Podcast Pontifications

Jones v Gimlet could be a landmark case and possibly a turning point for the disability community’s long-standing struggles for acceptance in podcasting. In short, the class action lawsuit claims that Gimlet Media is violating provisions of the American’s With Disability Act by not providing closed captioning services for content the podcasting company produces.

Te future triggered if this class action suit prevails is of interest to everyone who listens to podcasts. Not just the 10 - 13% of the population with hearing loss.

But let's talk about the elephant in the room: Podcasting is audio, not video. So exactly where would these closed captions for podcasts appear? In a podcast listening app, of course. Perhaps not Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pandora, or Google Podcasts. Although they might quickly follow, I think it takes someone creating a podcast listening app that is designed for people with hearing loss -- even those who are completely deaf. 

Before you get too twisted up in tech hurdles, I remind you that captions already appear on our TV screens for live sporting events, local news programs, or a national broadcast from the Rose Garden. It should be a straightforward process to replicate those same processes and technologies to work in a dedicated podcast app on your phone. 

Spoiler: Descript has already implemented the technology to do this. When you hit “play” in a Descript transcript, the words highlight along with the audio, as you can see in this video: https://www.loom.com/share/efd2b1428b2f49eaad347aa6df59a992

With captions that dramatic pause you put in for effect in your audio delivery is effective in text. And it doesn’t take a lot of imagination to figure out how text treatment, like bold, italics. or emoji ???? could be used to better communicate emphasis, subtly, or tone. 

Not all podcasts require “on the fly” captioning. Some of the most popular podcasts have a months-long development cycle per episode. For those, it’s not terribly arduous to imagine the development of an “official” subtitle track as part of the post-production process. For those shows, they can layer in the text treatments I mentioned to make sure they nail the tone they were looking for. 

But why stop there?

Since someone is already designing a visual interface layered on top of the audio for consumption in a dedicated app, why not add more than just rich text and add in images and other content that both enhances the audio experience and benefits those with hearing loss?

If that reminds of you of enhanced podcasting, it should. And if you’re remembering all the times that enhanced podcasting has been re-invented and failed many, many times over, you are smart to do so.

But keep this in mind: One of the many reasons most of those attempts failed because the end-user -- the everyday podcast listener -- didn’t find the “enhanced” experience compelling enough to change their behavior. 

Unlike every other podcast app, this podcast app I’m imagining  ould be designed for a specific user base. And 10 - 13% of the population sure sounds like an addressable market to me.

Again, much of the inventing necessary to enable this has been done. Though I’m not the guy who's not going to do any of the work, it seems a straightforward process to assembling those prior inventions in a way to make closed captions for podcasts a very real thing.

Regardless of the outcome of the current lawsuit, it’s good to have this conversation. Anything we can do to make podcasts more accessible is a Very Good Thing, every rational person would agree. You don’t have to be an activist in the disability community to think so.

-----

Read the full article and share with a friend: https://podcastpontifications.com/episode/the-future-of-closed-captions-may-look-like-podcast-karaoke

Podcast Pontifications is published by Evo Terra four times a week and is designed to make podcasting better, not just easier.

Follow Evo on Twitter for more podcasting insights as they come.

And if you need a professional in your podcasting corner, please visit SimplerMedia.pro to see how Simpler Media Productions can help you reach your business objectives with podcasting.

Mentioned in this episode:

Support For Abortion Rights

While Americans overwhelmingly support the right of an individual to make their own decisions about abortion, unfortunately, that right is no longer protected everywhere in the U.S. The Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade on June 24th. Abortion is a basic healthcare need for the millions of people who can become pregnant. Everyone should have the freedom to decide what’s best for themselves and their families, including when it comes to ending a pregnancy. This decision has dire consequences for individual health and safety, and could have harsh repercussions for other landmark decisions. Restricting access to comprehensive reproductive care, including abortion, threatens the health and independence of all Americans. Even if you live in a state where abortion rights are upheld, access to safe medical procedures shouldn’t be determined by location, and it shouldn't be the privilege of a small few. You can help by donating to local abortion funds. To find out where to donate for each state, visit donations4abortion.com. If you or someone you know needs help, or if you want to get more involved, here are 5 resources: 1. ShoutYourAbortion.com is a campaign to normalize abortion. 2. DontBanEquality.com is a campaign for companies to take a stand against abortion restrictions. 3. Abortion.cafe has information about where to find clinics. 4. PlanCPills.org provides early at-home abortion pills that you can keep in your medicine cabinet. 5. Choice.CRD.co has a collection of these resources and more. We encourage you to speak up! And spread the word.

This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

OP3 - https://op3.dev/privacy
Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacy
Podsights - https://podsights.com/privacy