Speaker 1: Ridiculous History is a production of I Heart Radio. Welcome
Speaker 1: back to the show Ridiculous Historians. Thank you, as always
Speaker 1: so much for tuning in. Yeah, I'm over here in
Speaker 1: in my wife's shoe collection. I'm trying to find the
Speaker 1: pointy of shoes in there, and you know what, nothing
Speaker 1: is over a couple of centimeters. I'm really I'm sadden,
Speaker 1: I'm saddened. Well, I'll be a pumped up reebok. Matt Frederick,
Speaker 1: you've returned for part two of our story on crack
Speaker 1: ow the weird pointy shoes of medieval Europe. That yep,
Speaker 1: I'm here. I am Nope, I'm here. That's okay. Now, Now,
Speaker 1: for everyone who hasn't somehow listened to part one, please
Speaker 1: do check it out. It's a lot of fun. We
Speaker 1: skirted with a little bit of danger there at the end, Matt,
Speaker 1: but we got away clean, as we have often in
Speaker 1: the past. Knockout wood and uh right now. Wanted to
Speaker 1: check in with you before we moved to part two.
Speaker 1: How you feeling about the weird history of these weird shootes? Oh? Man,
Speaker 1: I am feeling, you know what, really optimistic that there's
Speaker 1: even more ridiculous stuff that we're about to talk about today,
Speaker 1: I've I've consumed an entire forty eight fluid ounces of
Speaker 1: Khalifa Colderbrew, and I am feeling ready to rock. Then,
Speaker 1: without further ado, thanks to our super producers Casey Pegrim
Speaker 1: guest producers Andrew Howard and Max Williams, away we go
Speaker 1: Part two of Weirdly Weirdly Pointy Shoes. These shoes, these poolines,
Speaker 1: they're not seeing as a fat They're seen as a symbol,
Speaker 1: a way of communicating that one is doing well in
Speaker 1: the world. So it's funny because they may have also
Speaker 1: been a form of like a predecessor of what's called
Speaker 1: retail therapy today. According to some historians, medieval fashion at
Speaker 1: the time was largely known for its clean lines and
Speaker 1: this kind of chased minimalism. So maybe, and again this
Speaker 1: is speculation. Maybe a good explanation for this flamboyance is
Speaker 1: that the shoes emerged onto the scene very shortly after
Speaker 1: the Black Death killed like thirty maybe sixty of the
Speaker 1: European population. So you've survived, made it out. Yeah, Now
Speaker 1: you can wear these things around and be a bit
Speaker 1: frivolous because life is short. No, but that totally makes
Speaker 1: sense psychologically, why something that's a little perhaps stranger to
Speaker 1: the everyday person would be just more accepted. And it
Speaker 1: really makes me think about the fashion trends that are
Speaker 1: going to be coming out in the next couple of
Speaker 1: years across the world. Right now, right, I hope masks
Speaker 1: stay around. Mask are awesome. I think they will. I
Speaker 1: was actually perusing l ed types of masks, and I
Speaker 1: was even looking at gauntlets. There are some incredible Etsy
Speaker 1: cyberpunk gauntlets that you can just buy and and you
Speaker 1: know you could. It's every day you stuff. I always think, oh,
Speaker 1: maybe that's a dragon Con thing. But dragon Con is
Speaker 1: not going to be a thing anymore, or Comic Con
Speaker 1: or any of these things. They just don't exist anymore.
Speaker 1: But I can wear a gauntlet at home. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: gotta be the dragon Con you wish to see in
Speaker 1: the world. I think that's Gandhi or was a guy
Speaker 1: dressed as Gandhi at dragon pot He told me that
Speaker 1: got it? That makes a lot of sense. I think
Speaker 1: I met him too. I think he did. He's a
Speaker 1: friend of this show. So we know that there is
Speaker 1: a cultural context from which this popularity may have arisen,
Speaker 1: but it kept as controversy as it continued. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's something that's often it's considered like the first
Speaker 1: the domain of the elite. But then the church begins
Speaker 1: to attack it. Remember we said they called him devil's fingers.
