Speaker 1: Judge Juan Merchant holding Donald Trump in contempt yet again
Speaker 1: for violating his gag order. And now the New York
Speaker 1: County judge is now giving a major warning to the President,
Speaker 1: telling him that after he has violated his gag order
Speaker 1: again during the trial, the next time, well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to put you in jail. Yeah, jail time for any
Speaker 1: further infractions. Take a listen to this from Fox News
Speaker 1: where Annie McCarthy said putting Donald Trump in jail would
Speaker 1: be the worst decision ever for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 2: Abana Seawan now indicating that he's going to find Donald
Speaker 2: Trump in contempt for the tenth time. He's recognizing fairly
Speaker 2: quickly that when you slap one thousand dollars fines on
Speaker 2: a billionaire, you're not necessarily going to get him to
Speaker 2: change his ways or his comments or what he says
Speaker 2: in public or otherwise. But he said, this is the
Speaker 2: judge now that he would consider jail up there for
Speaker 2: further violations to that extent prosecutors have urged him to
Speaker 2: do so.
Speaker 3: Will that likely happen?
Speaker 2: Let's go to Andy McCarthy on that former assistant US attorney.
Speaker 2: Fox News contributed that would be a big lead but
Speaker 2: what do you think, Andy.
Speaker 4: Well, I think it'd be politically disastrous for Democrats to
Speaker 4: have Donald Trump be put in jail over this. I
Speaker 4: think it would just cause more scrutiny for this case,
Speaker 4: which is very politicized.
Speaker 5: I don't see how that helps them politically.
Speaker 4: So I think the judges backing himself into a bad
Speaker 4: corner by continuing to draw a line in the sand
Speaker 4: that I think he really doesn't want to.
Speaker 5: Cross with these struts of incarceration.
Speaker 2: You're the legal legal I'm not, as they've often told you.
Speaker 2: I've watched a lot of law shows, so.
Speaker 3: I think I qualify.
Speaker 2: But the one thing that struck me, couldn't the judge
Speaker 2: make this easier on himself and everybody else if he
Speaker 2: just said the standards i'm applying to you, Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: I will apply now to Michael Cohen.
Speaker 4: Well, there's less law for the proposition that you can
Speaker 4: you can stifle a witness than a party. But you're
Speaker 4: quite right that you know there's there's what the law
Speaker 4: exactly says, and that there's what the judge could do
Speaker 4: if the judge really wants, If the judge made it
Speaker 4: clear to prosecutors that he wants their witness to stop
Speaker 4: talking about Trump.
Speaker 5: They're talking about the case, they would that would happen quickly.
Speaker 4: He's not doing that on the rationalization that Trump is
Speaker 4: the only one who's on trial.
Speaker 5: But the thing is, Neil, If what he's saying.
Speaker 4: Is that he's trying to shield the proceedings from, you know,
Speaker 4: heightened publicity and other potential things that could undermine the proceedings,
Speaker 4: it really doesn't matter which participant in the trial is
Speaker 4: doing the talking, whether it's Trump or somebody else, that
Speaker 4: still generates what the what the judge says he's trying
Speaker 4: to shield the jury and the rest of the pro
Speaker 4: says from So I think it's a disingenuous argument. My
Speaker 4: own view of it, for what it's worth, is that
Speaker 4: he doesn't the judge doesn't want Trump talking about the
Speaker 4: fact that the judge's daughter is a political operative for
Speaker 4: the Democrats who gets a lot of money working for
Speaker 4: people who define themselves by.
Speaker 5: How much they loath Trump.
Speaker 4: I think that's problematic for the judge and he doesn't
Speaker 4: want Trump talking about it. So he's pretextually saying that
Speaker 4: Trump is threatening witnesses, which Trump isn't doing, so that
Speaker 4: he has an excuse to tamp down that line of
Speaker 4: argument by Trump.
Speaker 1: You listen to what he had to say there, and
Speaker 1: I think the point that is the takeaway is if
Speaker 1: you're a judge, are you really going to lock up
Speaker 1: the front runner for the presidency of the United States
Speaker 1: of America over the most egregious court case we have
Speaker 1: seen in modern political history?
