some level of presidential immunity. That is
Speaker 1: not what the media was wanting you to hear. In fact,
Speaker 1: it was very clear on MSNBC in the hours leading
Speaker 1: up to this case, starting in the oral arguments that
Speaker 1: we're going to take place, they want you to believe
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump was trying to use presidential community in
Speaker 1: essence to.
Speaker 2: Like murder people. I'm not kidding.
Speaker 1: They're like, well, does he have immunity if he walks
Speaker 1: up and just it's killing his political opponents or starts
Speaker 1: shooting people, Right, that's the extreme that they go to. Now,
Speaker 1: there's also another perspective on this, and it is the
Speaker 1: fact that.
Speaker 2: It's taken this long to deal with.
Speaker 1: Presidential community case, and it wasn't done on purpose, so
Speaker 1: there could be a political warfare aspect of this that
Speaker 1: would drag on forever. We're going to talk about that
Speaker 1: in a moment, because I do believe that's a large
Speaker 1: part of this. Now, let me go back to what
Speaker 1: I was saying a moment ago about MSNBC. MSNBC in
Speaker 1: the hours leading up in NBC News and all the
Speaker 1: others really were doing the same thing. They were basically
Speaker 1: telling you that this is an evil president.
Speaker 2: Who tried to overthrow an election.
Speaker 1: Right, they're using their same talking points they've been using,
Speaker 1: and therefore he doesn't deserve presidential community. Listen to this,
Speaker 1: and this was just right before the Supreme Court got
Speaker 1: started in their oral.
Speaker 2: Arguments over this Presidential Community case.
Speaker 3: Listen, it cannot be the case that a president of
Speaker 3: the United States kent attempt to overturn an election and
Speaker 3: seize power, and that our justice system is incapable of
Speaker 3: holding a trial of holding him to account before the
Speaker 3: next election.
Speaker 2: That cannot be the case.
Speaker 1: Take, by the way, that's Liz Cheney, right, who is
Speaker 1: a useful idiot of the left, who was one of
Speaker 1: those with the January sixth right, that was trying to
Speaker 1: get rid of Donald Trump and to literally make it
Speaker 1: where he was never able to run for president again.
Speaker 2: So that's who you're hearing talking there.
Speaker 1: And you notice that what she's saying is actually the
Speaker 1: complete opposite of what I was saying. She's actually saying,
Speaker 1: we have to live in a world where we hold
Speaker 1: this guy accountable and he didn't even have the chance
Speaker 1: to run.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: Interesting how she's using basically my same argument, but on
Speaker 1: the complete opposite side of it, because she wants Donald
Speaker 1: Trump not to even be able to run for office.
Speaker 2: She wasn't done. Keep listening.
Speaker 3: In action that will result in further delay in preventing
Speaker 3: the American people from seeing that evidence in open court
Speaker 3: is itself suppression of the evidence. That the American people
Speaker 3: have a right to see that evidence, and the court
Speaker 3: ought to.
Speaker 1: Recognize that, and the court ought to recognize that. So
Speaker 1: what she's saying is Donald Trump should have already been disqualified
Speaker 1: from being able to run for president.
Speaker 2: Okay, Like that's it very clearly.
Speaker 1: Now, there's also some of the oral arguments that I
Speaker 1: want to give you, and this is Donald Trump's lawyer,
Speaker 1: John Sower, who is having a conversation with Supreme Court
Speaker 1: Justice Katanji Brown Jackson, also known as kb J, about
Speaker 1: the importance in essence of the president having this ability
Speaker 1: to have this presidential immunity.
Speaker 2: And you can see how political it is.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 2: Just Jackson is hardcore liberal. We all know that.
Speaker 1: And from these or arguments, I think what you can
Speaker 1: tell is she's wanting to make a liberal stand here
Speaker 1: because I think she knows that the Court is going
Speaker 1: to make it very clear that, yes, a president of
Speaker 1: the United States of America has to have some significant
Speaker 1: level of presidential community. Now I'm going to play this
Speaker 1: for you in just a second, but first let me
Speaker 1: tell you about her friend's over at Patriot Mobile. If
Speaker 1: you're like me and you are just sick and tired
Speaker 1: of giving your money to woke companies that are fighting
Speaker 1: against what you believe in, that hate your values, hate
Speaker 1: your family values, then you need to check out Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: You may not realize that Big Mobile gives massive donations
Speaker 1: millions and millions of dollars to the Democratic Party Democratic candidates,
Speaker 1: and what's even worse than that money to plan parenthood.