Speaker 1: They said that these pointy shoes, the Plaine was encouraging
Speaker 1: what they called um. They meant a different thing by this,
Speaker 1: but what they called sodomy. Sodomy was at the time
Speaker 1: just a catch all term for any kind of sex
Speaker 1: or sexual act considered nonstandard. So basically, if you're not
Speaker 1: married right and having sexual relationships for the sole purpose
Speaker 1: of procreation very specific and orthodox way, in a very
Speaker 1: specific way, then you're breaking the rules and anything else
Speaker 1: is deviant and an aberration. And so members of the
Speaker 1: public start associate extravagant fashions in general, and pointy shoes
Speaker 1: in particular, with alternative or deviant sexuality. Just picture a
Speaker 1: religious authority saying and there are there were also there
Speaker 1: also very long, usurious locks like therese of women then
Speaker 1: shuts two tights through the tight unique unseemly it's the
Speaker 1: end of days. So we talked about how the Black
Speaker 1: Death rolled through killed lots and lots of people, and
Speaker 1: it was said by clergy that this that one of
Speaker 1: the reasons that the Black Death came through and all
Speaker 1: of these people are being punished, it was because of
Speaker 1: the sexual deviancies, right, and these poo lanes were a
Speaker 1: symbol of that. And you can also see why maybe
Speaker 1: there was a push or an underground push for the
Speaker 1: pooh lanes because it was almost this It was almost
Speaker 1: symbolic of freedom or or um, the thing that everybody
Speaker 1: pushes for throughout history at some point or another in
Speaker 1: these waves of just trying to show that you don't
Speaker 1: have to conform this like minor nonconformity thing, but doing
Speaker 1: it in small ways, I don't know, very symbolic. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're absolutely right, because people want to be free to
Speaker 1: arrive at their own definitions of themselves, which I think
Speaker 1: is an inherently human and noble thing. But then also
Speaker 1: control over how people are allowed to present themselves is
Speaker 1: a big deal to authorities throughout history, you know, and
Speaker 1: everything from haircuts to clothing to food too. More So,
Speaker 1: the Church doesn't like this, and they have they have
Speaker 1: these different reasons, so they say, yes, it's indicative of
Speaker 1: sexually proclivities, which a seemly and ungodly. But if you
Speaker 1: think about it, there's a good argument that the poolane
Speaker 1: could be regarded as foul. It's a long, tippy shoe
Speaker 1: and they are mostly worn by well to do young
Speaker 1: men and then later as young men in general, who
Speaker 1: reportedly would stand on street corners and like wiggle them
Speaker 1: at people, and people started to say, well, they're starting
Speaker 1: to be the stereotype where folks would say, if somebody
Speaker 1: wears poulines with bells sewn to the end of them,
Speaker 1: what they're telling you is that they're available for the
Speaker 1: sick hute flicks man. I wish that guy that we
Speaker 1: won't name us here because I want to ask him
Speaker 1: whether or not that's where the term bell end came from. Okay, Okay,
Speaker 1: we'll ask him later last after this show, we'll text
Speaker 1: the yes. So, like you said, this is something that
Speaker 1: later historians, especially in the queer community, had looked into,
Speaker 1: right at, this sort of idea of using fashion as
Speaker 1: almost another language, a non verbal language to convey ones, positions, intentions, desires,
Speaker 1: and aims. That's a brilliant thing that continues today in
Speaker 1: all sorts of parts of the world. But here's the argument.
Speaker 1: Here's the argument I thought was kind of the most disingenuous.