Speaker 3: Number one? And number two?
Speaker 1: Are you going to do it to the guy who's
Speaker 1: a former president just on that alone? And then the
Speaker 1: front runner, which is clear election interference? That's the question
Speaker 1: everyone should be asking. Want to talk to you, though,
Speaker 1: real quick about something else, and that's inflation. Inflation is skyrocketing.
Speaker 1: It is well above the Fed's target rate. Consumer prices
Speaker 1: of skyrocketed year over year over year, and if you
Speaker 1: look at what it costs to live now compared to
Speaker 1: what it costs just four years ago, you know you
Speaker 1: need an extra twenty two thousand dollars on average per
Speaker 1: family just to keep up with where you were four
Speaker 1: years ago. Now, what does that mean for your retirement?
Speaker 1: It means you need more money now to retire than
Speaker 1: ever before. And that is where gold and silver come in.
Speaker 1: Gold and silver have historically been good hedges against inflation.
Speaker 1: That's why we're seeing gold right now continuing to hit
Speaker 1: record highs. It's a great way to protect your hard
Speaker 1: earned retirement dollars. Now, there are a lot gold comies
Speaker 1: out there. Many of them will tell you to put
Speaker 1: all your money in gold and silver. That is not diversification,
Speaker 1: and they'll never tell you to do that at Freedom
Speaker 1: Goold USA. The other thing is there's a lot of
Speaker 1: companies that charge insane commission, so when you go to
Speaker 1: buy gold, you're already upside down significantly. When you actually
Speaker 1: get that gold, well, guess what, Freedom Goold USA. They
Speaker 1: charge twenty five to thirty percent less than most major
Speaker 1: gold and silver firms. So take control of your financial
Speaker 1: future now. Visit Freedomgoldusa dot com slash ben. It's freedom
Speaker 1: GOOLDUSA dot com slash ben save twenty five to thirty
Speaker 1: percent less than most major gold and silver firms. That
Speaker 1: means twenty five to thirty percent more gold or silver
Speaker 1: in your account. One eight hundred sixty five five eight
Speaker 1: eight four to three is their number. One eight hundred
Speaker 1: sixty five five eight eight four three. Call them, tell
Speaker 1: them Ben Ferguson sent you, and ask them about getting
Speaker 1: free silver in your account today freedom GOOLDUSA dot com
Speaker 1: slash ben all right. Back to what Anny McCarthy was
Speaker 1: saying there, it'd be politically disastrous for Dems if the
Speaker 1: judge ordered Trump to be in jail. I do believe
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is showing just how egregious this is.
Speaker 1: And look, they were finding Trump one thousand dollars for
Speaker 1: a single violation. He previously fined Trump for nine violations.
Speaker 1: That's nine grand Trump then had another quote violation the
Speaker 1: judge's the judge's mind right for a tenth contempt defense
Speaker 1: occurred before the last order.
Speaker 3: And not afterwards.
Speaker 1: Trump did not push the boundaries after the first gag
Speaker 1: order ruling. Just so you know, quote, this court will
Speaker 1: have to consider a jail sanction, is what the judge
Speaker 1: said the court and quote, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: I have a job to do. Part of that job
Speaker 1: is protect the dignity of the justice system. The violation
Speaker 1: is a direct attack on the rule of law, and
Speaker 1: I cannot allow that to continue, he added. According to
Speaker 1: the court reporters, now, the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg
Speaker 1: alleged Trump committed four violations, including comments about Michael Cohen,
Speaker 1: a guy that is a convicted If I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: it's a felon, right convicted felon, and he can say
Speaker 1: and go on TV and on his podcast and say
Speaker 1: whatever he wants to say. Also, David Pecker, the former
Speaker 1: publisher of the National Inquirer, these are things that they're
Speaker 1: able to talk and Trump's not. And the prosecutors allege
Speaker 1: a speech directed towards witnesses was a violation of the
Speaker 1: original gag order quote. I think it's a political hoax,
Speaker 1: Trump told reporters before entering the courtroom today.