Speaker 1: If you have a cell phone and a about ninety
Speaker 1: nine percent of you do. You need to switch to
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile. Now, let's talk about them as a company.
Speaker 2: Number one.
Speaker 1: You get the same exact service you've been used to,
Speaker 1: You use the same towers you're using right now. But
Speaker 1: when you pay your bill, something amazing happens. They take
Speaker 1: about five percent of your bill at no extra cost
Speaker 1: to you, and they give it back to conservative organizations
Speaker 1: and causes that support our First and Second Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: that support the rights of unborn children. And they also
Speaker 1: give donations to those that have fought for our country,
Speaker 1: to first responders that risk their lives and get hurt
Speaker 1: on the job, and to wounded warriors who need financial
Speaker 1: help and aid. That is why I love Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: Switching is really easy now in twenty twenty four, switching
Speaker 1: is like not a big deal.
Speaker 2: It used to be miserable and you'd be in the
Speaker 2: store for hours.
Speaker 1: Not when you switch to Patriot Mobile, all you got
Speaker 1: to do is call them nine to seven to Patriot
Speaker 1: that's nine seven to two Patriot nine seven to two
Speaker 1: Patriot or online at Patriotmobile dot com slash ben that's
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash ben. When you call them,
Speaker 1: use a promo code Ben. You'll also get free activation.
Speaker 1: So make the switch and make a difference with every
Speaker 1: phone call you make Patriotmobile dot Com slash Ben or
Speaker 1: nine seven to two Patriot. Take a listen to Trump's
Speaker 1: lawyer back and forth with Justice Jackson, and you can
Speaker 1: hear I'm reading into this, but I believe this is
Speaker 1: a clear indication that even she knows that the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court is going to rule in favor more than likely
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump when it comes to presidential immunity.
Speaker 2: Listen carefully.
Speaker 5: Potential for criminal liability is taken off the table. Wouldn't
Speaker 5: there be a significant risk that future presidents would be
Speaker 5: emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while they're in office.
Speaker 5: It's right now the fact that we're having this debate
Speaker 5: because oh, we'll see his said that presidents might be prosecuted.
Speaker 5: Presidents from the beginning of time have understood that that's
Speaker 5: a possibility. That might be what has kept this office
Speaker 5: from turning into the kind of crime center that I'm envisioning.
Speaker 5: But once we say no criminal liability, mister president, you
Speaker 5: can do whatever you want. I'm worried that we would
Speaker 5: have a worse problem than the problem of the president
Speaker 5: feeling constrained to follow the law while he's in officer.
Speaker 1: Now you hear her there, She's like, in other words,
Speaker 1: I want to rewrite two hundred and thirty four years
Speaker 1: of precedent because I don't like Donald Trump. And she's saying,
Speaker 1: I believe that presidents are just going to start, you know,
Speaker 1: like over and over and over and over again, just
Speaker 1: breaking the law and go rogue if we give them
Speaker 1: the ability, which by the way, they've already had to
Speaker 1: presidential immunity, like they've already had it. And to listen
Speaker 1: to Trump's lawyer's response, it is a very clear and
Speaker 1: concise response to this activist Supreme Court justice.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I respectfully disagree with that, because the regime you've
Speaker 6: described is the regime we've operated under for two hundred
Speaker 6: and thirty four years. There has not been an expectation
Speaker 6: based on two hundred and thirty four years of one
Speaker 6: broken politic.
Speaker 5: All right, let me ask you another question, hicker, Let
Speaker 5: me ask you another question about this.
Speaker 1: By the way, you notice how fast she just moved
Speaker 1: on from that. She didn't want to hear his answer.
Speaker 1: She wanted to put her statement up there that she
Speaker 1: was a good lefty on the Supreme Court and his response,
Speaker 1: I'm going to read it for you.
Speaker 2: I respectfully disagree with that because.