Speaker 1: The church also said that really long poulanes were bad
Speaker 1: because they stopped people from being able to kneel, so
Speaker 1: then they stop people from praying, and priests started calling
Speaker 1: them Satan's clause because of this. The reason I think
Speaker 1: that's silly is it makes the assumption that polanes are
Speaker 1: an irremovable shoe that doesn't happen. The closest thing people
Speaker 1: have to an irremovable you is the foot or the
Speaker 1: skin of the foot. Yeah. I mean some of these,
Speaker 1: some of these boots with like the elaborate stuff you
Speaker 1: gotta do to tighten them and get them on, those
Speaker 1: are almost, you know, irremovable unless you really want to
Speaker 1: put some thought and time into it. Yeah, you're right,
Speaker 1: that's the time commitment, right. But you see what I'm saying, Like,
Speaker 1: I feel like they just didn't like stuff that was popular,
Speaker 1: which is weird because the you know, and and I
Speaker 1: say this with full respect, but if you look at
Speaker 1: the history of the importance that European religious institutions put
Speaker 1: on who can or cannot wear certain types of uniform
Speaker 1: or fashion, whether they are layer, clergy, etcetera, that it
Speaker 1: tracts to me that they would be very sensitive to
Speaker 1: changes in fashion because in a way they kind of
Speaker 1: had this conception that everyone should have a rough uniform,
Speaker 1: the k should dress differently from the priests, the pope
Speaker 1: or the peasant. Well. Yeah, and speaking of the pope,
Speaker 1: do you remember when Pope Urban I believe the fifth,
Speaker 1: was like, guess what, can't wear these anymore? Too bad?
Speaker 1: I know you love them, don't care. I can't. That's it.
Speaker 1: I'm done. I'm going back inside to put on my
Speaker 1: poo lanes because I'm the pope. Pope, I call it
Speaker 1: pope lanes. This is my thing. Now, it's my thing.
Speaker 1: Now there's a pope choose. It's interesting because he did
Speaker 1: issue that edict and nobody really listened to it. They
Speaker 1: were like, you'll take these poolanes from my cold dead toes.
Speaker 1: So eventually, as this the vicious sexual connotation of the
Speaker 1: poulane continues and it becomes more a known and accepted thing,
Speaker 1: the English Crown feels like they have to step in
Speaker 1: because essentially they were saying, it's like, you know, the
Speaker 1: longer need to on a poolane, the more masculine the man,
Speaker 1: and uh people didn't like that. Some people didn't like that.
Speaker 1: They were like, don't judge me by my foot game,
Speaker 1: and so yeah, well you know what they say about
Speaker 1: a guy with a really long poolane, he doesn't have
Speaker 1: a job. Well, or these do have a job. Wow.
Speaker 1: Uh but yeah, the was it the British Crown or
Speaker 1: the Parliament? It was it was a British authority stepped
Speaker 1: forward and said, guess what, we are going to ban
Speaker 1: these now. So the church banned them, and now the
Speaker 1: secular authority comes through and says, uh, sorry, yes they
Speaker 1: banned them. Parliament says wearing these types of shoes is
Speaker 1: now equivalent to public indecency, but only if you're not rich.
Speaker 1: They say, no person under the estate of Lord can
Speaker 1: wear any gown, jacket or coat that does not cover
Speaker 1: the genitals and buttocks. Also, you can't wear any shoes
Speaker 1: or boots with pikes those points longer than two inches,
Speaker 1: And no tailor can make a short garment or stuffed
Speaker 1: doublet and no shoe maker can make you know, long
Speaker 1: pointy shoes anymore. It's a law from fourteen sixty three.
Speaker 1: They had other stuff to do that day, but they
Speaker 1: chose to do that. Well, I mean, I get it
Speaker 1: like making crunchless doubloons is like, uhloons? Is that that's
Speaker 1: not the right word. What's the doublet? Not a doublet?
Speaker 1: What's the there's pantaloons, breaches? How about grieves? Note those
Speaker 1: are fortions? Uh? How about ty ones? Uh? Yeah? But
Speaker 1: like you were saying, I'm gonna say, yeah, I get it.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I just can't get over an edict saying
Speaker 1: no tailor, she'll make anything. What it was what was
Speaker 1: your quote? Not cover the genitals and buttocks? Yes, yeah
Speaker 1: you have, but it's okay if you're the lord or
Speaker 1: over the king can do what he wishes with his Australia,
Speaker 1: but everybody else has to cover it up. And this
Speaker 1: is the sumptuary law we're talking about earlier. These set out,
Speaker 1: you know, exactly what you were describing earlier, Matt a
Speaker 1: very specific kind of plane length based on one social class,
Speaker 1: and it was argued that he was okay for barons
Speaker 1: and nights to have longer points because they were less
Speaker 1: susceptible to the sinful things that wearing these shoes would
Speaker 1: tempt you to do. The only other city that took
Speaker 1: a stand against this was Paris. They banned them in
Speaker 1: thirteen sixty eight, but it came and went. You know,
Speaker 1: that's how fashion is. It's cyclical. By fourteen seventy five,
Speaker 1: the poulane had largely vanished. European footwear under King Henry
Speaker 1: the Eighth got really into a wide box toed shoes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a real reaction to the plane there. Yeah. And
Speaker 1: then later England past laws restricting the width of the shoes.