Speaker 3: It's election interference.
Speaker 1: This is a ridiculous situation, not fair, not fair, but
Speaker 1: we will fight.
Speaker 3: I just want to be very clear.
Speaker 1: I think if they put Donald Trump in jail, it
Speaker 1: will be the biggest backfire in modern political history.
Speaker 3: I really, really, really do believe that.
Speaker 1: Now the gag order is to prevent Trump from making
Speaker 1: public comments about witnesses participating in the trial. The problem is,
Speaker 1: the main witness is a guy who's his former lawyer
Speaker 1: and a guy who's out there making a living off
Speaker 1: of trashing Donald Trump. Should he be able to respond, Yes,
Speaker 1: There's also another reason why Donald Trump should be able
Speaker 1: to speak and not be silenced by the court. He's
Speaker 1: running for president of the United States of America, and
Speaker 1: part of running for office is having the ability to
Speaker 1: defend yourself when people are coming after you. It is
Speaker 1: incredibly unfair and clearly it is election interference to tell
Speaker 1: a former president and the front runner for the presidency
Speaker 1: yet again, that they can't respond to people that are
Speaker 1: attacking him, and it will alter and change the election
Speaker 1: in a major way.
Speaker 3: That's just the reality here.
Speaker 1: I want to play for you real quick what Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said before he walked into the courthouse. And the
Speaker 1: reason why is because there's two two points here. One
Speaker 1: yay talks about the fact that this judge has found
Speaker 1: him in contempt for the tenth time. It's ten thousand
Speaker 1: dollars total and fines a thousand freach charge, and now
Speaker 1: the judge saying, hey, I'm gonna put you in jail,
Speaker 1: and I want you to listen to Trump and how
Speaker 1: he responds that first off. But the second thing I
Speaker 1: want you to notice is how quickly he pivots and
Speaker 1: goes back to the issues. For example, the Columbia University
Speaker 1: just canceled their commencement, and he says that shouldn't have
Speaker 1: happened like this is unfair to the students, all because
Speaker 1: the radical extremists on the left. And there's a focus
Speaker 1: part here that I love about Trump, Like, yes, he's
Speaker 1: being clearly there's election interference going on, like that is
Speaker 1: so clear, but he's still staying focused on the issues
Speaker 1: for the American people at the very same time. Take
Speaker 1: a listen to Trump as he's walking into the court.
Speaker 6: The first question, as you know, they've taken away my
Speaker 6: constitutional right, so I'm not allowed to answer to that question.
Speaker 6: This has never happened in this country before. It's a
Speaker 6: ridiculous thing. It's a ridiculous case.
Speaker 5: I did nothing.
Speaker 3: Wrong, absolutely nothing wrong.
Speaker 6: I take a look at great Jared this morning he
Speaker 6: went on, take a look at Andrew McCarthy or Jonathan
Speaker 6: Journally or Barca who. It's like they say there's an
Speaker 6: ocase here, and yet the judges gagged me and I'm
Speaker 6: not allowed to talk about.
Speaker 5: I guess his total conflict.
Speaker 7: The judge is totally confidict It could be conflicted, and
Speaker 7: you want to take a look at it, and I'm
Speaker 7: not supposed to be talking about it, but I am
Speaker 7: allowed to say that the judges a conflict that like
Speaker 7: nobody's ever happy.
Speaker 3: For you ought to take a look at it.
Speaker 7: He's taken away my constitutional right to speak.
Speaker 3: I was in Miami this weekend and reporters are.
Speaker 7: Asking me questions the same questions like you're asking me,
Speaker 7: and I have to say I have a gaggle or
Speaker 7: I can't speak about it.
Speaker 3: Never happened before or ever.
Speaker 5: Number one. Number two, it's a fake trial. They have
Speaker 5: no case.
Speaker 3: And it's been absolutely proven now that.
Speaker 5: No case whatsoever.
Speaker 7: This is Alvin Bragg doing it for political reasons for Biden.