Speaker 1: The regime you've described is the regime we've operated under
Speaker 1: for two hundred and thirty four years. And then she's like, crap,
Speaker 1: that didn't work. Okay, I want to move on from that.
Speaker 1: I have another question to ask you. And when the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court arguments turn into basically like TV talking points,
Speaker 1: like two talking heads debating, that's when you know there's
Speaker 1: probably a problem here, Okay, I like, and when the
Speaker 1: left goes rogue in this way, when the extreme justices
Speaker 1: in the Court won't even listen to the answer, it's
Speaker 1: the writing is pretty much on the wall here. And
Speaker 1: by the way, that wasn't the only justice that went
Speaker 1: crazy today at the Supreme Court. Justice Sude of my
Speaker 1: Art did it as well. Saut of my Or got
Speaker 1: in on this action. And I think it's because she
Speaker 1: wanted to make a real court clear point that she
Speaker 1: also hates Donald Trump. And and you just heard what
Speaker 1: I let you hear from Jackson, and it was pretty
Speaker 1: you know, extreme, And then listen to side of my Or, Well,
Speaker 1: she goes even more extreme in her questioning. Here's her
Speaker 1: back and forth with also the the lawyer who's representing
Speaker 1: Trump at the Supreme Court.
Speaker 7: Can be alleged, but it has to be proven. Melim
Speaker 7: In say, is a concept long viewed as appropriate in law,
Speaker 7: that there's some things that are so fundamentally evil that
Speaker 7: they have to be protected against. Now, I think, and
Speaker 7: your answer below, I'm going to give you a chance
Speaker 7: to say, if you stay by it. If the president
Speaker 7: decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he
Speaker 7: orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is
Speaker 7: that within his official acts for which he can get
Speaker 7: community It would.
Speaker 6: Depends on I without about we can see that could
Speaker 6: well be an official.
Speaker 7: He could and why because he's doing it for personal reasons.
Speaker 2: He's not doing it.
Speaker 7: Like President Obama is alleged to have done it to
Speaker 7: protect the country from a terrorist. He's doing it for
Speaker 7: personal gain. And isn't that the nature of the allegations here,
Speaker 7: that he's not doing them doing these acts and furtherance of.
Speaker 2: An official responsibility.
Speaker 7: He's suing it for personal being.
Speaker 6: I agree with that characterization of the indictment, and that
Speaker 6: confirms immunity because the characterization is that there's a series
Speaker 6: of official acts that we're done for.
Speaker 7: It now, because immunity says, even if you did it
Speaker 7: for personal gain, we won't hold you responsible.
Speaker 2: What do you how could that be? That's an extremely
Speaker 2: strong doctrine.
Speaker 6: In this Court's case law in cases like Fitzgerald.
Speaker 7: Will we go back to Justice Thomas's question, See, if
Speaker 7: you want to know why elections are so important, this
Speaker 7: is exactly why.
Speaker 1: Because when you allow people to get on the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court like Sodoma or who are so radical and hate
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, they actually act like the crazies that we
Speaker 1: see on the streets at these universities right now, for example,
Speaker 1: I mean listen to her question.
Speaker 2: This is at the Supreme Court level.
Speaker 1: If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt
Speaker 1: person and the orders of the military to assassinate him, is
Speaker 1: that within his official acts for which he can give immunity.
Speaker 2: This is what they have been doing to Trump.
Speaker 1: And you got to understand now this is about scoring
Speaker 1: political points, right You now have Supreme Court justices saying
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is going to go out there and
Speaker 1: assassinate his political rivals, when in reality, what was happening
Speaker 1: was the Democratic Party was coming after Donald Trump, trying
Speaker 1: to put him in jail, trying to take his property
Speaker 1: away from him, trying to frame him for crimes, trying
Speaker 1: to get others to turn on him, going after that,
Speaker 1: ran his campaign, going after General Flynn, trying to get
Speaker 1: any dirt on they could to then kick him out
Speaker 1: of office and impeach him over at dossier that they knew
Speaker 1: was created by them, having an FBI that was going
Speaker 1: after them, having an FBI that would protect at all costs,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, having an FBI that was there to protect
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, having an FBI that was not allowing for
Speaker 1: interviews of the Biden crime family, and was allowing the
Speaker 1: money to flow into the United States of America at
Speaker 1: a record level.