Speaker 1: Of course, you can imagine the craziness they could could
Speaker 1: happen there with the width of shoes. Isn't there a
Speaker 1: thing where people were going around like trying to stop
Speaker 1: people in the streets and say, oh, hold on this,
Speaker 1: let me take again. That's dying shoes. The width appear
Speaker 1: to be too much. They feed a wide natural. Look,
Speaker 1: we got shoveled feet. We shall see the old to
Speaker 1: me run this is he's got a very short like
Speaker 1: walking spans, a short, short man with wide feet, so
Speaker 1: he's kind of like a speed penguin. Actually, change it,
Speaker 1: it's a penguin. It's a penguin. They didn't know because
Speaker 1: they haven't seen penguins yet, speak terrible accent. I wonder like,
Speaker 1: it's so funny to be the concept of modifying shoe
Speaker 1: fashion to the point where it gets outlawed. But the
Speaker 1: the utility of the fashion change is so anti escape,
Speaker 1: like it makes it so much more difficult to escape
Speaker 1: any any situation where an authority is attempting to stop
Speaker 1: you weird. So we hope you enjoyed this story and
Speaker 1: knowing that there is there is a very long precedent
Speaker 1: or very long standing precedent to those folks at the
Speaker 1: local quick trip Buford Highway, which all the way also
Speaker 1: shout out to Buford Hiwa. It's got like the best
Speaker 1: food in town. It is known if you ever get
Speaker 1: a chance to travel or check it out. Matt. This
Speaker 1: became a two parter along the way because we had
Speaker 1: I think we had so much fun exploring this story.
Speaker 1: We run into some some pretty heavy social issues that
Speaker 1: continue to dog humanity in the modern day. So one
Speaker 1: of first off, thank you so much for hanging out
Speaker 1: with these two episodes, and also thanks of course to
Speaker 1: our our good pal Noel Brown who's on adventures. But
Speaker 1: we'll be returning, Matt. I want to give you the
Speaker 1: last word before we go to the credits. Oh, the
Speaker 1: last word, really, there could be any word you want.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. Oh wait wait if it's a curse word,
Speaker 1: we're gonna bleep it though. Oh man, does it have
Speaker 1: But is it one word? Can it be a phrase?
Speaker 1: I don't know the rules. It can be a commencement speech, bro,
Speaker 1: it's it's really yeah. You're the one who did us
Speaker 1: a favor, so it's all on you. Well, to everyone
Speaker 1: out there who's just graduated, I just want to say,
Speaker 1: listen to Camp Hell and Awake. Oh what, sorry, but seriously,
Speaker 1: congratulations grads and uh and do listen to Camp Hill
Speaker 1: and Awake. Hope. I hope you do that. But hey,
Speaker 1: the only thing I think, honestly we missed out on
Speaker 1: this episode was being able to consult with our friend
Speaker 1: because Jonathan Strickland. Of course it's time. Hell man, it
Speaker 1: wasn't a bit. No, you look different, thanks, No, uh,
Speaker 1: it's not all. It's Matt methol Mule throw Drick, my
Speaker 1: old old nemesis, Metholo Mule. You're in for a treat
Speaker 1: for Welcome to the most cringe worthy segment in all
Speaker 1: of podcasting. You face the quizter, Jonathan, Is it okay
Speaker 1: that I'm excited about this? Gentlemen? I have something I
Speaker 1: have to say first before we get into this. I
Speaker 1: climbed out of my poutine this morning and into my
Speaker 1: seventeen foot long pooline down to can of Satan Claw,
Speaker 1: donned my lascivious, ungodly tight shirt, place my propeller beanie
Speaker 1: upon my pace, and I made my way to the
Speaker 1: Ridiculous History studios, only to discover they are empty. You
Speaker 1: shall suffer for this. Oh, such great things to show you, Quister.