Speaker 5: This is a bike trial. He's a crooked president.
Speaker 6: Now, it just came out Columbia just canceled their commensal axioms.
Speaker 6: Columbia just canceled their commensal. That shouldn't happen. And it
Speaker 6: also came out that the.
Speaker 7: Protesters, many of the protesters are backed by Biden's donors.
Speaker 8: Okay, are you listening Israel? I Hope you're listening Israel,
Speaker 8: Hope you're getting smart. But they're back by Biden donors.
Speaker 8: That's where the money's coming from. And I'm not surprised
Speaker 8: at all.
Speaker 9: There's many other articles, many of them having to do
Speaker 9: with the gag order, the unconstitutionality having to do with
Speaker 9: the gag order, and it is unconstitutional and it shouldn't
Speaker 9: be allowed. And I wish people could proved a little bit.
Speaker 7: Quicker the knowelling courts, because the whole world is watching you,
Speaker 7: so they see what's happening.
Speaker 6: More importantly, frankly, they have no case. They have absolutely
Speaker 6: no case. It's a political.
Speaker 7: Hopes and selection interference anything they can do, and even
Speaker 7: the witnesses they want to bring up, they have nothing
Speaker 7: to do with the case. This is a ridiculous situation,
Speaker 7: not fair, not fair.
Speaker 3: But we will fight, thank you, but we will fight.
Speaker 1: You can hear the President going back to that and saying, look,
Speaker 1: we still have business here that we got to deal with.
Speaker 1: We still have a country in essence to save, and
Speaker 1: so I'm going to tell you what's going on, but
Speaker 1: I'm also going to move on now. All of this
Speaker 1: is happening, by the way, right now, while there's something
Speaker 1: else that the Democrats are going to have to deal with,
Speaker 1: this reality. The judge and brag and everyone involved in
Speaker 1: this case. They say there's nothing political here, right, They're lying,
Speaker 1: And I think most Americans have figured that out, Like
Speaker 1: they're lying, that's number one. But if you're gonna hold
Speaker 1: the line that this is real and something that was
Speaker 1: supposed to happen and it was something that we needed
Speaker 1: to happen. If that's the line, then don't you have
Speaker 1: to put Trump in jail if he violates it yet again,
Speaker 1: which I have no doubt he's going to, and then
Speaker 1: you got to stick by that. But then there's Democrats
Speaker 1: that are going to say, wow, no, no, no, just find
Speaker 1: him again, right, just just just find him again. Don't
Speaker 1: put him in jail because that will be the biggest
Speaker 1: backfire we've ever seen. So if you don't put Trump
Speaker 1: in jail at this point, then it doesn't that speak
Speaker 1: to just how political this whole entire witch hunt actually is.
Speaker 1: That you are willing to arrest him, you're willing to
Speaker 1: try to ruin his life, You're you're willing to go
Speaker 1: to trial over charges that Alvin Bragg said he would
Speaker 1: bring if he gets elected and is raising money off
Speaker 1: of that. The federal government wouldn't even take the case
Speaker 1: because they said that there was no evidence in a
Speaker 1: crime committed here. And then you do this the way
Speaker 1: that they did it in court basically the second go
Speaker 1: round so it's not federal charges, and they say, oh.
Speaker 3: This isn't political.
Speaker 1: Okay, if it's not political, then you got to put
Speaker 1: Trump in jail. And if you don't put him in jail,
Speaker 1: and you keep finding him a thousand dollars over and
Speaker 1: over and over and over again, then you are admitting
Speaker 1: by not putting him in jail, that this is in
Speaker 1: fact political because you're you're afraid that if you put
Speaker 1: him in jail, that it's going to affect the outcome
Speaker 1: of the election. Like if you want to see and
Speaker 1: they know this, this judge knows this. Alvin Bragg has
Speaker 1: to know this if you actually locked up. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine seeing a former president of the United States of
Speaker 1: America and you want to talk about election interference putting
Speaker 1: him in jail?
Speaker 3: Donald Trump in jail.
