The Michael Jackson Case for Innocence Podcast

After the 2019 allegations of sex abuse against Michael Jackson, a mother's concern over her daughter's love of the pop star leads to her own investigation. The findings overturn her initial assumption of guilt, and she shares the evidence that convinced her of his innocence. This is a detailed accounting of the evidence, told by the mother-daughter team and assisted by 3 voice actors. All of the source material for the evidence you'll hear in each episode is provided on their podcast website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence.com

http://www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence.com

Eine durchschnittliche Folge dieses Podcasts dauert 46m. Bisher sind 26 Folge(n) erschienen. Dies ist ein wöchentlich erscheinender Podcast.

Gesamtlänge aller Episoden: 19 hours 44 minutes

subscribe
share






  • 1
  • 2
  •    
  • 3
  • >

episode 25: Bonus, Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 4


In this final episode of our rebuttal, we circle back to Part 1 in our series, focusing on how Think Twice doesn't follow journalism fairness standards and rigorously challenge their presumption of guilt.

You'll hear examples of applying a "consider the opposite" approach to the Michael Jackson allegations, by asking what else has to be true if he were innocent. We invite  hosts Leon Neyfakh and Jay Smooth to engage with innocence advocates...


share








 February 6, 2024  36m
 
 

episode 24: Bonus: Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 3


In this episode, we present a few more examples of how the narrative in Think Twice is one-sided and slanted.  There's a  wider context and missing information in their stories that's important to consider, which calls into question their own theories and conclusions.

We take a look at how Think Twice presents Michael Jackson’s relationship with his father and what they’ve left out of the background regarding Jackson’s Oxford speech...


share








 January 30, 2024  1h23m
 
 

episode 23: Bonus: Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 2



In part 2 of our rebuttal, you'll hear some examples of bias, lack of context and misleading information in Think Twice that undermines their presumption of guilt. The focus of this episode is examining how Think Twice  handles the evidence in the first two sex abuse cases against Michael Jackson...


share








 January 23, 2024  1h4m
 
 

episode 22: Bonus: Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 1



Think Twice is an Audible podcast released in April 2023 about the legacy of Michael Jackson. Over its 10-episode series, Think Twice focuses on the theme of why we the public  are still listening to Michael Jackson, despite the allegations against him...


share








 January 23, 2024  21m
 
 

episode 21: Rebuttal to The New York Times Documentary 'Sin Eater'


In this bonus episode of the podcast, we critique the use of  Michael Jackson  in The New York Times Presents documentary series entitled, "Sin Eater." "Sin Eater" is a 2-part documentary about the shady legacy of Anthony Pellicano, a Hollywood private investigator most active in the 1990s. The documentary promotion page says about Pellicano: "Hollywood’s dirtiest private investigator didn’t operate within the law to hide the sins of the rich and powerful...


share








 March 21, 2023  24m
 
 

episode 20: Summarizing the Cases: "It's Time for Me to Get Mine"


Up to this point in the podcast, we’ve been focusing on each sex abuse case separately, in order to address their problems point by point. But by compiling and comparing the evidence in all four cases, there are telling patterns that emerge among Jackson’s accusers. patterns that compound the individual weaknesses of their claims, and build an even stronger case for Jackson’s innocence...


share








 March 7, 2023  1h7m
 
 

episode 19: Deception Science: Lie Detection & Bias


How does the science of lie detection and bias factor into the Michael Jackson sex abuse allegations?  With an emphasis on the deceit revealed in the Leaving Neverland documentary, this episode focuses on the following questions: What does science tell us about our ability to  spot a liar? What steps do deception experts recommend we take when trying to judge if a story is true? And finally, why did so many people get taken in  by this film?

Website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence...


share








 February 21, 2023  44m
 
 

episode 18: Leaving Neverland Part 4: Dan Reed


The focus of the third and final episode on Leaving Neverland is how filmmaker Dan Reed continues the pattern of deceit in his promotional interviews. Through his responses, Reed reveals that he is not interested in the accuracy of his film, only the impact of this film. The episode concludes by taking a measure of how Leaving Neverland matches up with accepted standards for documentary filmmaking.

Website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence...


share








 February 14, 2023  43m
 
 

episode 17: Leaving Neverland Part 3: Why So Graphic?


One of the most talked about aspects of Leaving Neverland is the very graphic descriptions of sex abuse by both Robson and Safechuck.  It was a shock to hear these accusers spell out the specific sex acts at length on screen. These vivid and compelling details are what led to many viewers believing the allegations were true...


share








 February 7, 2023  26m
 
 

episode 16: Leaving Neverland Part 2: Director's Cut


Leaving Neverland Part 2 picks up in 1992, when Robson and Safechuck claim Jackson dropped them for Macaulay Culkin and Brett Barnes. The Robsons express resentment that Jackson didn't take Wade on the Dangerous Tour, and are upset that he took Barnes. You'll hear about the accusers' support of Jackson during the Chandler scandal of 1993, and their improbable claims of being intimidated by Jackson and his lawyers to testify in 2005...


share








 January 31, 2023  1h4m
 
 
  • 1
  • 2
  •    
  • 3
  • >