Speaker 1: How what is the crotch area of your breeches? How
Speaker 1: are they doing? Oh? My card pieces? Awesome? Awesome? Yeah, boy,
Speaker 1: listening to you just sort of with your way through
Speaker 1: medieval terminology was truly the highlight of my week. So
Speaker 1: glad I came in on this one. I could feel
Speaker 1: a disturbance in the force when we were when we
Speaker 1: decided to call beanies Deely bops. I can feel somewhere
Speaker 1: out there. So Jonathan Strickland ak the quister. Long time
Speaker 1: listeners know what goes on with our continuing cold war
Speaker 1: here on Ridiculous History. But for anyone who might be
Speaker 1: unfamiliar with this segment, what exactly is about to go down? Well,
Speaker 1: I am about to present to the two of you
Speaker 1: three scenarios. Two of them are real, one of them
Speaker 1: I made up. Seas, it is up to the two
Speaker 1: of you to determine which one is the fake. You
Speaker 1: have three minutes to do so, and you may ask
Speaker 1: me questions once I finish all three scenarios, but you
Speaker 1: have to you have to preface it with a phrase
Speaker 1: of my choosing. You will for reasons that will soon
Speaker 1: become clear. Understand why I've chosen this phrase phrase for
Speaker 1: this one is soon, may the Wellerman come? So you
Speaker 1: have those That is a hint to the nature of
Speaker 1: the three questions. And of course, um as always, we
Speaker 1: will make certain to mark who won and who lost
Speaker 1: the end. But that is that is the gist of it.
Speaker 1: Matholomew Froderic. Are you prepared? I am prepared. Let me
Speaker 1: just make sure I get this right. Soon. May the
Speaker 1: Wellerman come? Soon? May the Wellerman come? Okay, So it's
Speaker 1: a statement, Okay, yes, yes, it's it's to bring us
Speaker 1: sugar and tea and RUMs. But you are so slow
Speaker 1: on the uptake, Frederic, I really am where's the old person?
Speaker 1: Where the old go? All right? Well, I will make do.
Speaker 1: I suppose here we are scenario number one under the
Speaker 1: intersection of Clay and Sandsome Streets in San Francisco is
Speaker 1: something odd. The intersection is five blocks from the piers
Speaker 1: at the bay, and yet under that intersection is the Neantic,
Speaker 1: a ship from the mid nineteenth century. It is just
Speaker 1: one of more than forty ships buried in San Francisco,
Speaker 1: but it's the only one that served as the inspiration
Speaker 1: for the name of the company that made Pokemon Go.
Speaker 1: Scenario two, a construction crew in Old Town, Alexandria and
Speaker 1: Virginia found something odd. While preparing a construction site on
Speaker 1: South Union Street. They found a buried eighteenth century warship,
Speaker 1: possibly one used in the American Revolutionary War. The remains
Speaker 1: were in reasonably good shape, largely, it is believed because
Speaker 1: since it was buried, oxygen could not reach it. Scenario three.
Speaker 1: In Topeka, can just south of the Kansas River, you'll
Speaker 1: find the Topeka Zoo. The zoo was founded in nineteen
Speaker 1: thirty three, but underwent an expansion in nineteen sixty six.
Speaker 1: During the construction process, cruise discovered something truly odd, the
Speaker 1: remains of an old ship, believed to be a small
Speaker 1: whaling vessel. There were no local records of such a
Speaker 1: ship and archaeologists are puzzled as to how it got there.
Speaker 1: Begin the time and the timing begins. Now we have
Speaker 1: three minutes. Matt Okay, Okay, m clay Streets in San Francisco.
Speaker 1: Neantic is the name of the ship? Okay? Does is me? Thinking? Allows? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're not asking it. If we want to ask a question,
Speaker 1: we say that thing and then we ask yes, yes,
Speaker 1: that's right, Matt. So like so soon may the Williman come? Yes?
Speaker 1: Mr Bolin. So the third one was to Peka, Kansas.
Speaker 1: That's correct. They've discovered a ship. No one knows how
Speaker 1: it got there, just south of the Kansas River. What
Speaker 1: was the age of it? Again, they had not determined it.
Speaker 1: According to the source I saw, they suspected it was
Speaker 1: from the nineteenth century. Okay, sweet, soon may the Williman come? Yes?