Speaker 1: There's been word that's been coming out that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: or the Secret Service are now planning for actual contingencies
Speaker 1: how they would keep a former president safe while in prison.
Speaker 1: Like while in prison and what does that look like?
Speaker 1: You can't put him with the rest of the prison population.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have to completely isolate him from everybody else
Speaker 1: because your job is to keep the president safe. So
Speaker 1: what does it look like if you do this, and
Speaker 1: if you do it, the President the Secret Service are
Speaker 1: going to have to be involved in every step of this.
Speaker 1: It's not like you just say I'm putting you in
Speaker 1: jail and then you walk out the baylists grab you
Speaker 1: and they take you back behind the court.
Speaker 3: It didn't work that way.
Speaker 1: But if you want to see American patriots get angry,
Speaker 1: put Donald Trump in jail. And if you don't do it,
Speaker 1: and he does quote cross the line again and then
Speaker 1: you purposely don't put him in jail after you make
Speaker 1: this threat, then it goes back again to proving the
Speaker 1: point this is all political from the very beginning. They're
Speaker 1: what they're wanting to do, and what they're trying to
Speaker 1: do is put Donald Trump in a court room so
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump can't go out in campaign. Okay, Like
Speaker 1: that's the whole ball game here, and they know it,
Speaker 1: and Trump knows it. And by the way, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is also called for the arrest of Jack Smith, the
Speaker 1: special prosecutor, after prosecutors admit to misleading a judge on
Speaker 1: evidence that they tampered with There were several revelations last
Speaker 1: week that the special counsel Jack Smith's team had mishandled
Speaker 1: evidence in the trial of former President Trump over his
Speaker 1: allegedly criminal mismanagement of classified documents. Trump then went on
Speaker 1: social media to demand the case against him be dropped
Speaker 1: and that Smith himself be prosecuted instead, saying, quote, it
Speaker 1: has always been clear that the document's case is nothing
Speaker 1: but an election interference scam concocted by crooked Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and deranged Jack Smith and their hacks and thugs.
Speaker 3: That's what he said.
Speaker 1: On Friday, he said, now derange Jack Smith has had
Speaker 1: to admit in a filing in front of Judge Cannon
Speaker 1: to what I've been saying happened since the illegal raid
Speaker 1: on my home at Marlago, that he and his team
Speaker 1: committed blatant evidence tampering by mishandling the very boxes they
Speaker 1: used as a pretext to bring this fake case. These
Speaker 1: deeply illegal actions by the politicized prosecutors mandate that this
Speaker 1: whole witch hunt be dropped immediately. He added in the
Speaker 1: box's hoaxes MAGA twenty twenty four.
Speaker 3: He then put at the end of that.
Speaker 1: Post on true Social Hours later, Trump returned a true
Speaker 1: Social account to demand that Smith be quote arrested, saying
Speaker 1: arrest arrange Jack Smith, he is a criminal based on
Speaker 1: the fact that there was evidence tampering going on as
Speaker 1: a pretext to getting in.
Speaker 3: And having a raid at Marlago again.
Speaker 1: I hope they put Trump in jail. I mean that
Speaker 1: because I think the world will. I think the United
Speaker 1: States America will stand up and say this is out
Speaker 1: of control radicalism by the extreme left. This is a weapon,
Speaker 1: is a the politicalization of the Justice Department, and people
Speaker 1: will say that is a step too far. And by
Speaker 1: the way, that's exactly why I think this judge won't
Speaker 1: do it. He can threaten it all he once, but
Speaker 1: this is why I think he won't actually do it.
Speaker 1: I want to pivot to what's going on in Israel
Speaker 1: as well, real quick, because it's really important that you know,
Speaker 1: and there is a pr stunt that is unfolding before
Speaker 1: our very eyes. Hamas has agreed they claim to a
Speaker 1: ceasefire proposal from Egypt and Katar. Now we have heard
Speaker 1: nothing official from the Israeli government. Is what the media
Speaker 1: initially says about this, claiming that now if Israel doesn't
Speaker 1: agree to the terms that were put together from Egypt
Speaker 1: and Qatar, that they're somehow now the aggressor, and this
Speaker 1: is a pr stunt. I want you to listen to
Speaker 1: how the Cut News cover this instantly. They took the
Speaker 1: bait from Hamas, they took the bait for the terrorists,
Speaker 1: and they ran with it on National TV.