Speaker 2: Like if you want to know who was.
Speaker 1: Assassinating their political opponent, you got to understand. This is
Speaker 1: what they do in third world countries. They try to
Speaker 1: they lock up people like Mandela, They lock up their
Speaker 1: political rivals, so they just try.
Speaker 2: To kill them.
Speaker 1: Well, look at what they've tried to do to Donald Trump. Hey,
Speaker 1: don't run again. If you do, hoho, Well, if you do,
Speaker 1: then it's came on right. If you do, we're gonna
Speaker 1: have some real problems. Here, and this is why I
Speaker 1: believe that the Supreme Court is probably going to is
Speaker 1: probably going to ruin favor of Donald Trump because because
Speaker 1: of the arguments and how radical the arguments were by
Speaker 1: the left justices. The Associated Press put it this way.
Speaker 1: The US Supreme Court has taken up Donald Trump's bid
Speaker 1: to avoid prosecution over zephorts overturn his twenty twenty election
Speaker 1: loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Arguments set to begin at ten am.
Speaker 1: Trump's lawyers argue that former presidents are entitled to absolute
Speaker 1: immunity for their official acts. Otherwise, they say, politically motivated
Speaker 1: prosecutions of former occupants the oval office would become routine,
Speaker 1: which is exactly what we've just witnessed of this president.
Speaker 1: And presidents couldn't function as the commander in chief if
Speaker 1: they had to worry about criminal charges after they left office, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, is exactly what they've just done to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump for the last three years and we all
Speaker 1: know it. Lower courts have rejected those arguments, including a
Speaker 1: nanimous three judge panel on an appeals court in Washington, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, they forget to leave out the ap
Speaker 1: It's a very liberal court that gets overruled by the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court all the time time, and even if the
Speaker 1: High Court resignlingly follows suit, the timing of its decision
Speaker 1: may be as important as the outcome. The AP rights,
Speaker 1: that's because Trump, the presumpt of twenty twenty four Republican
Speaker 1: president nominee, has been pushing to delay the trial until
Speaker 1: after the November election.
Speaker 2: Why. It's not because afraid of the outcome.
Speaker 1: It's because he doesn't want to be tied up in
Speaker 1: court while he should be actually running for president the
Speaker 1: United States of America. And this is the reason why
Speaker 1: Democrats are obsessed with this case. They want him to
Speaker 1: be in court, just like he's stuck in court every
Speaker 1: day now in New York City and not out there
Speaker 1: campaigning over a ridiculous hush money trial that the Feds
Speaker 1: wouldn't even bring against Trump. It's basically double jeopardy, and
Speaker 1: so they have him stuck in court so he can't
Speaker 1: do his rallies. The AP goes on to write the
Speaker 1: justices issue their decision, the more likely he is to succeed.
Speaker 1: So I love how the AP's like, well, he's delaying it. No,
Speaker 1: he's trying to delay it so he can run for
Speaker 1: president of the United States of America. He's running. This
Speaker 1: is election interference. Democrats are trying to interfere.
Speaker 2: With the election. The Associated Press is.
Speaker 1: Trying to jedi mind trick you into believing somehow this
Speaker 1: is Trump's fault because he's trying to avoid basically having
Speaker 1: to deal with the music right, having to deal with
Speaker 1: being guilty of something. No, he's the Republican nominee, and
Speaker 1: they're trying to get him in court every single day,
Speaker 1: and every day he's in court instead of out there
Speaker 1: campaigning is a massive advantage and election interference by the DOJ,
Speaker 1: by the FBI, by the Biden administration, who, by the way,
Speaker 1: is running against him. If you're Joe Biden and you're
Speaker 1: the Biden campaign, where is the best place for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump to be every day?
Speaker 2: In court? Now?
Speaker 1: The court typically issues its last opinions by the end
Speaker 1: of June, which is roughly four months before the election.
Speaker 2: So what does that mean.