Speaker 1: Not Noel. So you've got sources for these and one
Speaker 1: of them is completely makes up seas and you've just
Speaker 1: told us you have a source. Are you allowed to
Speaker 1: lie even further? Quister? Absolutely crap, I've been lying this time.
Speaker 1: That might they might be three made up praise stories there,
Speaker 1: and I would really get you in the past. In
Speaker 1: his defense, the quister has said it will not split
Speaker 1: hairs and have I do not alter tiny details just
Speaker 1: to make something lie. So in other words, if the
Speaker 1: ship's name wasn't Niantic, would that invalidate the first one? Well,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't go so far as that. So either there
Speaker 1: is or there is not a ship named Niantic that
Speaker 1: was buried under San Francisco. Okay, okay, so we've got
Speaker 1: so me the Williman. Yes, what was scenario too? Again?
Speaker 1: And two? Was that an old town Alexandria during the
Speaker 1: construction process for a hotel at the waterfront, they discovered
Speaker 1: an American Revolutionary era warship buried under ground. Okay, um,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say, Matt, I'm going to say that I
Speaker 1: feel like number one is true. I feel like I've
Speaker 1: heard that story before, maybe without knowing the Pokemon Go connection,
Speaker 1: but I feel like I've heard that story before. Here's
Speaker 1: the deal. I feel like I've heard it too. But
Speaker 1: that's what's making it so suspect to me, because it
Speaker 1: feels like I've heard it. We have I know, I know,
Speaker 1: I do. We do? You and I have to be okay,
Speaker 1: all right, what do you think if we if we
Speaker 1: chose two or three if we just let's bet on
Speaker 1: ourselves for one between two or three? Which is which
Speaker 1: is fake? Oh? Man, So Kansas is by the river,
Speaker 1: he has stated, Alexandria, Virginia. That's where it's a hotel waterfront.
Speaker 1: I would say three. Okay, I'm gonna I got your back, man,
Speaker 1: lock it in three to one. Locked, Oh, Meth Halliel Frederickson,
Speaker 1: I'm so glad you're not one of the regular coasts.
Speaker 1: You got it right, Yes, o man, first times, listen,
Speaker 1: listen you you both owe me all right. It is
Speaker 1: hard to walk three miles in a seventeen, yes, but
Speaker 1: you meet people to know your status exactly. I was
Speaker 1: going to have them carry me in my sedan chair,
Speaker 1: as usually the case, but it turns out that sedans
Speaker 1: very heavy. It's a big so to be fair, So Jonathan,
Speaker 1: thank you for coming on the show. I guess we
Speaker 1: um we can't break. We can't break a little bit
Speaker 1: of k fave here, which is we are all on
Speaker 1: zoom because it's still pandemic days. The three of us
Speaker 1: were lucky enough to see each other for a second
Speaker 1: in the office. We're working on some secret projects. Coincided.
Speaker 1: But I just want to give you a shout out
Speaker 1: and thank you for HOPPI on this zoom maybe a
Speaker 1: little bit early. We're not going to tell people how
Speaker 1: long well he showed up. I think right at the
Speaker 1: right time. You and I took a while. It's technically
Speaker 1: technically I showed up when I was told to show up.
Speaker 1: That's true. That's true. And we we were late, so
Speaker 1: I was reading your facial expressions, and there was stuff
Speaker 1: like because we're very responsive with each other, we're doing
Speaker 1: each other for years, and when when we were when
Speaker 1: we were clearly like, we're like, huh, you know, maybe
Speaker 1: Jonathan would know this. I I cannot imagine the amount
Speaker 1: of like torture that must have been. It required a
Speaker 1: lot of self control not to hit the un mute,
Speaker 1: which wouldn't have affected the listeners at all, except for
Speaker 1: the fact that there would have been long, silent pauses
Speaker 1: in the middle of your recording. We would have had
Speaker 1: you a d R all about just maybe come in
Speaker 1: with line where you say you guys need to think
Speaker 1: about what you did and then keep I felt like
Speaker 1: I felt like my introduction was was essentially that, where
Speaker 1: I just confronted you with a litany of facts. I hope.