Speaker 10: That's a proposal that has now been on the table
Speaker 10: for more than a week, a proposal that the US
Speaker 10: has been urging Hamas to take. Now, our understanding of
Speaker 10: the most recent iteration of this proposal is that Hamas
Speaker 10: would agree to the release of thirty three hostages from
Speaker 10: the so called humanitarian category, so that is women, it
Speaker 10: is children, it is the elderly, it is people with
Speaker 10: serious medical conditions, and in return, Israel would agree to
Speaker 10: a forty day ceasefire and the release of potentially thousands
Speaker 10: of Palestinian prisoners. Now we should stress us at this point,
Speaker 10: all we have is this statement from the political wing
Speaker 10: of Hamas. We do not have the detail of what
Speaker 10: exactly it is that they have agreed to. And there
Speaker 10: has been pretty frenetic diplomacy over the weekends involving CIA
Speaker 10: director Bill Burns, who has been chrisp crossing the Middle East,
Speaker 10: starting in Egypt, flying to Katar coming here to Israel,
Speaker 10: so it is possible that the framework of that deal
Speaker 10: has changed over the weekends. It is also worth saying
Speaker 10: that these deals are often structured in terms of first
Speaker 10: and agreement on a broad framework and then hammering out
Speaker 10: of the details. And as we know, Chris, the devil
Speaker 10: is often in the detail.
Speaker 5: But there is positive indication.
Speaker 10: For the first time since that last ceasefire deal, which
Speaker 10: lasted only a week collapsed on December one last year,
Speaker 10: this is the first time that we have heard from
Speaker 10: Hamas that they are prepared to accept a ceasefire proposal.
Speaker 10: Now we have heard nothing officially from the Israeli government.
Speaker 10: Israel is certainly aware of this statement from Hamas, they
Speaker 10: are studying it, but we have not heard yet from
Speaker 10: Prime Minister net Yahu or from Israeli official. But this
Speaker 10: is a potentially potentially positive sign after these many, many
Speaker 10: months of bloodshed in Gaza, and these many many painful
Speaker 10: months of the hostages staying in Amas captivity.
Speaker 3: All right, so let's be queer what the media is
Speaker 3: doing there.
Speaker 1: They're telling you that this is a deal that Israel
Speaker 1: should take, while admitting they have no idea what's in
Speaker 1: the deal. Did you notice that, like, oh, well, this
Speaker 1: is a big deal, and we've got terrorists that are
Speaker 1: agreeing to a new deal after they're the ones that
Speaker 1: broke the ceasefire agreement last time, and this is like,
Speaker 1: we're very excited about this, and this is something that
Speaker 1: they need to do. What's in the deal, we don't know,
Speaker 1: but they should agree to it. Israel shouldn't agree to anything,
Speaker 1: especially they don't know what's in the damn deal. Tom Cotton,
Speaker 1: by the way, coming out after amasays has agreed to
Speaker 1: a ceasefire deal that makes no mention to the hostages,
Speaker 1: because about thirty minutes after that MSNBC report, it came
Speaker 1: out that there was no mention of releasing hostages in
Speaker 1: this deal. I want you to hear what Tom Cotton
Speaker 1: said while on Fox.
Speaker 11: All right, let's go.
Speaker 12: Ahead now and bring in Senator Tom cottony serves on
Speaker 12: the Senate Armed Services Committee. Sir, just hearing this news
Speaker 12: that Hamas says they have agreed to the terms of
Speaker 12: the ceasefire without specifying what those terms are. Mighty hard
Speaker 12: for the Israelis to agree to a ceasefire when Hamas
Speaker 12: has not even been truthful or forthcoming about how many
Speaker 12: hostages remaining captivity, and how many of them are even
Speaker 12: alive at this point.