Speaker 1: It's very clear, very clear Democrats want this to come quickly,
Speaker 1: and they want it to come quickly for one reason
Speaker 1: and one reason only. They don't want him to be
Speaker 1: able to campaign. I think they know this is crap.
Speaker 1: I think they understand it is. I think you can
Speaker 1: tell from justice side of my Ore and Jackson just
Speaker 1: how ridiculous this entire thing is. The Supreme Court, and
Speaker 1: I think there's a very good chance they're going to
Speaker 1: come down and they're going to say, yes, the president
Speaker 1: for the last two hundred and thirty four years has
Speaker 1: presidential immunity on a basic level. And not only that,
Speaker 1: but if he didn't, then the president couldn't do their job.
Speaker 1: This is election interference. That's what it is, folks. It's
Speaker 1: election interference, plain and simple. They need him in court,
Speaker 1: and if they can keep him in court, they win.
Speaker 7: All right.
Speaker 1: I want to also get to something out here, and
Speaker 1: it deals with the economy.
Speaker 2: You may have seen that.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Dow is down like six hundred points
Speaker 1: at some point, which was shocking, and we're now learning
Speaker 1: more about what's happening. The White House is coming out
Speaker 1: defending the terrible economic news. White House brought out their
Speaker 1: top guy, Bernstein, who said that Biden's economy is quote great,
Speaker 1: and we will defend it all day long. This is
Speaker 1: grocery inflation, according to Consumer Price Index, has been zero,
Speaker 1: they say for the past two months. Well guess what
Speaker 1: you're paying countless dollars more now for groceries than you
Speaker 1: did a year, two, three years ago, and everybody knows it.
Speaker 1: So the White House just flat out lying to your face.
Speaker 2: Listen to this.
Speaker 8: Now, we've seen a lot of news about energy from
Speaker 8: this president, you know, limiting LG exports when it comes
Speaker 8: to permitting future permits to non free trade agreements. You've
Speaker 8: seen the Alaska wildlife refuge. They're taking thirteen point three
Speaker 8: million acres off the table. That's putting pressure on gas prices,
Speaker 8: which have been inching up over the past month. And
Speaker 8: we've seen overall CPI inflation go up.
Speaker 2: Maybe because of that.
Speaker 8: Are you worried that inflation is not gone? First of all,
Speaker 8: and you know it's hits here to stay.
Speaker 9: We have a lot more work to do on lowering
Speaker 9: costs on behalf of the American people, and that is
Speaker 9: absolutely at the heart of our agenda. Whether it's negotiating
Speaker 9: lower prescription drug prices, capping the price of insulin at
Speaker 9: thirty five dollars a month, saving millions of Americans eight
Speaker 9: hundred dollars a year on their insurance coverage.
Speaker 2: Our work is definitely not.
Speaker 8: But but Jared, lowering those costs are only for a
Speaker 8: small portion of Americans. You know, a lot of Americans
Speaker 8: are feeling all the gas prices going up. They're feeling,
Speaker 8: you know, nineteen percent entries in all items, grocery items
Speaker 8: up twenty one percent since President Biden came into office.
Speaker 2: This is what people hold on.
Speaker 9: Let's unwrap a lot of that, because I do want
Speaker 9: to get to the gas price. So, grocery inflation, at
Speaker 9: least according to the Consumer Price Index, has been zero
Speaker 9: for the past two months.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 9: That doesn't mean the grocery prices are back to where
Speaker 9: we'd like to see them, but grocery inflation has flattened
Speaker 9: a great deal and that certainly helps, especially in a
Speaker 9: time when people's paychecks are beating prices again thirteen months
Speaker 9: in a row, in a year over year basis. Mid
Speaker 9: wage workers wages have beat prices. They're buying powers going up. Now,
Speaker 9: let's talk about gas. So one of the things that.
Speaker 1: I just have to laugh here for a second, that
Speaker 1: stats as he's saying this are up on the screen
Speaker 1: as the White House is lyned to that. Well, hold on,
Speaker 1: I mean, things are great, right, We'll defend this economy
Speaker 1: all day long.
Speaker 2: We think it's amazing. How many of you think it's amazing.
Speaker 1: The majority of Americans, by the way, do not believe
Speaker 1: that things are amazing right now, because we're saying that
Speaker 1: Bidenomics clearly equals major inflation and everybody knows it.