Speaker 1: I hope you never have to listen to this, Jonathan,
Speaker 1: because the parts of you missed. Uh. Look, Ben, I'm
Speaker 1: not cut out for this. You and knowl are really
Speaker 1: good at it. Jonathan fantastic. I'm really glad that you
Speaker 1: guys are are helming this show. It is tough to
Speaker 1: know so much about the ridiculousness of history. You're too kind, Matt,
Speaker 1: and I hope that you will, of course. I think
Speaker 1: we all hope that you will return in the future. Okay,
Speaker 1: all right, the consensus of the show in official we
Speaker 1: have a quorum that hopes you will return in the future. Uh.
Speaker 1: And maybe you and Jonathan will meet once again in
Speaker 1: the field of quister battle sooner than you think, Matt.
Speaker 1: One thing that we it feels so ridiculous because we
Speaker 1: hang out all the time, but when one thing we
Speaker 1: like to do we have folks over on the show,
Speaker 1: is to let the audience know anything that you're working
Speaker 1: on that they should catch up on when they get
Speaker 1: a chance. I understand we do another show called stuff.
Speaker 1: They don't want you to know. Jonathan, you've been on
Speaker 1: that as well. Actually, we need to have you back
Speaker 1: on that because we've got some things coming up where
Speaker 1: we need your expertise as Jonathan Strickland, not as the quister.
Speaker 1: You know, I make no guarantees which one you get,
Speaker 1: but I'm happy. I'm happy to jump on. We really do.
Speaker 1: We made a whole episode by ourselves about n f
Speaker 1: T S and uh we need you so so, Matt.
Speaker 1: Where where can people find find some of your projects? Well,
Speaker 1: you can find a lot of the shows that I'm
Speaker 1: officially an ep on right now, but I'm not voicing
Speaker 1: anything besides stuff they don't want you to know. But
Speaker 1: I would recommend checking out the second season of Ephemeral,
Speaker 1: which is a great podcast hosted by Alex Williams, second
Speaker 1: season of Stranger Arrivals, Camp Hell and Awake, which is
Speaker 1: a true crime show, Algorithms about to come out. There's
Speaker 1: so many shows coming out right now in our realm.
Speaker 1: We would just I'd love for you to listen to
Speaker 1: any and all of them, but don't elect this one
Speaker 1: or stuff they don't want you to know, or tech
Speaker 1: stuff or what are what are your other shows? Johnathan
Speaker 1: John has got like seven shows. I mean, there's Large
Speaker 1: nor John Collider, there's the Restless Ones. I think I
Speaker 1: voiced something for strange arrivals. I think you did. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: so yeah, I'd like to keep my hand in lots
Speaker 1: of things. Thank you, Matt, You are too kind. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I am a huge fan of all the work that
Speaker 1: we've all been doing since before there was an internet,
Speaker 1: it feels like so I think any listeners who enjoy
Speaker 1: this show you should definitely explore sort of the deeper
Speaker 1: catalog because there's a lot of really compelling stuff out there.
Speaker 1: Some of it is silly, some of it is extremely serious,
Speaker 1: and some of it seems to try and bridge the
Speaker 1: gap between the two. Mm hmm. And as always, we
Speaker 1: hope that you enjoy this show. We hope you enjoyed
Speaker 1: the other shows that we have here in our strange
Speaker 1: panopoly of adventures as stay tuned. As always, there is
Speaker 1: more to come on the way. Thanks of course, Alex
Speaker 1: Williams could post our track. Thanks to our awesome super
Speaker 1: producers Casey Pegrom, Andrew Howard and Max Williams. Jonathan Matt Again,
Speaker 1: thanks to you guys. Thinks of course to knowl as well,
Speaker 1: and if you have a story about ridiculous fashion that
Speaker 1: you'd like us to delve into, please let us know.
Speaker 1: Head on over to our Facebook page, Ridiculous Historians. We
Speaker 1: can't wait to hear from you. Jonathan. What kind of
Speaker 1: shoes are you wearing? Man? Well, that's seventeen foot long poolins.
Speaker 1: I actually told you that you do listen at all,
Speaker 1: terrible at improv. All right, that's our show. For more
Speaker 1: podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app,
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.