Speaker 11: Well, Jillian, we'll have to see exactly what Israel says
Speaker 11: they received from Hamas. But this sounds suspiciously like an
Speaker 11: info operation trying to win a pr war, because Hamas
Speaker 11: knows it can't win a military war against Israel, nor
Speaker 11: can you negotiate with them in good faith. As you said,
Speaker 11: we don't even know how many of the hostages remain alive.
Speaker 11: We hope most of them do, but I think we
Speaker 11: have to accepit up the reality that many or even most,
Speaker 11: might already be dead. Hamas won't even provide proof of
Speaker 11: life photos or videos. It would not be hard for
Speaker 11: Hamas to put today's newspaper in front of these hostages
Speaker 11: and have them speak a few words into the camera,
Speaker 11: but then that would reveal their ace cards, how many
Speaker 11: hostages they still have alive. And Hamas is not going
Speaker 11: to do that, and they're especially not going to do
Speaker 11: that as long as Joe Biden continues to pressure Israel
Speaker 11: to give Hamas what it wants more than all, which
Speaker 11: is its continued existence. Israel is dedicated to Hamas's destruction.
Speaker 11: There are four Hamas battalions left in Rafa. Every time
Speaker 11: Joe Biden says or his senior aide say, we don't
Speaker 11: want Israel to take down these battalions in Rafa. We
Speaker 11: demand that they reopen these gates the supplies can get in.
Speaker 11: Apparently now withholding ammunition from Israel, all it does is
Speaker 11: make Comas less likely to agree to any kind of
Speaker 11: hostage release because they think they're going to get from
Speaker 11: Joe Biden's pressure what Israel is otherwise only getting when
Speaker 11: they apply military pressure to Hamas.
Speaker 13: At least, according to one report, I saw Israel or
Speaker 13: Yaho in that call did agree to reover the carb
Speaker 13: Shalom crossing for humanitarian assistants.
Speaker 3: Reuters is reporting on this.
Speaker 13: Here's what it's said about Israel's rejection of the Hamas deal.
Speaker 13: Israeli official says Hamas announcement appears to be a ruse
Speaker 13: to cast Israel is the side refusing a deal. And
Speaker 13: there's a tremendous amount of pressure on Biden too from
Speaker 13: the left.
Speaker 5: Listen to what.
Speaker 13: Bernie Sanders posted on x He said one million people
Speaker 13: have fled to Ratha for months. The US has warned
Speaker 13: against an attack. Yah who ignored the warnings. Now an
Speaker 13: assault is imminent, it will kill countless civilians. President Biden
Speaker 13: must back his words with action and all offensive military
Speaker 13: aid to Israel.
Speaker 3: Why wouldn't Hamas see an opportunity.
Speaker 11: Here, Well, John, that's exactly right again. As long as
Speaker 11: Joe Biden the Democratic Party keeps putting pressure on Israel,
Speaker 11: it makes him loss that much less likely to actually
Speaker 11: agree to release any of these hostages. The only reason
Speaker 11: they restarted arted negotiations a few weeks ago is because
Speaker 11: the invasion of Ratha appeared imminent. The only time Hamas
Speaker 11: has been willing to release hostages and when they is
Speaker 11: when they are feeling intense military pressure. And every time
Speaker 11: Joe Biden and the Democrats say that Israel should not
Speaker 11: proceed with this war, they demand a cease fire, and
Speaker 11: Hamas is simply emboldened. Look at what Hamas is saying
Speaker 11: about these disgusting cesspools of anti Semitic hate on our campuses,
Speaker 11: little gazes all around the country.
Speaker 5: They're celebrating them.
Speaker 11: Because they know that puts more pressure on Joe Biden
Speaker 11: and the Democrats to demand that Israel capitulate as opposed
Speaker 11: to what they should be doing. If these people want
Speaker 11: gozens to stop suffering, they should demand that Hamas release
Speaker 11: all the hostages and unconditionally surrender.