Speaker 2: We're witnessing it right now.
Speaker 1: In fact, Bloomberg put it this way on Bloomberg TV
Speaker 1: earlier today.
Speaker 4: This isn't going to make for great reading this morning,
Speaker 4: and the Oval Office is it Bidenomics equals inflation. That
Speaker 4: is not what Bidenomics, the narrative was supposed to align with.
Speaker 10: Well, that's not what it represents. And look, I understand
Speaker 10: this is your poll, you're gonna promote it, but I.
Speaker 1: Think overall I love this. James Sperling is white House, Okay,
Speaker 1: he's a white House guy. The guy he's like, well,
Speaker 1: this is your poll, right. The polling shows the American
Speaker 1: people believe that Bidenomics is a disaster and that the
Speaker 1: president is not paying attention to just how bad it
Speaker 1: is in this country economically. And so his response is, well,
Speaker 1: this is your poll at Bloomberg, and this that you
Speaker 1: guys are you're promoting your poll. Okay, So you're saying
Speaker 1: at the same time, screw you to the American people, right,
Speaker 1: that's what you're saying.
Speaker 2: Am I wrong?
Speaker 1: You're saying, well, I don't care what the poll says,
Speaker 1: and the American people are hurting the American people. We
Speaker 1: don't care that they're saying that Bidenomics isn't working very well.
Speaker 1: We're going to keep running with this now. Bloomberg also
Speaker 1: came up with this. Listen to this. Three quarters of
Speaker 1: swing state voters say that Biden is responsible for how
Speaker 1: they feel about the economy right now, and Trump has
Speaker 1: increased his leads over Biden in swing states, and.
Speaker 11: A majority of swing state voters med see worsening economic
Speaker 11: conditions in the coming months, so it doesn't spell optimism for.
Speaker 2: The Biden camp.
Speaker 11: Less than one in five respondents say they expect inflation
Speaker 11: and interest rates to be lower by the end.
Speaker 2: Of the year.
Speaker 11: And then more than three quarters say that Biden is
Speaker 11: responsible for how they feel about the economy, which isn't
Speaker 11: a very good mood, and more than half said that
Speaker 11: he is very responsible.
Speaker 1: More than half say is very responsible, and three quarters
Speaker 1: say yeah, it's Biden is responsible for how they feel
Speaker 1: about the economy. So the numbers are coming out the
Speaker 1: numbers are clear. The American people are holding Joe Biden
Speaker 1: accountable for Bidenomics, and they're holding them accountable for how
Speaker 1: how bad things are right now in this country. Janet
Speaker 1: Yellen coming out Treasury Secretary saying we have to we
Speaker 1: have to have a sustainable fiscal policy and President Biden
Speaker 1: is committed to that.
Speaker 2: Really, because you guys are.
Speaker 1: Spending one trillion dollars every one hundred day with a
Speaker 1: Biden budget, right, So.
Speaker 2: This is the promise.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: The President is even out there today saying that we
Speaker 1: got to get things under control in Syracuse, New York,
Speaker 1: all right, and what did he have to say? He's
Speaker 1: touting infrastructure. Infrastructure, folks, listen and all folks.
Speaker 12: All over the years, I've asked been leaders like Sanjay
Speaker 12: because the other team kept criticizing me for wanting to
Speaker 12: make these investments, you know, things like the Infrastructure Bill,
Speaker 12: which is over two million dollars and we're gonna have
Speaker 12: a we have an infrastructure decade coming. Last guy had
Speaker 12: Infrastructure Week and never showed up.
Speaker 2: But that's your president of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: The other team kept criticizing me for wanting to make
Speaker 1: these investments.
Speaker 2: We have an infrastructure decade coming.
Speaker 1: Last guy had Infrastructure Week and never showed up, and
Speaker 1: the audience laughed.
Speaker 2: There's your pre planned line by the president.
Speaker 1: Now, look, that may work in a room, okay, with
Speaker 1: people that are paying to see you, paying to be there,
Speaker 1: wanting to give you money because they believe in socialism.