Speaker 1: Do not fall for the propaganda. That is the reason
Speaker 1: why I played that for you, so that you understand,
Speaker 1: do not fall for this. They are trying to act
Speaker 1: like they want a deal and there's there's no mention
Speaker 1: of the hostages in the deal. Why would there be
Speaker 1: no mention in the deal of hostages because they're not
Speaker 1: going to give those up. That's their quote leverage, right,
Speaker 1: They're all in for the leverage.
Speaker 3: It's just pure leverage.
Speaker 1: And they're like, all right, we'll announce that we want
Speaker 1: to do a deal. We will, we'll announce it. We'll
Speaker 1: say we're going to do a deal. So what's in
Speaker 1: the deal. We're not talking about that. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we're not going to talk about what's in the deal.
Speaker 1: We're just going to tell you we've agreed to a deal.
Speaker 1: What about hostages? Is that going to be a part
Speaker 1: of the deal.
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 3: And why are they saying this? So this is all.
Speaker 1: Because the Israelis said, Hey, we're going to go into
Speaker 1: Rafla if you guys don't give us the hostages back,
Speaker 1: and agree to a real deal. We're going in because
Speaker 1: as you notice there, they even admit it. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: where they're keeping them, and that's where they are, these
Speaker 1: battalions of Hamas fighters. So we're going to go to
Speaker 1: the next phase of this war. And the media is
Speaker 1: helping them eld this by saying, well, you know, they
Speaker 1: agreed to a deal with with with Cutter and Jordan
Speaker 1: to put it together, right, so it must be a
Speaker 1: good deal.
Speaker 3: What's the deal? We don't know, right, We have no idea,
Speaker 3: we have no clut all. And while all that's happening,
Speaker 3: you have a president that's also.
Speaker 1: Talking about flying thousands of Palestinian quote refugees into the US,
Speaker 1: which is another massive problem here. So they're not listening
Speaker 1: to the terrorism threat, they're not listening to the Israelis.
Speaker 1: They're not standing out for the Israelis at all. And
Speaker 1: the White House, we were told, was even thinking about
Speaker 1: meeting with the protesters of these college campuses, which now
Speaker 1: the White House is denying because they got busted in
Speaker 1: the news.
Speaker 3: Listen to this, you can agreed.
Speaker 13: Parson Rocanna said that the president should and will be
Speaker 13: out visiting these campus among the protests.
Speaker 3: I mean the protest. Is there any plan for him
Speaker 3: to get out there and talk to students right now?
Speaker 1: I love that in Congress and roconsin you guys are
Speaker 1: gonna the President's going to be out there visiting these protesters,
Speaker 1: and the why is like no, no, no, no, We're
Speaker 1: not doing that.
Speaker 3: Next and move on quickly, move on, No follow ups.
Speaker 3: Let's go, no follow ups.
Speaker 1: Gotta move on, Gotta move on quickly, gotta move hurry, next, next,
Speaker 1: next question. The president is in a clear situation where
Speaker 1: he is trying to keep the extreme of his party
Speaker 1: intact so they'll vote for him, because if they don't
Speaker 1: show up, he screwed, and that means you're siding with
Speaker 1: the terrorist sympathizers. He also has a problem when it
Speaker 1: comes to funding. As we exposed on yesterday's show, the
Speaker 1: President's money is coming from the same exact people that
Speaker 1: are funding the anarchists, the anti Semites, the Nazis on
Speaker 1: these college campuses that want to kill all the Jews,
Speaker 1: and they want to take out Israel from the river
Speaker 1: to the sea. The people that are chanting death to
Speaker 1: America are being funded by the same millionaire and billionaires
Speaker 1: that are writing checks to Joe Biden, So Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: got to agree with them right now because he needs
Speaker 1: their money for reelection.
Speaker 3: Never forget who this man is.
Speaker 1: Make sure you share this podcast please with your family
Speaker 1: and friends, so everybody you know get to hear what
Speaker 1: we're exposing here every day.
Speaker 3: And I'll see you back here tomorrow