Speaker 1: But even listen to the president here saying, quote, we're
Speaker 1: exporting American jobs, and you're supposed to clap for this, and.
Speaker 12: It's clear we have the strongest economy in the world.
Speaker 12: That's a fact, teen million new jobs.
Speaker 2: Created in three and a half years.
Speaker 12: Unemployment hasn't been as low for this long, for fifty years,
Speaker 12: wages arise. Instead of importing foreign products, we're exporting and
Speaker 12: exporting American jobs. We're exporting American products and creating American jobs.
Speaker 1: We're exporting American jobs. It's clear we have the strongest
Speaker 1: economy in the world. Ask the American people. They're not
Speaker 1: buying the lies that you're telling them right now. They're
Speaker 1: not buying this idea that you guys are somehow killing
Speaker 1: it because they're living with these insanely high prices that
Speaker 1: we're dealing with right now. It is obvious that the
Speaker 1: president of the United States of America is in real
Speaker 1: trouble when it comes to the economy of the American people.
Speaker 1: I'll give you another headline, Biden's gains against Trump vanish
Speaker 1: on deep economic issues.
Speaker 2: New poll shows the.
Speaker 1: President's trailing Trump in six of seven swing states. Is
Speaker 1: a majority of poll respondency the economy worsening by the end.
Speaker 2: Of the year. And what does he say. He says,
Speaker 2: everything's great.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump coming out to the media talking about these
Speaker 1: new numbers as he's stuck in court with clear election interference.
Speaker 1: Here is what he had to say about Bidenomics.
Speaker 13: As you probably have heard, subverting things have happened that
Speaker 13: the biggest seems to be that the GV just announces
Speaker 13: all the way down to one point six percent of
Speaker 13: the setting south. It's a good worse gas prices than
Speaker 13: donaldll on.
Speaker 2: You were just also.
Speaker 13: Announced that seven dollars and sixty cents gas lady's going
Speaker 13: way up, energy wants are going away up, and the
Speaker 13: stock market is in a sense crashing. The numbers have
Speaker 13: heardent is Bite now sketching up with them. It's lucky
Speaker 13: that it's sketching up before even the police office. It's
Speaker 13: supposed to get in theselfs. But this is bid noomics.
Speaker 13: It's destroying our country at the border, destroying our country
Speaker 13: with other countries. They no longer respect for the United States.
Speaker 13: I think the dollars in tremendous trouble in terms of currency.
Speaker 13: This is going to be the standard, and it's going
Speaker 13: to be the standard with me with You're going to
Speaker 13: lose the dollars the standard. That'll be like losing the
Speaker 13: biggest war we've ever lost.
Speaker 2: And it's a shade.
Speaker 13: But it's all the way down to one point six,
Speaker 13: So don't tell you that.
Speaker 2: Nobody could that would be possible.
Speaker 13: And it looks like it's heading.
Speaker 2: Down from there.
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump telling you the truth. The GDP just
Speaker 1: announced it's all the way down to one point six
Speaker 1: and it's heading south. Gasoline is going way up, Energy
Speaker 1: costs are going way up. This is Bidenomics. This, by
Speaker 1: the way, is what the election is going to be about.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what it should be about. And when
Speaker 1: it was an ounce this morning calling it stagflation, here's
Speaker 1: what it sounded like at.
Speaker 14: First quarter GDP the annual rate one point six percent
Speaker 14: between January and March. The expectation was two point four percent.
Speaker 14: This is a much lower than anticipated number. As a refresher,
Speaker 14: the final three months of last year growth was three
Speaker 14: point four percent. So we're going from three point four
Speaker 14: percent all the way down to one point six percent.
Speaker 14: The consumer is slowing down, inflation remains high. The Atlanta
Speaker 14: Fed as of now has their GDP GDP now number
Speaker 14: at two point seven. So there you have at one
Speaker 14: point six percent. First look at first quarter two.
Speaker 1: I don't see how Joe Biden overcomes this. And this
Speaker 1: is exactly why they're going to try to lock up
Speaker 1: Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: This is what it's all about.
Speaker 1: Make sure you share this podcast with your family and friends.
Speaker 1: Please don't forget to rise a five star review and
Speaker 1: I'll see you back here tomorrow